SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.82 número1Tiempo de espera para el ingreso hospitalario de pacientes pediátricos a cirugías electivas en un Instituto Nacional de Salud Pediátrico en la Ciudad de MéxicoFenotipos hemodinámicos en hernia diafragmática congénita y su asociación con morbilidad y mortalidad índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México

versión impresa ISSN 1665-1146

Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex. vol.82 no.1 México ene./feb. 2025  Epub 09-Mayo-2025

https://doi.org/10.24875/bmhim.24000113 

Research articles

Characteristics of preterm infants in pediatric rehabilitation at a referral hospital in Peru

Características de lactantes prematuros en rehabilitación pediátrica de un hospital de referencia en Perú

Roger De la Cerna-Luna1  * 

Walter Chacon-Obregon2 

Paola Del Carpio-Samaniego3 

Ana Igei-Chiney1 

Alvaro Taype-Rondan4 

1Pediatric Rehabilitation Service, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Lima

2Rehabilitation Medicine Service, Hospital Santa Rosa, Ministerio de Salud, Lima

3Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, Hospital Nacional Carlos Alberto Seguín Escobedo, EsSalud, Arequipa

4Research Unit for the Generation of Health Evidence Synthesis, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima. Peru


Abstract

Background:

Prematurity is associated with a higher risk of disability. However, no studies on this population in rehabilitation settings in Peru have been found. This study aims to describe the characteristics of preterm infants at the Pediatric Rehabilitation Service of Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (SRP-HNERM).

Method:

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Medical records of preterm infants at SRP-HNERM from September 2023 to February 2024 were reviewed. The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE), General Movements Assessment (GMA), and other outcome measures were used for evaluation.

Results:

A total of 158 preterm infants were evaluated. During hospitalization, 51.3% were evaluated by a physiatrist, 47.5% received physical therapy, and 51.3% had feeding and swallowing disorders (FSD). After discharge, all patients were evaluated by a physiatrist at SRP-HNERM. Among infants with ≥ 44 weeks of corrected gestational age (CGA), 48.1% showed some degree of developmental delay, with global delay present in 34%. Of those with ≥ 48 weeks of CGA, 54.9% had an optimal HINE score. Normal GMA was observed in 51.2% of infants with ≤ 5 months of CGA. A higher frequency of global developmental delay was found in infants who had FSD during hospitalization and a lower frequency in those who had neonatal jaundice.

Conclusions:

Slightly more than half of the preterm infants were evaluated by a physiatrist, had FSD during hospitalization, had an optimal HINE score at ≥ 48 weeks of CGA, and had a normal GMA at ≤ 5 months of CGA. The presence of FSD during hospitalization should alert clinicians to a higher risk of global developmental delay in this population.

Keywords: Premature; Newborn; Infant; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Peru

Resumen

Introducción:

La prematuridad está asociada con mayor riesgo de discapacidad. Sin embargo, no encontramos estudios sobre esta población en entornos de rehabilitación en el Perú. Este estudio tiene como objetivo describir las características de lactantes prematuros en el Servicio de Rehabilitación Pediátrica del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (SRP-HNERM).

Método:

Estudio descriptivo transversal. Se revisaron historias clínicas de lactantes prematuros en el SRP-HNERM desde septiembre 2023 hasta febrero 2024. Para la evaluación, se utilizaron el Hammersmith Examination (HINE), el General Movements Assessment (GMA) y otras medidas de resultado.

Resultados:

Se evaluaron 158 lactantes prematuros. Durante la hospitalización, 51.3% fue evaluado por un fisiatra, 47.5% recibió terapia física, y 51.3% presentó trastornos de la succión-deglución (TSD). Posterior al alta, todos fueron evaluados por un fisiatra en el SRP-HNERM. 48.1% de aquellos con ≥ 44 semanas de edad gestacional corregida (EGC) presentó algún grado de retraso del desarrollo, con retraso global presente en el 34%. 54.9% de aquellos con ≥ 48 semanas de EGC tuvo una puntuación HINE óptima. 51.2% de aquellos con ≤ 5 meses de EGC tuvo una GMA normal. Se encontró mayor retraso global del desarrollo en aquellos que tuvieron TSD en hospitalización, y menor en los que tuvieron ictericia neonatal.

Conclusiones:

Poco más de la mitad fue evaluado por un fisiatra, tuvo TSD en hospitalización, tuvo una puntuación HINE óptima a ≥ 48 semanas de EGC y tuvo una GMA normal a ≤ 5 meses de EGC. La presencia de TSD en hospitalización debería alertar sobre un mayor riesgo de retraso global del desarrollo en esta población.

Palabras clave: Prematuro; Recién nacido; Lactante; Medicina física y rehabilitación; Perú

Introduction

Prematurity is defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestational age and is one of the leading causes of neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality1. Long-term complications of prematurity can affect the pulmonary, renal, cardiac, neurological, and endocrine systems, among others2. According to a 2022 study, global prematurity rates range from 5% to 18%, with high rates observed in industrialized and developing countries3. In Peru, the incidence of prematurity varies depending on the source of information: 23% according to the 2020 Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES), 8.8% according to the World Health Organization (WHO), and 7% according to the Ministry of Health (MINSA)4.

Prematurity is associated with a higher risk of disability, particularly motor and intellectual disabilities, making survival without disability an important outcome measure for this population5. Current data indicate that approximately 80% of preterm infants born between 22 and 32 weeks survive without any form of disability5. However, infants born very preterm (between 28 and 32 weeks) or with very low birth weight (≤ 1500 g) are at higher risk of having a lower health-related quality of life in early adulthood6. Children with a history of prematurity are at higher risk of developmental delays, poor academic performance, and lower intelligence quotients (IQ)7-9.

There are highly predictive tests for motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants, such as the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) and Prechtl’s General Movements Assessment (GMA)10. The HINE has the highest predictive accuracy for severe motor delay, whereas the GMA is most accurate for mild-to-moderate motor and cognitive delays11. Early developmental assessment in school-aged children with a history of prematurity shows good specificity and negative predictive value for cognitive impairments12. In Peru, screening tests such as the Test Peruano de Evaluación del Desarrollo del Niño (TPED) and the Perfil de Evaluación del Desarrollo Infantil del Hospital Rebagliati (REBA-PED) are used for child development assessment13.

Predicting disability associated with prematurity is crucial for initiating early rehabilitation that can reduce the progression of motor impairments, prevent complications, and improve long-term independence14. Early rehabilitation in preterm infants is significant due to increased brain plasticity during the first months of life and the absence of fixed pathological movement patterns15. Previous studies suggest that early rehabilitation in preterm infants can reduce the incidence of motor delays and improve bone mineralization16,17. Oral-motor rehabilitation interventions have proven effective in improving oral feeding in preterm infants, who frequently experience feeding and swallowing disorders (FSD)18,19.

Investigating the characteristics of preterm infants is essential due to their increased risk of long-term disabilities and health complications, as this enables early identification of developmental delays and timely interventions that can improve outcomes and quality of life3,5,14. These characteristics have been studied in various countries in Latin America and around the world10,16-17,19. However, no studies conducted in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) settings in Peru have been found. Therefore, this study aims to describe the characteristics of preterm infants in the Pediatric Rehabilitation Service of Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (SRP-HNERM).

Method

Design and study population

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using data from electronic medical records of preterm infants (born before 37 weeks of gestation) treated at SRP-HNERM over 6 months (September 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024). This timeframe was selected because the study variables were first recorded in SRP-HNERM medical records beginning in September 2023. All patients who met the selection criteria during this period were included.

Context

HNERM, located in Peru's capital, is one of the most important national referral centers for Social Health Insurance (EsSalud) due to its high level of specialization and problem-solving capacity20. All patients at SRP-HNERM were referred either from less complex EsSalud health-care facilities (outside Lima or from the Rebagliati Care Network) or through inter-consultation from other HNERM services.

Between September 2023 and February 2024, SRP-HNERM's staff included four physiatrists, 15 physical therapists, one occupational therapist, five speech and language therapists, and two psychologists. Of these, one physiatrist, five physical therapists, one occupational therapist, two speech and language therapists, and one psychologist were part of the Perinatal and Chromosomal Pathology Unit (also known as the "High-Risk Unit") of SRP-HNERM. This team provided both inpatient and outpatient care to preterm infants and their parents and/or responsible family members.

The Neonatology Service of HNERM includes neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and neonatal intermediate care units (NIMCU). In 2003, the perinatal mortality rate was estimated at 10.5/1,000 live births, and in 2018, the survival rate for NICU admissions was reported at approximately 75%.

Preterm infants hospitalized in the Neonatology Service of HNERM receive care from the SRP-HNERM multidisciplinary team, primarily consisting of physical therapy (PT) and speech and language therapy (SLT) interventions. During hospitalization, parents or responsible family members receive emotional support from the psychology team. Upon discharge, patients are referred to SRP-HNERM for outpatient care according to HNERM’s technical guide for the follow-up of high-risk children.

During the initial outpatient medical consultation at SRP-HNERM, the physiatrist prescribes 10 PT sessions for all preterm infants. The prescription for SLT depends on the presence of FSD. When signs of possible neurological damage are observed during the consultation, patients are referred to Pediatric Neurology (part of the Pediatric Clinical Specialties Service at HNERM) at the physiatrist’s choice.

SLT interventions for both hospitalized patients with FSD and outpatients include therapeutic techniques such as orofacial massage for tone normalization, extraoral massage to stimulate the rooting reflex, intraoral massage for non-nutritive sucking, orofacial and full-body stimulation to normalize altered sensitivity, and initiation of taste stimulation, among others.

Procedures

Following ethics committee approval, a list of all preterm infants seen in medical consultations between September 2023 and February 2024 was obtained from SRP-HNERM. Subsequently, 158 electronic medical records were manually reviewed to extract relevant information using a custom collection form, which was then imported into a Microsoft Excel database.

Preterm infants seen in medical consultations at SRP-HNERM were included because this facility has standardized the evaluation of all patients through a pediatric rehabilitation protocol21, enabling better characterization of this group.

Variables

Based on a literature review, variables collected included demographic, anthropometric, comorbidity-related, hospitalization care, outpatient medical consultation care, and clinical evaluation data.

For FSD diagnosis (a disorder of nutritive sucking leading to feeding difficulties) during hospitalization, the Premature Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (POFRAS) was used19. This instrument comprises 18 items evaluating five variables with separate scoring: corrected gestational age (CGA), behavioral organization (state of consciousness, overall posture, and overall tone), oral posture (lips and tongue), oral reflexes (rooting, sucking, biting, and gag reflexes), and non-nutritive sucking (tongue movement, tongue grooving, jaw movement, sucking strength, maintenance of rhythm, maintenance of alertness, and signs of stress)22. Each item receives 0 to 1 or 2 points, with a maximum total score of 35 points; a total score below 28 indicates FSD22.

Child development was assessed using REBA-PED, an instrument evaluating five developmental areas and identifying warning signs in patients aged 1-72 months13. Developmental delay is classified as mild if > 0% but < 25% (equivalent to 2 standard deviations in similar instruments) in one or more areas, significant if ≥ 25% in one area, and global if ≥ 25% in two or more areas20. Previous studies detail the methodology for creating and applying REBA-PED13,20.

HINE consists of 26 items assessing five neurological aspects in patients aged 2-24 months: cranial nerves (0-15), posture (0-18), movements (0-6), muscle tone (0-24), and reflexes and postural reactions (0-15), totaling a maximum of 78 points23. Items score 3 points if matching ≥ 75% of the typical development population, 2 points if matching 10-25%, and 1 or 0 points if matching ≤ 10%23. Optimal scores are ≥ 73 at 9 and 12 months and ≥ 67 and ≥ 70 at 3 and 6 months, respectively10,23.

The GMA was used to assess general movements. This test evaluates the complex motor patterns generated by the fetal and neonatal nervous system, which include variable sequences in the neck, arms, trunk, and legs that fluctuate in intensity, speed, and range of motion24. These movements are called writhing movements from term age and gradually disappear at 46-49 weeks of CGA when fidgety movements (FM) begin to appear24. Abnormal movements can be classified as poor repertoire, cramped-synchronized, chaotic, absent FM, or abnormal FM. If FM is only sporadically present or absent at 3-5 months of CGA, severe neurological deficits such as cerebral palsy (CP) are likely to develop24. The patient must be awake, calm, and alert to perform the GMA25. The GMA is considered normal if the patient exhibits writhing movements during the first period (before 46-49 weeks of CGA) and/or FM during the second period (up to 5 months of CGA)10,24.

The Escala de Evaluación de la Succión Nutricia was used to diagnose FSD in outpatient medical consultations. This instrument consists of seven questions: "Does the infant form and maintain a seal with the lips around the nipple?" "Does the infant maintain the sucking motion, lip, and jaw movement during feeding?" "Does the infant spit out or reject the nipple or bottle nipple?" "Does the infant have milk or vomit spill from the corners of the mouth?" "Does the infant have coughing episodes?" "Does the infant show signs of choking, gagging, or nausea?" and "Does the infant show signs of fatigue?"26 Each item is scored from 1 to 4 points, with a minimum and maximum total score of 7 and 28 points, respectively; a total score of < 25 is considered indicative of FSD26.

Statistical analysis

The data collected from the Excel spreadsheet were imported into Stata v17 software. Numerical variables were presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), depending on the data distribution in normality tests. Categorical variables were presented with absolute and relative frequencies. To assess the factors associated with global developmental delay, crude (RR) and adjusted relative risks (aRR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using Poisson regression with robust variance. The adjusted model included variables with a p < 0.05 in the crude analysis.

Results

A total of 158 preterm infants were evaluated at SRP-HNERM between September 2023 and February 2024. The median CGA was 52 weeks (IQR 40-72), and the median GA was 33 weeks (IQR 31-35). Most infants were moderately premature (43%), male (53.2%), from Lima (81.7%), new patients (74.4%), and had low birth weight (63.9%). Twins accounted for 25.9% of the sample. The most common comorbidities were neonatal jaundice (59.5%), congenital heart disease (33.5%), and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (21.5%). The median length of hospital stay was 19 days (IQR 6-33). Among the infants, 51.3% were evaluated by a physiatrist during hospitalization, and 47.5% received PT while hospitalized. FSD was present in 51.3% during hospitalization, and 85.2% received SLT for this reason. Parents and/or relatives of 36.1% of infants received emotional support during hospitalization (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic, anthropometric, comorbidity-related, and hospitalization care characteristics of preterm infants (n = 158) 

Characteristics n (%)
CGA (in months)* 3 (0-8)
CGA (in weeks)* 52 (40-72)
GA (in weeks)* 33 (31-35)
Classification
Late preterm 48 (30.4)
Moderate preterm 68 (43.0)
Very preterm 37 (23.4)
Extremely preterm 5 (3.2)
Male sex 84 (53.2)
From Lima 129 (81.7)
New patient 118 (74.4)
Birth weight
Normal 26 (16.5)
Low weight 101 (63.9)
Very low weight 23 (14.6)
Extremely low weight 8 (5.1)
Twin 41 (25.9)
Comorbidities
Neonatal jaundice 94 (59.5)
Congenital heart disease 53 (33.5)
Retinopathy of prematurity 34 (21.5)
Congenital hypotonia 12 (7.6)
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia 11 (7.0)
Intraventricular hemorrhage 8 (5.1)
Down syndrome 6 (3.8)
Congenital hypertonia 6 (3.8)
Metabolic bone disease 6 (3.8)
History of abdominal surgery 5 (3.2)
Hypothyroidism 4 (2.5)
Days of hospitalization* 19 (6-33)
Evaluated by the physiatrist during hospitalization 81 (51.3)
Received physical therapy during hospitalization 75 (47.5)
FSD during hospitalization 81 (51.3)
Received speech and language therapy during hospitalization for FSD 69 (85.2)
Emotional support to parents and/or family members during hospitalization 57 (36.1)
Received outpatient physical therapy (continuing patient) (n = 40) 40 (100)
Months elapsed from birth to the first session of outpatient physical therapy for those who received it* 2 (1-4)
Received outpatient speech and language therapy for FSD (continuing patient) (n = 40) 2 (5)

*Median (p25-p75). CGA: corrected gestational age; GA: gestational age; FSD: feeding and swallowing disorder.

After hospital discharge, all patients were evaluated by the physiatrist at SRP-HNERM, with a median time of 1 month from discharge to the first outpatient medical consultation. All continuing patients received outpatient PT after the first outpatient medical consultation, and the median time from birth to the first session was 2 months (IQR 1-4). Only 5% of the continuing patients received outpatient SLT for FSD, with a median time of 1 month from birth to the first session (Table 1).

Among the infants, 4.4% had macrocephaly, 3.8% had microcephaly, and 9.5% had some form of positional cranial deformity. Asymmetrical skin folds were present in 15.8% of cases, whereas no patients exhibited orthopedic deformities. FSD was present in 12.7% of patients at the outpatient medical consultation. Among patients with 44 weeks or more of CGA, 48.1% exhibited some degree of developmental delay, with global delay present in 34%. Greater delays were observed in the gross motor (17.9%), hearing and language (17.9%), and fine motor (13.2%) areas (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics of preterm infants in outpatient medical consultation (n = 158) 

Characteristics n (%)
Developmental delay in those with ≥ 44 weeks of CGA (n = 106) 51 (48.1)
Delay in gross motor development 19 (17.9)
Delay in hearing and language development 16 (15.1)
Delay in fine motor development 14 (13.2)
Delay in personal-social development 8 (7.6)
Delay in intelligence and learning development 6 (5.7)
Global developmental delay in those with ≥ 44 weeks of CGA (n = 106) 36 (34.0)
Macrocephaly 7 (4.4)
Microcephaly 6 (3.8)
Positional cranial deformation 15 (9.5)
Brachycephaly 5 (3.2)
Dolichocephaly 4 (2.5)
Plagiocephaly 4 (2.5)
Scaphocephaly 2 (1.3)
Asymmetric skin folds 25 (15.8)
Orthopedic deformity 0 (0)
FSD 20 (12.7)
HINE score in those with ≥ 48 weeks of CGA (n = 82)* 71 (64-76)
Low score in muscle tone 66 (80.5)
Low score in posture 58 (70.7)
Low score in reflexes and postural reactions 45 (54.9)
Low score in cranial nerves 24 (29.3)
Low score in movements 12 (14.6)
Optimal HINE score in those with ≥ 48 weeks of CGA (n = 82) 45 (54.9)
GMA in those with ≤ 5 months of CGA (n = 84)
Normal 43 (51.2)
Poor repertoire 10 (11.9)
Cramped-synchronized 4 (4.8)
Abnormal Fidgety movements 1 (1.2)
Deferred 26 (30.9)
Referral to pediatric neurology 60 (38.0)

*Median (p25-p75). CGA: corrected gestational age; FSD: feeding and swallowing disorder; HINE: hammersmith infant neurological examination; GMA: prechtl’s general movements assessment.

Among patients with 48 weeks or more of CGA, 54.9% had an optimal HINE score, with a median of 71 (IQR 64-76). Most patients had low HINE scores in muscle tone (80.5%), posture (70.7%), and reflexes and postural reactions (54.9%). In patients aged 5 months or less, 51.2% had a normal GMA. Among those showing abnormal movements, poor repertoire movements were the most common (11.9%). The GMA was deferred in 30.9% of these patients because they were not awake, calm, and alert during the assessment. A referral to Pediatric Neurology was made for 38% of patients (Table 2).

In the analysis of associated factors, a higher frequency of global developmental delay was found in patients with 80 weeks or more of CGA compared to those with less than 60 weeks of CGA (aRR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.04-3.21), as well as in those who had FSD during hospitalization (aRR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17-3.88). In addition, a lower frequency of global delay was found in patients with neonatal jaundice (aRR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.78) (Table 3).

Table 3 Factors associated with global developmental delay in preterm infants with 44 weeks or more of corrected gestational age (n = 106) 

Factors Global developmental delay
No Yes RR (95% CI)
Sex
Female 32 (61.5) 20 (38.5) Ref
Male 38 (70.4) 16 (29.6) 0.77 (0.45-1.32)
CGA (in weeks), in tertiles
44-59 28 (70.0) 12 (30.0) Ref
60-79 27 (81.8) 6 (18.2) 0.61 (0.25-1.45)
80-132 15 (45.5) 18 (54.5) 1.82 (1.03-3.21)
GA (in weeks), in tertiles
24-32 30 (66.7) 15 (33.3) Ref
33-34 16 (59.3) 11 (40.7) 1.22 (0.66-2.27)
35-36 24 (70.6) 10 (29.4) 0.88 (0.45-1.72)
Birth weight
Normal 12 (66.7) 6 (33.3) Ref
Low weight 48 (69.6) 21 (30.4) 0.91 (0.43-1.93)
Very or extremely low weight 10 (52.6) 9 (47.4) 1.42 (0.63-3.20)
Days of hospitalization, in tertiles
0-9 27 (64.3) 15 (35.7) Ref
10-28 23 (76.7) 7 (23.3) 0.65 (0.30-1.41)
29-210 20 (58.8) 14 (41.2) 1.15 (0.65-2.05)
Optimal HINE score
No 37 (60.7) 24 (39.3) Ref
Yes 33 (73.3) 12 (26.7) 0.68 (0.38-1.21)
FSD during hospitalization
No 65 (69.1) 29 (30.9) Ref
Yes 5 (41.7) 7 (58.3) 1.89 (1.07-3.34)
Congenital heart disease
No 45 (65.2) 24 (34.8) Ref
Yes 25 (67.6) 12 (32.4) 0.93 (0.53-1.65)
Twin
No 55 (65.5) 29 (34.5) Ref
Yes 15 (68.2) 7 (31.8) 0.92 (0.47-1.82)
Neonatal jaundice
No 22 (52.4) 20 (47.6) Ref
Yes 48 (75.0) 16 (25.0) 0.53 (0.31-0.89)
Retinopathy of prematurity
No 56 (65.1) 30 (34.9) Ref
Yes 14 (70.0) 6 (30.0) 0.86 (0.41-1.79)

CGA: corrected gestational age; GA: gestational age; HINE: hammersmith infant neurological examination; FSD: feeding and swallowing disorder.

Discussion

Most infants in this study were male. A national cohort study from 2016 in the Netherlands reported that male sex was a significant risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth, with a higher risk of neonatal morbidity27. However, a 2018 study in the UK involving high-risk pregnant women for preterm birth did not observe a significant increase in the risk of spontaneous or iatrogenic preterm birth when the fetus was male, which contradicts reports in low-risk pregnancies28. Regarding the potential implications of prematurity on child development, a systematic review from 2023 found that preterm males did not have greater impairment compared to females29.

The most frequent comorbidities were neonatal jaundice, congenital heart disease, and ROP. A systematic review from 2021 reported that neonatal morbidities were important risk factors associated with lower IQ in young adults born very preterm or with very low birth weight9. Neonatal jaundice is a neurological risk factor in neonates, associated with hearing, visual, and intellectual disabilities, as well as conditions such as autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder30. A systematic review from 2024 found that 26% and 19% of preterm infants with congenital heart disease exhibited cognitive impairment and intellectual disability, respectively31. A systematic review from 2023 concluded that in preterm infants, ROP was associated with a higher risk of intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, behavioral problems, and developmental delay32.

Just over half of the infants were evaluated by the physiatrist during hospitalization. The physiatrist typically is part of the multidisciplinary team that examines preterm infants during hospitalization and provides care in outpatient consultations20,33. Preterm infants hospitalized in the Neonatology Service of HNERM should be evaluated by the physiatrist at least once. However, many preterm infants were not evaluated, possibly due to a short hospitalization time (median of 19 days), compared to what was reported by studies from 2022 in Brazil (median of 39 days) and Malaysia (medians of 26 and 44 days for each group), and by a 2018 study across various European countries (medians of 52.4 and 76.5 days depending on the region)34-36.

Just under half of the infants received PT during hospitalization. This could be related to the lack of evaluation of preterm infants by the physiatrist, who is the first in the multidisciplinary team to examine these patients and lead rehabilitation interventions. PT is often necessary for most preterm infants due to psychomotor delays caused by biological immaturity16. A systematic review from 2020 suggests that PT during hospitalization could have a significant effect on the mental and motor development of preterm infants, especially during the 1st year of life37.

Just over half of the infants had FSD during hospitalization, which is higher than reported by a systematic review from 2021 (prevalence of 27%)19. A systematic review from 2022 concluded that oral feeding within 72 h after birth in preterm infants and low birth weight infants possibly reduces the risk of mortality, length of hospital stay, risk of sepsis, and weight loss at discharge38. A systematic review from 2021 revealed that oral-motor therapy interventions in preterm infants could reduce the time to transition to full oral feeding and the length of hospital stay, as well as increase feeding efficiency and weight gain18. More than 85% of infants received SLT during hospitalization for FSD; those who did not receive therapy likely missed it due to a short hospitalization time or because they were not in a condition to receive it.

After hospital discharge, all preterm infants were evaluated by the physiatrist at the SRP-HNERM, and the median time from discharge to the first outpatient medical consultation was 1 month. A consensus from 2023 among physiatrists in South Korea recommended outpatient medical evaluations for preterm infants within the 1st month after hospital discharge if there was at least one high-risk antecedent: brain injury, periventricular leukomalacia, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, meningitis, encephalitis, ventriculomegaly, feeding disorders associated with malnutrition, neonatal sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia with mechanical ventilation up to 36 weeks of CGA, neonatal jaundice, confirmed congenital or neuromuscular disorder, extreme prematurity, extremely low birth weight, high social risk, hypertonia, hypotonia, infantile spasms, or epilepsy39.

Just under half of the infants with 44 weeks or more of CGA exhibited some degree of developmental delay, with greater delays in gross motor, hearing and language, and fine motor areas. This is consistent with findings from a 2023 study of children under 5 years old treated at the SRP-HNERM, who more frequently exhibited delays in hearing and language, and gross motor areas20. A systematic review from 2023 reported that moderate preterm infants had a higher risk of developmental delay compared to term-born infants7. The effect of prematurity on child development persists into school age and beyond40. Systematic reviews from 2018 and 2020 concluded that preterm infants had lower scores in cognitive ability tests, as well as in motor skills, behavior, reading, mathematics, and spelling8,40.

Just over half of the infants with 48 weeks or more of CGA had an optimal HINE score (median of 71). This percentage was lower than that found in a 2023 study of preterm infants in Norway (79.5% with optimal HINE at 3 months of CGA, median of 61.8) but higher than reported in a 2018 study of late preterm infants in Greece (25.4% with optimal HINE at 6 months of CGA, median of 59)41,42. The median HINE score was higher than reported by these studies and also higher than that of another study from 2022 in preterm infants in Italy (55.6 at 3 months of CGA)10.

Just over half of the infants with 5 months or less of CGA exhibited a normal GMA. This percentage was lower than that found in a 2022 study of preterm infants in Italy, where 68.1% had normal FM10; in a 2023 study of preterm infants in India with 32 weeks or less of gestational age, where 54.9% and 94.4% had normal general movements and FM, respectively43; and in a 2023 study of very preterm infants in Germany, where 93.9% had normal FM44.

A higher frequency of global developmental delay was found in infants with FSD during hospitalization. In preterm infants, having FSD at 40 weeks of CGA may be a clinically useful and simple marker of developmental delay risk45. Extreme preterm infants with FSD should be identified as high risk for motor delay at 4-5 years, compared to those without FSD46. Preterm infants with FSD are more likely to present language delays at 18 months of CGA47.

A lower frequency of global developmental delay was found in infants with neonatal jaundice. A systematic review from 2023 concluded that neonatal jaundice has not been demonstrated to be a unique risk factor for developmental alterations in preterm infants, unlike in term newborns, where it is associated with hearing, neurological, and motor developmental alterations, particularly during the 1st year of life30. Therefore, more studies are needed in preterm infants with neonatal jaundice to determine its impact on child development30.

Limitations and strengths

This study has limitations that should be considered to properly interpret its results: (1) as a retrospective study based on the review of electronic medical records, it is possible that the physiatrists in charge of the outpatient consultations at the SRP-HNERM incorrectly recorded some data. (2) Other relevant variables could not be collected as they were not systematically recorded in the medical records (such as the degree of neonatal jaundice or the receipt of phototherapy during hospitalization). (3) The study was conducted in a referral hospital in Lima, Peru, so the results may not be representative of other facilities. (4) Preterm infants not seen at the SRP-HNERM due to transportation, geographical, or other barriers were not included. (5) In addition, there may be a survival bias since preterm infants who died early were not included in the study.

However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to thoroughly evaluate the characteristics of preterm infants in a PM&R setting in Peru. It provides relevant information to understand the needs of this population and formulate improvement proposals.

Conclusions and recommendations

Slightly more than half of the preterm infants at the SRP-HNERM were evaluated by the physiatrist and had FSD during hospitalization. Slightly less than half received PT during hospitalization. Slightly more than half of infants with 48 weeks or more of CGA had an optimal HINE score. Slightly more than half of those with 5 months or less of CGA had normal GMA. A higher frequency of global developmental delay was found in infants who had FSD during hospitalization and a lower frequency in those who had neonatal jaundice.

These findings highlight the importance of adopting strategies to increase the number of preterm infants evaluated by the physiatrist and those who receive PT and SLT during hospitalization. After hospital discharge, it is necessary to strengthen outpatient care in PM&R for preterm infants, as a significant number showed poor outcomes in the predictive tests used in outpatient medical consultations. Finally, it is essential to recognize and address FSD early, both during hospitalization and on an outpatient basis, due to its association with global developmental delay.

References

1. Mitrogiannis I, Evangelou E, Efthymiou A, Kanavos T, Birbas E, Makrydimas G, et al. Risk factors for preterm birth:an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies. BMC Med. 2023;21:494. [ Links ]

2. Pravia CI, Benny M. Long-term consequences of prematurity. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020;87:759-67. [ Links ]

3. Khandre V, Potdar J, Keerti A. Preterm birth:an overview. Cureus. 2022;14:e33006. [ Links ]

4. Guevara-Rios E. La prematuridad:un problema de salud pública. Rev Peru Invest Matern Perinat. 2023;12:7-8. [ Links ]

5. Bourke J, Wong K, Srinivasjois R, Pereira G, Shepherd CC, White SW, et al. Predicting long-term survival without major disability for infants born preterm. J Pediatr. 2019;215:90-7. [ Links ]

6. Bolbocean C, Van Der Pal S, Van Buuren S, Anderson PJ, Bartmann P, Baumann N, et al. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes of very preterm or very low birth weight adults:evidence from an individual participant data meta-analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023;41:93-105. [ Links ]

7. Pettinger KJ, Copper C, Boyle E, Blower S, Hewitt C, Fraser L. Risk of developmental disorders in children born at 32 to 38 weeks gestation:a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2023;152:e2023061878. [ Links ]

8. McBryde M, Fitzallen GC, Liley HG, Taylor HG, Bora S. Academic outcomes of school-aged children born preterm:a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e202027. [ Links ]

9. Eves R, Mendonça M, Baumann N, Ni Y, Darlow BA, Horwood J, et al. Association of very preterm birth or very low birth weight with intelligence in adulthood:an individual participant data meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175:e211058. [ Links ]

10. Dicanio D, Spoto G, Alibrandi A, Minutoli R, Nicotera AG, Di Rosa G. Long-term predictivity of early neurological assessment and developmental trajectories in low-risk preterm infants. Front Neurol. 2022;13:958682. [ Links ]

11. Caesar R, Colditz PB, Cioni G, Boyd RN. Clinical tools used in young infants born very preterm to predict motor and cognitive delay (not cerebral palsy):a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021;63:387-95. [ Links ]

12. Wong HS, Santhakumaran S, Cowan FM, Modi N, Medicines for Neonates Investigator Group. Developmental assessments in preterm children:a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20160251. [ Links ]

13. De la Cerna-Luna R, Casas-Flores N, Igei-Chiney A, Taype-Rondan A. REBA-PED:propuesta de una herramienta para evaluar el desarrollo infantil en el contexto peruano. Rev Cuerpo Med HNAAA. 2023;16(2). [ Links ]

14. Palisano RJ, Orlin MN, Schreiber J. Campbell's Physical Therapy for Children. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO:Elsevier;2023. [ Links ]

15. Taczała J, Latalski M, Dmoszyńska-Graniczka M, Aftyka A, Majcher P. Neurodevelopmental outcome and early rehabilitation of premature babies - is it needed in the first 2 years of life?Ann Agric Environ Med. 2021;28:172-8. [ Links ]

16. Parau D, Todoran AB, Balasa R. Physiotherapy intervention on premature infants-a pilot study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60:138. [ Links ]

17. Torró-Ferrero G, Fernández-Rego FJ, Gómez-Conesa A. Physical therapy to prevent osteopenia in preterm infants:a systematic review. Children (Basel). 2021;8:664. [ Links ]

18. Chen D, Yang Z, Chen C, Wang P. Effect of oral motor intervention on oral feeding in preterm infants:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021;30:2318-28. [ Links ]

19. Weeks CL, Marino LV, Johnson MJ. A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:5576-86. [ Links ]

20. De la Cerna-Luna R, Fernandez-Guzman D, Alvarado-Gamarra G, Taype-Rondan A. Developmental delay assessment in children <5 years of age attended in the pediatric rehabilitation service of a reference hospital in Peru. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2023;80:189-201. [ Links ]

21. De la Cerna-Luna R, Aleman-Del Castillo A, Rado-Triveno J. Pediatric rehabilitation evaluation protocol. PM R. 2024;16:521-3. [ Links ]

22. Muñoz-Zambrano I, Cárdenas-Camayo Y, Cháves-Peñaranda MC. Evaluación del inicio de la alimentación oral en prematuros con “POFRAS”en instituciones hospitalarias:fiabilidad interobservador. Popayán Colombia. Acta Pediátr Méx. 2022;43:270-9. [ Links ]

23. Romeo DM, Apicella M, Velli C, Brogna C, Ricci D, Pede E, et al. Hammersmith infant neurological examination in low-risk infants born very preterm:a longitudinal prospective study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64:863-70. [ Links ]

24. Einspieler C, Bos AF, Libertus ME, Marschik PB. The general movement assessment helps us to identify preterm infants at risk for cognitive dysfunction. Front Psychol. 2016;7:406. [ Links ]

25. Abbasi H, Mollet SR, Williams SA, Lim L, Battin MR, Besier TF, et al. Deep-learning markerless tracking of infant general movements using standard video recordings. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023;2023:1-4. [ Links ]

26. Rendon-Macias ME, Villasis-Keever MA, Martinez-Garcia MC. Validación de una escala clínica de la succión nutricia. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2016;54:318-26. [ Links ]

27. Peelen MJ, Kazemier BM, Ravelli AC, De Groot CJ, Van Der Post JA, Mol BW, et al. Impact of fetal gender on the risk of preterm birth, a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1034-41. [ Links ]

28. Teoh PJ, Ridout A, Seed P, Tribe RM, Shennan AH. Gender and preterm birth:is male fetal gender a clinically important risk factor for preterm birth in high-risk women?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;225:155-9. [ Links ]

29. Christians JK, Ahmadzadeh-Seddeighi S, Bilal A, Bogdanovic A, Ho R, Leung EV, et al. Sex differences in the effects of prematurity and/or low birthweight on neurodevelopmental outcomes:systematic review and meta-analyses. Biol Sex Differ. 2023;14:47. [ Links ]

30. Solis-Garcia G, Raghuram K, Augustine S, Ricci MF, St-Hilaire M, Louis D, et al. Hyperbilirubinemia among infants born preterm:peak levels and association with neurodevelopmental outcomes. J Pediatr. 2023;259:113458. [ Links ]

31. Derridj N, Calderon J, Bonnet D, Khoshnood B, Monier I, Guedj R. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm and growth-restricted neonate with congenital heart defect:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2024;183:1967-87. [ Links ]

32. Diggikar S, Gurumoorthy P, Trif P, Mudura D, Nagesh NK, Galis R, et al. Retinopathy of prematurity and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1055813. [ Links ]

33. Ferrara PE, Gatto DM, Codazza S, Zordan P, Stefinlongo G, DI Polito A, et al. PEP mask therapy for the rehabilitation of a pre-term infant with respiratory distress syndrome:a case report. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;59:436-9. [ Links ]

34. Costa LP, Costa GA, Valete CO, Machado JK, Silva MH. In-hospital outcomes in preterm and small-for-gestational-age newborns:a cohort study. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2022;20:eAO6781. [ Links ]

35. Yun WZ, Kassab YW, Yao LM, Khairuddin N, Ming LC, Hadi MA. Effectiveness and safety of early versus late caffeine therapy in managing apnoea of prematurity among preterm infants:a retrospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2022;44:1140-8. [ Links ]

36. Maier RF, Blondel B, Piedvache A, Misselwitz B, Petrou S, Van Reempts P, et al. Duration and time trends in hospital stay for very preterm infants differ across European regions. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19:1153-61. [ Links ]

37. Soleimani F, Azari N, Ghiasvand H, Shahrokhi A, Rahmani N, Fatollahierad S. Do NICU developmental care improve cognitive and motor outcomes for preterm infants?A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:67. [ Links ]

38. Chitale R, Ferguson K, Talej M, Yang WC, He S, Edmond KM, et al. Early enteral feeding for preterm or low birth weight infants:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2022;150:e2022057092E. [ Links ]

39. Hyun SE, Kwon JY, Hong BY, Yoon JA, Choi JY, Hong J, et al. Early neurodevelopmental assessments of neonates discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit:a physiatrist's perspective. Ann Rehabil Med. 2023;47:147-61. [ Links ]

40. Allotey J, Zamora J, Cheong-See F, Kalidindi M, Arroyo-Manzano D, Asztalos E, et al. Cognitive, motor, behavioural and academic performances of children born preterm:a meta-analysis and systematic review involving 64 061 children. BJOG. 2018;125:16-25. [ Links ]

41. Paulsen H, Ljungblad UW, Riiser K, Evensen KA. Early neurological and motor function in infants born moderate to late preterm or small for gestational age at term:a prospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2023;23:390. [ Links ]

42. Chatziioannidis I, Kyriakidou M, Exadaktylou S, Antoniou E, Zafeiriou D, Nikolaidis N. Neurological outcome at 6 and 12 months corrected age in hospitalised late preterm infants -a prospective study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018;22:602-9. [ Links ]

43. Kadam AS, Nayyar SA, Kadam SS, Patni BC, Khole MC, Pandit AN, et al. General movement assessment in babies born preterm:motor optimality score-revised (MOS-R), trajectory, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 1 Year. J Pediatr X. 2022;8:100084. [ Links ]

44. Teschler U, Dathe AK, Heuser-Spura KM, Bialas J, Cordier LJ, Albayrak B, et al. General movements trajectories and outcome at 12 months in very preterm infants:an analysis of tendencies and pathological persistence. Sci Rep. 2023;13:21825. [ Links ]

45. Lainwala S, Kosyakova N, Power K, Hussain N, Moore JE, Hagadorn JI, et al. Delayed achievement of oral feedings is associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 26 months follow-up in preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37:483-90. [ Links ]

46. Rinat S, Mackay M, Synnes A, Holsti L, Zwicker JG. Early feeding behaviours of extremely preterm infants predict neurodevelopmental outcomes. Early Hum Dev. 2022;173:105647. [ Links ]

47. Adams-Chapman I, Bann CM, Vaucher YE, Stoll BJ, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Association between feeding difficulties and language delay in preterm infants using bayley scales of infant development-third edition. J Pediatr. 2013;163:680-5.e1-3. [ Links ]

FundingThe authors declare that they have not received funding.

Ethical considerations

Protection of humans and animals. The authors declare that no experiments involving humans or animals were conducted for this research.

Confidentiality, informed consent, and ethical approval. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee for Research of HNERM (Ethical Qualification Certificate AUT No. 082-CE-GHNERM-GRPRESSALUD-2024). All collected information remained strictly confidential and was used exclusively for the study.

Declaration on the use of artificial intelligence. The authors declare that no generative artificial intelligence was used in the writing of this manuscript.

Received: September 04, 2024; Accepted: November 25, 2024

* Correspondence: Roger De la Cerna-Luna E-mail: rdelacerna89@gmail.com

Conflicts of interest

Roger De la Cerna-Luna and Ana Igei-Chiney work at Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. The other authors do not report any potential conflicts of interest related to this study.

Creative Commons License Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Published by Permanyer. This is an open ccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license