SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.84 issue3Cardiovascular exercise on obese women: Effects on adiponectine, leptine, and tumour necrosis factor-alphaRyanodine receptor, calcium leak and arrhythmias author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Archivos de cardiología de México

On-line version ISSN 1665-1731Print version ISSN 1405-9940

Abstract

LANGE, Juan Manuel et al. Right ventricular septal stimulation would produce similar bi-ventricular dyssynchrony as does apical stimulation in patients with normal ejection fraction. Arch. Cardiol. Méx. [online]. 2014, vol.84, n.3, pp.183-190. ISSN 1665-1731.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acmx.2013.11.008.

Objective: To determine in patients with normal ejection fraction, undergoing permanent VVI pacing, if medial septal stimulation has lower dyssynchrony than apical stimulation assessed by echocardiography. Method: A prospective trial, 19 patients > 70 years old, scheduled for VVI pacemaker implantation for complete degenerative atrioventricular block, ventricular frequency < 50 beat per minute and ejection fraction ≥ 45%. Patients with atrial fibrillation, heart failure, left bundle branch block and QRS durations longer than 120 milliseconds in surface electrocardiogram with sinus rhythm were excluded. Patients were randomized to apical implantation group A: 47% and septal implantation group B: 53%. Echocardiographic parameters were measured previous to the implant, 48 h, 5 and 48 months after implantation. Results: No patients had diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy or heart failure. Echocardiographic parameters for interventricular dyssynchrony between groups were A: 14.44 ± 19.76 msec vs. B: 9 ± 36.45 msec; A: 6.11 ± 62.11 msec vs. B: 13 ± 38.31 msec; A: 77 ± 53.51 msec vs. B: 24.29 ± 80.90 msec, P = NS). For interventricular dyssynchrony were A: 46.44 ± 19.76 msec vs. B: 42.20 ± 29.56 msec; A: 45.33 ± 45.67 msec vs. B: 29.80 ± 44.66 msec; A: 46,38 ± 20 msec vs. B: 21 ± 27.20 msec, P = NS) at 48 h, 5 and 48 months, respectively. Conclusion: Apical site of stimulation does not increase ventricular dyssynchrony rate in patients with preserved ejection fraction. Septal stimulation showed decreased trend in interventricular dyssynchrony.

Keywords : Pacemaker; Cardiac resynchronization; Stimulation site; Ventricular resynchronization; Ventricular dyssynchrony; Argentina.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License