69 6Pseudoscalar current and covariance with the light-front approachEvolution of electronic bandgap by anion variation to explore niobium new halide double perovskites Cs2GeNbX6 (X = Cl, Br, I) for solar cells and thermoelectric applications: first principles analysis 
Home Page  

  • SciELO

  • SciELO


Revista mexicana de física

 ISSN 0035-001X

Rev. mex. fis. vol.69 no.6 México nov./dic. 2023   24--2025

https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.69.060802 

High energy physics

New Eigensolution of the Klein-Gordon and Schrödinger equations for improved modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential and its applications using Bopp’s Shift method and standard perturbation theory in the 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries

A. Mairechea 

aDepartment of Physics, M’sila University, Laboratory of Physics and Material Chemistry, M’sila University, BP 239, Algeria, e-mail: abdelmadjid.maireche@univ-msila.dz


Abstract

The deformed Klein-Gordon equation has been solved in three-dimensional extended relativistic quantum mechanics (3D-ERQM) symmetries for the improved modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential (IMYKP) model under the influence of the deformation space-space symmetries. The new relativistic energy eigenvalues were calculated using the parametric Bopp’s shift method and standard perturbation theory in addition to the approximation scheme suggested by Greene and Aldrich for the inverse square terms. The new relativistic energy eigenvalues of (LiH, HCl, CO and H2) molecules under the IMYKP model it was shown to be sensitive to the atomic quantum numbers (j,l,s,m), mixed potential depths (V 0 ,D e ,r e ), the screening parameter’s inverse α and noncommutativity parameters (Θ,τ,χ). In addition, we analyzed the nonrelativistic energy values by applying the well-known transmission rules known in the literature. In addition, we studied many special cases useful to researchers in the framework of the new extended symmetries, such as the improved modified Kratzer potential, the improved generalized Kratzer potential, the improved Kratzer potential, the improved modified Kratzer plus screened Coulomb potential, the improved Hellmann potential, the improved Yukawa potential, and improved inversely square Yukawa potential. We noticed that these particular results are identical to our previous work and other known works in the literature. The study is further extended to calculate the mass spectra of mesons of charmonium (cc¯) and bottomonium (bb¯) within the framework of the IMYKP model in three-dimensional extended non-relativistic quantum mechanics (3D-ENRQM) symmetries.

Keywords: Klein-Gordonequation, modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential; Noncommutative space; Bopp’s shift method; star products

1. Introduction

The Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations, or relativistic mod equations, can be solved analytically or numerically to offer us a lot of information about a physical systems. Various techniques are available in the literature to obtain their solutions, such as the parametric Nikiforov-Uvarov (pNU) method, the exact quantization rule, the Qiang-Dong proper quantization rule, the path integral method, the asymptotic iteration method (AIM), the factorization method, the Laplace transform approach, the supersymmetric quantum mechanics (SUSYQM), the ansatz method, and the series expansion method. These equations play a vital role in statistical physics, solid-state physics, quantum field theory, atomic and sub-atomic physics, and molecular physics. Various research has been carried out on these equations of many considerable potentials. Parmar and Vinodkumar (2021) studied the combined modified Yukawa and Kratzer potential (MYKP) in the case of the Klein-Gordon equation (KGE) for calculated numerical results of the energy spectrum for CO, H2, LiH, and HCl molecules by pNU and SUSYQM methods using the Greene-Aldrich approximation to handle 1/r and 1/r 2 terms in the effective potential [1]. Many researchers have dealt with either the modified Yukawa or Kratzer potentials either individually or through the combination of one or both of them with other potentials within the framework of the different fundamental equations. Edet et al. analyzed the modified Kratzer potential plus the screened Coulomb potential by the pNU method and obtained the energy spectrum [2]. Ikot et al. obtained the exact bound state energy spectrum of the Schrödinger equation with energy-dependent molecular Kratzer potential using AIM [3]. Ikot et al. (2019) obtained the energy eigenvalues and the corresponding normalized eigenfunctions of screened Kratzer potential for lithium hydride (LiH) and hydrogen chloride (HCl) diatomic molecules within the framework of non-relativistic quantum mechanics via the pNU method. Ikot et al. (2019) obtained the energy eigenvalues and the corresponding normalized eigenfunctions of the screened Kratzer potential for lithium hydride (LiH) and hydrogen chloride (HCl) diatomic molecules within the framework of non-relativistic quantum mechanics via the pNU method [4]. Ahmadov et al. [5] studied solutions of KGE with the Manning-Rosen equation plus a class of Yukawa potentials using pNU and SUSYQM methods and presented the energy spectrum for any l-state and the corresponding radial wave functions in terms of the hypergeometric functions. Purohit et al. (2021) solved the Schrodinger¨ equation in D dimensions and obtained the eigenspectrum of the energy and momentum for time-independent and timedependent Hulthen-screened cosines Kratzér potentials Using the Qiang-Dong proper quantization rule and the supersymmetric quantum mechanics approach [6]. Recently, Purohit et al. (2022) obtained the energy spectrum for MYKP with the magnetic field and Aharanov-Bohm flux field using the pNU approach and SEM in this study [7]. The Kratzer potential (KP), which is known first and foremost by Kratzer itself [8], is used in quantum atomic-molecular physics and has played a vital role in the history of molecular and quantum chemistry [9]. Purohit et al. (2020) [10] obtained via the generalized Nikiforov-Uvarov method the approximate bound-state solutions of the D-dimensional KGE for screened cosine Kratzer potential (SCKP) using approximation suggested by Greene-Aldrich. Next year, Purohit et al. also investigated SCKP under the influence of the magnetic field and Aharanov-Bohm flux field and obtained energy eigenvalues and wave functions with external fields via the pNU method using the approximation method suggested by Greene-Aldrich for handling centrifugal barriers [11]. On the other hand, Yukawa potential, often called screened Coulomb potential, is a short-range potential that has applications in particle, high-energy, and molecular physics. It is used to study the interaction that occurs between the atoms of diatomic molecules [12-14]. Recently, Purohit et al. (2022) used the linear plus modified Yukawa potential as the quarkantiquark interaction potential and obtained the energy eigenvalues and associated wave function by solving the KGE analytically using the pNU method [15]. Based on this motivation, in this work, we study new approximate bound state solutions of the deformed Klein-Gordon equation (DKGE) in three-dimensional extended relativistic quantum mechanics (3D-ERQM) symmetries of a newly proposed combined potential called the improved modified exponential screened plus Yukawa potential (IMYKP) within the framework of parametric Bopp’s shift method. This is a new potential model that has not yet been studied to the best of our knowledge in 3D-ERQM symmetries. The main objective of this study is to deepen the study of research [1] performed in the frameworks of symmetries known in quantum mechanics known in the literature and research on new applications of this potential. It is worth noting that the first foundations of quantum mechanics were based on non-commutative axioms for all positions q^μ(s,h,i)*q^ν(s,h,i)q^ν(s,h,i)*q^μ(s,h,i) and momentum π^μ(s,h,i)*πνs,h,i π^ν(s,h,i)*π^μ(s,h,i), individually or in combination q^μ(s,h,i)*π^ν(s,h,i)π^ν(s,h,i)*q^μ(s,h,i), here (∗) stands for the Weyl-Moyal star product. However, the scientific task was not accomplished due to mathematical difficulties. This made the specialized researchers ignore two basic axioms and complete the research path in the last axiom, and this is what is known as the relative and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics known in the literature. In recent years, real indicators have appeared, for example, the divergence problem in the standard model (SM), where gravitational forces are not included in addition to many other problems [16-26]. It should be mentioned that before the renormalization approach was created and gained popularity, Heisenberg proposed the idea of extended non-commutativity to the coordinates as a possible treatment for eliminating the limitless numbers of field theories in 1930. Snyder published the first work on QFT’s history in 1947 [27], and Connes introduced its geometric analysis in 1991 and 1994 [28, 29] in an effort to standardize QFT. Seiberg and Witten obtain a new version of gauge fields in noncommutative gauge theory [30] by extending earlier ideas on the advent of NC geometry in string theory with a nonzero B-field. The elimination of the observed unwanted divergences or infinities that appear to produce short-range in field theories like gravitational theory by creating new quantum fluctuations is one of the potential objectives of NC deformation of space-space and phase-phase. The noncommutative R4extended to the supersymmetric field theories for the U(1) vector multiplets and chiral multiplets of the fundamental, anti-fundamental and adjoint representations of the gauge group [31], this shows another confirmation of the validity and effectiveness of the non-commutative theory. It is important to refer to some of our work related to the study of each of the two potentials under study in the framework of the extended Schrodinger¨ equation such as new modified Kratzér-type interactions [32], modified Kratzer potential [33] and the generalized perturbed Yukawa potential [34], DKGE such as a linear combination of Hulthen and Kratzer potentials [35], modified More general exponential screened Coulomb potential plus Yukawa potential [36], generalized modified screened Coulomb plus inversely quadratic Yukawa potential [37], Manning-Rosen plus quadratic Yukawa potential [38], the deformed unequal scalar and vector Hellmann plus modified Kratzer potentials [39], modified equal scalar and vector Manning-Rosen and Yukawa potentials [40] and the Kratzer potential which studied by Darroodi et al. [41]. For the deformed Dirac equation, we have studied both modified Yukawa potential [42], improved inversely quadratic Yukawa potential within improved Coulomb-like tensor interaction [43], improved Schiöberg potential within the Yukawa tensor interaction, new modified Yukawa potential [44], new modified Yukawa potential [45], spatially dependent mass for the improved Eckart potential including the improved Yukawa tensor interaction [46]. Furthermore, the modified Kratzer potential was studied in the framework of the Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau (DKP) equation [47]. The following are the vector and scalar IMYKP models that will be used in this study (V yk (rb) and S yk (rb)) as follows:

Vykr^Sykr^=Vykr-LΘ2rVyk(r)r+O(Θ2)Sykr-LΘ2rSyk(r)r+O(Θ2), (1)

where (V yk (r),S yk (r)) are the (vector, scalar) modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential, according to the view of 3D-RQM and 3D-NRQM symmetry, known in the literature [1]:

Vyk(r)=-A1exp(-2αr)r2+A2exp(-αr)r-A3-(A4r-A5r2-De), (2.1)

and

Syk(r)=-S1exp(-2αr)r2+S2exp(-αr)r-S3-(S4r-S5r2-De), (2.2)

where potential strength parameters A 1A 3V 0, A 2 ≡ 2V 0, A 4 ≡ 2D e r e , A5Dere2 and α is the screening parameters, D e is the dissociation energy, r e is the equilibrium bond length, (r^andr) are the interatomic distances in the extended QM and usual QM symmetries, respectively. The coupling is the scalar product of the usual components of the angular momentum operator L(L x ,L y ,L z ) and the infinitesimal non-commutativity vector Θ (θ 12 23 13)/2. In the case of G NC , the noncentral generators can be suitably realized as self-adjoint differential operators (q^μ(s,h,i), π^ν(s,h,i)) appear in n three varieties. The first is the canonical structure (CS) variety, the second is the Lie structure (LS) variety, and the last corresponds to the quantum plane (QP) variety in the representations of Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures, satisfying a¨ deformed algebra of the form (for simplicity, we have used the natural units =c=1) [25,48-55]:

[xμ(s,h,i),pν(s,h,i)]=iδμνIn-3D-QM symmetry[q^μ(s,h,i),*π^ν(s,h,i)]=ieffδμνIn-3D-EQM symmetry, (3)

and

[xμ(s,h,i),xν(s,h,i)]=0[q^μ(s,h,i),*q^ν(s,h,i)]={iϵμνθ :  For CS variety, ihμναq^α(s,h,i) :  For LS variety,iGμναβΛαβ : For QP variety.  (4)

with Λαβq^α(s,h,i)q^β(s,h,i), here q^μ(s,h,i) can be equal one of (x^μsx^μh x^μi) and π^μ(s,h,i) can be equal one of (p^μs  p^μh  p^μi) which are the generalized coordinates and the corresponding generalizing momentums, respectively, in 3D-EQM symmetries, while the corresponding coordinates xμ(s,h,i) (xμs  xμh  xμi) and pμs,h,i pμs  pμh  pμi in the usual 3D-QM symmetries, respectively, (or) Additionally, the uncertainty relation (in LHS of the below equation) that corresponds to the LHS of Eq. (3), will become in 3D-EQM symmetries as follows:

|Δxμ(s,h,i)Δpν(s,h,i)|δμν/2|Δq^μ(s,h,i)Δ^ν(s,h,i)|effδμν/2. (5)

On the other hand, we notice that the RHS of Eq. (4) generates a novel uncertainty relation:

|Δq^μ(s,h,i)Δq^ν(s,h,i)|{θ|ϵμν|2For CS variety,hμν2 For LS variety,Gμν2  For QP variety.  (6)

here h µν and G µν are equal to the average values:

{hμν=|α3(fμναx^α(s,h,i))| Gμν=|α,β3(Gμναβx^α(s,h,i)x^β(s,h,i))|.

The new subdivided three-uncertainties relations in Eq. (6) have no comparison in the existing literature. Under the Lorentz transformation, which includes boosts and/or rotations of the observer’s inertial frame, Eqs. (3) and (4) are covariant equations (have the same behavior as q^μ(s,h,i). We are expanded the modified equal-time noncommutative canonical commutation relations (METNCCCRs) to include both Heisenberg and interaction pictures in both 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries. Here δ µν is the Kronecker symbol, (µ,ν = 1,2,3), θ µν is antisymmetric real constant (3 × 3) matrices with the dimensionality (length)2 parameterizing the deformation of space-space, ϵ µν is an antisymmetric tensor operator describing the non-commutativity of space-time (ϵ µν = − ϵ µν = 1 for µν and ϵ ϵϵ = 0) and θ ∈ R is the noncommutative parameter, eff is the effective Planck constant. The new deformed scalar product h(x) ∗ g(x) is defined by the Weyl-Moyal ∗-product in three different ways [56-61]:

(h*g)(x)=exp(iϵμνθμxνx)(hg)(x)(hg)(x)-iϵμνθ2μxhνxgxμ=xν+O(θ2) (7)

The second component in Eq. (7) provides a physical representation of the consequences of space-space non-commutativity. The outline of the paper is as follows: Section 2 presents an overview of the 3D-KGE under the modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential models. Section 3 is devoted to investigating the 3D-DKGE using the well-known Bopp’s shift method to obtain the effective potential for the IMYKP model. Furthermore, using standard perturbation theory, we find the expectation values of the radial terms (1/(1 − z)4, z 2 /(1 − z)3, z 2 /(1 − z)4, z/(1 − z)2, z/(1 − z)3 and 1/(1 − z)3) to calculate the corrected relativistic energy generated by the effect of the perturbed effective potential Ξpertyk(r) of the IMYKP model, and we derive the global corrected energies for bosonic particles and antiparticles whose spin quantum number has an integer value. Section 4 is reserved to analyze the non-relativistic limit, in 3D-ENRQM symmetries for the IMYKP model. In the next section, we will discuss the most important special cases in the relativistic and non-relativistic cases, which are useful for specialists and readers alike. Section 6 is reserved for the study of spin-averaged mass spectra of HLM under IMKSCP models in 3D-ENRQM symmetries. Finally, we present our conclusion in Sec. 7.

2. An overview of KGE under the modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential model in 3D-RQM symmetry

In order to construct a physical model describing a physical system that interacted with the improved modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential model in the 3D-ERQM symmetries, it is useful to recall the eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenfunctions under the influence of this system within the framework of relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM) known in the literature. In this case, the system is governed by the following Klein-Gordon equation:

(2+(Enl-Vyk(r))2-(Myk+Syk(r))2)Ψnl(r,θ,φ)=0. (8)

The vector potential V yk (r) and space-time scalar potential S yk (r) are produced from the four-vector linear momentum operator A µ (V yk (r), A = 0) and the reduced mass M yk of (LiH, HCl, CO and, H2) molecules. While E nl is the relativistic eigenvalues, (n,l) represent the principal and spin-orbit coupling terms. Since the modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential model has spherical symmetry, it allows the wave function solution Ψ nl (r,θ,ϕ) of the known form (unl(r)/r)Yml(θ,φ) while Yml(θ,φ) is spherical harmonics and m is the projections on the Oz-axis. The radial component u nl (r) satisfies the differential equation as follows [1]:

(d2dr2+Enl2-M2-((Vyk(r)2)2-(Syk(r)2)2-(EnlVyk(r)+2MSyk(r)))-l(l+1)r2)unl(r)=0. (9)

Parmar and Vinodkumar used the Alhaidari et al. [62] scheme to write the radial part of KGE in Eq. (9), by restyling the vector and scalar potentials (V yk (r),S yk (r)) → (V yk (r)/2,S yk (r)/2) under the non-relativistic limit. Using V yk (r) from Eq. (2) with V yk (r) = S yk (r) in Eq. (9), we obtain the following

(d2dr2+Enl2-M2-Ξyk(r)-l(l+1)r2)unl(r)=0, (10)

with

Ξyk(r)=(Enl+M)(A1exp(-2αr)r2-A2exp(-αr)r+A3+A4r-A5r2-De). (11)

The author of Ref. [1] used the supersymmetry quantum mechanics and factorization methods to obtain the expression of u nl (r) as a function of Gauss’s Hypergeometric function 2 F 1 (−n,n + 2ω nl + 2X nl ,2X nl + 1;z) in usual 3D-RQM symmetries as,

Ψnl(r,θ,φ)=Cnlnzωnlr(1-z)Xnl 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl,2Xnl+1;z)Yml(θ,φ), (12)

with

{ωnl=ϵnl2+l(l+1)+(Enl+M)A5-(Enl+M)A4αXnl=12+(Enl+M)(A5-A1)+(l+1/2)2, (13)

where z and ϵnl2 equal (exp(−αr)) and −[(E nl + M)(E nl M + A 3D e )] 2 , respectively, while N nl is the normalization constant:

Cnln=n!Γ(2ωnl+1)Γ(n+2ωnl+1)αn!(2Xnl+1)Γ(n+2ωnl+2Xnl+1)22ωnl+2Xnl-1Γ(2ωnl+n+1)Γ(2Xnl+n+1). (14)

The corresponding relativistic energy eigenvalues for the modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential model for (LiH, HCl, CO and, H2) molecules in 3D-space, obtained the equation of energy [1]:

Enl2-M2=(Enl+M)(De-A3+α2A5-αA4)+α2l(l+1)

-α2[(Enl+M)α2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A1)+l(l+1))2(n+Xnl)+n+Xnl2]2. (15)

3. The new solutions of DKGE under the IMYKP models in 3D-ERQM symmetries:

3.1. Review of BS method

Let us begin in this subsection by finding the physical form of IMYKP models in three-dimensional extended relativistic quantum mechanics (3D-ERQM) symmetries. Our objective is achieved by applying the new principles that we have seen in the introduction (Eqs. (3), (4), and (7)), summarized in the new relationships of the modified equal-time noncommutative canonical commutation relations (METNCCCRs) and the notion of the Weyl-Moyal star product. These data allow us to rewrite the usual radial KG equations in Eq. (10) in the 3D-ERQM symmetries as follows:

(d2dr2+Enl2-m02-Ξyk(r)-l(l+1)r2)*unl(r)=0. (16.1)

There are two approaches to including non-commutativity in quantum field theory: The first method is represented by rewriting the various NC physical fields (Ψ^nl,Φ^nl,e^μa,...) in terms of their corresponding fields (Ψnl,Φnl,eμa,...) in the known quantum space in the literature, in proportion to the non-commutative parameters Θ (θ 12 23 13)/2, which is similar to the Taylor development [63-71] while the second method depends on reformulating the non-commutative operator (q^,π^) with its view of the quantum operators (x,b pb) known in the literature and the properties of space associated with the non-commutative parameters Θ (θ 12 23 13)/2. It is normal for the physical results to be identical when using either of them. It is known to specialized researchers that F. Bopp had proposed new quantization rules

(x,p)(q^=x-i2p,π^=p+i2x),

instead of the usual correspondence

(x,p)(q^=x,q^=p+i2x).

This procedure is called Bopp’s shifts method (BSM) [72-77]. This quantization procedure is called Bopp quantization [76]. The Weyl-Moyal star product h(x,p)∗g(x,p) induces BSM in the respect that it is replaced by h(x-i2p,p+i2x)*g(x,p) [69]. This, allows us to obtain

{Ξyk(r)*unl(r)=Ξyk(r)(r^)unl(r)l(l+1)r2*unl(r)=l(l+1)r^2unl(r). (16.2)

The Bopp’s shift method has achieved great success when applied by specialized researchers to the four basic equations correspond to the relativistic deformed Schrödinger equation (see, e.g., [32-34,77-82]) and the other three relativistic equations represented by the deformed Klein-Gordon equation (see, e.g., [83-88]), deformed Dirac equation (see, e.g., [47,93,94]) and the deformed Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau equation (see, e.g., [86-89]). It is worth motioning that that Bopp’s shift method permutes us to rewrite Eq. (16.1) without star product to the simplest form:

(d2dr2+Enl2-m02-Ξyk(r^)-l(l+1)r^2)unl(r)=0. (17)

The modified algebraic structure of covariant canonical commutation relations with the notion of the Weyl-Moyal star product in Eqs. (3) and (4), which become new METNCCCRs with ordinary known products in literature, are as follows (see, e.g., [72-77]):

[q^μ(s,h,i),π^ν(s,h,i)]=ieffδμνand[q^μ(s,h,i),q^ν(s,h,i)]=iθμν. (18)

In 3D-ERQM symmetries, one possible way of implementing the algebra defined by Eq. (18) is to construct the noncommutative set of variables (q^μ(s,h,i), π^ν(s,h,i)) from the corresponding commutative variables (xμ(s,h,i),pν(s,h,i)) employing of linear transformations. This can be generally done by using the Seiberg-Witten map, given by [72-77]:

(q^μ(s,h,i)π^μ(s,h,i))=(xμ(s,h,i)-3ν=1iθμν2pν(s,h,i)+O(θ2)pμ(s,h,i)+O(θ2)). (19)

This allows us to find the operator r^2, in the 3D-ERQM symmetries, equal to [80-85]:

r^2=r2-LΘ+O(Θ2). (20)

The Taylor expansion of effective potential Ξyk(r^) can be expressed as in the 3D-ERQM symmetries, as:

Ξyk(r^)=Ξyk(r)-12rΞ(r)rLΘ+O(Θ2), (21)

and

l(l+1)r^2=l(l+1)r2+l(l+1)r4LΘ+O(Θ2). (22)

Substituting Eqs. (20) and (21) into Eq. (17), we obtain the following as the radial Schrödinger equation:

(d2dr2+Enl2-m02-Ξyk(r)-Ξykpert(r))unl(r)=0, (23)

with

Ξykpert(r)=l(l+1)r4LΘ-12rΞ(r)rLΘ+O(Θ2). (24)

If we compare Eq. (23) and Eq. (10), we observe an additive potential Ξykpert(r) dependent on new radial terms, which is coupled with the coupling that explains the interaction of the physical features of the system with the topological deformations of space-time. From a physical point of view, this means that the spontaneously generated term Ξykpert(r) as a result of the topological properties of deformation space-space can be considered very small compared to the fundamental term

Ξykpert(r)=(-l(l+1)-(Enl+M)A5r4-(Enl+M)-αA1exp(-2αr)r3

-A1exp(-2αr)r4+αA2exp(-αr)2r2+A2exp(-αr)2r3-A42r3)LΘ+O(Θ2). (25)

Furthermore, by using the unit step function (also known as the viside step function θ (x) or simply the theta function), it is possible to rewrite the global induced potential Ξt_ykpert(r) for bosonic particle (positive energy) and bosonic antiparticle (negative energy) in 3D-DKG symmetries as:

Ξt_ykpert(r)=Ξykpert(r)θ(|Encyk|)-Ξykpert(r)θ(-|Encyk|)={Ξykpert(r) for bosonic particles -Ξykpert(r) for bosonic antiparticles, (26)

where the step function θ(x) is given by:

θ(x)={1 for x00 for otherwise, (27)

Eq. (23) cannot be solved analytically for any state l ≠ 0 because of the centrifugal term and the studied potential itself. In fact, since the effective perturbative potential Ξykpert(r) given in Eq. (25) has a strong singularity at r → 0, we need to use the technique of the Greene and Aldrich approximation scheme [95] and applied by Parmar and Vinodkumar [1]. The radial part of the three-dimensional deformed Klein-Gordon equation (3D-DKGE) with the IMYKP model contains the centrifugal terms l(l + 1)/r 2 and l(l + 1)/r 4 since we assume l 6= 0. However, the IMYKP model is a kind of potential that cannot be solved exactly when the centrifugal term is taken into account unless l = 0 is assumed. The conventional approximation used in this paper:

1r2α2(1-exp(-αr))2=α2(1-z)21rα1-exp(-αr)=α1-z. (28)

This allows us, after direct calculations, to find the following results:

{1r4α4(1-z)4, exp(-2αr)r3α3z2(1-z)3exp(-2αr)r4α4z2(1-z)4, exp(-αr)r2α2z(1-z)2exp(-αr)r3α3z(1-z)3 and 1r3α3(1-z)3. (29)

This gives the perturbative effective potential as follows:

Ξykpert(z)=(K11-z4+K2z21-z3+K3z21-z4+K4z1-z2+K5z1-z3+K61-z3)LΘ+O(Θ2), (30)

with

{K1=α4[(Enl+M)A5+α4l(l+1)]K2=K3=(Enl+M)α4A1K4=K5=-(Enl+M)α3A2/2K6=(Enl+M)α3A4/2. (31)

The IMYKP model is extended by including new radial terms 1/(1 − z)4, z 2 /(1 − z)3, z 2 /(1 − z)4, z/(1 − z)2, z/(1 − z)3 and 1/(1 − z)3 to become the IMYKP model in 3D-ERQM symmetries. The new additive part Ξykpert(r) is also proportional to the infinitesimal coupling , this is logical from a physical point of view, because it explains the interaction between the physical properties of the studied potential L and the topological properties resulting from the deformation of space-space Θ. This allows us to consider the additive effective potential as a perturbation potential compared with the main potential Ξykpert(r) (parent potential operator) in the symmetries of 3D-ERQM symmetries, that is, the inequality Ξykpert(r)Ξyk(r) has been achieved. That is all the physical justification for applying the time-independent perturbation theory that can be satisfied. This allows us to give a complete prescription for determining the energy level of the generalized (n,l,m) th excited states.

3.2. The expectation values under the IMYKP models in the 3D-ERQM symmetries

In this subsection, we want to apply the perturbative theory, in the case of 3D-ERQM symmetries, to find the 6-expectation values T(nlm)yk-μ,T(nlm)yk-2,T(nlm)yk-3,T(nlm)yk-4,T(nlm)yk-5 and T(nlm)yk-6 which are equal, respectively 1/(1-z)4(nlm)yk,z2/(1-z)3(nlm)yk,z2/(1-z)4(nlm)yk,z/(1-z)2(nlm)yk,z/(1-z)3(nlm)yk and 1/(1-z)3(nlm)yk for bosonic particles taking into account the unperturbed wave function Ψ nl (r,θ,ϕ) which we have seen previously in Eq. (12). After straightforward calculations, we obtain the expectation values T(nlm)yk-1,T(nlm)yk-2,T(nlm)yk-3,T(nlm)yk-4,T(nlm)yk-5 and T(nlm)yk-6 by applying the standard perturbation theory in first-order as follows:

T(nlm)yk-1=Cnln20++z2ωnl(1-z)2Xnl-4[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl,2Xnl+1;z)]2dr, (32.1)

T(nlm)yk-2=Cnln20++z2ωnl+2(1-z)2Xnl-3[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl,2Xnl+1;z)]2dr, (32.2)

T(nlm)yk-3=Cnln20+z2ωnl+2(1-z)2Xnl-4[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl,2Xnl+1;z)]2dr, (32.3)

T(nlm)yk-4=Cnln20+z2ωnl+1(1-z)2Xnl-2[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl,2Xnl+1;z)]2dr, (32.4)

T(nlm)yk-5=Cnln20+z2ωnl+1(1-z)2Xnl-3[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl,2Xnl+1;z)]2dr, (32.5)

and

T(nlm)yk-6=Cnln20+z2ωnl(1-z)2Xnl-3[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl,2Xnl+1;z)]2dr. (32.6)

We have used useful abbreviations X^(nlm)sp-yk=n,l,m|X^|n,l,m to avoid the extra burden of writing, X^ equal 1/(1-z)4,z2/(1-z)3,z2/(1-z)4,z/(1-z)2,z/(1-z)3 and 1/(1-z)3. We can evaluate the above integrals either in a recurrence way through the physical values of the principal quantum number (n = 0,1,...) and then generalize the result to the general (n,l,m) th excited state or we use the method proposed by Tas et al. [96] and applied by Ahmadov et al. [97], to obtain the general excited state directly. Introducing the change of variable z = exp(−αr). This maps the region 0r to 0z1 and allows us to obtain dr=-dzαz, and transform Eqs. (32,i = 1,6) into the following form:

T(nlm)yk-1=Cnln2α0+1z2ωnl-1(1-z)2Xnl-4[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl+2-2,2Xnl+1;z)]2dz, (33.1)

T(nlm)yk-2=Cnln2α0+1z2ωnl+2-1(1-z)2Xnl-3[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl+2-2,2Xnl+1;z)]2dz, (33.2)

T(nlm)yk-3=Cnln2α0+1z2ωnl+2-1(1-z)2Xnl-4[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl+2-2,2Xnl+1;z)]2dz, (33.3)

T(nlm)yk-4=Cnln2α0+1z2ωnl+1-1(1-z)2Xnl-2[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl+2-2,2Xnl+1;z)]2dz, (33.4)

T(nlm)yk-5=Cnln2α0+1z2ωnl+1-1(1-z)2Xnl-3[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl+2-2,2Xnl+1;z)]2dz, (33.5)

and

T(nlm)yk-6=Cnln2α0+1z2ωnl-1(1-z)2Xnl-3[ 2F1(-n,n+2ωnl+2Xnl+2-2,2Xnl+1;z)]2dz. (33.6)

We calculate the integrals in Eqs. (33,i=1,6¯) with the help of the special integral formula [98]:

0+1+1z2λ-1(1-z)2(ν+1)[2F1(-n,n+2(ν+λ+1);2λ+1;z)]2dz

=n!(n+ν+1)Γ(2λ)Γ(n+2(ν+1))Γ(2λ+1)(n+ν+1+λ)Γ(n+2λ+1)Γ(n+2λ+2(ν+1)), (34)

here Γ(ξ) denoting the usual Gamma function. By identifying Eqs. (33,i=1,6¯) with the integrals in Eqs. (34), we obtain the following results:

T(nlm)yk-1=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnl-2)Γ(2ωnl)Γ(n+2Xnl-4)Γ(2ωnl+1)(n+Dnl/2-2)Γ(n+2ωnl+1)Γ(n+Dnl-4), (35.1)

T(nlm)yk-2=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnl-3/2)Γ(2ωnl+2)Γ(n+2Xnl-3)Γ(2ωnl+3)(n+Dnl/2-1/2)Γ(n+2ωnl+3)Γ(n+Dnl-1), (35.2)

T(nlm)yk-3=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnl-2)Γ(2ωnl+2)Γ(n+2Xnl-4)Γ(2ωnl+3)(n+Dnl/2-1)Γ(n+2ωnl+3)Γ(n+Dnl-2), (35.3)

T(nlm)yk-4=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnl-1)Γ(2ωnl+1)Γ(n+2Xnl-2)Γ(2ωnl+2)(n+Dnl/2-1/2)Γ(n+2ωnl+2)Γ(n+Dnl-1), (35.4)

T(nlm)yk-5=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnl-3/2)Γ(2ωnl+1)Γ(n+2Xnl-3)Γ(2ωnl+2)(n+Dnl/2-1)Γ(n+2ωnl+2)Γ(n+Dnl-2), (35.5)

and

T(nlm)yk-6=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnl-3/2)Γ(2ωnl)Γ(n+2Xnl-3)Γ(2ωnl+1)(n+Dnl/2-3/2)Γ(n+2ωnl+1)Γ(n+Dnl-3), (35.6)

with D nl = 2ω nl + 2X nl .

3.3. The corrected energy for the IMYKP models in 3D-ERQM symmetries

What draws attention here is the application of our physical method resulting from the principle of superposition for the purpose of determining the total values of the relativistic energy, in 3D-RNCQM symmetries. The global effective potential Ξskeff(r) which is the sum of (Ξsk(r)+l(l+1)/r2+Ξskpert(r)) is responsible for the production of total relativistic energy within the framework of extended quantum mechanics symmetries under improved modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential. Naturally, the effective potential (Ξsk(r)+l(l+1)/r2) is responsible for the relativistic energy known in the literature under the modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential that we have seen in Eq. (14), which is dominant in the absence of space-space deformation. Whereas the spontaneously generated potential Ξskpert(r) due to space-space deformation will play the role of the corrected energy. Considering that the NC parameter Θ is arbitrary, it can be dealt with physically. Firstly, the influence of the perturbed spinorbit can be generated from effective perturbed potential Ξskpert(r) corresponding to the bosonic particle and antiparticle with spin-s such as LiH, HCl, CO and, H2. We obtain the perturbed spin-orbit effective potential by replacing the coupling of the angular momentum L operator and the NC vector Θ with the new equivalent coupling:

LΘΘLS with Θ=Θ122+Θ232+Θ132.

This degree of freedom results from the arbitrary nature of the infinitesimal NC vector Θ. We have oriented the spin-s of the (LiH, HCl, CO and, H2) molecules to become parallels to the vector Θ which interacted with the IMYKP model. Additionally, we use the following transformation which is well known in 3D-RQM symmetries:

ΘLSΘG2 with G2=12(J2-L2-S2).

In 3D-ERQM symmetry, the operators H^ncyk,J2,L2,S2 and Jz form a complete set of conserved physics quantities, and the eigenvalues of the operator G 2 are equal to the values:

ϝ(j,l,s)=12[j(j+1)-l(l+1)-s(s+1)], (36)

with |ls| ≤ j ≤ |l + s| for (LiH, HCl, CO and, H2) molecules. As a direct consequence, the square partially corrected energies ΔEykso2(n,V0,α,De,re,Θ,j,l,s)ΔEykso2 due to the perturbed effective potential Ξykpert(r) produced for the (n,l,m) th excited state, in 3D-ERQM symmetries as follows:

ΔEykso2=Θϝ(j,l,s) M(nlm)yk(n,V0,α,De,re). (37)

The global expectation values M(nlm)yk(n,V0,α,De,re) for (LiH, HCl, CO, and, H2) molecules, which were created from the effect of the IMYKP model, are determined from the following expression:

M(nlm)yk(n,V0,α,De,re)=6μ=1KμT(nlm)yk-μ(n,V0,α,De,re). (38)

The second principal physical contribution is due to the effect of the magnetic perturbative effective potential, which generates the perturbed potential Ξykpert(r) under the IMYKP model in the 3D-ERQM symmetries. These effective potentials are achieved when we replace both

