SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.6 número2The Security Council and the Illegal Transfer of Small Arms and Light Weapons to Non-State ActorsMigration of Responsibility: the Trust Doctrine and the Tohono O'Odham Nation índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados




Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO


Mexican law review

versión On-line ISSN 2448-5306versión impresa ISSN 1870-0578


AVILES, Luis A.. Sustainable Development and Environmental Legal Protection in the European Union: a Model for Mexican Courts to Follow?. Mex. law rev [online]. 2014, vol.6, n.2, pp.251-272. ISSN 2448-5306.

Over the past several decades, sustainable development as a paradigm for balanced development has made its way into the constitutional regimes of many nations. The justiciability of sustainable development, however -particularly in the context of environmental legal protection- remains problematic for many legal systems, including Mexico. This article traces the evolution of sustainable development within an international context; analyzes its influence on treaties that led to the European Union; and evaluates the use of environmental protection by the European Union's Court of Justice (referred to hereinafter as "ECJ"). An analysis of the interplay of the concept of sustainable development in the primary and secondary legislation of the European Union as interpreted by the ECJ leads us to the following conclusion: regarding the legal protection of the environment in the European Union, sustainable development may be viewed as a general principle of law that articulates a series of sub-principles contained in the treaties. These sub-principles include the precautionary principle and the "polluter-pays" principle. We also conclude that the unsystematic use of these sub-principles in the secondary legislation of the European Union weakens the ECJ's coherent handling of the concept in its decisions. This article also suggests that Mexican judges would be well advised to carefully study sustainable development as employed by the ECJ in cases involving constitutional and international collective environmental claims which may arise under the recent amendments to the Amparo Law.

Palabras llave : Sustainable development; environmental protection; justiciability; European Union; Mexico; Amparo; general principle of law.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )


Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons