Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Inglés (pdf)
Artículo en XML
Referencias del artículo
Traducción automática
Enviar artículo por emailIndicadores
Citado por SciELO 
Accesos
Links relacionados
Similares en
SciELO
Compartir
Permalink
Archivos de cardiología de México
versión On-line ISSN 1665-1731versión impresa ISSN 1405-9940
Resumen
CHACON-DIAZ, Manuel Alberto; BARRIOS-ESCALANTE, Jorge Alonso y ESPINOZA-ALVA, Daniel. Registry of "early latecomer" patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at the Instituto Nacional Cardiovascular INCOR - Peru. Arch. Cardiol. Méx. [online]. 2016, vol.86, n.2, pp.130-139. ISSN 1665-1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acmx.2015.08.007.
Objective
To assess the features of asymptomatic patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction who presents to the emergency with more than 12 h of evolution, and if there is a benefit of an invasive versus medical therapy.
Methods
Retrospective, cohort study from January 2012 to December 2014, we compare the outcomes at 6 and 12 months of follow up of the invasive group versus the conservative group.
Results
There were no differences in outcomes at 12 months between an invasive versus a conventional strategy; but, looking at the reperfusion state, we found more risk of death and heart failure at 12 months in the no-reperfused group versus the reperfused group (40% versus 0%, OR: 2, CI: 1.2-3.1, p = 0.028 for mortality and 53% versus 0%, OR: 2.2, CI: 1.3-3.98, p = 0.007 for heart failure).
Conclusions
In patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction with more than 12 h of evolution, the invasive strategy with optimal reperfusion is better than the conservative management or no reperfusion in terms of less mortality and heart failure at 12 months of follow up.
Palabras llave : Myocardial infarction; Mortality; Heart failure; Peru.
