SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11Efficiency of ozone (O3) therapy on experimental acidic skin burns in ratsRetrospective analysis of fractures in crab-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Veterinaria México OA

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6760

Veterinaria México OA vol.11  Ciudad de México  2024  Epub 20-Ene-2025

https://doi.org/10.22201/fmvz.24486760e.2024.1170 

Review Articles

Histophilosis in cattle: microbiology, epidemiology and pathology

Francisco Aguilar Romero* 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-0370

Francisco Suárez Güemes** 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0118-2494

Francisco J. Trigo Tavera***  a 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1855-2252

*National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research, National Center for Disciplinary Research in Animal Health and Safety. Mexico City, Mexico.

**National Autonomous University of Mexico, College of Veterinary Medicine/ Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Mexico City, Mexico.

***National Autonomous University of Mexico, College of Veterinary Medicine / Department of Pathology, Mexico City, Mexico.


Abstract

Histophilosis is a group of diseases suffered by domestic and wild ruminants, produced by Histophilus somni (formerly Haemophilus somnus), a gram-negative bacterium considered an opportunistic pathogenic microorganism that lives in the mucous membranes of ruminants. It mainly affects the respiratory and reproductive tract, as well as the central nervous system; it is also associated with various generalized disorders such as myocarditis, polyarthritis, conjunctivitis, choroiditis, mastitis, epididymitis, otitis, and septicemia. The aim of this review is to provide updated information on this group of diseases affecting cattle, covering the characteristics of the etiological agent, its main virulence factors, epidemiological aspects, and the pathogenesis of the infection. Additionally, the distribution of the disease worldwide, its diagnosis, prevention, and control are included.

Keywords: Histophilosis; Histophilus somni; Cattle; Pneumonia; Infertility

Study contribution

An updated review of the literature related to histophilosis in cattle is presented so that veterinary doctors and researchers interested in the subject have information that allows them to update their knowledge in the prevention, control, diagnosis, and research of this disease. Microbiological, epidemiological, and pathological aspects are included.

Introduction

Currently, the different diseases caused by this microorganism have been grouped under the name of syndrome or disease complex caused by Histophilus somni (H. somni), or as histophilosis, because they appear in the form of clinical syndromes associated with the respiratory and reproductive tracts, in addition to occurring in septicemic and miscellaneous forms.

Angen et al.1,2 proposed the name Histophilus somni after identifying, from isolates obtained from different parts of the world, that Haemophilus somnus, Histophilus ovis and Haemophilus agni were the same microorganism by performing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) hybridization, 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequencing, as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies.

Cases of histophilosis have been reported in cattle, sheep, goats, American bison, wild sheep3 and yaks.4

Bacterial characteristics

H. somni, belonging to the family Pasteurellaceae, is a gram-negative, small, highly pleomorphic cocobacillus. It is a microorganism that presents difficulties for its growth since it requires enriched medium such as Columbia agar, nutrient agar, blood agar base, or brain heart infusion agar, supplemented with 10 % defibrinated sheep or bovine blood and a partial atmosphere of 5 to 10 % CO2, incubation at 37°C for 24−48 h.5 It has been observed that adding monophosphated thiamine to the culture media favors its development.6 The colonies of H. somni reach a diameter of approximately 1−2 mm in 48 h, they are round and convex with a butter consistency and a slight yellowish-grey color, sometimes they usually present a weak hemolytic activity. The bacterium has no capsule, is immobile, does not have pili or flagella and does not produce spores.5

The isolates of H. somni are heterogeneous when considering their morphology, biochemical reactions, and antigenic expression.7 The above is explained by sequencing and finding differences between the genomes of commensal and pathogenic strains, which leads to difficulties in identifying this microorganism by conventional methods.8 The situation has been resolved with the establishment and use of molecular tools such as species-specific PCR,2 the use of restriction enzymes8 and, more recently, by nanotechnology, where fiber optic biosensors with hybrid DNA that recognized with high specificity and sensitivity to the DNA of H. somni in bacterial cultures and clinical samples were tested.9

Virulence factors

The virulence factors of H. somni are complex and are not yet fully identified, so studies continue in this regard. A very important advance is the complete sequencing of its genome, which facilitated the identification of chromosomal regions resembling islands of pathogenicity, which appear to be classic elements of horizontal transfer.10

One of the ways that the bacterium can protect itself against host defense mechanisms, in addition to promoting the colonization of several anatomical sites, is through the phase variation of the components of lipooligosaccharide (LOS), the most studied virulence factor. This variation is the result of a modification in the structure of the oligosaccharide due to translational changes. Studies suggest that the phase variation of this could alter the host’s response to infection by H. somni.11

Another virulence factor is the sialylation of LOS, an important factor for evading the humoral immune response, which consists of the binding of sialic acid (N-acetyl neuraminic acid) to a galactose terminal, catalyzed by one or more sialitransferases. Sialylation can be used as camouflage; therefore, the bacterium escapes immunodetection because sialic acid is not immunogenic, as it is part of or a normal component of host tissues.12

Thrombosis is another important factor that occurs in cases of septicemia leading to the development of thrombotic meningoencephalitis (TME), where disseminated vascular coagulation is observed, suggesting that it is produced by local alterations of the endothelium, which contributes to the formation of thrombi in the brain.13

The ability of H. somni to synthesize an exopolysaccharide (EPS), which it uses to form part of a complex matrix called biofilm, composed of bacterial cells, host cells, nucleic acids, nutrients, water, enzymes, and proteins, allows it to face and avoid host defense mechanisms and is essential for the binding of microcolonies by adhering strongly to surfaces where they are provided with a constant source of nutrients, in addition to being protected from the aggression of chemical substances such as antibiotics. Therefore, this biofilm is associated with the production of chronic and persistent diseases.1416

The surface of H. somni is the first site of interaction with the host. This surface is composed of substances that are considered virulence factors, such as LOS, EPS, in addition to a fibrillar network of a protein nature and the outer membrane proteins within which the main outer membrane proteins are found. This variety of proteins that are involved in virulence and inducing protective immunity allow H. somni to evade the immune response, phagocytosis, and complement-mediated inactivation. It has been suggested that these could also act in combination with non-specific binding antibodies, thereby blocking the adhesion of specific antibodies to H. somni.17 Protective antibodies directed against the 40 kDa outer membrane protein antigen have been reported, suggesting that this may be a virulence factor.18 .

Pathogenesis

The ability of pathogenic bacteria to colonize, infect, and cause clinical manifestations of disease depends on the host cells’ response to the bacteria. The variety of clinical syndromes caused by H. somni is indicative of the ability of this opportunistic pathogen to interact with a wide variety of cellular tissues and evade local and systemic immune response. Probably, the ability of H. somni to survive inside phagocytic cells contributes in part to lasting infections, in addition to using leukocytes to transport themselves through the bloodstream to distant tissues to establish new foci of infection.13

The ability of H. somni to cause disease in the upper respiratory tract requires a tropism and adherence towards its epithelial cells, and from this site, it can reach the lower respiratory tract, where it participates together with Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica in bovine respiratory disease (BRD). If H. somni spreads through the bloodstream, it frequently results in thrombus formation.13,19

The primary pathological process is vasculitis, accompanied or preceded by thrombosis and septic infarction. Once H. somni is located in one or more organs, it causes the separation of endothelial cells from small blood vessels and the consequent exposure of the basement membrane. This activates the coagulation mechanisms that lead to the formation of thrombi, as seen in the occurrence of TME. Histologically, the lesions consist of inflammation and infarction and are concentrated in the capillaries and venules. The immediate subsequent reaction involves the surrounding tissue, followed by thrombosis of larger vessels with ischemia and infarction. The inflammatory reaction is acute, and the cellular response is almost always neutrophilic. The clinical manifestation of infection by this bacterium appears to be due to the inflammatory response of the host, resulting in vasculitis and the death of endothelial cells.13,20,21

Epidemiology

It has been mentioned that the habitat of H. somni is the mucous membranes of ruminants, showing greater affinity in that of the reproductive tract, from where it is frequently isolated. It is concluded that the mode of dissemination is mainly by inhalation of aerosols produced by urine, ingestion of body fluids or venereally transmitted.5,21 This microorganism can remain viable in nasal mucus and blood for up to 70 days at 23.5 °C, in cervical mucus for 5 days, and in urine for no longer than 2 h.20,21

Initially, histophilosis occurred in cattle in the form of TME in feedlots and was considered important; it is now known that it can also affect confined dairy cattle and grazing cattle.5 Regarding the time of occurrence of TME, there is controversy because some studies report a higher prevalence in the winter months, while others report it in humid and temperate times, which is when more cases occur.20 TME is related to the recent transport of cattle, as it has been observed that it occurs approximately 4 weeks after arrival in the feedlots.21 The simultaneous occurrence of TME in newly transported calves and in animals that have remained in the farm indicates that other factors, in addition to transport, would be involved, so it is considered multifactorial.

In some regions of North America, cases related to respiratory syndrome have been reported to be more common in the spring, particularly in calves born in the prairies. Animals can be affected between 4 and 24 months of age, but most cases occur in animals aged 7 to 9 months.3 The prevalence of H. somni as a disease producer is more frequent in intensive production units due to the stress conditions to which livestock are subjected by handling and transport practices or to infections with primary agents such as viruses or mycoplasmas.5,20,21

Clinical cases have been reported in cattle produced by H. somni in different countries around the world, such as United States of America, Canada, South Africa, Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, New Zealand,3 Turkey,19 Italy,22 Venezuela, Argentina, Uruguay,23 the United Kingdom,24 Brazil,23,25 Iran,26 Australia,27) Mexico28,29 and Russia,30 among others.

Clinical manifestations

Central nervous system (CNS) condition

TME mainly affects calves from 6 to 10 months of age that arrived in the feedlot two or three weeks before and does not usually behave as a contagious disease because, when there is an outbreak, individual cases occur sporadically in pens.21 The clinical signs are depression, fever, blindness, convulsions, lameness with stiff gait, ataxia, paresis, otitis, coma, and sudden death.20 The classic lesion is a multifocal hemorrhage with necrosis in the brain that can range from moderate to severe. Reddish-brown infarcts of 1−30 mm in diameter are observed in the brain.20,21 Initially, the CNS condition was considered the main problem caused by H. somni, however, a constant decrease in this disease was detected in subsequent reports; instead, other pathologies associated with the respiratory and reproductive tracts were present and increased, in addition to occurring in septicemic form and other miscellaneous forms.3

Bovine respiratory disease

Respiratory tract infections in cattle are multi-etiological, involving at the same time H. somni, M. haemolytica, and P. multocida, in addition to viral agents. H. somni has gained importance because it is considered to be the route of entry to produce septicemia. In the upper respiratory tract, it can cause tracheitis and laryngitis; in the lower respiratory tract, it can cause suppurative bronchopneumonia, and fibrinous pleuritis, as well as significantly participating in the classic syndrome known as shipping fever. Signs of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) are fever, tachypnea, cough, runny nose, tearing, depression, loss of appetite, depression, and death. A predisposition for cattle to become ill with pulmonary histophilosis are infections with some viruses, such as infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, bovine respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza type 3, bovine viral diarrhea, and bovine coronavirus.3,31,32

The lesions in lung tissue that can be observed are not necessarily characteristic of histophilosis, since the appearance of BRD involves the parallel participation of M. haemolytica and P. multocida, so a fibrinosupurative bronchopneumonia can be observed with bilateral lobular lesions in the cranioventral lobes.21 Areas of gray-red consolidation are observed, and there may be the presence of exudate in the air passages.3 The occurrence of severe fibrinous pleuritis between 30 and 90 days after the arrival of the cattle to the feedlots is the most common manifestation of histophilosis in western Canada.33

The economic impact of histophilosis and subclinical BRD has not been evaluated, but some authors consider it to be the most frequent and costly disease affecting the livestock industry in the United States of America.34,35

Reproductive tract disease

Regarding the reproductive tract, this is considered the ecological niche or reservoir of H. somni, which has been isolated from clinically healthy bulls and steers from the foreskin by 71 %; from the semen, bladder, testicles, and accessory sexual glands by 19 %; and from the ampulla by 10 %.36 Calves of infected cows are born weak and die in a short time or do not develop properly.37 It has also been observed that 2-month-old calves can develop suppurative epididymitis.38 Cows have been reported to have cases of vaginitis, cervicitis, endometritis, infertility, and abortion,(5, 22, 28) so genital infection is considered to result in infertility, increased open days, and repetition of services for achieving gestation.39

Septicemic and miscellaneous form

When H. somni penetrates the circulatory system, it is distributed in several areas and organs of the body and can thus be found simultaneously in more than one place. This microorganism has been found in the brain, heart, skeletal muscle, joints, larynx, liver, and kidneys. Another manifestation of the septicemic form that is frequently observed is myocarditis, which causes acute heart failure and sudden death. Within the so-called miscellaneous forms, cases of otitis, mastitis, conjunctivitis, and polyarthritis have been reported.3,5,40

Diagnosis

Due to the different clinical presentations of histophilosis, it is difficult to make the diagnosis by clinical examination, so it is necessary to use the laboratory. Depending on the clinical manifestation, the samples can be from lung, heart, brain, cerebrospinal fluid, or any tissue with macroscopic lesions.3 Initially, the main objective in the diagnosis was to isolate H. somni from affected tissues to subsequently confirm its identification by conventional means or using endpoint PCR, a process that on average takes approximately 2 weeks.2,5 At present, the livestock industry requires a rapid and accurate differential diagnosis, so techniques have been developed that allow it to be carried out from clinical samples such as semen or lung tissue, and even tests that include the simultaneous detection of pathogens from both the respiratory and digestive tracts are being evaluated.4143

It is important to note that to respond to current diagnostic demands, new methodologies emerge and are evaluated every day. As an example of these, where nanotechnology is used, they tested fiber optic biosensors with hybridized DNA that recognizes with high specificity and sensitivity the DNA of H. somni, present in bacterial cultures and clinical samples.9 Another example is the evaluation of two quantitative PCRs (qPCR) to detect and quantify bacterial and viral pathogens involved in the occurrence of BRD, resulting in rapid, specific, and sensitive assays for the detection of H. somni, M. haemolytica, P. multocida, and Mycoplasma bovis.42

The amplification of polymerase recombinase is a method similar to PCR, which detects the genetic material of the microorganisms participating in BRD, with the advantage that being isothermal does not require the use of sophisticated laboratory equipment. The technique is performed at a temperature of 37 to 42 °C, and the results are obtained within 3 to 10 minutes.43

Another molecular tool is isothermal amplification with loop or hoop formation, which can qualitatively or quantitatively identify the DNA of infectious agents; this technique was tested for the detection of H. somni, M. haemolytica, and P. multocida in nasal exudate samples from cattle, giving 99 % sensitivity and 89 % specificity.44 This same modified technique, as a colorimetric assay, was tested and performed in a feedlot where nasal exudates from steers were studied, giving results that are between 60 and100 % consistent with PCR assays performed in the laboratory with the same samples. At this point, the authors, PascualGarrigos et al., propose in the future to carry out more tests on the farm to quantify the pathogens in the clinical samples and to be able to differentiate healthy from sick animals.45

Prevention and control

There are predisposing factors in the different clinical presentations of histophilosis, so a comprehensive prevention program must be established to avoid the stress conditions that make cattle more susceptible to this disease. Therefore, it is important to review and, where appropriate, correct aspects such as facilities, handling programs, nutrition and health. A common handling practice in feedlots is to perform metaphylaxis upon arrival of animals as a measure of prevention of an outbreak of BRD. For example, in the United States of America, 92.6 % of feedlots were found to use mass antibiotic treatment to prevent BRD in calves.34

The impact of the above is the appearance of antimicrobial resistance, as demonstrated by a study carried out over three years with isolates of H. somni, M. haemolytica and P. multocida, where a tendency towards resistance was observed, being greater in M. haemolytica; when comparing the isolates of H. somni, it was observed that those from treated animals showed greater resistance.46 Other studies on the subject show similar results; for example, in Canada, isolates of H. somni, M. haemolytica, and P. multocida obtained from cattle in feedlots with conventional handling and cattle from pens where they are raised without antibiotics were evaluated and compared, finding a greater presence of macrolide resistance genes in isolates obtained from conventionally raised animals.47 In Russia, when studying 18 isolates of H. somni, they found resistance to streptomycin in 50 %: neomycin, in 40 %, and sulfonamides in 33 %.48

Within health programs, vaccination is another way to prevent histophilosis, using biologicals formulated with the bacteria that participate in BRD, finding variable results of protection, so Capik et al.49 performed a systematic review of what has been published on the subject and concluded that further research in biologicals is needed in the future to prevent BRD.

Conclusion

This review provides an overview of the complexity of histophilosis, its multiple clinical presentations, as well as the different factors and etiological agents that, together with H. somni, participate in producing this condition. This complexity can have a negative impact on several aspects, such as the presumptive clinical misdiagnosis made on farms, and, therefore, when diagnostic support is required by the laboratory, specific analyses for this disease are not requested. Although it is true that practices are carried out to prevent and control diseases such as bovine respiratory disease or reproductive tract diseases in which H. somni actively participates, in each of the farms there is no exact knowledge of the participation of this microorganism.

What has been observed in Mexico over several years is that in most diagnostic laboratories there is no information on the subject nor established protocols to isolate and identify H. somni, and, for example, in the case of BRD, the diagnosis focuses mainly on determining the participation of M. haemolytica and P. multocida. Therefore, it is considered necessary that this type of information be disseminated in order to determine the future significance of this disease and its possible effect on the production of the cattle industry.

References

1. Angen Ø, Ahrens P, Kuhnert P, Christensen H, Mutters R. Proposal of Histophilus somni gen. nov., sp. nov. for the three species incerta sedis Haemophilus somnus, Haemophilus agni" and Histophilus ovis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2003;53(5):1449-1456. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02637-0. [ Links ]

2. Angen Ø, Ahrens P, Tegtmeier C. Development of a PCR test for identification of Haemophilus somnus in pure and mixed cultures. Veterinary Microbiology 1998;63:39-48. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(98)00222-3. [ Links ]

3. O'Toole D, Sondgeroth KS. Histophilosis as a natural disease. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2016;396:15-48. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5008. [ Links ]

4. Swati S, Pooja KPJ, Krithiga N, Juwar D, Manjunatha R, Sharan SP, et al. Respiratory infections in yak (Bos grunniens): a pilot study on isolation and direct PCR diagnosis for pasteurellosis, mannheimiosis and histophilosis. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 2018;88(9):998-1002. doi: 10.56093/ijans.v88i9.83540. [ Links ]

5. Humphrey JD, Stephens LR. Haemophilus somnus: a review. Veterinary Bulletin. 1983;53:987-1004. [ Links ]

6. Inzana TJ, Corbeil LB. Development of a defined medium for Haemophilus somnus isolated from cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 1987;48(3):366-369. [ Links ]

7. Canto GJ, Biberstein EL. Serological diversity in Haemophilus somnus. Journal Clinical Microbiology. 1982;15:1009-1015. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.6.1009-1015.1982. [ Links ]

8. Angen Ø. Taxonomy of Histophilus somni. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2016;396:1-14. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5007. [ Links ]

9. Bandara BA, Zuo Z, McCutcheon K, Ramachandran S, Heflin RJ, Inzana TJ. Identification of Histophilus somni by a nanomaterial optical fiber biosensor assay. Journal Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 2018;30(6):821-829. doi: 10.1177/1040638718803665. [ Links ]

10. Siddaramappa S. Histophilus somni genomics and genetics. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2016;396:49-70. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5009. [ Links ]

11. Inzana TJ. The many facets of lipooligosaccharide as a virulence factor for Histophilus somni. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2016;396:131-148. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5020. [ Links ]

12. Inzana TJ, Glindermann G, Cox AD, Wakarchuk W, Howard MD. Incorporation of N-acetylneuraminic acid into Haemophilus somnus lipoologosaccharide (LOS): enhancement of resistance to serum and reduction of LOS antibody binding. Infection and Immunity. 2002;70:4870-4879. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.9.4870-4879.2002. [ Links ]

13. Behling-Kelly E, Rivera-Rivas J, Czuprynski CJ. Interactions of Histophilus somni with host cells. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2016;396:71-87. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5010. [ Links ]

14. Petruzzi B, Inzana TJ. Exopolysaccharide Production and biofilm formation by Histophilus somni. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2016;396:149-160. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5013. [ Links ]

15. Sandal I, Inzana TJ, Molinaro A, De Castro C, Shao JQ, Apicella MA, et al. Identification, structure, and characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by Histophilus somni during biofilm formation. BioMed Central Microbiology. 2011;11:186-202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-186. [ Links ]

16. Sandal I, Shao JQ, Annadata S, Apicella MA, Boye M, Jensen TK, et al. Histophilus somni biofilm formation in cardiopulmonary tissue of the bovine host following respiratory challenge. Microbes and Infection. 2009;11(2):254-263. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.11.011. [ Links ]

17. Corbeil LB. Histophilus somni surface proteins. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2016;396:89-107. doi: 10.1007/82_2015_5011. [ Links ]

