September
29, 2025
December
, 2024
Coastal marine and fluvial deposits, exposed at Cerro El Divisadero near Rancho La Palma, Baja California Sur, Mexico, contain a fossil record of cetaceans (baleen whales). U Pb zircon dating of a tuff horizon collected near the base of Cerro El Divisadero yields a 206Pb/238U age of 27.95 ± 0.16 Ma. This suggests that the marine and fluvial beds at the Rancho La Palma locality are late Rupelian in age and not lower Miocene as previously reported. Therefore, the marine deposits from the Cerro El Divisadero section can be correlated with the Oligocene El Cien Formation at San Juan de La Costa and are contemporaneous with the middle part of its San Juan Member, representing a marginal facies of this unit. Our results constrain the age of the baleen whales found at the Cerro El Divisadero section, providing clues for Oligocene cetacean evolution in the North Pacific.
Keywords::
marine-fluvial stratigraphy, U-Pb geochronology, zircon dating
Marine sedimentary deposits in the southern Baja California Peninsula show an extensive record of extinct marine vertebrates, including cetacean fossils (Hernández-Cisneros and Nava-Sánchez, 2022; Viglino et al., 2023). A new study at the Rancho La Palma locality, Baja California Sur, Mexico, reports the presence of a new species of a cetacean fossil (Echericetus novellus; Hernández-Cisneros et al., 2023) belonging to the Eomysticetidae family, an extinct lineage of baleen whales that lived during the Oligocene.
The Oligocene (33.9-23.0 Ma) is marked by high adaptive radiation in cetacean evolutionary history (e.g., Fordyce, 2017), hence the importance of precise ages to improve our knowledge of timing, duration and processes that drove cetacean evolution.
The discovery of baleen whale fossils at the Rancho La Palma locality attracts interest in understanding the geological context of the marine and fluvial deposits from the Cerro El Divisadero section. The cetacean fossil record within the continuous and well-exposed sedimentary succession from the Cerro El Divisadero makes this a unique locality that brings valuable information for studies of diversification of baleen whales.
However, the lack of absolute ages in many fossiliferous localities makes it challenging to unravel and accurately explain ecological succession events and evolutive changes regarding marine fossil assemblages at southern Baja California peninsula. The beds from Cerro El Divisadero have been informally dated as lower Miocene based on correlation of near volcanic and sedimentary deposits (Schwennicke et al., 1996).
Here we report U-Pb zircon dating of a tuff horizon using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS). This is the first date to be measured from Cerro El Divisadero section at the Rancho La Palma locality, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico (Figure 1).
The tuff sample used here for U-Pb dating belongs to a lenticular reworked tuff up to 15 cm thick located above the basal marine deposits (bed 1, 2) of the Cerro El Divisadero stratigraphic section (Figure 1). Schwennicke et al. (1996) divided the stratigraphic section at the Cerro El Divisadero into three parts. The basal part represents the marine beds, mudstone and phosphatic sandstone that contains cetacean fossils, the lower part is composed of light-coloured tuffaceous sandstone with conglomeratic lenses, and the upper part consists of grey-brown conglomeratic tuffaceous sandstones. The marine deposits at the Cerro El Divisadero overlie eolian sandstones of the Salto Formation (Schwennicke et al., 1996; Figure 1).
Following Schwennicke et al. (1996) and our new observations, the bottom layer (bed 1) is a sandy conglomerate which grades laterally into conglomeratic sandstone representing a gravelly beach deposit and marking the beginning of a marine transgression. This basal conglomeratic bed contains phosphatic grains and grades upwards into sandstone, mudstone, and greenish tuffaceous mudstone with sandstone lenses (bed 2), exhibiting parallel lamination, some lenticular and flaser bedding, and poor bioturbation.
Bed 2 reflects a lagoonal depositional environment influenced by volcanic activity, changing texturally upwards into the grey, slightly tuffaceous volcaniclastic sandstone of bed 3, which is 30 m thick (Schwennicke et al., 1996). Bed 3 reflects a distal fluvial depositional setting. It comprises regularly sorted, silty fine-grained sandstone to poorly sorted, fine to coarse-grained sandstone.
The silty sandstone is predominantly found in the lowermost portion of bed 3 (see Schwennicke et al., 1996). Scattered volcanic granules and pebbles occur in the rock or from thin conglomeratic lenses. The lowermost 2 m of bed 3 typically are finely laminated, and the cross-bedding and cross-lamination are present in the middle and upper parts. Bed 3 grades upwards into coarser muddy, and pebbly sandstone, all of volcaniclastic composition (Figure 1). The fluvial deposits of bed 3 are interpreted herein as basal strata of the volcaniclastic arc-derived Comondú Group, originally defined and described as a formation by Heim (1922) and Hausback (1984).
Zircon grains were separated using standard gravimetric and magnetic separation techniques at the Jack Satterly Laboratory, University of Toronto. Zircon grains and standards were mounted in an epoxy stub and polished to expose the grains. Cathodoluminescence images were used to identify growth zones and inclusions as well as targeting the spot locations (Figure 2).
U-Pb isotopic analyses were conducted using an Agilent 7900 ICPMS and an NWR193 excimer laser system. U-Pb data were collected on 88Sr (10 ms), 206Pb (30 ms), 207Pb (80 ms), 208Pb (10 ms) and 235U (20 ms) using spot analyses and were conducted with laser wavelength of 193 nm. 235U was monitored instead of 238U in order to remain below the digital to analog detector threshold.
To remove surface contamination, each spot was pre-ablated with ten laser shots using a larger beam size. Laser beam diameter was 50 μm, with a fluence of about 4 J/cm2 and frequency of 10 Hz. Single spot analysis contained 15 sec background acquisition followed by 25 sec data acquisition and 20 sec washout. Zircon 91500 (Wiedenbeck et al., 1995) standard was used between analyses to correct for plasma mass and oxide elemental fractionation biases.
Temora zircon (Black et al., 2004) was used as a secondary standard with a measured age of 416.6 ± 3.4 Ma (2σ, MSWD = 0.91; Figure S1 in Supplementary Data). Raw data reduction was carried out using custom VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) software written by D.W. Davis. Averaging and regression were carried out using Isoplot (Ludwig, 2012). U decay constants are from Jaffey et al. (1971).
The tuffaceous sample yielded fresh-looking zircon grains of euhedral long-prismatic morphology (Figures 2 and 3). Cathodoluminescence images (CLI) show oscillatory zonation, which is typical of felsic igneous rocks (Corfu et al., 2003). Results of 27 analyses on 22 crystals are presented in Supplementary Data (Table S1). A Wetherill concordia plot of U-Pb data is shown in Figure 3. Omitting the oldest analysis, it gives a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 27.95 ± 0.16 Ma (2σ, MSWD = 1.7). Including the oldest does not change the age significantly (27.99 ± 0.17 Ma) but it raises the MSWD to 2.1, therefore we have omitted this analysis. The zircon grains show uniform color and morphology (Figure 3). Commonly, detrital zircon grains show variation in color, morphology and size as well as evidence of rounding by transport. Therefore, the uniform age of 27.95 ± 0.16 Ma obtained here from the zircon likely represents an age of volcanic deposition during sedimentation of the marine-fluvial deposits at Rancho La Palma locality (Figure 1).
The Oligocene age of 27.95 ± 0.16 Ma reported here for the Cerro El Divisadero section is significantly older than the inferred Lower Miocene age (younger than 23.0 Ma) suggested by Schwennicke et al. (1996). These authors correlated the volcano-clastic rocks from the upper part of the Cerro El Divisadero section with volcanoclastic deposits of the Comondú Formation (Hausback, 1984; Drake et al., 2017; Camarena-Vázquez, 2018) exposed at the Cerro Atravesado near the city of La Paz, about 28 km north of Rancho La Palma (Figure 1), which are overlain by a rhyodacite flow, Comondú Formation, dated with K-Ar at 19.1 ± 1.2 Ma (Hausback, 1984). However, at Cerro Atravesado there are no strata that could be correlated with the marine deposits from the Cerro El Divisadero section at Rancho La Palma locality.
The nearest Oligocene marine deposits to the Cerro El Divisadero section belong to the San Juan Member of El Cien Formation (Fischer et al., 1995) exposed in the area around San Juan de la Costa, ~40 km northwest of La Paz (Figure 1). The Cien Formation is composed of siliceous and silty mudrock, fine-to coarse-grained sandstone, tuff, coquina beds, conglomerate, and phosphatic sediment (Applegate, 1986; Schwennicke, 1992; Fischer et al., 1995) and is Oligocene in age (Drake et al., 2017; Schöllhorn et al., 2020). Zircon age dating from tuff horizons from the San Juan Member (El Cien Formation) at San Juan de la Costa yield 206Pb/238U ages between 28.6 ± 0.5 Ma and 26.9 ± 0.5 Ma (Schöllhorn et al., 2020). These Oligocene ages overlap with our results indicating that the marine-fluvial deposits from Cerro El Divisadero section are contemporaneous in age with the San Juan Member at San Juan de La Costa, suggesting that deposition of both sedimentary successions was influenced by the same volcanic activity of the Comondú arc, but deposited under different depositional conditions.
The basal part of the Cerro El Divisadero section shows some palaeontologic and lithologic similarities to the marine beds from El Cien Formation. Marine deposits from the El Cien Formation, the latter includes phosphatic sandstone and phosphorite horizons (e.g., Fischer et al., 1995; Plata-Hernández, 2002; Schöllhorn et al., 2020) as well as abundant vertebrate fossils such as cetaceans (e.g., Hernández-Cisneros et al., 2017). However, despite the cetacean fossil content and the phosphatic material present in the marine beds of the Cerro El Divisadero section, there is no lithological correlation with the marine deposits from the El Cien Formation (San Juan Member). The occurrence of phosphorite horizons (e.g.,Fischer et al., 1995; Schöllhorn et al., 2020), diatoms (Kim and Barron, 1986) as well as abundant marine vertebrate fossils, including desmostylians and cetaceans (Grimm, 1992; Hernández-Cisneros et al., 2017), suggest that the marine succession from the middle San Juan Member reflects open shelf-near coast and upwelling area deposits. Conversely, the marine-fluvial beds exposed at Cerro El Divisadero correspond to lagoonal - distal alluvial fan deposits (Schwennicke et al., 1996).
Therefore, the marine deposits at La Palma locality might represent lagoonal and beach settings controlled by a short-lived marine transgression followed by regression due to volcaniclastic influx. These lagoonal-beach facies at La Palma locality are coeval with the middle San Juan Member but are not exposed in the San Juan de La Costa area.
The late Rupelian age of 27.95 ± 0.16 Ma reported here constrains the age of the marine and fluvial deposits from the Cerro El Divisadero as well as the paleontological record of baleen whales. This provides more clues to understand the regional marine palaeoenvironment and facilitates accurate paleontological correlations with other Oligocene localities around the world that contain marine fossil assemblages (e.g., cetacean faunas).
The Oligocene marine deposits in southern Baja California are unique due to their marine mammal fossil content, making them crucial for the studying the North Pacific biota evolutionary history.
A U-Pb age of 27.95 ± 0.16 Ma is reported and interpreted here to constrain the time of marine and fluvial deposition from Cerro El Divisadero section at Rancho La Palma locality, Baja California Sur, Mexico. This Oligocene age is in good agreement with U-Pb ages reported from similar tuff horizons in the middle San Juan Member at San Juan de la Costa locality suggesting that the marine deposits from the Cerro El Divisadero section belong to the El Cien Formation.
We conclude that the marine beds in the study area are contemporaneous to the middle part of the San Juan Member and may represent a marginal facies of this unit. The fluvial deposits above are therefore interpreted as basal strata of the volcaniclastic arc-derived Comondú Group. In addition, the age of 27.95 ± 0.16 Ma constrains the paleontological record of cetacean fossils found at the Cerro El Divisadero, helping to understand the evolution of baleen whales in the North Pacific.
Contributions of authors
(1) Fieldwork: TS; (2) Analysis and data acquisition: HRB, DWD; (3) Methodologic/technical development: HRB, DWD; (4) Writing of the original manuscript and interpretation: HRB, DWD, AEHC, TS.
Conflicts of interest
We declare that there is no conflict of interest that could influence the work reported in this paper.
Handling editor
Francisco J. Vega.
This study was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Discovery Grant RGPIN-2016-05575 to D.W. Davis. We are grateful for constructive comments by Luigi Solari and an anonymous reviewer, which greatly improved the manuscript.
| Standardized Concordia: | Ages Ma | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis | 207Pb/235U | SigM | 206Pb/238U | SigM | RhoXY | U ppm | 206Pbppm | Th/U | 207Pb/206Pb | SigM | 207Pb/235U | SigM | 206Pb/238U | SigM | %Disc |
| Spot 1 | 0.02832138 | 0.0006 | 0.0043 | 0.00005 | 0.554 | 386 | 1.65 | 0.5 | 98.44 | 40.66 | 28.36 | 0.58 | 27.54 | 0.32 | 72 |
| Spot 2 | 0.02859344 | 0.0006 | 0.0043 | 0.00005 | 0.510 | 337 | 1.45 | 0.45 | 108.76 | 43.87 | 28.63 | 0.62 | 27.68 | 0.31 | 75 |
| Spot 3 | 0.02857366 | 0.0006 | 0.0043 | 0.00005 | 0.527 | 486 | 2.1 | 0.62 | 98.89 | 39.42 | 28.61 | 0.56 | 27.78 | 0.29 | 72 |
| Spot 4 | 0.0316597 | 0.0009 | 0.0044 | 0.00005 | 0.442 | 173 | 0.76 | 0.8 | 298.95 | 56.5 | 31.65 | 0.87 | 28.24 | 0.35 | 91 |
| Spot 5 | 0.03265113 | 0.0006 | 0.0043 | 0.00005 | 0.562 | 415 | 1.8 | 0.51 | 399.26 | 35.66 | 32.62 | 0.62 | 27.86 | 0.3 | 93 |
| Spot 6 | 0.02934651 | 0.0007 | 0.0042 | 0.00005 | 0.499 | 247 | 1.05 | 0.29 | 212.03 | 50 | 29.37 | 0.73 | 27.18 | 0.34 | 87 |
| Spot 7 | 0.02848765 | 0.0004 | 0.0043 | 0.00004 | 0.661 | 868 | 3.75 | 0.38 | 92.32 | 27.64 | 28.52 | 0.44 | 27.77 | 0.29 | 70 |
| Spot 8 | 0.02871494 | 0.0005 | 0.0043 | 0.00004 | 0.631 | 580 | 2.5 | 0.34 | 113.37 | 29.38 | 28.75 | 0.46 | 27.74 | 0.28 | 76 |
| Spot 9 | 0.02927348 | 0.0008 | 0.0044 | 0.00006 | 0.495 | 236 | 1.04 | 0.38 | 118.59 | 52.59 | 29.30 | 0.75 | 28.22 | 0.36 | 76 |
| Spot 10 | 0.02968228 | 0.0005 | 0.0044 | 0.00005 | 0.636 | 721 | 3.15 | 0.43 | 157.92 | 30.06 | 29.70 | 0.49 | 28.14 | 0.3 | 82 |
| Spot 11 | 0.02878451 | 0.0005 | 0.0044 | 0.00004 | 0.557 | 468 | 2.04 | 0.37 | 95.08 | 34.99 | 28.81 | 0.51 | 28.03 | 0.28 | 71 |
| Spot 12 | 0.02846352 | 0.0007 | 0.0044 | 0.00005 | 0.445 | 323 | 1.42 | 0.46 | 50.33 | 51.87 | 28.50 | 0.69 | 28.24 | 0.31 | 44 |
| Spot 13 | 0.03650096 | 0.0008 | 0.0044 | 0.00004 | 0.482 | 597 | 2.63 | 0.63 | 604.9 | 38.85 | 36.40 | 0.74 | 28.36 | 0.28 | 96 |
| Spot 14 | 0.03213087 | 0.0008 | 0.0044 | 0.00005 | 0.503 | 369 | 1.64 | 0.64 | 302.61 | 46.06 | 32.11 | 0.75 | 28.61 | 0.34 | 91 |
| Spot 15 | 0.02758434 | 0.0005 | 0.0044 | 0.00004 | 0.570 | 688 | 3.01 | 0.9 | 6.482 | 18.35 | 27.63 | 0.49 | 28.12 | 0.29 | 100 |
| Spot 16 | 0.02861796 | 0.0004 | 0.0045 | 0.00005 | 0.683 | 894 | 3.99 | 0.53 | 27.37 | 26.72 | 28.65 | 0.43 | 28.67 | 0.3 | -5 |
| Spot 17 | 0.03003579 | 0.0005 | 0.0044 | 0.00004 | 0.647 | 826 | 3.63 | 0.47 | 172.48 | 27.05 | 30.05 | 0.45 | 28.3 | 0.28 | 84 |
| Spot 18 | 0.0309769 | 0.0008 | 0.0045 | 0.00005 | 0.481 | 261 | 1.19 | 0.71 | 168.65 | 50.38 | 30.98 | 0.76 | 29.23 | 0.35 | 83 |
| Spot 19 | 0.02873362 | 0.0005 | 0.0043 | 0.00004 | 0.638 | 740 | 3.22 | 0.56 | 97.54 | 28.38 | 28.76 | 0.45 | 27.95 | 0.28 | 72 |
| Spot 20 | 0.02925503 | 0.0005 | 0.0044 | 0.00005 | 0.660 | 740 | 3.28 | 0.44 | 94.5 | 28.83 | 29.28 | 0.47 | 28.49 | 0.31 | 70 |
| Spot 21 | 0.02951744 | 0.0006 | 0.0044 | 0.00005 | 0.639 | 646 | 2.85 | 0.48 | 123.35 | 33.58 | 29.54 | 0.54 | 28.4 | 0.34 | 77 |
| Spot 22 | 0.02946952 | 0.0006 | 0.0044 | 0.00006 | 0.647 | 483 | 2.11 | 0.62 | 143.78 | 36.44 | 29.49 | 0.6 | 28.11 | 0.37 | 81 |
| Spot 23 | 0.02943381 | 0.0008 | 0.0043 | 0.00005 | 0.471 | 226 | 0.97 | 0.43 | 197.38 | 54.63 | 29.46 | 0.79 | 27.44 | 0.35 | 86 |
| Spot 24 | 0.02838264 | 0.0004 | 0.0043 | 0.00004 | 0.712 | 1066 | 4.6 | 0.76 | 86.49 | 21.26 | 28.42 | 0.36 | 27.74 | 0.25 | 68 |
| Spot 25 | 0.0276123 | 0.0004 | 0.0042 | 0.00004 | 0.636 | 687 | 2.92 | 0.48 | 56.77 | 29.24 | 27.66 | 0.44 | 27.32 | 0.28 | 52 |
| Spot 26 | 0.02869834 | 0.0005 | 0.0043 | 0.00005 | 0.585 | 643 | 2.75 | 0.55 | 132.27 | 34.9 | 28.73 | 0.52 | 27.51 | 0.3 | 79 |
| Spot 27 | 0.02887489 | 0.0005 | 0.0043 | 0.00005 | 0.559 | 481 | 2.06 | 0.5 | 141.62 | 36.56 | 28.90 | 0.54 | 27.57 | 0.29 | 81 |
| Temora zircon | Temora zircon | ||||||||||||||
| Temora-1 | 0.50507468 | 0.0076 | 0.0663 | 0.00086 | 0.857 | 243 | 16.13 | 0.64 | 421.97 | 17.35 | 415.13 | 5.15 | 413.9 | 5.2 | 2 |
| Temora-2 | 0.50923848 | 0.0072 | 0.0665 | 0.00078 | 0.831 | 208 | 13.85 | 0.65 | 434.59 | 17.4 | 417.94 | 4.82 | 414.9 | 4.7 | 5 |
| Temora-3 | 0.51286227 | 0.0061 | 0.0678 | 0.00069 | 0.857 | 440 | 29.83 | 0.78 | 407.64 | 13.71 | 420.37 | 4.1 | 422.7 | 4.2 | -4 |
| Temora-4 | 0.51178449 | 0.0061 | 0.0667 | 0.00065 | 0.815 | 459 | 30.58 | 0.8 | 439.52 | 15.47 | 419.65 | 4.13 | 416.0 | 3.9 | 6 |
| Temora-5 | 0.51084369 | 0.0066 | 0.0672 | 0.00069 | 0.798 | 331 | 22.26 | 0.66 | 416.08 | 17.24 | 419.02 | 4.41 | 419.6 | 4.2 | -1 |
| Temora-6 | 0.49821103 | 0.0066 | 0.0654 | 0.00072 | 0.835 | 251 | 16.43 | 0.67 | 421.43 | 16.23 | 410.49 | 4.47 | 408.6 | 4.4 | 3 |