SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue3Productive performance of the Guayas cichlid (Mesoheros festae) fed palm meal based diets during the juvenile stageReproductive biology of the sailfish Istiophorus platypterus in the Acapulco Bay, Mexico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Hidrobiológica

Print version ISSN 0188-8897

Abstract

JIMENEZ-REYES, Sofía; PACHECO-ALMANZAR, Eloísa  and  IBANEZ, Ana Laura. The utility of urohial shape in the discrimination of Pisces: Mugilidae species and local populations. Hidrobiológica [online]. 2020, vol.30, n.3, pp.259-267.  Epub Dec 06, 2021. ISSN 0188-8897.  https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcbs/hidro/2020v30n3/jimenez.

Background:

The exploration of new structures allowing species identification is relevant for fisheries science since it permits to be managed them better. The urohial is a specific structure of bony fish, which begins to be considered a character to discriminate between species. Mugilidae is a family with very conserved morphology, so finding a structure useful to discriminate species and/or populations is a pending task.

Goals:

Thus, the objective is to determine the taxonomic usefulness of the urohial bone shape on its lateral, dorsal and ventral view in species discrimination: Mugil cephalus and M. curema and in location discrimination, two from the Gulf of Mexico and one for the Mexican Pacific.

Methods:

Urohial shape was analyzed using the Procrustes method were the relative warps were submitted to discriminant analyzes and MANCOVA in order to detect differences in lateral, dorsal and shape among species and localities (α = 0.05 p <0.05).

Results:

The percentages of discrimination between species by cross validation were 86.6, 96.5, and 95.1% for lateral, dorsal and ventral views, respectively where the dorsal view in addition to being the one that showed the highest percentage of classification was less influenced by size. Discrimination between locations for M. curema was 65.9, 54.9, and 60.4%, respectively, and for M. cephalus was 66.7, 49.0, and 56.9%, respectively. Size did not influence the uriohial shape, except in the ventral view for M. cephalus.

Conclusions:

The urohial bone was useful for the discrimination of species, particularly in its dorsal view, while it was less suitable for discriminating between localities.

Keywords : geometric morphometry; Pisces: Mugilidae; urohial.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )