SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número2La Neurociencia y sus ramificacionesFactores asociados con el rendimiento cognitivo en residentes de centros de cuidados a largo plazo en el Noreste de México índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Archivos de neurociencias (México)

versión On-line ISSN 2954-4122

Arch. Neurocien. (Mex.) vol.26 no.2 Ciudad de México abr./jun. 2021  Epub 20-Jun-2025

https://doi.org/10.31157/archneurosciencesmex.v26i2.277 

Letters to the editor

Glutamine-mediated nitric oxide synthase inhibition might explain the ‘arginine paradox’

Iván Pérez-Neri1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0190-7272

Camilo Ríos-Castañeda1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3216-0119

1Department of Neurochemistry. National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suarez


Keywords: glutamine; nitric oxide; arginine paradox

From several studies, it has been described that nitric oxide synthase(NOS) activity increases if extracellular arginine levels are elevated 1,2 despite of the high intracellular amino acid level (0.1 - 2 mM in endothelial cells 3 ), which would maintain the enzyme saturated 4. This ‘arginine paradox’ may be explained by several mechanisms including amino acid transport, translational control and the presence of endogenous NOS inhibitors 5,6.

Increasing extracellular arginine concentration (10-1000 µM), in a range including levels found in neurologic patients 7, favors an increased cytokine-activated inducible NOS (iNOS) activity in cultured astrocytes through a translational mechanism. Also, at the 100-µM extracellular level, arginine increases nitrite synthesis by endothelial cells 8.

However, other studies show NOS activity may be independent of extracellular arginine levels. For example, arginine administration does not cause vasorelaxation or alter blood pressure according to some studies 9,10. Also, astrocyte nitric oxide (NO) synthesis is reduced even in the presence of increased extracellular arginine levels when argininosuccinate synthetase (AS, the rate limiting enzyme in arginine synthesis) is inhibited.

Moreover, AS activity is inhibited by NO, so possibly an increased NOS activity uncouples arginine levels and NO synthesis. Furthermore, arginine and citrulline are competitive inhibitors of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (which catalyzes hydrolysis of endogenous NOS inhibitors) 11; this may increase the levels of methylarginines, thus inhibiting NOS independently of arginine levels 12.

Some studies 7 are consistent with those previous reports since no correlation between arginine and NOx was reported, suggesting that, at least as shown by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations, NO synthesis in the central nervous system (CNS) is independent of arginine levels.

In fact, increasing extracellular arginine concentrations increases NO synthesis in arginine-depleted cells only 13. This evidence suggests the dependence of NOS activity on arginine levels is related to an additional mechanism.

According to some studies 7, glutamine modulates NO synthesis. Increasing extracellular arginine concentration (up to 10 mM) in the absence of glutamine in a culture media does not alter bradykinin-induced NO synthesis but increases it when glutamine is also present 14.

Furthermore, high extracellular glutamine concentrations inhibit iNOS activity 15. Glutamine (600 µM) also inhibits endothelial NOS activity. This inhibition is reverted upon the addition of arginine (10 µM and above) just as the ‘arginine paradox’ predicts.

Glutamine inhibits bradykinin-induced NO synthesis if intracellular arginine concentration is below 3 mM, only higher arginine concentrations avoid glutamine inhibition. This regulation is likely to occur in vivo since, in endothelial cells, intracellular glutamine concentration may be more than 20-fold higher than arginine, and it is reduced up to 98% during NO synthesis allowing enzyme activity.

Furthermore, it may occur in the human CNS since mean CSF glutamine and arginine concentrations in neurologic patients were 505 (143-1830) µM and 19 (0.1-99) µM, respectively 7. Actually, this solution to the ‘arginine paradox’ was proposed 20 years ago by in vitro studies and is now supported in vivo7. The ‘arginine paradox’ was previously solved for iNOS through an arginine-modulated translational mechanism; our proposed mechanism is likely to be related to the constitutive isoforms since it is independent of infection and inflammation 7. Experimentally, NOS activity may be modulated by manipulating arginine levels 1,2; physiologically, this seems to be modulated by glutamine concentration 7.

Modulation of these mechanisms is important since NOS inhibition is considered a possible therapeutic strategy for some disorders involving oxidative stress, not only in the nervous system but also cardiovascular disease 16, and Coronavirus disease-19 17 among many others. Both arginine17 and glutamine 18 supplementation have been tested to modulate NO synthesis in humans, so their reciprocal modulation should be taken into account.

References

1. Flam BR, Hartmann PJ, Harrell-Booth M, Solomonson LP, Eichler DC. Caveolar localization of arginine regeneration enzymes, argininosuccinate synthase, and lyase, with endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nitric Oxide. 2001; 5(2):187-197. DOI: 10.1006/niox.2001.0340 [ Links ]

2. Mathewson AM, Wadsworth RM. Induction of iNOS restricts functional activity of both eNOS and nNOS in pig cerebral artery. Nitric Oxide. 2004; 11(4):331-339. Doi: 10.1016/j. niox.2004.10.006 [ Links ]

3. Gornik HL, Creager MA. Arginine and endothelial and vascular health. J Nutr. 2004;134(S10):2880S-2887S; discussion 2895S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.10.2880S [ Links ]

4. Salter M, Duffy C, Garthwaite J, Strijbos PJ. Ex vivo measurement of brain tissue nitrite and nitrate accurately reflects nitric oxide synthase activity in vivo. J Neurochem. 1996; 66(4):1683-1690. DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66041683.x [ Links ]

5. Lee J, Ryu H, Ferrante RJ, Morris SM, Ratan RR. Translational control of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by arginine can explain the arginine paradox. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(8):4843-4848. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0735876100 [ Links ]

6. Morris Jr SM. Enzymes of arginine metabolism. J Nutr. 2004;134(10):2743S-2747S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.10.2743S [ Links ]

7. Pérez-Neri I, Ramírez-Bermúdez J, Ojeda-López C, Montes S, Soto-Hernández JL, Ríos C. Las concentraciones de glutamina y citrulina reflejan la síntesis del óxido nítrico en el sistema nervioso humano. Neurología. 2020;35(2):96-104. DOI: 10.1016/j. nrl.2017.07.013 [ Links ]

8. Shin S, Mohan S, Fung HL. Intracellular L-arginine concentration does not determine NO production in endothelial cells: implications on the “L-arginine paradox”. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011; 414(4):660-663. Doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.112 [ Links ]

9. Aisaka K, Gross SS, et al. L-arginine availability determines the duration of acetylcholine-induced systemic vasodilatation in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;163(2):710-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(89)92281-X [ Links ]

10. Gold ME, Bush PA, Ignarro LJ. Depletion of arterial L-arginine causes reversible tolerance to endothelium-dependent relaxation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;164(2):714-721. DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(89)91518-0 [ Links ]

11. Ogawa T, Kimoto M, Sasaoka K. Purification and properties of a new enzyme, NG,NG-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase, from rat kidney. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(17):10205-10209. [ Links ]

12. Tsikas D, Böger RH, Sandmann J, Bode-Böger SM, Frölich JC. Endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitors are responsible for the L-arginine paradox. FEBS Lett. 2000;478(1-2):1-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01686-0 [ Links ]

13. Closs EI, Scheld JS, Sharafi M, Förstermann U. Substrate supply for nitric-oxide synthase in macrophages and endothelial cells: role of cationic amino acid transporters. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;57(1):68-74. [ Links ]

14. Arnal JF, Münzel T, Venema RC, James NL, Bai CL, Mitch WE et al. Interactions between L-arginine and L-glutamine change endothelial NO production. An effect independent of NO synthase substrate availability. J Clin Invest. 1995;95(6):2565-2572. DOI: 10.1172/JCI117957 [ Links ]

15. Bryk J, Ochoa JB, Correia MI, Munera-Seeley V, Popovic PJ. Effect of citrulline and glutamine on nitric oxide production in RAW 264.7 cells in an arginine-depleted environment. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008;32(4):377-383. DOI: 10.1177/0148607108319807 [ Links ]

16. Rochette L, Lorin J, Zeller M, Guilland JC, Lorgis L, Cottin Y et al. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition and oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases: possible therapeutic targets. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;140(3):239-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.07.004 [ Links ]

17. Gambardella J, Khondkar W, Morelli MB, Wang X, Santulli G, Trimarco V. Arginine and Endothelial Function. Biomedicines. 2020;8:277. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8080277 [ Links ]

18. Durante W. The Emerging Role of l-Glutamine in Cardiovascular Health and Disease. Nutrients. 2019;11(9) DOI: 10.3390/nu11092092 [ Links ]

Correspondence Dr. Iván Pérez Neri. Department of Neurochemistry. National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suarez. Insurgentes Sur Num. 3877, Col. La Fama, Tlalpan. México City, CP. 14269, México. ✉ ipneri03@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License