SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.69 número3Evaluation of the Apparent Permeability Xoefficient (Papp) of 5-o-β-d galactopyranosyl-7-methoxy-3'-4'-dihydroxy-4-phenylcoumarin in MDCK Cells índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society

versión impresa ISSN 1870-249X

J. Mex. Chem. Soc vol.69 no.3 Ciudad de México jul./sep. 2025  Epub 20-Feb-2026

https://doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v69i3.2168 

Articles

Chemical Composition of the Essential Oils of Salvia polystachia and Salvia microphylla (Lamiaceae) Growing in Costa Rica

Carlos Chaverri1  2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-994X

José F. Cicció1  2  * 

1Escuela de Química, Ciudad Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Montes de Oca, Mercedes, 11501-Costa Rica.

2Centro de Investigaciones en Productos Naturales (CIPRONA), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Montes de Oca, Mercedes, 11501-Costa Rica.


Abstract:

Salvia, with about 900 to 1000 species, is the largest genus in the Lamiaceae family, distributed both in the Old World and the American continent. This work aimed to study the chemical composition of the essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation from aerial parts of Salvia polystachia growing wild and S. microphylla cultivated in Costa Rica. The chemical composition of the oils was studied by capillary gas chromatography with a flame detector (GC-FID) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using the retention indices on a 5 % diphenyl-95 % dimethylpolysiloxane capillary column in addition to mass spectral fragmentation patterns. One hundred twenty-three compounds were identified in the essential oil of S. polystachia, constituting about 91.9 % of the total oil. The major constituents were germacrene-D (25. 8 %), (E )-caryophyllene (15.9 %), bicyclogermacrene (7.2 %), caryophyllene oxide (5.7 %), palustrol (3.2 %) and β -elemene (2.8 %). This is the first report on the chemical composition of the essential oil obtained from S. polystachia. Seventy-three compounds were identified in the essential oil of S. microphylla, constituting about 91.6 % of the total oil. The major constituents were (E)-caryophyllene (34.5 %), germacrene-D (8.4 %), trans-muurola- 4(14),5-diene (6.5 %), caryophyllene oxide (4.7 %), germacrene B (4.2 %), β-pinene (3.2 %), γ-terpinene (3.2 %), β-gurjunene (3.2 %) and borneol (2.2 %). The presence in large amounts of the biologically active (E) -caryophyllene and its oxide, and other sesquiterpenes (e.g., germacrene D, trans-muurola-4(14),5- diene, bicyclogermacrene, and germacrene B) in the essential oils were characteristic. Both species can be classified within the sages whose essential oils have sesquiterpenoids as major constituents (sesquiterpene chemotype).

Keywords: Salvia spp.; essential oils; sesquiterpenoids; diterpenoids; (E)-caryophyllene, germacrene-D; GC-FID; GC-MS

Resumen:

El género Salvia , contiene cerca de 900 a 1000 especies, es el mayor de la familia Lamiaceae, distribuido tanto en el Viejo Mundo como en América. El objetivo de este trabajo fue estudiar la composición química de los aceites esenciales obtenidos mediante hidrodestilación de las partes aéreas de Salvia polystachia silvestre y de S. microphylla cultivada en Costa Rica. El aceite esencial se obtuvo mediante hidrodestilación con un equipo Clevenger modificado. La composición química de los aceites se analizó mediante las técnicas de cromatografía gaseoso-líquida con detector de ionización de llama (GC-FID) y de cromatografía gaseoso-líquida acoplada a un detector selectivo de masas (GC- MS). Para la identificación de los constituyentes se utilizaron índices de retención obtenidos en una columna capilar tipo DB-5 y se usaron los patrones de fragmentación de masas. En el aceite esencial de S. polystachia se identificaron en total 123 compuestos, correspondientes a 91.9 % de los constituyentes totales. Los compuestos mayoritarios fueron germacreno-D (25.8 %), (E)-cariofileno (15.9 %), biciclogermacreno (7.2 %), óxido de cariofileno (5.7 %), palustrol (3.2 %) y β-elemeno (2.8 %) . Este es el primer informe acerca de la composición química de aceites esenciales de S. polystachia . En el aceite esencial de S. microphylla, se identificaron un total de 73 compuestos constituyendo el 91.6 % del aceite total. Los constituyentes mayoritarios fueron (E)-cariofileno (34.5 %), germacreno-D (8.4 %), trans -murola-4(14),5- dieno (6.5 %), óxido de cariofileno (4.7 %), germacreno B (4.2 %), β-pineno (3.2 %), γ-terpineno (3.2 %), β-gurjuneno (3.2 %) y borneol (2.2 %). La presencia en cantidad importante de (E)-cariofileno, biológicamente activo y su óxido, así como de otros sesquiterpenos (p. ej., germacreno D, trans-muurola-4(14),5-dieno, biciclogermacreno y germacreno B) en los aceites esenciales fue característica y, ambas especies, pueden clasificarse dentro del grupo de salvias cuyos aceites esenciales presentan sesquiterpenoides como constituyentes principales (quimiotipo sesquiterpénico).

Palabras clave: Salvia spp.; aceites esenciales; sesquiterpenoides; diterpenoides; (E)-cariofileno, germacreno-D; GC-FID; GC-MS

Introduction

Lamiaceae is a family of flowering plants with about 236 genera and over 7173 species 1. Plants of this family are mostly aromatic herbs or small shrubs with young stems, often four-angled. Many lamiaceous herbs are used as spices and for medicinal purposes, such as balm (Melissa officinalis L.), basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Mill.), marjoram (Origanum majorana L.), mint (Mentha spp.), oregano (Origanum vulgare L.), perilla ( Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.), sage ( Salvia officinalis L.), savory (Satureja spp.), and thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). Some dried herbs or spices in Europe and Costa Rica are used in commercial blends named Herbes de Provence and Italian Seasoning2.