18. Gogolewski RP, Kania SA, Liggitt HD, Corbeil LB. Proctective ability of antibodies against 78 and 40 kilodalton outer membrane antigens of Haemophilus somnus strains. Infection and Immunity. 1988;56:2307-2316. doi: 10.1128/iai.56.9.2307-2316.1988. [ Links ]

19. Cengiz S, Adigüzel M, Dinç G. Detection of Pasteurella multocida, Mannhemia haemolytica, Histophilus somni and Mycoplasma bovis in cattle lung. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2021;12(3):710-720. doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12i3.5469. [ Links ]

20. Stephens LR, Little PB, Wilkie N, Barnum DA. Infectious thromboembolic meningoencephalitis in cattle: a review. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association. 1981;178:378-384. [ Links ]

21. Harris FW, Janzen ED. The Haemophilus somnus disease complex (haemophilosis): a review. Canadian Journal Veterinary Research. 1989;30:816-822. [ Links ]

22. Bano L, Bonci M, Drigo I, Tonon E, Mazzolini E, et al. Recurrent detection of Histophilus somni in the genital tract of dairy cattle with reproductive failures in Italy. Large Animal Review. 2011(17):171-176. [ Links ]

23. Margineda CA, O`Toole D, Prieto M, Uzal FA, Zielinski GC. Histophilus somni myocarditis and leptomeningitis in feedlot cattle: case report and occurrence in South America. Journal Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 2019;31(6):893-898. doi: 10.1177/1040638719876302. [ Links ]

24. Wessels J, Wessels ME, Thomson L. Histophilus somni myocarditis in cattle in the UK. Veterinary Record. 2004;154:608. [ Links ]

25. Headley AS, Carvalho BL, Fernandes AA, Elsen Saut JP, Lopes BA, Alcindo AA. Bovine respiratory disease associated with Histophilus somni and bovine respiratory syncytial virus in a beef cattle feedlot from Southeastern Brazil. Semina: Ciencias Agrárias Londrina. 2017;38(1):283-293. doi: 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n1p283. [ Links ]

26. Sharifzadeh A, Doosti A, Dehkordi PG. Frequency of Haemophilus somnus in the semen of bulls in Iran as determined by polymerase chain reaction. Scientific Research and Essays. 2011;6(6):1458-1460. doi: 10.5897/SRE11.205. [ Links ]

27. Goldspink LK, Mollinger JL, Barnes TS, Groves M, Mahony TJ, Gibson JS. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Histophilus somni isolated from clinically affected cattle in Australia. The Veterinary Journal. 2015;203(2):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.12.008. [ Links ]

28. Aguilar RF, Trigo TFJ, Herrera LE, Avila GJ, Suárez GF. Histophilus somni (Haemophilus somnus) aislado en casos de problemas de tracto reproductor de ganado lechero. Primer reporte en México. Técnica Pecuaria en México. 2005;43(2):185-195. [ Links ]

29. Ortega-Pacheco A, Gutiérrez-Blanco E, M. Blanco-Molina J, Guillermo-Cordero J. An outbreak of bovine thromboembolic meningoencephalitis in Yucatan, Mexico. Veterinary Record. 2014;2(1). doi: 10.1136/vetreccr-2013-000034. [ Links ]

30. Kapustin AV, Moiseeva NV, Laishevtcev AI, Luchko MA. Histophilosis of cattle. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2017;10(7):319-326 doi: 10.18551/rjoas.2017-10.45. [ Links ]

31. Chai J, Capik SF, Kegley B, Richeson JT, Powell JG, Zhao J Bovine respiratory microbiota of feedlot cattle and its association with disease. Veterinary Research. 2022;53(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-01020-x. [ Links ]

32. Li C, Zaheer R, Kinnear A, Jelinski M, McAllister TA. Comparative microbiomes of the respiratory tract and joints of feedlot cattle mortalities. Microorganisms. 2022;10:134. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10010134. [ Links ]

33. Saunders JR, Thiessen WA, Janzen ED. Haemophilus somnus infections I. A ten years (1969-1978) retrospective study of losses in cattle herds in western Canada. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 1980;21:119-123. [ Links ]

34. USDA. Feedlot 2011. Part IV: health and health management on US. feedlots with a capacity of 1,000 or more head. NAHMS Feedlot Studies. US: Fort Collins, National Animal Health Monitoring System; 2013. [ Links ]

35. Griffin D. The monster we don't see: subclinical BRD in beef cattle. Animal Health Research Reviews. 2014;15(2):138-141. doi: 10.1017/S1466252314000255. [ Links ]

36. Humphrey JD, Little PB, Barnum DA, Doig PA, Stephens LR, Thorsen J. Occurrence of Haemophilus somnus in bovine semen and in the prepuce of bulls and steers. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine. 1982;46: 215-217. [ Links ]

37. Waldhalm DG, Hall RF, Meinershagen BS, Card CS, Frank FW. Haemophilus somnus infection in cow as a possible contributing factor to weak calf syndrome: isolation and animal inoculation studies. American Journal Veterinary Research. 1974;35:1401-1403. [ Links ]

38. Dobberstein R. Isolation of Histophilus somni and Truperella pyogenes from 2-month-old calf with chronic fibrosins and suppurative epididymitis. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. 2020;61:776-778. PMCID: PMC7313357. [ Links ]

39. Kwiecien JM, Little PB. Haemophilus somnus and reproductive disease in the cow: a review. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 1991;32:595-601. PMCID: PMC1481068. [ Links ]

40. Panciera RJ, Dahlgren RR, Rinker HB. Observations on septicemia of cattle caused by Haemophilus-like organism. Veterinary Pathology. 1968;5:212-226. doi: 10.1177/030098586800500303. [ Links ]

41. Thanthrige-Dona N, Lung O, Furukawa-Stofferb T, Buchananb C, Josephc T, Godsond DL, et al. A novel multiplex PCR-electronic microarray assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of bovine respiratory and enteric pathogens. Journal Virology Methods. 2018;261:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.08.010. [ Links ]

42. Pansri P, Katholm J, Krogh KM, Aagaard AK, Schmidt LMB, Kudirkiene E, et al. Evaluation of novel multiplex qPCR assays for diagnosis of pathogens associated with the bovine respiratory disease complex. Veterinary Journal. 2020;256:105425. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2020.105425. [ Links ]

43. Conrad CC, Daher RK, Stanford K, Amoako KK, Boissinot M, Bergeronn MG, et al. A sensitive and accurate Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for detection of the primary bacterial pathogens causing Bovine Respiratory Disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;7:208. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00208. [ Links ]

44. Mohan S, Pascual-Garrigos A, Brouwer H, Pillai D, Koziol J, Aaron Ault A, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the detection of Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Histophilus somni in bovine nasal samples. ACS Agricultural Science and Technology. 2021;1:100-108. doi: 10.1021/acsagscitech.0c00072. [ Links ]

45. PascualGarrigos A, Maruthamuthu MK, Ault A, Davidson JL, Rudakov G, Pillai D, et al. Onfarm colorimetric detection of Pasteurella multocida, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Histophilus somni in crude bovine nasal samples. Veterinary Research. 2021;52:126. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00997-9. [ Links ]

46. Magstadt DR, Schuler AM, Coetzee JF, Krull AC, O'Connor AM, Cooper VL, et al. Treatment history and antimicrobial susceptibility results for Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni isolates from bovine respiratory disease. cases submitted to the Iowa State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory from 2013 to 2015. Journal Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. 2018;30(1):99-104. doi: 10.1177/1040638717737589. [ Links ]

47. Stanford K, Zaheer R, Klima C, McAllister T, Peters D, Niu YD, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in members of the bacterial bovine respiratory disease complex isolated from lung tissue of cattle mortalities managed with or without the use of antimicrobials. Microorganisms. 2020;8(2):288. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020288. [ Links ]

48. Yatsentyuk SP, Pobolelova YI, Rudnyaev DA, Laishevchev AI, Kapustin AV. Identification of antibiotic resistance of the cattle pathogen Histophilus somni. Agricultural Biology. 2021;56(2):304-314. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2021.2.304eng. [ Links ]

49. Capik SF, Moberly HK, Larson RL. Systematic review of vaccine efficacy against Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida and Histophilus somni in North American cattle. Bovine Practitioner. 2021;55(2):125-133. doi: 10.21423/bovine-vol55no2p125-133. [ Links ]

Data availability All relevant data are included in the document.

Funding statement This research was funded by the National Autonomous University of Mexico (www.unam.mx). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the manuscript preparation.

Received: February 21, 2023; Accepted: February 19, 2024

aCorresponding author Email address: trigo@unam.mx

Conflicts of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Author contributions Conceptualization: F Aguilar.

Writing-original draft: F Aguilar.

Writing-review and editing: JF Trigo, F Suárez.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License