SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 número4Evaluación del sangrado, dolor y tiempo quirúrgico del abordaje midvasto versus parapatelar medial en artroplastía total de rodilla primaria por osteoartrosis grado IVRevascularización ósea: aloinjerto estructural intramedular versus extramedular. Trabajo experimental índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Acta ortopédica mexicana

versión impresa ISSN 2306-4102

Resumen

GARCIA-GONZALEZ, N et al. Reliability of radiographic parameters to determine the surgical success in distal radius fractures. Acta ortop. mex [online]. 2022, vol.36, n.4, pp.216-222.  Epub 29-Sep-2023. ISSN 2306-4102.  https://doi.org/10.35366/109806.

Introduction:

distal radius fractures are the most common in upper extremities. Therefore, it is important to standardize radiographic measures for their surgical approach. This study assessed the intra/interobserver reproducibility of radiographic parameters associated with surgical success of distal radius fractures.

Material and methods:

retrospective cross-sectional design of secondary data extracted from clinical records. Posteroanterior and lateral X-rays of 112 distal radius fractures were assessed by two trauma specialists standardized in the measurements required to compute five parameters indicative of postoperative success: radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance, and articular stepoff. The reproducibility of distances and angles was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, calculating the mean of the difference between measurements, the range at ± 2 SD, and the proportion of measurements outside ± 2 SD. Postoperative success was also compared between patients with and without obesity according to the mean of the two measures made by each evaluator.

Results:

evaluator 1 had the largest intra-observer difference in radial height (0.16 mm) and the largest proportion outside ± 2 SD in ulnar variance (8.1%); evaluator 2 had the largest difference in volar tilt (1.92o) and the highest proportion in radial inclination (10.7%). The largest inter-observer difference was for ulnar variance (1.02 mm) and the largest proportion outside ± 2 SD. for radial height (5.4%). Radial tilt had the largest difference (1.41o) with 4.5% of measurements outside ± 2 SD. Ulnar variance and volar tilt had the largest difference in postoperative success between evaluators, especially in patients with obesity.

Conclusion:

improving the radiographic quality and standardizing the measurements results in more reproducible indicators.

Palabras llave : Bland-Altman; surgical success; fracture; distal radius; reproducibility.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español