Salvia (tribe Mentheae) is a cosmopolitan genus of about 900 to 1000 species distributed worldwide and predominantly occurring in the American continent (Central and South America, ca. 500 species), the Mediterranean basin, and Central Asia (ca. 250 species) and Eastern Asia (ca. 90 species) 3. The characteristics of this genus are the flowers with only two stamens and the secreting glandular trichomes that accumulate complex essential oils composed mainly of terpenoids, which are stored in the subcuticular space within these anatomical structures 4-6. The genus Salvia has been the subject of numerous chemical studies. It is a rich source of terpenoids, steroids, and polyphenolics 7-9.

Salvia is the only genus of Lamiaceae in Costa Rica (apart from the cultivated Rosmarinus officinalis, native to the Mediterranean region) whose flowers have a bilabial calyx and only two stamens. In Costa Rica, the genus Prunella is the only one that shares these morphological traits. Salvia polystachia Cav. is a perennial herb or subshrub, up to 2 m high, with a distributional range from Mexico to Honduras, Costa Rica, and Panama 10. In Costa Rica, it is distributed in several habitats from 850 to ca. 2500 m of altitude, in tropical rainforests, tropical montane forests, oak forests, and disturbed areas where the plant is commonly known as “chan,” “chirrite” and “jalacate”. This species is recognized by its petiolate and ovate-lanceolate leaves up to 13 cm long and 7 cm wide with rounded or slightly cordate base, acuminate apex, and characteristic densely spiciform inflorescences with blue flowers 11. Salvia polystachia belongs to subgenus Calosphace, containing ca. 500 species endemic to North, Central, and South America 12 and represents a well-defined natural group, strongly supported as monophyletic 3.

In Mexico, S. polystachia is popularly known as “chía” with S . hispanica L., S. columbria Benth., and another Salvia spp. Since pre- Hispanic times, the rural population has used the “chía” nutlets as food 13,14. Salvia polystachia is used in traditional medicine as a purgative drug to treat dysentery and to stop diarrhea 11.

Phytochemical studies of S. polystachia from Mexico have been directed primarily to the extraction, isolation, and structural elucidation of neo-clerodane diterpenes (polystachynes) by spectroscopic methods 15-17. Calzada and collaborators 18,19 studied the antiamoebic and antigiardial activities of crude acetone extract of S. polystachia and of four of its diterpenoid constituents, resulting in linearolactone (=linearifoline) was the most active clerodane against both Entamoeba histolytica and Giardia lamblia trophozoites.

Several exotic species of sage are occasionally cultivated as ornamentals in Costa Rica, such as Salvia leucantha Cav. (“bandera”), and S. microphylla natives of Mexico. Salvia microphylla Kunth is an introduced subshrubby species with bright red flowers grown in the gardens of the University of Costa Rica campus. This species is native to Mexico, where it is commonly known as “mirto or toronjil” and it is also part of the subgenus Calosphace, used traditionally to relieve gastrointestinal troubles (stomachache, diarrhea, dysentery, cramps, and colic) and insomnia; and is used externally to treat rheumatism and skin problems 12. Phytochemical studies of S. microphylla revealed the presence of sesquiterpenoids, diterpenoids, triterpenoids, and phenolic compounds 20-23.

In the literature, there are many studies on the chemical composition of essential oils of diverse species of Salvia growing in different countries 24-34. The composition of the essential oils of S. microphylla cultivated in Italy (Giardini Botanici Hanbury, Capo Mortola, Ventimiglia) 35, Brazil (the Garden of Medicinal Plants of the Federal University, Lavras, Minas Gerais) 36, and Algeria (Blida, southwest of Algiers) 37 have been reported. Recently, two reports on the volatile chemical composition of S. microphylla cv. Hot Lips (with striking bicolor flowers with half- white and half-red petals that resemble crimson-red lips) cultivated in Italy (Sanremo) 38 and in the USA (Grover Beach, California) 39 were published.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports in the literature about the chemical composition of the essential oils from S. polystachia. The present paper is intended to contribute to the chemical knowledge of the essential oil from aerial parts of this species growing wild in Costa Rica. In this study, we also determine the chemical composition of the essential oils of S. microphylla, an introduced species cultivated in a garden in Costa Rica.

Experimental

Plant material

Aerial parts of a representative sample of a population of Salvia polystachia were collected in May 2015 in El Tirol, Province of Heredia (10°04’11’’N, 84°05’07” W), at an elevation of 1850 m. A voucher specimen was deposited in the Herbarium of the University of Costa Rica (USJ 105600) (See (A), Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 (A) Salvia polystachia and, (B) S. microphylla blooming in Costa Rica. (Photografies by J. J. Araya and C. Chaverri). 

Aerial parts of Salvia microphylla were collected in August 2016 in the University of Costa Rica Campus, locality of Mercedes de Montes de Oca, Province of San José (9°56’16’’N, 84°02’57” W) at an elevation of 1205 m. A voucher specimen was deposited in the Herbarium of the University of Costa Rica (USJ 111225). (See (B), Fig. 1).

Essential oil extraction

Fresh aerial parts of Salvia polystachia (520 g) and S. microphylla (240 g) were submitted to hydrodistillation at atmospheric pressure using an all-glass Clevenger-type apparatus for 3 h. The distilled essential oils were collected and dried over sodium sulfate (Na2SO4, Merck KGaA, anhydrous GR for analysis), filtered, and stored at 0-10 °C in the dark for further analyses.

Gas chromatographic analysis (GC-FID)

The essential oils of S. polystachia and S. microphylla were analyzed by capillary gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) using a Shimadzu GC-2014 gas chromatograph. The data were obtained on a 5 % diphenyl-95 %-dimethylpolysiloxane fused silica capillary column (30 m x 0.25 mm; film thickness 0.25 μm; MDN-5S, Supelco). The GC integrations were performed with a LabSolutions, Shimadzu GCsolution™ Chromatography Data System software, version 2.3. Operating conditions used were carrier gas N2, flow 1.0 mL/min; oven temperature program: 60 to 280 °C at 3 °C/min, 280 °C (2 min); sample injection port temperature 250 °C; detector temperature 280 °C; the split ratio was adjusted to 1:60.

Gas chromatography-Quadrupole mass spectrometry analysis (GC-MS)

GC-MS analyses were conducted with a Shimadzu GC-17A gas chromatograph coupled with a GCMS-QP5000 apparatus and GCMSsolution™ software (version 1.21), with Wiley 139 and NIST computerized databases. The data were obtained with the same column described above. Operating conditions were carrier gas He, flow 1.0 mL/min; oven temperature program: 60-280 °C at 3 °C/min; sample injection port temperature 250 °C; transfer line temperature 260 °C; ionization voltage: 70 eV; ionization current 60 μA; scanning speed 0.5 s over m/z 38 to 400 Da range; the split ratio was adjusted to 1:70.

Compound identification

Identification of the constituents of the oils was performed using the retention indices, which were calculated employing a homologous series of n-alkanes on a 5 % diphenyl-95 % dimethylpolysiloxane type column 40, and by comparison of their mass spectra with those published in the literature 41 or those of our own homemade MS spectra library or comparing their mass spectra with those available in the NIST 107 and Wiley 139 computerized databases or in a web source 42. To obtain the retention indices for each peak, 0.1 μL of the n-alkane mixture (Sigma, C8-C32 standard mixture) was co-injected under the same experimental conditions reported above. Integration of the total chromatogram (GC-FID), expressed as area percent, without correction factors, has been used to obtain quantitative compositional data.

Results and discussion

The hydrodistillation of fresh aerial parts of S. polystachia from Costa Rica produced a colorless oil yielding 0.02 % (v/w). The essential oil contained 123 identified compounds, accounting for 91.9 % of the total composition (see the Sp column, Table 1). The essential oil was found to be a complex mixture consisting largely of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (64.0 %) and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (20.3 %) with minor quantities of monoterpenoids, aliphatic compounds, and diterpenoids. The major constituents were germacrene D (25.8 %), (E) -caryophyllene (15.9 %), bicyclogermacrene (7.2 %), caryophyllene oxide (5.7 %), palustrol (3.2 %) and β-elemene (2.8 %) (see the Total Ion Chromatogram -TIC- in Fig. 2).

Table 1 Chemical composition of aerial parts essential oil of Salvia polystachia (Sp) and S. microphylla (Sm) from Costa Rica. 

No. aCompound RIb RILit.c Class Sp (%) Sm (%) IMd
1 (Z)-Hex-3-en-1-ol 850 850 A 0.3 1,2
2 (E)-Hex-2-en-1-ol 854 854 A tr 1,2
3 Hexan-1-ol 863 863 A tr 1,2
4 α-Thujene 925 924 M tr 0.1 1,2
5 α-Pinene 932 932 M 0.1 0.5 1,2,3
6 Camphene 946 949 M 0.5 1,2
7 Benzaldehyde 956 952 A tr 1,2
8 Sabinene 972 969 M 0.7 0.2 1,2
9 β-Pinene 977 974 M 0.2 3.2 1,2,3
10 Oct-1-en-3-ol 978 974 A tr 1,2
11 Octan-3-one 988 979 A tr tr 1,2
12 Myrcene 989 988 M tr 0.2 1,2
13 Octan-3-ol 996 988 A tr tr 1,2
14 Octanal 998 998 A tr 1,2
15 α-Phellandrene 1001 1002 M tr 1,2
16 (Z)-Hex-3-enyl acetate 1004 1004 A tr 1,2
17 δ-3-Carene 1009 1008 M 0.1 tr 1,2
18 α-Terpinene 1016 1014 M tr 0.1 1,2
19 p-Cymene 1023 1020 M tr 0.8 1,2
20 Limonene 1027 1024 M tr 0.1 1,2,3
21 β-Phellandrene 1030 1025 M tr 0.1 1,2
22 1,8-Cineole 1032 1026 OM tr 1.5 1,2,3
23 (Z)-β-Ocimene 1033 1032 M tr 1,2
24 (E)-β-Ocimene 1044 1044 M tr 1,2
25 γ-Terpinene 1055 1054 M 0.1 3.2 1,2
26 cis-Sabinene hydrate 1067 1065 OM 0.2 tr 1,2
27 p-Mentha-2,4(8)-diene 1081 1085 M tr 1,2
28 Terpinolene 1082 1086 M tr 0.1 1,2
29 Linalool 1093 1095 OM 0.3 1,2,3
30 trans-Sabinene hydrate 1098 1098 OM 0.2 tr 1,2
31 Nonanal 1100 1100 A tr tr 1,2
32 trans-Thujone 1111 1112 OM tr 1,2
33 trans-Pinene hydrate 1115 1119 OM tr 1,2
34 trans-Pinocarveol 1140 1135 OM 0.1 1,2
35 cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol 1122 1118 OM tr 1,2
36 Undec-1-yne 1127 1122 A tr 1,2
37 cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol 1132 1133 OM tr 1,2
38 trans-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol 1144 1136 OM tr 1,2
39 Camphor 1147 1141 OM tr tr 1,2,3
40 (2E,6Z)-Nona-2,6-dienal 1151 1150 A tr
41 Camphene hydrate 1154 1145 OM tr 1,2
42 (Z)-Isocitral 1158 1160 OM 0.1 1,2
43 Pinocarvone 1162 1160 OM tr 1,2
44 Borneol 1166 1165 OM tr 2.2 1,2,3
45 Terpinen-4-ol 1175 1174 OM 0.1 0.3 1,2,3
46 Thuj-3-en-10-al 1181 1181 OM tr 1,2
47 Dill ether 1184 1184 OM tr 1,2
48 α-Terpineol 1189 1186 OM 0.2 0.1 1,2
49 Myrtenol 1192 1194 OM tr 1,2
50 Decanal 1201 1201 A tr 1,2,3
51 trans-Piperitol 1208 1207 OM tr 1,2
52 trans-Pulegol 1213 1213 OM tr 1,2
53 β-Cyclocitral 1218 1217 OM tr 1,2
54 Cumin aldehyde 1248 1238 OM tr tr 1,2
55 Pinocamphone 1247 1246 OM tr 1,2
56 1-Octen-3-ol butanoate 1278 1280 A 0.1 1,2
57 Isobornyl acetate 1283 1283 OM tr 1,2
58 Bornyl acetate 1291 1287 OM tr 1,2
59 α-Terpinen-7-al 1287 1285 OM tr 1,2
60 Dihydroedulan I 1294 1292 OM 0.2 1,2
61 (2E,4E)-Deca-2,4-dienal 1318 1315 A tr 1,2
62 Bicycloelemene 1331 1330e S 0.1 1,2
63 δ-Elemene 1334 1335 S 0.2 1,2
64 α-Cubebene 1345 1345 S 0.1 1,2
65 α-Ylangene 1367 1373 S 0.1 0.1 1,2
66 α-Copaene 1373 1374 S 1.6 1.3 1,2
67 β-Bourbonene 1381 1387 S 1.5 1.2 1,2
68 β-Elemene 1387 1389 S 2.8 0.3 1,2
69 Cyperene 1397 1398 S tr 1,2
70 (Z)-Caryophyllene 1400 1408 S 0.1 1,2
71 α-Gurjunene 1405 1409 S 1.6 1,2
72 (E)-Caryophyllene 1419 1417 S 15.9 34.5 1,2,3
73 β-Copaene 1428 1430 S 0.4 1,2
74 β-Gurjunene 1429 1431 S 3.2 1,2
75 trans-α-Bergamotene 1430 1432 S tr 1,2
76 α-Guaine 1432 1437 S 0.3 1,2
77 γ-Elemene 1437 1439 S 0.6 1,2
78 Aromadendrene 1436 1439 S tr tr 1,2
79 6,9-Guaiadiene 1439 1442 S tr 1,2
80 cis-Muurola-3,5-diene 1442 1448 S 0.1 1,2
81 α-Humulene 1452 1452 S 1.2 1.2 1,2,3
82 Dehydroaromadendrene 1457 1460 S 0.1 1,2
83 cis-Cadina-1(6),4-diene 1460 1461 S tr 1,2
84 cis-Muurola-4(14),5-diene 1463 1465 S tr 1,2
85 9-epi-(E)-Caryophyllene 1465 1464 S 0.4 1,2
86 4,5-di-epi-Aristolochene 1466 1471 S 0.5 1,2
87 γ-Gurjunene 1473 1475 S tr 1,2
88 β-Chamigrene 1473 1476 S 0.5 1,2
89 Germacrene D 1481 1484 S 25.8 8.4 1,2
90 β-Selinene 1489 1489 S tr 1,2
91 trans-Muurola-4(14),5-diene 1491 1493 S 6.5 1,2
92 γ-Amorphene 1492 1495 S 0.5 1,2
93 Bicyclogermacrene 1495 1500 S 7.2 1,2
94 α-Muurolene 1500 1500 S 0.3 0.5 1,2
95 Germacrene A 1506 1508 S 0.7 1,2
96 γ-Cadinene 1511 1513 S 0.7 1,2
97 (Z)-β-Bisabolene 1513 1514 S 0.7 1,2
98 Cubebol 1514 1514 OS 0.3 1,2
99 δ-Cadinene 1516 1522 S 1.6 0.9 1,2,3
100 trans-Cadina-1,4-diene 1528 1533 S 0.2 1,2
101 10-epi-Cubebol 1532 1533 OS 0.2 1,2
102 α-Cadinene 1534 1537 S 0.1 1,2
103 Germacrene B 1560 1559 S 4.2 1,2
104 (E)-Nerolidol 1561 1561 OS 0.3 1,2,3
105 Palustrol 1569 1567 OS 3.2 1,2
106 Dendrolasin 1570 1570 Misc tr 1,2
107 Spathulenol 1578 1577 OS 1.6 1,2
108 Caryophyllene oxide 1583 1582 OS 5.7 4.7 1,2
109 Globulol 1590 1590 OS tr 1,2
110 Viridiflorol 1592 1592 OS 0.5 1,2
111 Salvial-4(14)-en-1-one 1597 1594 OS 0.1 tr 1,2
112 Longiborneol (Juniperol) 1598 1599 OS tr 1,2
113 Ledol 1605 1602 OS 1.7 1,2
114 β-Oplopenone 1605 1607 OS tr 1,2
115 Humulene epoxide II 1610 1608 OS 0.1 0.7 1,2
116 1,10-di-epi-Cubenol 1615 1618 OS 0.9 1,2
117 Junenol 1619 1618 OS 0.2 1,2
118 1-epi-Cubenol 1627 1627 OS 0.1 1,2
119 Muurola-4,10(14)-dien-1-β-ol 1626 1630 OS 0.3 1,2
120 Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dien-5α-ol 1632 1639 OS 0.3 0.3 1,2
121 Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dien-5β-ol 1634 1639 OS 0.8 1,2
122 epi-α-Cadinol (τ-cadinol) 1638 1638 OS 0.3 1,2
123 epi-α-Muurolol (τ-Muurolol) 1643 1640 OS 0.5 tr 1,2
124 α-Eudesmol 1654 1652 OS 1.2 1,2
125 α-Cadinol 1658 1652 OS 1.3 1,2
126 Intermedeol 1666 1665 OS 0.6 1,2
127 14-Hydroxy-9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene 1670 1668 OS 0.4 1,2
128 Germacra-4(15),5,10(14)-trien-1α-ol 1685 1685 OS 1.2 0.6 1,2
129 Eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1β-ol 1689 1687 OS 0.8 0.3 1,2
130 cis-Thujopsenal 1707 1708 OS 0.1 1,2
131 Pentadecanal 1714 1715 A 0.1 1,2
132 Mint sulfide 1744 1740 SS tr 1,2
133 Drimenol 1770 1766 OS 0.4 1,2
134 Hexadecan-2-one 1809 1809 A tr 1,2
135 (5E,9E)-Farnesyl acetone 1909 1913 OS tr 1,2
136 Phytol 1943 1942 OD tr 1,2
137 Pimaradiene 1953 1948 D tr 1,2
138 Hexadecanoic acid 1961 1959 A 1.8 1,2,3
139 Sandaracopimar-8(14),15-diene 1964 1968 D 0.6 1,2
140 Manoyl oxide 1992 1987 OD 0.3 1,2
141 Ethyl hexadecanoate 1997 1992 A 0.1 1,2
142 (E)-Biformene (labda-8(20),12,14-triene) 1998 1997 D 0.1 1,2
143 (E,E)-Geranyl linalool 2021 2026 OD tr tr 1,2
144 Abietatriene 2052 2055 D 0.2 1,2
145 (Z)-Phytol 2108 2114f OD 0.6 tr 1,2
146 Nezukol 2129 2132 OD tr 1,2
147 Oleic acid 2142 2141 A 0.8 1,2,3
148 Octadecanoic acid 2170 2172 A 1.2 1,2,3
149 Docosane 2200 2200 A tr 1,2,3
150 8,13-Abietadien-18-ol 2319 2324 OD 0.2 1,2
151 trans-Ferruginol 2328 2331 OD 0.1 1,2
152 3-α-Acetoxy-manool 2351 2359 OD 0.1 1,2
153 Tetracosane 2400 2400 A tr 1,2,3
154 Pentacosane 2500 2500 A tr 1,2,3
 
Chemical classes
Monoterpene hydrocarbons M 1.2 9.1
Oxygenated monoterpenes OM 1.1 7.6
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons S 64.0 64.2
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes OS 20.3 9.4
Aliphatics A 4.0 0.4
Diterpenes D 0.3 0.6
Oxygenated diterpenes OD 1.0 0.3
Others tr
Identified components (%) 91.9 91.6

aCompounds listed in order of elution from 5 % phenyl 95 % dimethylpolysiloxane type column. bRI = Retention index relative to C8-C32 n-alkanes on the 5 % phenyl 95 % dimethylpolysiloxane type column. cLit. RI = DB-5 41,42. dIMIdentification method: 1 = Experimental retention index; 2 = MS spectra; 3 = Standard. tr = Traces (<0.05 %). e43; f44. Major compounds are in boldface.

Fig. 2 GC-MS chromatogram (TIC) of Salvia polystachia oil: 1. β-elemene; 2. (E)-caryophyllene; 3. germacrene D; 4. bicyclogermacrene; 5. palustrol; and 6. caryophyllene oxide. 

The hydrodistillation of fresh aerial parts of S. microphylla cultivated in Costa Rica produced a colorless oil yielding 0.13 % (v/w). The 73 identified oil compounds, accounting for 91.6 % of the whole volatiles, are summarized in Table 1 (see the Sm column). The essential oil composition consisted largely of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (64.2 %), oxygenated sesquiterpenes (9.4 %), and monoterpene hydrocarbons (9.1 %), with minor quantities of monoterpenoids, aliphatic compounds, and diterpenoids. Seventy-three individual constituents were identified. The oil was dominated by (E)-caryophyllene (34.5 %), germacrene-D (8.4 %), trans-muurola-4(14),5-diene (6.5 %), with moderate amounts of caryophyllene oxide (4.7 %), germacrene B (4.2 %), β-pinene (3.2 %), γ-terpinene (3.2 %), β-gurjunene (3.2 %) and borneol (2.2 %), (see Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Structure of the major sesquiterpenoid compounds identified in the essential oils of Salvia polystachia and S. microphylla, which occur in Costa Rica. 

In the few studies carried out to date, quantitative and some qualitative differences in the chemical composition of essential oils have been observed. The oil of air-dried plants of S. microphylla cultivated in Italy 35, was rich in (E)-caryophyllene (10.8 %), bornyl acetate (9.1 %), 1,8-cineole (8.4 %), α-eudesmol (6.4 %), α-pinene (5.9 %), camphene (5.3 %), and β-eudesmol (5.3 %). The essential oil obtained from fresh leaves of plants cultivated in Brazil 36 presented as a major constituent (E)-caryophyllene (15.35 %), accompanied by α-eudesmol (14.06 %), β-eudesmol (8.74 %), γ-eudesmol (7.64 %), bicyclogermacrene (6.17 %) and isobornyl acetate (4.94 %), while the essential oil of S. microphylla from Algeria 37, contain (E)-caryophyllene (15.65-17.86 %), α-eudesmol (9.86-21.47 %), bornyl acetate (5.18-8.35 %), 1,8-cineole (1.98-7.50 %), γ-eudesmol (5.93-7.43 %), β-eudesmol (6.04-6.05 %), spathulenol (4.30-5.12 %), aromadendrene (4.90-5.39 %), and bicyclogermacrene (3.65-5.02 %). The chemical composition of the essential oil from the Costa Rican S. microphylla sample (University of Costa Rica campus) not previously studied is roughly similar to those formerly reported 35-37. The Costa Rican essential oil is somewhat different in that neither bicyclogermacrene, spathulenol, γ-eudesmol, nor β-eudesmol was found. However, germacrene D and trans-muurola-4(14),5-diene were seen as important constituents not present in previously studied samples.

There are only two reports in the literature on the chemical composition of the essential oils of the garden cultivar Hot Lips. The essential oil extracted from leaves of S. microphylla cv. Hot Lips cultivated in California contains guaiol (24.6-26.3 %) as the major constituent, accompanied by α-eudesmol (15.6-19.9 %), (E) -caryophyllene (5.5-11.5 %), camphor (3.5-10.6 %) and 1,8-cineole (1.4-6.2 %) 39. Guaiol is also present in the flower volatiles (4.0 %) of that cultivar growing in Italy (Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Sanremo) 38, but in this case, the principal constituents were completely different (!): davana ether (16.3 %), hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (11.9 %), carvacrol (10.9 %), thymol (8.1 %), and (E,E) -farnesyl acetate (4.4 %). This difference could be due, on the one hand, to the fact that the flowers were specifically studied as a distinctly morphological part, and on the other hand, because an essential oil was not strictly extracted, since the volatile compounds were obtained by Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME) technique.

Although more than thirty -five compounds are shared by the Costa Rican oil of S. microphylla and the oil from cultivar Hot Lips 39, notable differences can be observed between them. In the studies carried out on S. microphylla, the major compound of the oil was (E)-caryophyllene, and the Costa Rican oil sample was the one that contained it in greater quantity (34.5 %). Some biological activities reported for this compound include analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, neuroprotective, gastroprotective, anti-diabetic, antimicrobial, and antiproliferative effects. These properties have provided health benefits in several experimental models, such as analgesia, inflammation, anxiety disorder, depression, colitis, neurodegeneration, autoimmune diseases, metabolic ailments, osteoarthritis, and some types of cancer 45,46.

Other main constituents of the oil were germacrene-D, trans-muurola- 4(14),5-diene, caryophyllene oxide, and germacrene B. The volatiles from the cultivar Hot Lips growing in the USA and Italy contained guaiol, which appears to be a characteristic biomarker compound. The previously studied essential oils from S. microphylla do not contain guaiol 35-37, as does our oil sample of this species growing in Costa Rica.

Additionally, the essential oil of S. polystachia contained some diterpenoids (1.3 %) as minor constituents: phytol, abietatriene, (E)-biformene, 8,13 -abietadien-18-ol, trans-ferruginol, 3α-acetoxy-manool, pimaradiene, and nezukol, whereas the essential oil of S. microphylla presented sandaracopimar-8(14),15-diene and manoyl oxide. Diterpenoids isolated from Salvia spp. are the largest class of terpenoids found in this genus 9 and, in the subgenus Calosphace they are both ubiquitous and characteristic 12. Diterpenoid classes identified belong to four chemical skeletons: phytane, abietane, pimarane, and labdane (see the structures of cyclic diterpenoids identified, in Fig. 4).

Fig. 4 Structures of cyclic diterpenoids identified in the essential oils of Salvia polystachia and S. microphylla from Costa Rica. 

The essential oils of these two Salvia species from Costa Rica seem to be part of the group of Salvia oils containing mainly sesquiterpenoids with (E)-caryophyllene, germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene, and caryophyllene oxide as some of the principal constituents. Some examples are S. aethiopis L. 24,47-50, S. amplexicaulis Lam. 51, S. cardiophylla Benth. 52, S. chionantha Boiss. 53, S. chloroleuca Rech. f. & Aellen 53,54, S. compressa Vent. 55, S. grossheimii Sosn. 56, S. guaranitica A.St.-Hil. ex Benth. 57, S. leucantha Cav. 58, S. longipedicellata Hedge 51,59, S. nemorosa L. 49, S. nubicola Wall. ex Sweet 60, S. palaestina Benth. 61, S. sclareopsis Bornm. ex Hedge 62, S. verbascifolia M. Bieb. 62, S. verticillata L. 50,63, and S. xanthocheila Boiss. ex Benth. 54,64. Jassbi et al. 65 and more recently, Asgarpanah 66 classified the species of the genus Salvia growing in Iran into four categories according to their essential oil composition (GC-MS and GC-FID analyses) depending upon their major components: a) monoterpene chemotype, b) mono and sesquiterpene chemotype, c) sesquiterpene chemotype with caryophyllane type-C-skeleton as the predominant compounds, and germacrane, aromadendrane, cadinane, and other sesquiterpene classes as the other major constituents and, d) GLV (green leaf volatiles) chemotype. Most species examined in Iran are represented by the sesquiterpene chemotype which is prevalent there. The publications included in these studies indicated that the species of the Salvia genus showed that there is a large chemical polymorphism. These chemical differences could be due to biotic (genetic and biological differences) and abiotic conditions (which include all environmental factors) and those resulting from human activities, including extraction and analysis methods.

Conclusions

The chemical composition of the essential oil obtained from the aerial parts of a wild natural population of Salvia polystachia growing in Costa Rica has been determined for the first time. Sesquiterpenoids dominated the chemical composition of the oil (84.3 %), with germacrene D, (E)-caryophyllene, bicyclogermacrene, and caryophyllene oxide as principal constituents. The chemical composition of essential oils obtained from the aerial parts of cultivated S. microphylla in Costa Rica was studied for the first time. The essential oil also consists mainly of sesquiterpenoids (70.4 %). The main sesquiterpene encountered was (E)-caryophyllene. This was accompanied by lesser amounts of germacrene D, trans-muurola-4(14),5-diene, caryophyllene oxide, and germacrene B. Both species can be classified within the sages whose essential oils have sesquiterpenoids as major constituents (sesquiterpene chemotype).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Escuela de Química, CIPRONA and Vicerrectoría de Investigación, University of Costa Rica (UCR), for financial support (Project No. 809-B 6180) and to C. O. Morales (School of Biology, UCR) for the species identification.

