SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.88 número1Profile of proinflammatory markers in pregnant women who died of severe COVID-19Epidemiological panorama of type 2 diabetes in Mexico: differences by state and social determinants índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista médica del Hospital General de México

versão On-line ISSN 2524-177Xversão impressa ISSN 0185-1063

Resumo

CANO-CALDERON, Juan M. et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone versus thalidomide and dexamethasone for response rates in multiple myeloma patients: a retrospective study. Rev. med. Hosp. Gen. Méx. [online]. 2025, vol.88, n.1, pp.10-17.  Epub 23-Maio-2025. ISSN 2524-177X.  https://doi.org/10.24875/hgmx.24000002.

Introduction:

The most current treatment of multiple myeloma is based on a combination of drugs, including immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors. The bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) and thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD) regimens are commonly used as a first-line treatment due to limited resources.

Objective:

To compare the proportion of favorable responses, survival, and time to the next treatment between two different treatment approaches.

Materials and methods:

Retrospective study based on medical records of patients with multiple myeloma, eligible for stem cell transplantation, who received, first-line, the VTD or TD combination.

Results:

A total of 83 patients were analyzed. The average age was 57 years. The most common type of MM was immunoglobulin G kappa (79.5%), and 51.8% had an International Staging System score of 3. At diagnosis, 28.9% had renal failure, and 42.2% had albumin levels < 3 g/dL. 37.3% were treated with the TD regimen, whereas 62.7% received the VTD regimen. It was considered that 53% had a favorable response. However, patients treated with ETV showed a higher proportion of responses (54.8% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.011). Regarding survival, no differences were identified between the two treatments (Log Rank 0.076) or between the times until the next treatment (Log Rank 0.288).

Conclusion:

The VTD scheme was superior to the TD scheme, presenting response ratios similar to other series worldwide. This makes it a viable option for patients with limited financial resources.

Palavras-chave : Multiple myeloma; Bortezomib; Thalidomide; Acute phase response; Survival.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )