SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.68 número2Phytochemistry, Mineral Estimation, Nutritional, and the In Vitro Anti-Sickling Potentials of Oil Extracted from the Seeds of Mucuna FlagellipesMorphological and Nutritional Characterization of Wild Edible Blackberries (Rubus spp.) from Sinaloa, Mexico índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society

versión impresa ISSN 1870-249X

J. Mex. Chem. Soc vol.68 no.2 Ciudad de México abr./jun. 2024  Epub 24-Mar-2025

https://doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v68i2.1910 

Articles

Fe3O4@NH2@Oxalic Acid: A Convenient Catalyst for Synthesis of Pyrrolinone Derivatives

Seyran Esmaeilzadeh1 

Davood Setamdideh1  * 

Fatemeh Ghanbary1 

1Department of Chemistry, Mahabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahabad, Iran.


Abstract.

In this context, an amine-functionalized magnetite nanoparticle was synthesized from FeCl3•6H2O and 1, 2-ethylenediamine at 110 °C in ethylene glycol within 6 hours. Then, the obtained corresponding Fe3O4@NH2 was used for the preparation of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid as organoacid-magnetic nanoparticles under ultrasonic irradiation at 60 °C within 4 hours. Its chemical structure was characterized by FT-IR, XRD, SEM, VSM, and EDAX spectra. The Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles were successfully used for the synthesis of pyrrolinones derivatives in excellent yields of the products (90-95 %) within 6-10 hours at room temperature in ethanol.

Keywords: Ethylenediamine; amino-functionalization; nano-magnetite; pyrrolinones; green chemistry

Resumen

Se sintetizó una nanopartícula de magnetita funcionalizada con aminas a partir de FeCl3•6H2O y 1,2-etilendiamina a 110 °C en etilenglicol durante 6 horas. Posteriormente, el Fe3O4@NH2 que se obtuvo se utilizó para la preparación de nanopartículas magnéticas organoácidas de Fe3O4@NH2@ácido oxálico por irradiación ultrasónica a 60 °C durante 4 horas. Su estructura química se caracterizó por sus espectros de FT-IR, XRD, SEM, VSM, y EDAX. Las nanopartículas de Fe3O4@NH2@ácido oxálico se utilizaron existosamente para sintetizar derivados de pirrolinonas con rendimientos excelentes (90-95%), en 6-10 horas de reacción a temperatura ambiente en etanol.

Palabras clave: Etilendiamina; funcionalización amino; nanomagnetita; pirrolinonas; química verde

Introduction

The functionalization of the magnetic nanoparticles (the F-MNPs) is crucial for chemical processes, and they have many applications in medical and biological research. Meanwhile, the amine-functionalized magnetite nanoparticles (the AF-MNPs) have received more attention because of their properties such as excellent magnetism, tunable sizes, good crystallinity, and facile dispersion in water [1-13].

The AF-MNPs and their derivatives have been used for different fields in organic chemistry such as bio-conjugated to biological molecules (proteins, nucleic acids, and peptides) [1], for cellulase immobilization to prevent wastage of cellulosic resources [2], to prepare cis-pinane [3], catalyst for Heck reaction [4], synthesis of xanthenes [5], selective separation of catecholamines in urine [6], hydrogenation and Heck reactions by Pd immobilized on the AF-MNPs [7], for attachment of polyacrylic acid [8], for the treatment of gastric, colon, and pancreatic cancers in near future [9], for the synthesis of carbamates [10], for degradation of the methyl orange and p-nitrophenol reduction in aqueous media [11], enhanced photocytotoxicity [12], and removal of carmoisine dye from aqueous solutions [13].

On the other hand, pyrrolin-2-one skeleton has biological activity in some synthetic drugs and natural products, for example: Cotinine [14], Doxapram hydrochloride [15], Ethosuximide [16], Rolipram [17], Lactacystin [18], Salinosporamide [19], (−)-Azaspirene [20] and Pesticides [21] (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1 The chemical structure of some natural products and drugs with pyrrolinone moiety. 

Some procedures have been reported for the synthesis of pyrrolin-2-ones [22-27]. However, a coupling of arylamines and aromatic aldehydes with acetylenedicarboxylates is an important synthetic method for the synthesis of this class of compounds. This method has been studied by several protocols such as using of nano-TiO2 [28], in water as a green solvent [29], by p-toluensulfonic acid [30], under ultrasound irradiation [31], or microwave irradiation [32], by ionic liquids [33], in the presence of nano-magnetic particles [34], and AmberChrom as a polymer catalyst [35]. For improving the obtained result as a part of the synthetic project we turned attention to the synthesis of a more stable and convenient catalyst for this procedure. Thus, we decided to link oxalic acid on magnetite nanoparticles by a covalent bond. Our survey showed using of amine-functionalized magnetite nanoparticles (the AF-MNPs) is a good approach for this subject. Thus, pyrrolin-2-ones were synthesized by a new methodology from aldehydes, anilines and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate by Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid as a reusable nano-magnetic catalyst at room temperature (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2 The synthesis of 1,5-diaryl-3-hydroxy-4-methoxycarbonyl-3-pyrrolin-2-ones by Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid as a catalyst.  

Experimental

Materials

All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company. FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker spectrometer. XRD patterns were recorded using a Holland Philips (model: PW1730) (radiation, λ= 0.154056 nm, CuK), Step size 0.05°, time per step 1 second (2θ=5°-80°). SEM images were performed on a Model FESEM: TESCAN company (model: MIRA III) manufactured by Czech. EDX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis) was taken by FESEM: model: MIRA II from TESCAN company manufactured by Czech (Detector: SAMX, France). VSM analysis was taken by model MDKB manufactured by Kavir Kashan Magnet Company (Iran). TGA analysis was recorded by Model Q600; TA company manufactured by the USA. IR and 1H NMR spectra were recorded on PerkinElmer FT-IR RXI and 300 MHz Bruker spectrometers, respectively. Pyrrolinone derivatives were characterized by their 1H-NMR, FT-IR spectra. All yields referred to isolated pure products. TLC was applied for reaction monitoring over silica gel 60 F254 aluminum sheet.

Synthesis of Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticles

The magnetic amine-functionalized nanoparticles (Fe3O4@NH2) were prepared via solvothermal reaction with major modification [1]. FeCl3.6H2O (1.5 gr), 1, 2-ethylenediamine (3 g), and sodium acetate anhydrous (12 g) were dissolved in ethylene glycol (45 mL) via vigorous mechanical stirring. Then, the reaction was heated at 110°C for 6 hours under the Ar atmosphere. The obtained magnetic nanoparticles were isolated by a powerful magnet, and washed with distilled H2O, and EtOH several times. Then, the product was dried at 60 °C for 2 hours.

Preparation of Fe3O4@NH2@Oxalic acid nanoparticles

Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticles (0.25 g) were dispersed in ethanol (15 mL) by ultrasonic bath for 30 minutes. Then, a solution of oxalic acid (0.4 g) in ethanol-water (20mL/10mL) was prepared and was charged in the above solution. The obtained mixture was irradiated by ultrasonic irradiation for 4 hours at 60 °C under the Ar atmosphere. The obtained magnetic nanoparticles (i.e Fe3O4@NH2@Oxalic acid) were isolated by a powerful magnet, washed with ethanol, and distilled water several times to remove all organic impurities. Then, the product was dried at 60 °C for 2 hours.

The synthesis of 1,5-diphenyl-3-hydroxy-4-methoxycarbonyl-3-pyrrolin-2-one (1a) by Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid; A typical procedure

A mixture of benzaldehyde (0.106 g, 1 mmol), aniline (0.093 g, 1 mmol), and Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid (0.2 g) in 5 mL of ethanol was prepared in a round-bottomed flask (25 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and was strongly stirred at room temperature for 40 min. Then to the mixture dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (0.14 gr, 1 mmol) was added. The reaction was completed within 8 hours. The reaction was monitored over silica gel 60 F254 aluminum sheet (eluent: ethyl acetate/n-hexane: 1/1). The catalyst was separated by using a strong magnet. The separated catalyst was washed with acetone and ethanol two times then dried in an oven (50 °C) and reused for further reactions. The solvent has been evaporated by a rotary instrument and further residue was recrystallized from methanol. The white solid achieved an excellent yield of 0.295 g (95 %) with a melting point of 182-183 °C [30]. The product was characterized by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, FT-IR and C, H, N elemental analysis.

FT- IR (KBr)(cm−1): 3260 (OH), 2958, 1702 (C=O), 1680 (C=O), 1498, 1382, 1232, 1002; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.10 (s, 1H, CH), 7.07-7.62 (m, 10 H, Ar and br s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 50.55, 61.05, 112.35, 122.96, 125.80, 128.13, 128.38, 128.73, 129.13, 136.74, 137.00, 153.14, 162.96 (C=O), 164.49 (C=O). Anal. Calcd for C18H15NO4: C, 69.89; H, 4.89; N, 4.53. Found: C, 69.92; H, 4.81; N, 4.48.

Results and discussion

A literature survey showed that the preparation of the AF-MNPs by direct coupling of amino agents to magnetite nanoparticles has been carried out by different chemical procedures. The chemical conditions for these methods have been summarized in table 1 for more consideration.

Table 1 Synthesis of the AF-MNPs by different protocols. 

Entry Magnetite source Amino agent Steps Size, nm
11-3, 7-8, 40, 44-46, 48, 50, 52-53 FeCl3•6H2O 1,6-hexadiamine 1 1.95-200
25 FeCl3•6H2O & FeCl2•4H2O 1,6-hexadiamine 1 20
36, 38, 49 FeCl3•6H2O & FeCl2•4H2O H2N(CH2)3Si(OCH3)3 2 13-150
436a FeCl3•6H2O H2N(CH2)3Si(OCH3)3 2 250
536 FeCl3•6H2O & FeSO4•7H2O H2N(CH2)3Si(OCH3)3 2 10
642, 45 Fe(NO3)3•9H2O H2N(CH2)3Si(OCH3)3 2 20-40
74, 39, 41 FeCl3•6H2O triethylenetetramine 1 70-100
837 FeCl3•6H2O & FeCl2•4H2O (CH3O)3Si(CH2)3NH(CH2)2NH(CH2)2NH2 2 20-100
943 FeCl3.6H2O poly(propyleneglycol)bis(2-aminopropyl ether) 1 20
1047 FeCl3•6H2O 2,2-(ethylenedioxy)-bis-(ethylamine) 1 6
1151 FeCl3•6H2O 2-aminoterephthalic acid 2 4
126 FeCl3•6H2O & FeSO4•7H2O H2N(CH2)3Si(OEt)3 2 none

In continuous of these procedures (table 1), Fe3O4@NH2 was synthesized by a new protocol. The magnetite nanoparticles were prepared from FeCl3•6H2O. Also, 1, 2-ethylenediamine was used as an amino agent. As shown in table 2, some experiments were carried out for optimizing the best ratio of the reagents, temperature, and reaction time. All reactions were performed by a one-pot reaction of FeCl3•6H2O and 1, 2-ethylenediamine in the ratio (1:10) in ethylene glycol at different temperatures & times under an inert atmosphere.

Table 2 Optimization reaction conditions for the synthesis of Fe3O4@NH2 (product) from FeCl3•6H2O (A), 1, 2-ethylenediamine (B), and sodium acetate anhydrous (C) in ethylene glycol (45 mL). 

Entry A/g B/g C/g θ/° C t/h Product
1 1.5 2 3 150-190 3 and 6 impure
2 1.5 3 6 200 3 and 6 impure
3 1.5 2 12 200 6 impure
4 1.5 3 6 110 3 poor quality
5 1.5 3 12 110 6 good quality
6 1.5 3 6 110 12 poor quality

The quality of the obtained AF-MNPs was determined by comparing FT-IR spectra as shown in Fig. 1(a-c). In Fig. 1(a), the band at 645 cm-1 assigned to the impurity some amount of maghemite [36b] when the reactions were carried out at 200 °C (table 2, entry 2-3). The same results were achieved at 150-190 °C (table 2, entry 1). Due to the absorbance bands at 3428 cm-1 (NH stretching vibration) and 2934 and 2862 cm-1 (asymmetric stretching vibration and symmetric stretching vibration of CH2), 1, 2-ethylenediamine was coated better at 110 °C within 6 hours (Fig. 1(c)) (Table 2, entry 5), while the coating was reduced in fewer time of reaction (3 hours, Fig. 1(b)) (Table 2, entry 4).

Fig. 1 (a) FT-IR spectrum of synthesized of Fe3O4-CH2CH2-NH2 at 200 °C within 6 hours (Table 2, entry 3). (b) FT-IR spectrum of synthesized of Fe3O4-CH2CH2-NH2 at 110 °C within 3 hours (Table 2, entry 4). (c) FT-IR spectrum of synthesized of Fe3O4-CH2CH2-NH2 at 110 °C within 6 hours (Table 2, entry 5). 

Thus, the results (Table 2, entry 5) showed that a one-pot reaction of FeCl3•6H2O and 1, 2-ethylenediamine in the ratio (1:10) at 110 °C within 6 hours in ethylene glycol gave the best quality and quantity of Fe3O4-CH2CH2-NH2 (Fe3O4@NH2) as shown in Scheme 1. The chemical structure of Fe3O4@NH2 was characterized by FT-IR and VSM spectra.

A one-pot reaction of FeCl3.6H2O and 1, 2-ethylenediamine in the ratio (1:10) at 110 °C within 6 hours in ethylene glycol gave the best quality and quantity of Fe3O4-CH2CH2-NH2 (Fe3O4@NH2) as shown in Scheme 3.

Scheme 3 The synthesis of Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticles.  

Then, oxalic acid as an organic acid was linked to surface of Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticles. The best reaction conditions were obtained by performing some reactions in different conditions as shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Optimization reaction conditions for the synthesis of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid (product) from Fe3O4@NH2 (1 g) under the Ar atmosphere. 

Entry moxalic acid / g Conditions θ / °C t / h Product1
1 0.4 - RT 2 or 4 no
2 0.4 ultrasonic RT 2 or 4 no
3 0.8 ultrasonic 40 2 or 4 no
4 1.2 ultrasonic 40 2 or 4 no
5 1.2 ultrasonic 60 2 no
6 1.2 ultrasonic 60 4 yes
7 1.2 - 60 4 no
82 1.6 ultrasonic 60 4 yes
92 1.2 ultrasonic 60 8 yes

1The formation of the product (Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid) was characterized by FT-IR spectrum.

2The obtained results from entries 8 and 9 are similar to entry 6. These results showed that more amounts of oxalic acid and more reaction time for the preparation of the product are not required.

The results showed (Table 3, entry 6) that oxalic acid can be linked by using ultrasonic irradiation at 60 °C within 4 hours under the Ar atmosphere. Thus, the Fe3O4-CH2CH2NH-CO-CO2H (Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid) nanoparticles were successfully synthesized, as shown in Scheme 4. The chemical structure of the Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid was characterized by FT-IR, XRD, SEM, VSM, and EDAX spectra.

Scheme 4 The synthesis of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles from Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticles under ultrasonic irradiations.  

The FT-IR spectrum of Fe3O4-CH2CH2-NH2 (Fe3O4@NH2) is shown in Fig. 2(a). The band at 3428 cm-1 was assigned to NH stretching vibration which was combined with OH stretching vibration of the absorbed water on Fe3O4. The bands at 2934 cm-1 and 2862 cm-1 were assigned to asymmetric stretching vibration and symmetric stretching vibration of CH2. The band at 1626 cm-1 was assigned to OH bending vibration of the absorbed water on Fe3O4. The band at 1547 cm-1 was assigned to NH bending vibration. The band at 1316 cm-1 was assigned to C-C stretching of vibration. The band at 1023 cm-1 was assigned to C-N stretching vibration and the band at 583 cm-1 was assigned to the Fe-O bending vibration [34b].

Fig. 2 The FT-IR spectra of (a) Fe3O4-CH2CH2-NH2 (Fe3O4@NH2), (b) Fe3O4-CH2CH2NH-CO-CO2H, (Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid) (c) oxalic acid.  

The FT-IR spectrum of Fe3O4-CH2CH2NH-CO-CO2H (Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid) has been shown in Fig. 2(b). The band at 3394 cm-1 was assigned to OH stretching vibration of the COOH group. The band at 1684 cm-1 and 1673 cm-1 were assigned to C=O bond stretching vibrations of the COOH and CO-NH groups, respectively. The band at 1397 cm-1 was assigned to OH bending vibration of the COOH group. The band at 1267 cm-1 was assigned to C-O stretching vibration. The band at 1037 cm-1 was assigned to C-N stretching vibration. The band at 787 cm-1 was assigned to OH bending vibration of the COOH group, and 567 cm-1 was assigned to the Fe-O bending vibration.

A comparison of the FT-IR spectra of Fe3O4@NH2 in Fig. 2(a) and Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid in Fig. 2(b) shows that a band at 1626 cm-1 in Fig. 1(a) does not appear in the FT-IR spectrum of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid Fig. 2(b). Because this band was replaced by a doublet band at 1684 cm-1 (acidic C=O) and 1673 cm-1 (amide C=O). This result that was indicated the successful attachment of oxalic acid to Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticles.

The VSM spectrum was used to evaluate the magnetic measurement of magnetite nanoparticles at room temperature as shown in Fig. 3(a). Due to the lack of magnetic remanence and coercivity, the room-temperature magnetization curve of the Fe3O4@NH2 and Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles suggests a paramagnetic state of the nanoparticles. The magnetization curves indicate the saturation magnetization of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid and Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticles, which were diminished to 10.50 emu/g from 12.90 emu/g. These results are significantly smaller than reported values for bulk Fe3O4 (92 emu/g and 100 emu/g) [54]. In the Fe3O4@NH2 and Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid adsorbed water, amine agent, and oxalic acid reduce the measured magnetic strength because magnetic nanoparticles are diluted with diamagnetic physically.

The SEM images of nano-Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid (Fig. 3(b)) show the presence of spheric nanoparticles with 81 nm of average diameter.

Fig 3 a) The room-temperature magnetization curve of the Fe3O4@NH2 and Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles. b) The SEM spectra of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid.  

The XRD patterns of the Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles are presented in Fig. 4. The peak positions are indexed as (111), (220), (331), (400), (422), (511), (440), (620), (533) and (444) in the 2θ range of 20-80°. These results reveal the existence of a Fe3O4 core in the Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid which is in good agreement with the literature [54-55]. Fig. 5 shows EDAX analysis of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles. The sample peaks are observed for carbon, oxygen, iron, and nitrogen. It reveals that carbon was from 1, 2-ethylenediamine and oxalic acid, oxygen from oxalic acid and Fe3O4, iron from Fe3O4, and nitrogen from 1, 2-ethylenediamine. These results shows that surface of Fe3O4 was coated more than 93 % by organic materials (1, 2-ethylenediamine, and oxalic acid).

Fig 4 The XRD patterns of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles.  

Fig 5 EDAX analysis of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles.  

The synthesized Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles were used for the synthesis of pyrrolin-2-one derivatives after optimum reaction conditions as shown in Table 4. It was best to combine benzaldehyde (1 mmol), aniline (1 mmol), and 0.2 g Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles as the catalyst in ethanol. The reaction was completed after 8 hours to give the corresponding pyrrolin-2-ones in 95 % yields as shown in Scheme 2.

Table 4 Optimization reaction conditions for the synthesis of 1,5-diphenyl-3-hydroxy-4-methoxycarbonyl-3-pyrrolin-2-one in the presence of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles as catalyst at room temperature.a 

Entry Catalyst Amounts (g) Solvent t/h Yields, %b
1 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 0.1 EtOH 12 35
2 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 0.15 EtOH 12 60
3 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 0.2 EtOH 8 95
4 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 0.5 EtOH 6 93
5 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 1 EtOH 6 90
6 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 0.2 MeOH 2 90
7 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 0.2 EtOAc 24 75
8 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 0.2 H2O 24 0
9 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid 0.2 THF 24 47

a benzaldehye (1 mmol), aniline (1 mmol), DAMD (1 mmol). b The yields were referred to as isolated products.

For more proofing, the reaction of a variety of anilines and aromatic aldehydes was performed under optimized reaction conditions. All the reactions were completed within 6-10 hours in the excellent yields of pure products (1-8a) (90-95 %) as shown in scheme 2. All products were characterized by FT-IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and C. H, N elemental analysis. In the 1H-NMR spectrum, the chemical shifts of the CH group in the heterocyclic ring appear around 5.62-6.41 ppm, as a single signal. In the FT-IR spectrum, the C=O stretching frequency of the products appears around 1675-1693 cm-1. The melting points of the products were measured and compared with the literature [30-35].

Due to the chemical structure of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid, CO2H groups can provide an acidic surface with good polarity. All moieties in this reaction are polar. Thus, they can react and condensate more easily on Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid surface by dipolar-dipolar interactions. Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nanoparticles activate the aldehyde functional group for reaction with aniline. Thus, an imine as an intermediate (step (I), Scheme 3) is produced. Then, the obtained H2O molecules from this condensation reaction, react with DMAD and produce a 1,3-dipolar intermediate (step (II), Scheme 3) [30], which would undergo the addition to the imine (step (III & IV), Scheme 3). Then, an intramolecular attack of the amino group on one of the esters results in the formation of the five-membered ring as pyrrolin-2-one skeleton (a, step (V), Scheme 3).

Scheme 3 The schematic and the tentatively proposed mechanism for the synthesis of pyrrolin-2-one derivatives by Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid as catalyst.  

The reusability of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid catalyst was examined. The recycled catalyst can be used three more times. For example, the second and third rounds yields of the product (Scheme 2, 1a) were 92 % and 93 % respectively. For more consideration, the efficiency of Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid nano-magnetic catalyst for the synthesis of 1,5-diphenyl-3-hydroxy-4-methoxycarbonyl-3-pyrrolin-2-one (Sheme 2, 1a) has been compared with other reported protocols as shown in Table 5. The comparison shows Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid catalyst has a good potential for the synthesis of pyrrolin-2-one derivatives.

Table 5 Comparison of synthesis of 1,5-diphenyl-3-hydroxy-4-methoxycarbonyl-3-pyrrolin-2-one by Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid with the different protocols. 

Entry Protocol Yield t/h Green Profile Availability Reusable Catalyst Reference
1 Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid/EtOH/RT 95 8 yes yes yes current
2 EtOH/H2O/RT 87 15 yes yes no 29
3 P-TsOH/EtOH/RT 62 48 no yes no 30
4 Citric Acid/US/ EtOH/RT 90 0.3 yes no no 31
5 P-TsOH/MW/EtOH/RT 96 0.1 no no no 32
6 TiO2 admicelle/H2O/RT 75 18 yes no no 28
7 [bmim]BF4/PEG-400/RT 89 1 yes no yes 33a
8 MW/[BBSI]Cl/Ethylene glycol/RT 90 0.1 yes no yes 33b
9 [BBSI]Cl/ball milling/RT 90 0.5 yes no yes 33c
10 [BBSI]HSO4/ball milling/RT 87 0.4 yes no yes 33c
11 Fe3O4@SiO2@Propyl–ANDSA/EtOH/RT 87 8 yes no yes 34
12 Fe3O4@PEG-400@oxalic acid/MeOH/RT 90 24 yes no yes 35
13 LEDs/Rose Benga /CH3CN-H2O 94 0.8 yes no yes 56
14 AmberChrom/brine/  EtOH/RT 95 6 yes yes yes 35

Conclusions

In this research, the Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticle was synthesized from FeCl3•6H2O and 1, 2-ethylenediamine. Then, Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid as an organoacid-magnetic nanoparticle was synthesized by coupling of Fe3O4@NH2 nanoparticle and oxalic acid under ultrasonic irradiations. Also, the nano-Fe3O4@NH2@oxalic acid was used for preparation of a variety of pyrrolin-2-ones. The reactions were performed in ethanol in the excellent of yields at room temperature. The recovered and regenerated catalyst can be useful for reaction with loss of activity. Thus, easy work-up, mild reaction conditions, recyclability, recovery, non-toxicity, economically affordable, and high efficiency are valuable characteristics that make this new method noteworthy.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of this work by the Research Council of the Islamic Azad University, Mahabad Branch, Mahabad, Iran. DOI:

References

1. Wang, L.; Bao, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 12, 6341- 6343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200501334. [ Links ]

2. Hana, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Dong, J.; Tang, X.; Ni, L.; Wang, L. Biochem. Eng. J. 2018, 130, 90-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2017.11.008. [ Links ]

3. Liua, Y.; Lib, L.; Liub, S.; Xiea, C.; Yub, S. J. Mol. Catal. A. Chem. 2016, 424, 269-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2016.09.007. [ Links ]

4. Ma, M.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, D.; Dou, J.; Zhang, H.; Xu, H. Catal. Commun. 2012, 17, 168-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2011.10.015. [ Links ]

5. Naeimi, H.; Ansarian, Z. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2018, 85, 265-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.01.047. [ Links ]

6. Han, Q.; Wu, X.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Kang, X.; Zhu, H. Separations 2021, 8, 196 https://doi.org/10.3390/separations8110196. [ Links ]

7. Zhang, F.; Jin, J.; Zhong, X.; Li, S.; Niu, J.; Li, R.; Ma, J. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 1238-1243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C0GC00854K. [ Links ]

8. Xu, Y. Y.; Zhou, M.; Geng, H. J.; Hao, J. J.; Ou, Q. Q. Appl. Surf Sci. 2012, 258, 3897-3902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.054 [ Links ]

9. Wang, X.; Almoallim, H. S.; Cui, Q.; Alharbi, S. A.; Yang, H. Int. J. Biol. Macromol 2021, 171, 198-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.037. [ Links ]

10. Sharma, K.; Dutta, S.; Sharma, S. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 1303-1316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C4DT03236E. [ Links ]

11. Snoussi, Y.; Bastide, S.; Abderrabba, M.; Chehimi, M. M. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 41, 551-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.10.021. [ Links ]

12. Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Dai, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, J. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2018, 23, 50-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.06.002. [ Links ]

13. Gemeay, A. H.; Keshta, B. E.; El-Sharkawy, R. G.; Zaki, A. B. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 32341-32358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06530-y. [ Links ]

14. Dwoskin, P.; Teng, L.; Buxton, S. T.; Crooks, P. A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 288, 905-911. DOI:https://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/288/3/905.short. [ Links ]

15. Singh, P.; Dimitriou, V.; Mahajan, R. P.; Crossley, A. W. Br. J. Anaesth. 1993, 71, 685-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/71.5.685. [ Links ]

16. Patsalos, P. N. Epilepsia 2005, 46, 140-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00326.x. [ Links ]

17. Lampe, J. W.; Chou, Y.; Hanna, R. G.; Di Meo, S. V.; Erhardt, P. W.; Hagedorn, A. A.; Ingebretsen, W. R.; Cantor, E. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1041-1047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00060a012. [ Links ]

18. Omura, S.; Fujimoto, T.; Otoguro, K.; Matsuzaki, K.; Moriguchi, R.; Tanaka, H.; Sasaki, Y. J. Antibiot. 1991, 44, 113-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.44.113. [ Links ]

19. Feling, R. H.; Buchanan, G. O.; Mincer, T. J.; Kauffman, C. A.; Jensen, P. R.; Fenical, W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 355-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200390115. [ Links ]

20. Asami, Y.; Kakeya, H.; Onose, R.; Yoshida, A.; Matsuzaki, H.; Osada, H. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2845-2848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ol020104+. [ Links ]

21. Fischer, R.; Lehr, S.; Drewes, M. W.; Feucht, D.; Malsam, O.; Bojack, G.; Arnold, C.; Auler, T.; Hills, M.; Kehne, H. German Patent DE 102004053191 2006. [ Links ]

22. Franco, M. S. F.; Casagrande, G. A.; Raminelli, C.; Moura, S.; Rossatto, M.; Quina, F. H.; Pereira, C. M. P.; Flores, A. F. C.; Pizzuti, L. Synth. Commun. 2015, 45, 692-701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2014.978504. [ Links ]

23. Andana, M.; Hashimoto, S. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 79-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(97)10493-2. [ Links ]

24. Choi, D. R.; Lee, K. Y.; Chung, Y. S.; Joo, J. E.; Kim, Y. H.; Oh, Ch. Y.; Lee, Y. S.; Ham, W. H. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2005, 28, 151-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02977706. [ Links ]

25. Burgess, L. E.; Meyers, A. I.; J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1656-1662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00032a012. [ Links ]

26. Overman, L. E.; Remarchuk, T. P.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja017198n. [ Links ]

27. Singh, V.; Saxena, R.; Batra, S. J. Org. Chem . 2005, 70, 353-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jo048411b. [ Links ]

28. Sarkar, R.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Tetrahedron Lett . 2013, 54, 3706-3711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.05.017. [ Links ]

29. Zonouz, A. M.; Eskandari, I.; Notash, B. Synth Commun. 2015, 45, 2115-2121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2015.1065506. [ Links ]

30. Sun, J.; Wu, Q.; Xia, E.Y.; Yan, C. G. Eur. J. Org. Chem . 2011, 2981-2986. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ejoc.201100008. [ Links ]

31. Ahankar, H.; Ramazani, A.; Slepokura, K.; Lis, T.; Joo, S. W. Green Chem . 2016, 18, 3582-3593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c6gc00157b. [ Links ]

32. Marapala, K. S.; Venkatesh, N.; Swapna, M.; Venkateswar, P. R. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 2020, 13, 227-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20902/ijctr.2019.130128. [ Links ]

33. a) Pervaram, S.; Ashok, D.; Venkata Ramana Reddy, C.; Sarasija, M.; Ganesh, A. Chem. Data Collect. 2020, 29, 100508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100508. b) Ghaffari Khaligh, N.; Mihankhah, T.; Rafie Johan, M.; Titinchi, S. J. J. Green Process Synth . 2019, 8, 373-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2019-0004. c) Ghaffari Khaligh, N.; Mihankhah, T.; Rafie Johan, M.; Synth . Commun. 2019, 49, 1334-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2019.1601225. [ Links ]

34. a) Ghorbani-Vaghei, R.; Sarmast, N.; Mahmoodi, J. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 31, e3681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.3681. b) Esmaeilzadeh, S.; Setamdideh, D. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2021, 86, 1039-1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC210521059E. [ Links ]

35. Hamdi Mohamadabad, P.; Setamdideh, D. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2023, 55, 265-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00304948.2022.2141044. [ Links ]

36. a) Kim, H. K.; Park, J. W.; J. Environ. Sci. Health. A. 2019, 54, 648-656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1579535. b) Burakevich, J. V.; Lore, A. M.; Volpp, G. P. J. Org. Chem . 1971, 36, 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00800a001. [ Links ]

37. Chan, C. C. P.; Gallard, H.; Majewski, P. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0828-2. [ Links ]

38. Ebrahimi-Tazangi, F.; Hekmatara, S. H.; Yazdi, J. S. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 809, 151779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151779. [ Links ]

39. Zhang, C. L.; Cheng, H. D.; Ren, S. Y.; Zhang, W. P.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; MA, J. H.; Zhang, C. S.; Guo, Z. Y. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 199, 052042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/199/5/052042. [ Links ]

40. Fan, G.; Rena, Y.; Jiangb, W.; Wang, C.; Xub, B.; Liu, F. Catal. Commun . 2014, 52, 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2014.04.006. [ Links ]

41. Gao, J.; He, Y.; Zhao, X.; Ran, X.; Wuc, Y.; Su, Y.; Dai, J. J. Colloid Interface. Sci. 2016, 481, 220-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.07.057. [ Links ]

42. Chu, C.; Lu, C.; Yuan, J.; Xing, C. Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 3673-3681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1651. [ Links ]

43. Guan, N.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Sun, D. Colloid Surf. A-Phsicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 346, 221-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.06.022. [ Links ]

44. He, X.; Yang, W.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Hu, B.; Wang, T.; Hou, X. Microchim. Acta. 2018, 185, 125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-2672-2. [ Links ]

45. Jafarnejad, M.; Daghighi Asli, M.; Afshar Taromi, F.; Manoochehri, M. Int. J. Biol. Macromol . 2020, 148, 201-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.017. [ Links ]

46. Lin, S.; Hua, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, L.; Lin, K. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 76, 452-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.225. [ Links ]

47. Das, M.; Dhak, P.; Gupta, S.; Mishra, D.; Maiti, T. K.; Basak, A.; Pramanik, P. Nanotechnology 2010, 21, 125103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/12/125103. [ Links ]

48. Baghani, A. N.; Mahvi, A. H.; Gholami, M.; Delikhoon, N. R. M. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2016, 14, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-016-0252-0. [ Links ]

49. Pazouki, M.; Zabihi, M.; Shayegan, J.; Fatehi, M. H. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 35, 671-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-017-0293-9. [ Links ]

50. Han, L.; Li, Q.; Chen, S.; Xie, W.; Bao, W.; Chang, L.; Wang, J. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07802-8. [ Links ]

51. Li, Y.; Xie, Q.; Hu, Q.; Li, C.; Huang, Z.; Yang, X.; Guo, H. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30651. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30651. [ Links ]

52. Xiong, S.; Wang, M.; Cai, D.; Li, Y.; Gu, N.; Wu, Z.; Anal. Lett. 2013, 46, 912-922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2012.747094. [ Links ]

53. Tang, Z.; Li, F. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2016, 13, 772-776. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1166/jctn.2016.4873. [ Links ]

54. Cornell, R. M.; Schwertmann, U. U. in: The Iron Oxides: Structure Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses, 2nd ed.; Completely Revised and Extended Edition; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003. [ Links ]

55. Loh, K. S.; Lee, Y. H.; Musa, A.; Salmah, A. A.; Zamri, I. Sensors. 2008, 8, 5775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s8095775. [ Links ]

56. Dutta, A.; Rohman, M. A.; Nongrum, R.; Thongni, A.; Mitra, S.; Nongkhlaw, R. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 8136 -8148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NJ00343G. [ Links ]

Received: November 11, 2022; Accepted: May 29, 2023

*Corresponding author: Davood Setamdideh, email: d.setamdideh@iau-mahabad.ac.ir; davood.setamdideh@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License