References

1. Harley, R. M.; Atkins, S.; Budantsev, A. L.; Cantino,P. D.; Conn, B. J.; Grayer, R.; Harley, M. M.; de Kok, R.; Krestovskaja, T.; Morales, R.; Paton, A. J.; Ryding O.; Upson, T., in: The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 7, Kubitzki, K.; Kadereit, J. W., Eds., Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004, 167- 275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18617-2_11. [ Links ]

2. Herman, L., in: Herb & Spice Companion: the complete guide to over 100 herbs & spices; Wellfleet Press, New York, USA, 2015. [ Links ]

3. Walker, J. B.; Sytsma, K. J.; Treutlein, J.; Wink, M. Am. J. Bot., 2004, 91, 1115-1125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.7.1115. [ Links ]

4. Tirillini, B.; Ricci, A.; Pellegrino, R. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1999, 565-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1999.9701215. [ Links ]

5. Giannouli, A. L.; Kintzios, S. E., in: Sage. The genus Salvia, Vol. 14, Kintzios, S. E., Ed., Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000, 72-82. [ Links ]

6. Janošević, D.; Budimir, S.; Alimpić, A.; Marin, P.; Al Sheef, N.; Giweli, A.; Duletić-Laušević, S. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2016, 68, 291-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS150602018J. [ Links ]

7. Lu, Y.; Foo, L.Y. Phytochemistry. 2002, 59, 117-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(01)00415-0. [ Links ]

8. Ulubelen, A., in: Sage. The genus Salvia, Vol. 14, Kintzios, S. E., Ed., Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000, 59-71. [ Links ]

9. Wu, Y. B.; Ni, Z. Y.; Shi, Q. W.; Dong, M.; Kiyota, H.; Gu, Y. C.; Cong, B. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5967-6026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200058f. [ Links ]

10. Pool, A., Manual de Plantas de Costa Rica, Vol. 6, Hammel, B. E.; Grayum, M. H.; Herrera, C.; Zamora, N., Eds., Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 2007, 49- 89. [ Links ]

11. Instituto Nacional Indigenista. Atlas de las plantas de la medicina tradicional mexicana, Vol. 1, Argueta, V. A., Coord., México, 1994, 398. [ Links ]

12. Jenks, A. A.; Kim, S. C. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 146, 214-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2012.12.035. [ Links ]

13. Bushway, A. A.; Belyea, P. R.; Bushway, R. J. J. Food Sci. 1981, 46, 1349-1350, 1356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb04171.x. [ Links ]

14. Lin, K. Y.; Daniel, J. R.; Whistler, R. L. Carbohydr. Polym. 1994, 23, 13-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(94)90085-x. [ Links ]

15. Maldonado, E.; Ortega, A. Phytochemistry. 2000, 53, 103-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00466-5. [ Links ]

16. Ortega, A.; Bautista, E.; Maldonado, E. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 1338-1339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.54.1338. [ Links ]

17. Bautista, E.; Ortiz-Pastrana, N.; Pastor-Palacios, G.; Montoya-Contreras, A.; Toscano, R. A.; Morales-Jimenez, J.; Salazar-Olivo, L. A.; Ortega, A. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 3003-3009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00591. [ Links ]

18. Calzada, F.; Yépez-Mulia, L.; Tapia-Contreras, A.; Bautista, E.; Maldonado, E.; Ortega, A. Phytother. Res. 2010, 24, 662-665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2938. [ Links ]

19. Calzada, F.; Bautista, E.; Yépez-Mulia, L.; García-Hernández, N.; Ortega, A. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 1600-1604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5421 [ Links ]

20. Esquivel, B.; Cárdenas, J.; Rodríguez-Hahn, L. J. Nat. Prod. 1987, 50, 738-740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/np50052a029. [ Links ]

21. Aydogmuş, Z.; Yeşilyurt, V.; Topçu, G. Nat. Prod. Res. 2006, 20, 775-781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786410500462843. [ Links ]

22. Bautista, E.; Toscano, R. A.; Ortega, A. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3210-3213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ol401022c. [ Links ]

23. Bautista, E.; Toscano, R. A.; Ortega, A. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1088-1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/np4009893. [ Links ]

24. Torres, M. E.; Velasco-Negueruela, A.; Pérez-Alonso, M. J.; Pinilla, M. G. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997, 9, 27-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1997.9700710. [ Links ]

25. Kamatou, G. P. P.; van Zyl, R. L.; van Vuuren, S. F.; Viljoen, A. M.; Figueiredo, A. C.; Barroso, J. G.; Pedro, L. G.; Tilney, P. M. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 21, 19-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2006.12067125. [ Links ]

26. Javidnia, K.; Miri, R.; Soltani, M.; Gholami, M.; Khosravi, A. R. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2008, 44, 654-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-008-9161-5. [ Links ]

27. Cardile, V.; Russo, A.; Formisano, C.; Rigano, D.; Senatore, F.; Arnold, N. A.; Piozzi, F. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 126, 265-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.08.034. [ Links ]

28. De Martino, L.; Roscigno, G.; Mancini, E.; De Falco, E.; De Feo, V. Molecules. 2010, 15, 735-746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15020735. [ Links ]

29. García-Rojas, A.; Fontecha-García, J.; Peralta-Bohórquez, A. F.; Quijano-Celis, C. E.; Morales, G.; Pino, J. A. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2012, 22, 369-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2010.9700348. [ Links ]

30. Sharopov, F. S.; Setzer, W. N. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2012, 6, 75-79. [ Links ]

31. Gürsoy, N.; Tepe, B.; Akpulat, A. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2012, 6, 278-287. [ Links ]

32. Sharopov, F. S.; Satyal, P.; Setzer, W. N.; Wink, M. Am. J. Essent. Oils Nat. Prod. 2015, 3, 26-29. [ Links ]

33. Ali, A.; Tabanca, N.; Demirci, B.; Blythe, E. K.; Ali, Z.; Başer, K. H. C.; Khan, I. A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 447-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf504976f. [ Links ]

34. Temel, H. E.; Demirci, B.; Demirci, F.; Celep, F.; Kahraman, A.; Doğan, M.; Başer, K. H. C. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2016, 28, 322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2016.1159257. [ Links ]

35. Chialva, F.; Monguzzi, F.; Manitto, P. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1992, 4, 447-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1992.9698108. [ Links ]

36. Lima, R. K.; Cardoso, M. d. G.; Andrade, M. A.; Guimaraes, P. L.; Batista L. R.; Nelson, D. L. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2012, 89, 523-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-011-1938-1. [ Links ]

37. Chouit, H.; Touafek, O.; Brada, M.; Benssouici, C. M.; Fauconnier, L.; El Hattab, M. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2021, 65(4), 582-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v65i4.1581. [ Links ]

38. Marchioni, I.; Najar, B.; Ruffoni, B. A.; Copetta Pistelli, L.; Pistelli, L. Plants. 2020, 9, 621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060691. [ Links ]

39. Satyal, P.; Calderón, C.; Setzer, W. N. Am. J. Essent. Oils Nat. Prod. 2020, 8, 06-10. [ Links ]

40. van den Dool , H.; Kratz P. D. J. Chromatogr. A. 1963, 11, 463-471. DOI: https://doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X. [ Links ]

41. Adams, R. P., in: Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/ Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, Illinois, USA, 2007. [ Links ]

42. Wallace, W. E. (Dir.). 2019. Mass spectra (by NIST Mass Spec Data Center). In Linstrom, P. J.; Mallard, W. G. (Eds.), Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, Available from http://webbook.nist.gov. [ Links ]

43. Shinoda, N.; Shiga, M.; Nishimura, K. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1970, 34, 234-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00021369.1970.10859603. [ Links ]

44. Skaltsa, H. D.; Demetzos, C.; Lazari, D.; Sokovic, M. Phytochemistry. 2003, 60, 743-752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(03)00386-8. [ Links ]

45. Francomano, F.; Caruso, A.; Barbarossa, A.; Fazio, A.; La Torre, C.; Ceramella, J.; Mallamaci, R.; Saturnino, C.; Lacopetta, D.; Sinicropi, M. S. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5420. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245420. [ Links ]

46. Di Sotto, A.; Mancinelli, R.; Gulli, M.; Eufemi, M.; Mammola, C. L.; Mazzanti, G.; Giacomom S. D. Cancers. 2020, 12, 3034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12103034. [ Links ]

47. Rustaiyan, A.; Masoudi, S.; Monfared, A.; Komeilizadeh, H. Flav. Fragr. J. 1999, 14, 276-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1026(199909/10)14:5<276::AID-FFJ825>3.0.CO;2-Y. [ Links ]

48. Chalchat, J. C.; Gorunovic, M. S.; Petrovic, S. D.; Maksimovic, Z. A. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2001, 13, 416-418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2001.9699711. [ Links ]

49. Morteza-Semnani, K.; Goodarzi, A.; Azadbakht, M. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 274-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2005.9698900. [ Links ]

50. Coisin, M.; Burzo, I.; Ştefan, M.; Rosenhech, E.; Zanfirache, M. M. Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universitǎţii, AI. I. Cuza” laşi s. II a. Biologie Vegetalǎ. 2012, 58, 51-58. [ Links ]

51. Petrović, S.; Pavlović, M.; Tzakou, O.; Couladis, M.; Milenković, M.; Vučićević, D.; Niketić, M. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2009, 21, 563-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2009.9700246. [ Links ]

52. Vila, R.; Clos, M.; Iglesias, J.; Cañigueral, S., in: Analysis of the essential oil of Salvia cardiophylla. In Essential oils: Basic and applied research. Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Essential OilsFranz, C.; Máthé, Á.; Buchbauer, G., Eds.; Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, Illinois, USA, 1997; 248-249. [ Links ]

53. Tel, G.; Östürk, M.; Duru, M. E.; Harmandar, M.; Topçu, G. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 3189-3193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.08.020. [ Links ]

54. Khaliazadeh, M. A.; Esmaeli, A.; Rustaiyan, A.; Eslami, B.; Masoudi, S. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2011, 46, 985-987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-011-9805-8. [ Links ]

55. Rustaiyan, A.; Jamzad, M.; Larijani, K.; Masoudi, S.; Jamzad Z. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2009, 21, 222-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2009.9700153. [ Links ]

56. Mirza, M.; Baher-Nik, Z. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2010, 46, 822-823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-010-9757-4. [ Links ]

57. Carrer, R. P.; Vanderlinde, R.; Dutra, S.; Marcon, A.; Echeverrigaray, S. Flav. Fragr. J. 2007, 22, 430-434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1817. [ Links ]

58. Negi, A.; Javed, M. S.; Melkani, A. B.; Dev, V.; Beauchamp, P. S. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2007, 19, 463-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2007.9699953. [ Links ]

59. Ozer, H.; Kilic, H.; Baris, O.; Adiguzel, A.; Gulluce, M. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2007, 43, 230-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-007-0089-y. [ Links ]

60. Melkani, A. B.; Negi, A.; Sati, S. C.; Khulbe, K.; Dev, V. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2010, 22, 575-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2010.9700403. [ Links ]

61. Salehi, P.; Sefidkon, F.; Tolami, L. B.; Sonboli, A. Flav. Fragr. J. 2005, 20, 525-527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1448. [ Links ]

62. Jamzad, M.; Rustaiyan, A.; Masoudi, S.; Jamzad, Z.; Yari, M. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2009, 21, 19-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2009.9700096. [ Links ]

63. Krstic, L.; Malencic, D.; Anackov, G. Bot. Helv. 2006, 116, 159-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-006-0767-6. [ Links ]

64. Salehi, P.; Tolami, L. B.; Sefidkon, F. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 442-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2005.9698956. [ Links ]

65. Jassbi, A. R.; Assdollahi, M.; Masroor, M.; Schuman, M. C.; Mehdizadeh, Z.; Soleimani, M.; Miri, R. Chem. Biodivers. 2012, 9, 1254-1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201100209. [ Links ]

66. Asgarpanah, J. Nat. Volatiles & Essent. Oils. 2021, 8, 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37929/nveo.852794. [ Links ]

Received: November 11, 2023; Accepted: August 08, 2024

*Corresponding author: José F. Cicció, email: jfciccio@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License