SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número55Breves comentarios a un reciente estudio de la Comisión Interamericana sobre Libertad ReligiosaEl derecho a la no discriminación de los servidores públicos en el ejercicio del derecho fundamental de libertad religiosa; una perspectiva comparada índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista IUS

versión impresa ISSN 1870-2147

Resumen

PATINO REYES, Alberto. First Sabbatarian case of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation in favor of Seventh Day Adventist Doctors. Rev. IUS [online]. 2025, vol.19, n.55, pp.75-96.  Epub 05-Mayo-2025. ISSN 1870-2147.  https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v19i55.2024.999.

A total of seventeen physicians were seeking certification of their specialty before the Mexican Board of Ophthalmology and the Mexican Board of Otorhinolaryngology, in accordance with the General Health Law, but, due to their religious convictions, they could not take the corresponding exams on Saturdays. Therefore, they requested the National Regulatory Committee of Medical Specialties Councils to change the day to carry out the evaluation. However, their petition did not receive a favorable response, for which reason they filed an Amparo lawsuit alleging violation of the right to conscientious objection, which was dismissed. Finally, the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation took up the Amparo and resolved, not the conscientious objection of the objecting doctors, but the indirect religious discrimination.

Palabras llave : Seventh-day Adventists; Conscientious Objection; Indirect Discrimination.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )