SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.74 número5Determinants of Clinical Behavior and Prognosis in Cushing's Disease: A Quest for Useful BiomarkersPredictors of poor outcomes in young non-comorbid patients with COVID-19 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de investigación clínica

versión On-line ISSN 2564-8896versión impresa ISSN 0034-8376

Rev. invest. clín. vol.74 no.5 Ciudad de México sep./oct. 2022  Epub 18-Nov-2022

https://doi.org/10.24875/ric.22000167 

Original articles

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index as a Predictor of Asymptomatic Organ Damage in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Treatment-Naive Hypertension

Ibrahim H. Inanc1  * 

Cengiz Sabanoglu1 

1Department of Cardiology, Kirikkale Yüksek İhtisas Hospital, Kirikkale, Turkey


ABSTRACT

Background:

Low-grade inflammation is known to facilitate the development of hypertensive organ damage. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a new inflammatory index based on circulating immune-inflammatory cells.

Objectives:

The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationship between the SII and asymptomatic organ damage (AOD) in patients with newly diagnosed treatment-naive hypertension (HTN).

Methods:

A total of 500 participants (≥ 18 years) were enrolled in the study, including 250 patients and 250 healthy volunteers. Microalbuminuria of > 30 mg/day or proteinuria of > 150 mg/day, left ventricular mass index of > 95 g/m2 in women and > 115 g/m2 in men, and carotid intima-media thickness of > 0.9 mm or the presence of plaque in the carotid were evaluated as AOD indicators. AOD grade was classified as follows: Grade I - One organ involved, Grade II - Two organs involved, Grade III - Three organs involved, and Grade IV - Four organs involved.

Results:

SII values were higher among patients with HTN than in the control group. Positive correlations were found between the SII and AOD indicators and C-reactive protein levels. Increasing SII values were a common independent predictor of the presence and severity of AOD. The gradually increasing threshold values of the SII from no AOD to Grade III-IV exhibited high diagnostic performance.

Conclusions:

High SII values were independent predictors of the presence and severity of AOD in patients with newly diagnosed treatment-naive HTN. Considering the role of inflammation in HTN, the SII, which can be easily evaluated using blood parameters, can be an effective prognostic screening tool.

Keywords Hypertension; End-organ damage; Systemic immune-inflammation index

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension (HTN), which is increasing in prevalence globally and is an important risk factor for mortality, may be diagnosed late due to its symptomless nature1. Therefore, most patients with HTN may have asymptomatic organ damage (AOD) at their first hospital admission. Atherosclerosis due to cardiac and vascular tissue damage induced by high blood pressure (BP) causes AOD2. AOD reaching critical levels result in irreversible organ dysfunction3. Thus, the detection of AOD and the determination of a treatment strategy at the first hospital admission of hypertensive patients are of prognostic importance.

Damage to endothelial tissue due to high BP is associated with the inflammatory response and contributes significantly to hypertensive organ damage4,5. High levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been detected in the dendritic cells of patients with HTN and animal models of HTN6. Increased ROS levels cause activation of innate and acquired immune cells. T-cells have been shown to migrate to the kidneys and vascular tree in animal models of hypertension. This is hypothesized to contribute to endothelial cell dysfunction and kidney damage7-9. In AOD, it plays a role in the innate and adaptive immune systems as well as HTN-related hemodynamic disorders10. In atherosclerosis, which plays a role in the pathogenesis of HTN, platelet and leukocyte infiltration are the driving force of the atherosclerotic lesions, dependent on inflammation, while neutrophils are the first line of defense11,12. In contrast, platelets play a role in regulating the effector functions of neutrophils and macrophages13. These mechanisms have an important role in the inflammatory response mediated by the innate or adaptive immune system in hypertensive organ damage.

Low-grade inflammation is known to facilitate the development of hypertensive organ damage14. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a new inflammatory index based on circulating immune-inflammatory cells15. Therefore, we hypothesized that the SII could be a simple, economic, and feasible screening tool to predict the presence and severity of AOD. In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between the SII and AOD in patients with newly diagnosed treatment-naive HTN.

METHODS

This study had a retrospective design and was performed at the Kirikkale High Specialization Hospital's Cardiology Clinic from January 2021 to December 2021. The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (Decision No. 2022.03.15), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Study population

A total of 500 participants (≥ 18 years) were enrolled in the study, including 250 patients who were newly diagnosed with treatment-naive HTN and 250 healthy volunteers in the Cardiology Clinic of Kirikkale Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital. Patients who presented for check-ups and did not have any chronic diseases or drug use were selected as the control group.

Previously known or documented diagnosis of primary or secondary HTN, smoking and alcohol use, obesity, any additional diseases (diabetes mellitus, rheumatic diseases, documented coronary artery disease, malignancy, active or chronic infection, acute or chronic kidney disease, peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and liver diseases), nephrotic-level proteinuria, and the use of antioxidant substances or lipid drugs were exclusion criteria.

Study protocol

HTN was defined as systolic BP (SBP) of ≥ 140 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) of ≥ 90 mmHg. Microalbuminuria of > 30 mg/day or proteinuria of > 150 mg/day left ventricular mass index (LVMI) of > 95 g/m2 in women and > 115 g/m2 in men, and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) of > 0.9 mm or the presence of plaque in the carotid were evaluated as AOD indicators16. Patients with any of these indicators were evaluated as AOD (+). In addition, AOD grade was classified as follows: Grade I - One organ involved, Grade II - Two organs involved, Grade III - Three organs involved, and Grade IV - Four organs involved17. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as follows: Body weight (kg)/height2 (m2). The SII was calculated with the following formula: Neutrophil count × Platelet count/Lymphocyte count.

Biochemical parameters

Fasting laboratory parameters were measured at the time of admission to the hospital. Lipid parameters (by enzymatic colorimetric methods), proteinuria, and microalbuminuria in 24 h (by turbidimetric methods) were evaluated with a Hitachi Modular P800 autoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostic Corp., Indianapolis, IN, USA). Erythrocytes and platelets were measured by impedance (resistance) method, leukocytes were measured by optical laser scattering (light scattering), and other complete blood count parameters were measured with a Sysmex XE 2100 hematology analyzer (Roche Diagnostic Corp., Indianapolis, IN, USA). Hemoglobin was measured photometrically.

BP measurement

Following 5 min of resting after hospital admission, all patients underwent three different BP measurements at 5-min intervals and their average was taken. BP measurements were made with an Omron M3 automatic sphygmomanometer (Omron Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). The diagnosis of hypertension was evaluated according to the 2018 ESC criteria18.

Echocardiographic examination

All echocardiographic examinations were performed by a cardiologist blinded to the study with an echocardiography device (2.5 MHz transducer, Vivid 7, GE-Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway). LVM was computed with the Devereux formula through 2D echocardiographic measurements. The Devereux formula of LVM = 1.04 × ([IVSTd + PWTd + LVIDd]3 – [LVIDd]3) – 13.6 was used and was indexed to body surface area (IVSTd: Interventricular septum thickness in diastole; PWT: Posterior wall thickness in diastole; and LVIDd: Left ventricular internal diameter in diastole)19. LVM index (LVMI) of > 95 g/m2 in women and > 115 g/m2 in men was considered an indicator of the left ventricular hypertrophy.

Carotid ultrasonography

CIMT was evaluated with the patient in a supine position with both hands under the head. CIMT values were measured with a high-resolution B-mode device (Logiq 7, GE Med Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) by a radiologist blinded to the clinical status of the patients. All measurements were made of the right and left main carotid arteries using a linear probe with an automatic system. Measurements were performed at three points: the right carotid artery branches from the brachiocephalic trunk, the left carotid arteries from the aorta at 2 cm away, and the bifurcation of the internal carotid arteries. Longitudinal measurements were performed from distances of media-adventitia echogenicity and vessel lumen echogenicity. CIMT was calculated by taking the average of three measurements made for each carotid artery.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The extent to which the data followed a normal distribution was evaluated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Numerical variables with and without normal distribution were plotted as mean ± standard deviation and median (25th and 75th interquartile range [IQR]), respectively. Categorical variables were indicated as numerical and percentile values. Correlations between numerical parameters were analyzed through Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis. Chi-square, Yates correction, and Fisher exact tests were used for the comparison of categorical data. Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test was used for the comparison of numerical variables between the two groups according to the distribution of normality. ANOVA (post hoc: Bonferroni test) or the Kruskal–Wallis H test (post hoc: Dunn test) was used for the comparison of numerical variables based on AOD grade according to the distribution of normality. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to predict AOD. Diagnostic performance assessment of the SII was performed by ROC curve analysis, and area under the curve (AUC), standard error (SE), and positive (+PV) and negative (−PV) predictive values are presented. The optimal threshold value of the SII in predicting AOD was determined by the Youden index method. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be significant in statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 250 patients with newly diagnosed HTN (mean age 50.8 ± 9.4, female ratio 64.8%) and 250 healthy controls (mean age 51.6 ± 11.4, female ratio 66.0%). The distributions of gender, age, and BMI were similar for the control and newly diagnosed HTN groups (p > 0.05). The median neutrophil and mean platelet levels in the newly diagnosed HTN group were higher compared with the control group, while mean lymphocyte levels were lower. The median SII was higher in the newly diagnosed HTN group than in the control group (508.1 vs. 320.2, p < 0.001). The levels of AOD indicators were higher in the newly diagnosed HTN.

In patients with newly diagnosed HTN, the SII levels positively correlated with proteinuria levels (r = 0.421; p < 0.001), the urinary albumin levels (r = 0.416; p < 0.001), the LVMI levels (r = 0.448; p < 0.001), and with the CIMT values (r = 0.534; p < 0.001) (Table 1). In addition, SII levels positively correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (r = 0.352; p < 0.001).

Table 1. Factors associated with asymptomatic organ damage in patients with newly diagnosed treatment-naive hypertension 

Variables CIMT LVMI Microalbuminuria Proteinuria
r p r p r p r p
Age 0.211 0.001* 0.241 0.026* 0.019 0.762 0.008 0.901
BMI 0.094 0.139 0.037 0.562 0.081 0.200 0.063 0.110
SBP 0.024 0.708 0.052 0.414 0.027 0.676 0.030 0.957
DBP 0.085 0.181 0.086 0.177 0.050 0.970 0.007 0.907
FBG 0.102 0.107 0.010 0.877 0.065 0.311 0.066 0.298
WBC 0.090 0.154 0.096 0.131 0.256 0.015* 0.030 0.642
Neutrophil 0.416 < 0.001* 0.420 < 0.001* 0.332 < 0.001* 0.326 < 0.001*
Platelet 0.309 0.001* 0.118 0.063 0.292 < 0.001* 0.270 < 0.001*
Lymphocyte 0.050 0.432 0.040 0.528 0.027 0.666 0.010 0.880
Hemoglobin −0.092 0.147 0.004 0.948 0.008 0.904 −0.047 0.463
Total cholesterol 0.085 0.186 −0.076 0.240 −0.009 0.884 0.008 0.906
LDL 0.078 0.225 −0.041 0.524 −0.008 0.903 0.005 0.940
HDL −0.051 0.432 0.020 0.752 −0.002 0.975 0.058 0.368
Triglyceride 0.245 0.022* −0.116 0.070 0.010 0.880 −0.007 0.918
Albumin −0.034 0.595 0.048 0.456 −0.002 0.979 0.054 0.394
CRP 0.298 0.023* 0.288 0.049* 0.292 0.012* 0.272 0.050*
SII 0.534 < 0.001* 0.448 < 0.001* 0.416 < 0.001* 0.421 < 0.001*
NLR 0.406 < 0.001* 0.355 < 0.001* 0.272 < 0.001* 0.311 < 0.001*
PLR 0.343 < 0.001* 0.302 < 0.001* 0.265 < 0.001* 0.268 < 0.001*

BMI: body mass index; CIMT: carotid intima media thickness; CRP: C-reactive protein; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; FBG: fasting blood glucose; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SII: systemic immune-inflammation index; WBC: white blood cell.

*p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

AOD was detected in 56% of patients with newly diagnosed treatment-naive HTN. The distribution of demographic and laboratory findings according to the presence of AOD is shown in Table 2. The mean age was higher in AOD (+) group compared to AOD (-) and control groups (control: 50.8 ± 9.4 vs. AOD (-): 49.7 ± 11.7 vs. AOD (+): 53.1 ± 10.9; p = 0.011), while other demographic findings did not differ between the groups. The median SII levels were highest in the AOD (+) group, followed by the AOD (-) and control groups, respectively (control: 320.2 vs. AOD (-): 462.3 vs. AOD (+): 600.7; p < 0.011). The median CRP levels were higher in the AOD (+) group than in other groups, while it was higher in the AOD (-) group than in control groups (Table 2).

Table 2. Demographic and laboratory findings associated with asymptomatic organ damage in newly diagnosed treatment-naive hypertension 

Variables Control (n = 250) Newly diagnosed hypertension p
AOD (-) (n = 110) AOD (+) (n = 140)
Age, years 50.8 ± 9.4 49.7 ± 11.7 53.1 ± 10.9 0.011*
Female gender, n (%) 162 (64.8) 66 (60.0) 99 (70.7) 0.201
BMI, kg/m2 27.3 ± 4.6 27.5 ± 4.7 27.7 ± 5.2 0.169
SBP, mm Hg 129.5 ± 17.3 158.5 ± 14.3 160.8 ± 12.1 < 0.001*
DBP, mm Hg 78.8 ± 18.1 98.4 ± 9.4 99.7 ± 9.6 < 0.001*
CIMT, mm 0.6 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.2 < 0.001*
LVMI, g/m2 74.2 ± 10.2 80.1 ± 12.7 98.1 ± 20.2 < 0.001*
Microalbuminuria, g/24 h 6.4 (3.6-14.4) 8.0 (4.0-14.4) 23 (8.8-44.2) < 0.001*
Proteinuria, g/24 h 56.3 (30.2-95.5) 74.7 (55.3-102.4) 134.9 (85.8-176.6) < 0.001*
FBG, mg/dL 95.9 ± 13.7 99.0 ± 11.9 96.9 ± 14.5 0.161
WBC, × 109/L 7.1 ± 1.6 7.2 ± 2.1 7.5 ± 2.2 0.114
Neutrophil, × 109/L 3.1 (2.8-3.5) 3.2 (2.8-4) 4.5 (3.9-5.4) < 0.001*
Platelet, × 109/L 233.4 ± 55.9 274.7 ± 61.7 300.5 ± 62.6 < 0.001*
Lymphocyte, × 109/L 2.4 ± 0.8 2.2 ± 0.8 2.2 ± 0.7 0.002*
Hemoglobin, d/dL 14.1 ± 1.8 14.2 ± 1.7 14.0 ± 1.6 0.265
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 195.3 ± 49.4 207.1 ± 43.4 203.4 ± 42.7 0.061
LDL, mg/dL 112 (89-142) 121 (100-149) 124 (95-146) 0.235
HDL, mg/dL 51.1 ± 12.7 48.9 ± 13.8 50.4 ± 12.9 0.366
Triglyceride, mg/dL 109 (79-163) 147.5 (108-188) 134 (97-196) 0.008*
Albumin, g/dL 45.3 ± 5.8 46.1 ± 3.1 46.2 ± 3.4 0.113
CRP, mg/dL 0.2 (0-0.5) 2 (1-3.8) 3.6 (2.3-6.7) < 0.001*
SII 320.2 (253.7-373.9) 462.3 (423.8-505.5) 600.7 (484.9-777.2) < 0.001*
NLR 1.4 (1.1-1.7) 1.7 (1.5-1.9) 2.1 (1.7-2.6) < 0.001*
PLR 94.0 (76.8-137.4) 134.5 (101.9-161.4) 139.5 (118.8-169.2) < 0.001*

AOD: asymptomatic organ damage; BMI: body mass index; CIMT: carotid intima media thickness; CRP: C-reactive protein; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; FBG: fasting blood glucose; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SII: systemic immune-inflammation index; WBC: white blood cell.

*p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bold characters show the difference between groups.

The frequency of AOD severity according to the number of organs involved in newly diagnosed HTN patients was as follows: Grade I in 26% (n = 65), Grade II in 16% (n = 40), Grade III in 7% (n = 17), and Grade IV in 7% (n = 18). The median SII levels increased as the AOD severity increased from Grade I to IV (Table 3).

Table 3. Demographic and laboratory findings associated with grade of asymptomatic organ damage in newly diagnosed treatment-naive hypertension 

Variables AOD (-) (n = 110) AOD (+) p
Grade I (n = 65) Grade II (n = 40) Grade III-IV (n = 35)
Age, years 49.7 ± 11.7 51.3 ± 10.5 51.8 ± 11.7 55.4 ± 11.2 0.028*
Female gender, n (%) 66 (60.0) 40 (61.5) 30 (75.0) 29 (82.9) 0.040*
BMI, kg/m2 27.5 ± 4.7 28.0 ± 5.0 28.8 ± 5.4 28.8 ± 5.6 0.355
SBP, mm Hg 158.5 ± 14.3 157.2 ± 8.7 162.6 ± 16.2 161.4 ± 11.2 0.103
DBP, mm Hg 98.4 ± 9.4 97.8 ± 5.9 99.8 ± 11.3 99.1 ± 6.3 0.781
CIMT, mm 0.7 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1 < 0.001*
LVMI, g/m2 80.1 ± 12.7 88.8 ± 16.3 97.3 ± 16.3 116.1 ± 19 < 0.001*
Microalbuminuria, g/24 h 8.0 (4.0-14.4) 9.2 (5.2-23.0) 22.6 (12.6-50.8) 55.2 (38-78.5) < 0.001*
Proteinuria, g/24 h 74.7 (55.3-102.4) 98 (66.2-135.6) 137.5 (95.9-195.4) 173 (155-234.8) < 0.001*
FBG, mg/dL 99.0 ± 11.9 96.9 ± 13.8 96.8 ± 12.7 96.9 ± 17.8 0.674
WBC, × 109/L 7.2 ± 2.1 6.9 (6.3-7.8) 7.5 (6.3-8.3) 7.8 (6.8-9.9) 0.060
Neutrophil, × 109/L 3.2 (2.8-4) 4 (3.6-4.6) 4.6 (4.1-5.3) 5.7 (4.6-7.4) < 0.001*
Platelet, × 109/L 274.7 ± 61.7 280.8 ± 53.5 301.2 ± 59.4 336.2 ± 67.4 < 0.001*
Lymphocyte, × 109/L 2.2 ± 0.8 2.4 ± 0.8 2.2 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.7 0.031*
Hemoglobin, d/dL 14.2 ± 1.7 14.1 ± 1.4 13.7 ± 1.6 13.8 ± 1.6 0.175
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 207.1 ± 43.4 202.5 ± 39.1 206.5 ± 52.7 201.2 ± 36.6 0.858
LDL, mg/dL 121 (100-149) 124 (99-139) 119 (88.5-150.5) 129.5 (98.5-146) 0.898
HDL, mg/dL 48.9 ± 13.8 48.7 ± 12.6 51.2 ± 12.4 52.7 ± 14.1 0.427
Triglyceride, mg/dL 147.5 (108-188) 138 (97-202) 141.5 (106.5-209) 118 (89.5-136) 0.097
Albumin, g/dL 46.1 ± 3.1 46.4 ± 2.8 46.4 ± 2.3 45.5 ± 5 0.573
CRP, mg/dL 2 (1-3.8) 3.4 (2-5.9) 3.7 (2.6-6.2) 4.4 (1.8-10.4) 0.008*
SII 462.3 (423.8-505.5) 498.3 (432.7-567.5) 670.8 (576.9-759.8) 931 (810-1141.4) < 0.001*
NLR 1.7 (1.5-1.9) 1.8 (1.6-2.1) 2.2 (1.9-2.5) 3.0 (2.3-3.7) < 0.001*
PLR 134.5 (101.9-161.4) 136.7 (122.8-166.0) 138.4 (118.9-165.7) 165.9 (133.3-193.3) < 0.001*

AOD: asymptomatic organ damage; BMI: body mass index; CIMT: carotid intima media thickness; CRP: C-reactive protein; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; FBG: fasting blood glucose; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; SBP: systolic blood pressure; SII: systemic immune-inflammation index; WBC: white blood cell.

*p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bold characters show the difference between groups.

Multivariable regression models, in which variables associated with the presence and severity of AOD was included, showed that SII was an independent predictor of the presence and all grades of AOD (Table 4). The BP and CRP levels did not correlate with the presence and grades of AOD.

Table 4. Independent predictors of presence and severity of asymptomatic organ damage 

Variables Multivariable Regression
OR 95% CI p
Lower Upper
AOD (+) (ref: AOD (–))
Age 1.03 1.01 1.06 0.045*
CIMT 1.14 1.09 1.19 < 0.001*
LVMI 1.08 1.04 1.12 < 0.001*
Microalbuminuria 1.09 1.04 1.14 < 0.001*
Proteinuria 1.02 1.01 1.03 < 0.001*
SII 1.05 1.01 1.11 0.002*
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.754 < 0.001*
Grade I (ref: AOD (–))
CIMT 1.13 1.09 1.18 < 0.001*
LVMI 1.06 1.03 1.10 < 0.001*
Proteinuria 1.02 1.01 1.03 < 0.001*
SII 1.06 1.01 1.11 0.012*
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.653 < 0.001*
Grade II (ref: Grade I)
LVMI 1.04 1.01 1.09 0.047*
Microalbuminuria 1.06 1.02 1.10 0.002*
SII 1.02 1.01 1.03 < 0.001*
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.722 < 0.001*
Grade III-IV (ref: Grade II)
Age 1.07 1.01 1.14 0.049*
CIMT 1.09 1.01 1.18 0.032*
LVMI 1.07 1.01 1.13 0.027*
Microalbuminuria 1.09 1.04 1.15 < 0.001*
SII 1.02 1.01 1.03 < 0.001*
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.788 < 0.001*

AOD: asymptomatic organ damage; CIMT: carotid intima media thickness; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; SII: systemic immune-inflammation index; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

*p < 0.05 is considered significant for statistical analyses.

An SII level higher than 486.7 with 75.7% sensitivity and 90.0% specificity was found to be a predictor of AOD (AUC ± SE = 0.902 ± 0.02, +PV = 90.6%, –PV = 74.4%, p < 0.001). The SII had superior diagnostic discrimination compared to other AOD indicators in predicting the presence of AOD (Fig. 1A). Threshold values of SII in predicting the degree of AOD are shown in figure 1B. In addition, SII had superior diagnostic performance than neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (SII vs. NLR: ∆AUC ± SE = 0.120 ± 0.04, p < 0.001; SII vs. NLR: ∆AUC ± SE = 0.184 ± 0.05, p < 0.001).

Figure 1. A: diagnostic performance assessment of SII in predicting AOD. B: threshold values of SII in predicting the degree of AOD. 

DISCUSSION

This study is the first to report that SII values were higher among newly diagnosed treatment-naive HTN patients compared to healthy controls. In patients with HTN, there was a positive correlation between SII values and all indicators of AOD, and SII values were higher among AOD (+) patients compared to AOD (–) patients. Threshold values showing a systemic increase in SII levels had high diagnostic performance in predicting the severity of AOD relative to the number of organs involved.

We detected the presence of AOD in most newly diagnosed treatment-naive HTN patients. Moreover, 14% of HTN patients had involvement of more than two organs. In another study conducted with newly diagnosed HTN patients, the prevalence of target organ damage was 60.7%, while the rate of involvement of more than two organs was 12%20. These findings indicated that the newly diagnosed HTN cohort was not aware of AOD at the time of their first visit to the hospital. As a result of the asymptomatic nature and late diagnosis of HTN, overt hypertensive organ damage may develop silently before it becomes clinically evident. In clinical practice, hypertensive organ damage is detected by CIMT, LVMI, urinary microalbuminuria, and urinary protein excretion, which requires further research and expertise21. Therefore, recent studies have focused on simpler and more economical AOD indicators, particularly those derived from blood parameters, which can be easily applied in any hospital, because the most common laboratory data universally available at the time of admission to the hospital are blood parameters22. Considering the role of inflammation in HTN, the SII, which can be easily calculated from blood parameters, can be a prognostic screening tool for newly diagnosed HTN patients.

HTN is an atherosclerotic and chronic inflammatory disease, and a sustained state of inflammation is associated with a worse prognosis23. This may explain the higher SII values among HTN patients compared to healthy controls. It is also known that inflammation plays a role in decreasing kidney function24. In a population-based study, high SII values were independent predictors of increased urinary albumin excretion15. The results of the ENCORE trial showed that decreased renal function is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including increased CIMT values25. In a study conducted with HTN patients, a positive correlation was shown between the SII and CIMT26. These findings are similar to those of the present study.

In HTN, the level of inflammation increases with endothelial dysfunction caused by mechanical or shear stress, while the activation of immune cells increases due to the triggering of atherosclerosis27. The activation of inflammatory cells and the production of collagen and matrix proteins play important roles in atherosclerosis28,29. Since atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory process, platelet and neutrophil levels increase depending on the inflammatory mediators released. This activation can lead to exacerbation of inflammatory responses through the secretion of various mediators of inflammation30. Lymphocytes play a role in the regulation of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses, and lymphocyte count undergoes a significant decrease in the presence of inflammation31. When tissue damage occurs, macrophages accumulate in the damaged tissue due to the inflammatory response. During this process, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α are secreted, and CRP synthesis is induced and increases with the progression of atherosclerosis32. These parameters have also been shown to play a role in hypertensive organ damage and they have been associated with increased inflammatory and apoptotic activation in patients with HTN4,33,34. These findings support the idea that the inflammatory response may be increased according to the presence or severity of AOD in cases of HTN. Moreover, there is a positive correlation between CRP and SII values. This finding is consistent with the increased threshold levels of the SII in predicting the presence and severity of AOD in the present study.

Based on the above-mentioned mechanisms, indices obtained from neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet levels may better reflect atherosclerotic processes and the presence of AOD. The previous studies have shown that PLR and NLR, which are indicators of inflammation, are associated with both endothelial dysfunction and AOD14,35. The SII may be a better prognostic indicator, because it includes all the components of both the NLR and PLR. A recent study investigated the relationship between the exaggerated morning BP surge, an important indicator of target organ damage and cardiovascular outcome, and SII values in patients with newly diagnosed HTN36. The SII values were shown to have better diagnostic performance than PLR and NLR in predicting exaggerated morning BP surges. In the present study, we found that SII values showed superior diagnostic performance compared to PLR and NLR. Our findings support the idea that the SII may be an important screening tool, particularly for the risk stratification of newly diagnosed patients with HTN, given the role of inflammation in HTN.

The most important limitation of this study is its retrospective design. Another limitation is that highly sensitive inflammatory markers, including cytokines, were not studied.

High SII levels were independent predictors of the presence and severity of AOD in patients with newly diagnosed treatment-naive HTN. Based on the prognostic role of inflammation in HTN, SII values showed a systemic increase with the severity of AOD relative to the number of organs involved and offered high diagnostic performance with significant thresholds for all grades of AOD.

REFERENCES

1. Gauer R. Severe asymptomatic hypertension: evaluation and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2017;95:492-500. [ Links ]

2. Lackland DT. Controlling hypertension to prevent target organ damage: perspectives from the world hypertension league president. Ethn Dis. 2016;26:267-70. [ Links ]

3. Lee RM, Dickhout JG, Sandow SL. Vascular structural and functional changes: their association with causality in hypertension: models, remodeling and relevance. Hypertens Res. 2017;40: 311-23. [ Links ]

4. Xiao L, Harrison DG. Inflammation in hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36:635-47. [ Links ]

5. McMaster WG, Kirabo A, Madhur MS, Harrison DG. Inflammation, immunity, and hypertensive end-organ damage. Circ Res. 2015;116:1022-33. [ Links ]

6. Loperena R, Harrison DG. Oxidative stress and hypertensive diseases. Med Clin North Am. 2017;101:169-93. [ Links ]

7. Kirabo A, Fontana V, De Faria AP, Loperena R, Galindo CL, Wu J, et al. DC isoketal-modified proteins activate T cells and promote hypertension. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:4642-56. [ Links ]

8. Loperena R, Van Beusecum JP, Itani HA, Engel N, Laroumanie F, Xiao L, et al. Hypertension and increased endothelial mechanical stretch promote monocyte differentiation and activation: roles of STAT3, interleukin 6 and hydrogen peroxide. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114:1547-63. [ Links ]

9. Mattson DL, Lund H, Guo C, Rudemiller N, Geurts AM, Jacob H. Genetic mutation of recombination activating gene 1 in Dahl salt-sensitive rats attenuates hypertension and renal damage. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;304: R407-14. [ Links ]

10. Krebs CF, Lange S, Niemann G, Rosendahl A, Lehners A, Meyer-Schwesinger C, et al. Deficiency of the interleukin 17/23 axis accelerates renal injury in mice with deoxycorticosterone acetate+angiotensin ii-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;63:565-71. [ Links ]

11. Schrottmaier WC, Mussbacher M, Salzmann M, Assinger A. Platelet-leukocyte interplay during vascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2020;307:109-20. [ Links ]

12. Doring Y, Drechsler M, Soehnlein O, Weber C. Neutrophils in atherosclerosis: from mice to man. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:288-95. [ Links ]

13. Gros A, Ollivier V, Ho-Tin-Noe B. Platelets in inflammation: regulation of leukocyte activities and vascular repair. Front Immunol. 2014;5:678. [ Links ]

14. Liu X, Zhang Q, Wu H, Du H, Liu L, Shi H, et al. Blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28:1339-46. [ Links ]

15. Qin Z, Li H, Wang L, Geng J, Yang Q, Su B, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index is associated with increased urinary albumin excretion: a population-based study. Front Immunol. 2022;13:863640. [ Links ]

16. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European society of hypertension (ESH) and of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159-219. [ Links ]

17. Aydin E, Ates I, Arikan MF, Yilmaz N, Dede F. The ratio of monocyte frequency to HDL cholesterol level as a predictor of asymptomatic organ damage in patients with primary hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2017;40:758-64. [ Links ]

18. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European society of cardiology and the European society of hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European society of cardiology and the European society of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018;36:1953-2041. [ Links ]

19. Foppa M, Duncan BB, Rohde LE. Echocardiography-based left ventricular mass estimation. How should we define hypertrophy? Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005;3:17. [ Links ]

20. Prakash D. Target organ damage in newly detected hypertensive patients. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:2042-46. [ Links ]

21. Ates I, Ozkayar N, Akyel F, Topcuoglu C, Akyel S, Barça AN, et al. The relationship between asymptomatic organ damage, and serum soluble tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK) and interleukin-17A (IL-17A) levels in non-diabetic hypertensive patients. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:159. [ Links ]

22. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119-77. [ Links ]

23. Bartoloni E, Alunno A, Valentini V, Luccioli F, Valentini E, La Paglia G, et al. Role of inflammatory diseases in hypertension. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2017;24:353-61. [ Links ]

24. Andrade-Oliveira V, Foresto-Neto O, Watanabe IK, Zatz R, Camara NO. Inflammation in renal diseases: new and old players. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1192. [ Links ]

25. Tyson CC, Smith PJ, Sherwood A, Mabe S, Hinderliter AL, Blumenthal JA. Association between normal or mildly reduced kidney function, cardiovascular risk and biomarkers for atherosclerosis: results from the ENCORE trial. Clin Kidney J. 2017; 10:666-71. [ Links ]

26. Cirakoglu OF, Yilmaz AS. Systemic immune-inflammation index is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensive patients. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2021;43: 565-71. [ Links ]

27. Sun HJ, Wu ZY, Nie XW, Bian JS. Role of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: the link between inflammation and hydrogen sulfide. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1568. [ Links ]

28. Koelwyn GJ, Corr EM, Erbay E, Moore KJ. Regulation of macrophage immunometabolism in atherosclerosis. Nat Immunol. 2018;19:526-37. [ Links ]

29. Zhu Y, Xian X, Wang Z, Bi Y, Chen Q, Han X, et al. Research progress on the relationship between atherosclerosis and inflammation. Biomolecules. 2018;8:80. [ Links ]

30. Arbel Y, Finkelstein A, Halkin A, Birati EY, Revivo M, Zuzut M, et al. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is related to the severity of coronary artery disease and clinical outcome in patients undergoing angiography. Atherosclerosis. 2012;225:456-60. [ Links ]

31. Liu J, Ao W, Zhou J, Luo P, Wang Q, Xiang D. The correlation between PLR-NLR and prognosis in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13:4892-99. [ Links ]

32. Badimon L, Peña E, Arderiu G, Padró T, Slevin M, Vilahur G, et al. C-Reactive protein in atherothrombosis and angiogenesis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:430. [ Links ]

33. Patrick DM, Van Beusecum JP, Kirabo A. The role of inflammation in hypertension: novel concepts. Curr Opin Physiol. 2021; 19:92-98. [ Links ]

34. Morillas P, de Andrade H, Castillo J, Quiles J, Bertomeu-González V, Cordero A, et al. Inflammation and apoptosis in hypertension. Relevance of the extent of target organ damage. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012;65:819-25. [ Links ]

35. Sevencan NO, Ozkan AE. Associations between neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, albuminuria and uric acid and the estimated glomerular filtration rate in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-3. Arch Med Sci. 2019;15:1232-39. [ Links ]

36. Saylik F, Sarikaya R. Can systemic immune-inflammation index detect the presence of exaggerated morning blood pressure surge in newly diagnosed treatment-naive hypertensive patients? Clin Exp Hypertens. 2021;43:772-79. [ Links ]

Received: July 02, 2022; Accepted: August 31, 2022

* Corresponding author: Ibrahim H. Inanc E-mail: dr.ibrahimhalilinanc@outlook.com

Creative Commons License Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Published by Permanyer. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license