LΘτLwith=ez, (39)

with the additive physical condition

[Θ]=[τ][](length)2,

here (ℵ and τ) are the intensity of the magnetic field induced by the effect of the deformation of space-space geometry and a new infinitesimal non-commutativity parameter. This choice, which comes from the fact that the vector Θ is arbitrary, or that the magnetic field is directed according to the (O z ) axis serves to simplify quantitative calculations without affecting the nature of the physical point of view, we also need to apply:

n',l',m'|Lz|n,l,m=mδm'mδl'lδn'n, (40)

with −|l| ≤ m ≤ +|l| for the (LiH, HCl, CO and, H2) molecules. All of these data allow for the discovery of the new square improved energy shift ΔEykmg2n,V0,α,De,re,τ,m for (LiH, HCl, CO and, H2) molecules due to the perturbed Zeeman effect created by the influence of the IMYKP model for the (n,l,m) th excited state in 3D-ERQM symmetries as follows:

ΔEykmg2(n,V0,α,De,re,τ,m)=τ(6μ=1KμT(nlm)yk-μ(n,V0,α,De,re))m, (41)

After we have completed the first and second stages of the self-production of energy, we are going to discover another very important case under the IMYKP model in 3D-ERQM symmetries. This physical new phenomenon is produced automatically from the influence of perturbed effective potential Ξykpert(r) which we have seen in Eq. (30). We consider the bosonic particle (or antiparticle) undergoing rotation with angular velocity Ω. The features of this subjective phenomenon are determined through the replace the arbitrary vector Θ with χΩ. Allowing us to replace the coupling LΘ with χ LΩ , as follows:

LΘ χLΩ. (42)

Here χ is just an infinitesimal real proportional constant. The effective potentials Wpertyk-rot(z), which induced the rotational movements of the bosonic particles, can be expressed as follows:

Wpertyk-rot(r)=χ(K1(1-z)4+K2z2(1-z)3+K3z2(1-z)4+K4z(1-z)2+K5z(1-z)3+K6(1-z)3)LΩ+O(Θ2). (43)

We chose a rotational velocity Ω parallel to the (Oz) axis (Ω= Ωe z ) to simplify the calculations, this, of course, does not change the physical characteristics of the examined problem as much as it simplifies the calculations. The pertubed generated spin-orbit coupling is then transformed into new physical phenomena as follows:

LΩχΩLz. (44)

All of this data allow for the discovery of the new corrected square improved energy ΔEykrot2(n,V0,α,De,re,χ,m) of the (LiH, HCl, CO and, H2) molecules due to the perturbed effective potential Wpertyk-rot(z) which is generated automatically by the influence of the IMYKP model for the (n,l,m) th excited state in 3D-ERQM symmetries as follows:

ΔEykrot2=χΩ(6μ=1KμT(nlm)yk-μ(n,V0,α,De,re)m. (45)

It’s worth noting that the authors of ref. [99] were studied rotating isotropic and anisotropic harmonically confined ultracold Fermi gases in two and 3-dimensional space at zero temperature, but in this case, the rotational term was added to the Hamiltonian operator manually, whereas, in our study, the rotation operator Wpertyk-rotz LΩ appears automatically due to the effect of the deformation of space-space under the IMYKP model. The eigenvalues of the operations G 2 for a bosonic particle and antiparticle (negative energy) with spin s = (1,2..) are equal [j(j + 1) − l(l + 1) − s(s + 1)]/2 , the possible values of j are {|ls|,|ls| + 1,...,|l + s|}. In the symmetries of the 3D-ERQM symmetries, the total relativistic improved energy Encyk(n,V0,α,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m) for the (LiH, HCl, CO and, H2) diatomic molecules with IMYKP model, corresponding to the generalized (n,l,m) th excited states are expressed as:

Encyk(n,V0,α,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=Enl+[M(nlm)yk((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2, (46)

where E nl are usual relativistic energies under the IMYKP model obtained from equations of energy in Eq. (15). It should be noted that the corrected relativistic energy in Eq. (46) can be generalized to include negative energy (the bosonic antiparticle) and the positive relativistic energy (the bosonic particle) as follows:

Et-ncyk-b={Enl +[M(nlm)yk((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2 for bosonic particle Enl -[M(nlm)yk((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2 for bosonic antiparticle, (47)

which can be written explicitly using the step θ(|Encyk|) function as:

Et-ncyk-b=|Encyk|θ(|Encyk|)-|Encyk-s|θ(-|Encyk|). (48)

It is important to point out that because we have only used corrections of the first order of infinitesimal noncommutative parameters (Θ,τ,χ), perturbation theory cannot be used to find corrections of the second order (Θ2 2 2).

4. The SE with IMYKP models in 3D-ENRQM symmetries

The main purpose of this section is to analyze the non-relativistic limit, in three-dimensional extended non-relativistic QM (3D-ENRQM) symmetries, for the IMYKP model. Two steps must be applied. The first one corresponds to the non-relativistic limit, in usual three-dimensional non-relativistic QM (3D-NRQM) symmetries. This is achieved by transferring the following values (Enl+μ and Enl-μ),by (2μ and Enlnr), respectively. This step was studied by Parmar and Vinodkumar [1] as:

Enlnr(n,V0,α,De,re)=α2l(l+1)2μ+De-A3+α2A5-αA4

-α22μ[l(l+1)2μα2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A4))2(n+Xnlnr)+n+Xnlnr2]2, (49)

with

Xnlnr=12+2μ(A5-A1)+(l+1/2)2. (50)

Now, under the non-relativistic limit, the relativistic expectation values T(nlm)yk-μ reduce to the new corresponding non-relativistic expectation values R(nlm)yk-μ,(μ=1,6¯) as:

R(nlm)yk-1=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnlnr-2)Γ(2ωnlnr)Γ(n+2Xnlnr-4)Γ(ωnlnr+1)(n+Dnlnr/2-2)Γ(n+2ωnlnr+1)Γ(n+Dnlnr-4), (51.1)

R(nlm)yk-2=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnlnr-3/2)Γ(2ωnlnr+2)Γ(n+2Xnlnr-3)Γ(2ωnlnr+3)(n+Dnlnr/2-1/2)Γ(n+2ωnl+3)Γ(n+Dnlnr-1), (51.2)

R(nlm)yk-3=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnlnr-2)Γ(2ωnl+2)Γ(n+2Xnlnr-4)Γ(2ωnl+3)(n+Dnlnr/2-1)Γ(n+2ωnlnr+3)Γ(n+Dnlnr-2), (51.3)

R(nlm)yk-4=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnlnr-1)Γ(2ωnlnr+1)Γ(n+2Xnlnr-2)Γ(2ωnlnr+2)(n+Dnlnr/2-1/2)Γ(n+2ωnlnr+2)Γ(n+Dnlnr-1), (51.4)

R(nlm)yk-5=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnlnr-3/2)Γ(2ωnlnr+1)Γ(n+2Xnlnr-3)Γ(2ωnlnr+2)(n+Dnlnr/2-1)Γ(n+2ωnlnr+2)Γ(n+Dnlnr-2), (51.5)

and

R(nlm)yk-6=Cnln2αn!(n+Xnlnr-3/2)Γ(2ωnlnr)Γ(n+2Xnlnr-3)Γ(2ωnlnr+1)(n+Dnlnr/2-3/2)Γ(n+2ωnlnr+1)Γ(n+Dnlnr-3), (51.6)

with

{Dnlnr=2ωnlnr+2Xnlnr,ωnlnr=l(l+1)+2μA5-2μA4α-2μ(Enlnr+A3-De)α2,Cnlnr=n!Γ(2ωnlnr+1)Γ(n+2ωnlnr+1)αn!(2Xnlnr+1)Γ(n+2ωnlnr+2Xnlnr+1)22ωnlnr+2Xnlnr-1Γ(2ωnlnr+n+1)Γ(2Xnlnr+n+1).. (52)

while the relativistic factors Kα(α=1,6¯) in Eq. (31) are reduced to the corresponding non-relativistic factors as follows:

{K1nr=-α4[A5+α4l(l+1)/2μ]K2nr=K3nr=-α4A1K4nr=K5nr=α3A2/2[1ex]K6nr=-α3A4/2. (53)

As a direct consequence, the new non-relativistic improved energy Enc-nlnr-yk of the excited state (n,l,m) th in 3D-ENRQM symmetries under the IMYKP model equals the non-relativistic energy Enlnr in Eq. (49) under the MYKP model, as a main part, plus non-relativistic correction which is generated with the effect of deformation space-space, as the perturbed part, as follows:

Enc-nlnr-yk(n,V0,α,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=α2l(l+1)2μ+De-A3+α2A5\na-αA4-α22μ[l(l+1)2μα2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A4))2(n+Xnlnr)+n+Xnlnr2]2

+M(nlm)yk-nr(n,V0,α,De,re)((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s)), (54)

where M(nlm)yk-nr(n,V0,α,De,re) is the non-relativistic expectation values which determined from the projection relation:

M(nlm)yk-nr(n,V0,α,De,re)=6μ=1KμnrR(nlm)yk-μ(n,V0,α,De,re). (55)

5. Study of important particular cases in 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries

We will look at some specific examples involving the new bound state energy eigenvalues in Eqs. (46) and (54) in this section. By adjusting relevant parameters of the IMYKP model in 3D-ERQM and three-dimensional extended non-relativistic quantum mechanics (3D-ENRQM) symmetries, we could derive some specific potentials useful for other physical systems for much concern the specialist reaches. It should be noted that these special cases were treated within the framework of relativistic and non-relativistic quantum mechanics known in the literature in ref. [1], and we are now in the process of generalizing them to include extended relativistic and non-relativistic quantum mechanics symmetries.

(1) If we choose, V 0 = 0, we obtain improved modified Kratzer potential (IMKP), and α → 0, from Eqs. (46) and (54), we deduced eigenvalues correspond to IMKP for 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries as [33]:

Enck(n,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=Enlr-k+[M(nlm)k((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2, (56)

and

Enc-nlnr-k(n,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=De-2μDe2re2(n+1/2+2μDere2+(l+1/2)2)2

+M(nlm)nr-k((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s)), (57)

where the relativistic eigenvalues Enlk in 3D-RQM symmetries are obtained from Refs. [1,2]:

Enlk2-M2=(Enlk+M)De-(Enlk+μ)De2re2(n+1/2+(Enlk+μ)De2re2+(l+1/2)2)2, (58)

while the new relativistic and non-relativistic expectations values M(nlm)k and M(nlm)nr-k can be determined from the following limits:

{M(nlm)k=lim(V0,α)(0,0)M(nlm)ykM(nlm)nr-k=lim(V0,α)(0,0)M(nlm)nr-yk. (59)

(2) If we choose, A 1 = A 2 = 0 and A 3 = −λ, we obtain improved generalized Kratzer potential (IGKP), and α → 0, from Eqs. (46) and (54), we deduced eigenvalues correspond to IGKP for 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries as:

Encgk(n,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=Enlr-gk+[M(nlm)gk((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2, (60)

and

Enc-nlnr-gk(n,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=De+λ-2μDe2re2(n+1/2+2μDere2+(l+1/2)2)2

+M(nlm)nr-gk((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s)), (61)

where the relativistic eigenvalues Enlgk in 3D-RQM symmetries obtained form [1,100]

Enlgk2-M2=(Enlgk+M)(De+λ)-(Enlgk+μ)De2re2(n+1/2+(Enlgk+μ)De2re2+(l+1/2)2)2, (62)

while the new relativistic and non-relativistic expectations values M(nlm)gk and M(nlm)nr-gk can be determined from the following limits:

{M(nlm)gk=lim(A1,A2,α,A3)(0,0,0,-λ)M(nlm)ykM(nlm)nr-gk=lim(A1,A2,α,A3)(0,0,0,-λ)M(nlm)nr-yk. (63)

(3) If we choose, A 1 = A 2 = 0 and A 3 = −D e , we obtain improved Kratzer potential, and α → 0, from Eqs. (46) and (54), we deduced eigenvalues correspond to improved Kratzer potential for 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries as:

Enckp(n,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=Enlr-kp+[M(nlm)kp((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2, (64)

and

Enc-nlnr-kp(n,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=-2μDe2re2(n+1/2+2μDere2+(l+1/2)2)2

+M(nlm)nr-kp((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s)), (65)

where the relativistic eigenvalues Enlkp in 3D-RQM symmetries obtained form [1,101]:

Enlkp2-M2=-(Enlkp+μ)De2re2(n+1/2+(Enlkp+μ)De2re2+(l+1/2)2)2, (66)

while the new relativistic and non-relativistic expectations values M(nlm)gk and M(nlm)nr-gk can be determined from the following limits:

{M(nlm)kp=lim(A1,A2,α,A3)(0,0,0,-De)M(nlm)ykM(nlm)nr-gk=lim(A1,A2,α,A3)(0,0,0,-De)M(nlm)nr-yk. (67)

(4) If we choose, A 1 = A 3 = 0 and A 2 = −A, we obtain improved modified Kratzer plus screened Coulomb potential (IMKSCP). From Eqs. (46) and (54), we deduced eigenvalues correspond to IMKSCP for 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries as:

Enckc=Enlr-kc+[M(nlm)kc((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2, (68)

and

Enc-nlnr-kc=α2l(l+1)2μ+De+α2Dere2-2αDere-α2[2μ(α2Dere2-α(A+2Dere))+l(l+1)2n+1+22μDe2re2+(l+1/2)2]2

+M(nlm)nr-kc((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s)), (69)

where the relativistic eigenvalues Enlkc in 3D-RQM symmetries are obtained from Refs. [1,2]:

Enlkc2-M2=(Enlkc+μ)(De+α2Dere2-2αDere)+α2l(l+1)

-α2[(Enlkc+μ)(α2Dere2-α(A+Dere))+l(l+1)2n+1+2(Enlkc+μ)De2re2+(l+1/2)2]2, (70)

while the new relativistic and non-relativistic expectations values M(nlm)kc and M(nlm)nr-kc can be determined from the following limits:

{M(nlm)kc=lim(A1,A3,A2)(0,0,-A)M(nlm)ykM(nlm)nr-kc=lim(A1,A3,A2)(0,0,-A)M(nlm)nr-yk (71)

(5) If we choose, A 1 = A 5 = 0 , A 2 = B and A 4 = C, we obtain improved Hellmann potential (IHP). From Eqs. (46) and (54), we deduced eigenvalues correspond to IMKSCP for 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries as [39]:

Enchp=Enlr-hp+[M(nlm)hp((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2, (72)

and

Enc-nlnr-hp=α2l(l+1)2μ-αC-α22μ[2μ(B-C)+l(l+1)2n+2l+2+n+l+22]2

+M(nlm)nr-hp((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s)), (73)

where the relativistic eigenvalues Enlhp in 3D-RQM symmetries obtained from Refs. [1,102]:

Enlhp2-M2=-αC(Enlhp+μ)+α2l(l+1)

-α2C2[(Enlhp+μ)(B-C)+l(l+1)2n+2l+2+n+l+22]2, (74)

while the new relativistic and non-relativistic expectations values M(nlm)hp and M(nlm)nr-hp can be determined from the following limits:

{M(nlm)hp=lim(A1,A5,A2,A4)(0,0,B,C)M(nlm)ykM(nlm)nr-hp=lim(A1,A5,A2,A4)(0,0,B,C)M(nlm)nr-yk. (75)

(6) If we choose, A 1 = A 3 = D e = 0 and A 2 = −A , we obtain an improved screened Coulomb potential or improved Yukawa potential (IYP). From Eqs. (46) and (54), we deduced eigenvalues correspond to IMKSCP for 3D-ERQM and 3DENRQM symmetries as [38,88,103]:

Encyp=Enlr-yp+[M(nlm)yp((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2, (76)

and

Enc-nlnr-yp=α2l(l+1)2μ-α22μ[l(l+1)-2μAα-12n+2l+2+n+l+22]2

+M(nlm)nr-yp((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s)). (77)

where the relativistic eigenvalues Enlyp in 3D-RQM symmetries obtained from Ref. [104,105]:

Enlyp2-M2=α2l(l+1)-α2[-Aα-1(Enlyp+μ)+l(l+1)2n+2l+2+n+l+22]2. (78)

while the new relativistic and non-relativistic expectations values M(nlm)yp and M(nlm)nr-yp can be determined from the following limits:

{M(nlm)yp=lim(A1,A3,De,A2)(0,0,0,-A)M(nlm)ykM(nlm)nr-yp=lim(A1,A3,De,A2)(0,0,0,-A)M(nlm)nr-yk. (79)

(7) If we choose, A 2 = A 4 = A 5 = 0 , A 1 = A and A 2 = D 2, we obtain improved inversely square Yukawa potential. From Eqs. (46) and (54), we deduced eigenvalues correspond to improved inversely square Yukawa potential for 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetries as [37,105]:

Enciyp=Enlr-iyp+[M(nlm)iyp((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s))]1/2, (80)

and

Enc-nlnr-iyp=α2l(l+1)2μ-α22μ\nt[l(l+1)-2μA(n+1/2+(l+12)2-2μA)+(n+1/2+(l+12)2-2μA)2]2

+M(nlm)nr-isy((τ+χΩ)m+Θϝ(j,l,s)), (81)

where the relativistic eigenvalues Enlyp in 3D-RQM symmetries obtained from Ref. [5,103]:

Enliyp2-M2=α2l(l+1)-α2

×[-A(Enliyp+μ)l(l+1)2(n+1/2+(l+12)2-A(Enliyp+μ))2+(n+1/2+(l+12)2-A(Enliyp+μ))2]2, (82)

while the new relativistic and non-relativistic expectations values M(nlm)iyp and M(nlm)nr-iyp can be determined from the following limits:

{M(nlm)iyp=lim(A2,A4,A5,A1,A2)(0,0,0,A,D2)M(nlm)ykM(nlm)nr-iyp=lim(A2,A4,A5,A1,A2)(0,0,0,A,D2)M(nlm)nr-yk. (83)

6. Spin-averaged mass spectra of HLM under IMKSCP models in 3D-ENRQM symmetries

The quark-antiquark interaction potentials, are spherically symmetrical and provide a good description of the heavy-light mesons (HLM) such as cc and bb. This would give us a strong incentive to dedicate this section to the purpose to determine the modified spin-averaged mass spectra of the heavy quarkonium system such as cc¯ and bb¯ under the IMKSCP model interaction, in 3D-ENRQM symmetries, by using the following formula,

Mnc-nlyk-hlm=2mq+{13(Enc-nlnr-yk-u+Enc-nlnr-yk-m+Enc-nlnr-yk-l) for spin-1Enc-nlnr-yk for spin-0, (84)

where Enc-nlnr-yk-u,Enc-nlnr-yk-m,Enc-nlnr-yk-l and Enc-nlnr-yk are the new energy eigenvalues that correspond (j = l + 1, s = 1), (j = l, s = 1), (j = l − 1, s = 1) and (j = l, s = 0) under improved modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential model interactions in 3D-NRNCQM symmetries. We generalized the original formula [106-108]:

Mnlyk-hlm=2mq+Enlnr,

here m q is the quark mass which equals the antiquark mass mq¯ in the case of charmonium cc¯, bottomonium bb¯ while Enlnr is the non-relativistic energy under modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential models which is determined by generalizing Eq. (49) in 3-dimensional space (N = 3). We need to replace the factor z(j,l,s) with new generalized values as follows:

ϝ(j,l,s)={l/2for(j=l+1,s=1)-1for(j=l,s=1)(-2l-2)/2for(j=l-1,s=1)0for(j=l,s=0). (85)

Permuted us to obtain the new energy eigenvalues Enc-nlyk-u,Enc-nlyk-m and Enc-nlyk-l and Enc-nlnr-yk of the heavy quarkonium system such as cc¯ and bb¯ as:

1. For the case: j=l+1 and s=1,Enlnc-u can be expressed by the following formula:

Enc-nlyk-u=α2l(l+1)2μ+De-A3+α2A5-αA4

-α22μ[l(l+1)2μα2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A4))2(n+Xnlnr)+n+Xnlnr2]2+M(nlm)nr-yk)(τ+χΩ)m+Θl2. (86)

2. For the case: j=l and s=1, Enc-nlyk-m can be expressed by the following formula:

Enc-nlyk-m=α2l(l+1)2μ+De-A3+α2A5-αA4

-α22μ[l(l+1)2μα2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A4))2(n+Xnlnr)+n+Xnlnr2]2+M(nlm)nr-yk((τ+χΩ)m-Θ). (87)

3. For the case: j = l − 1and s = 1, can be express on the new energy eigenvalue E nl yk−l by the following formula:

Enc-nlyk-l=α2l(l+1)2μ+De-A3+α2A5-αA4

-α22μ[l(l+1)2μα2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A4))2(n+Xnlnr)+n+Xnlnr2]2+M(nlm)nr-yk((τ+χΩ)m-Θ(l+1)). (88)

4. For the case (j = l, s = 0), we can be express on the new energy eigenvalue Enc-nlnr-yk by the following formula:

Enc-nlnr-yk=α2l(l+1)2μ+De-A3+α2A5-αA4

-α22μ[l(l+1)2μα2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A4))2(n+Xnlnr)+n+Xnlnr2]2+M(nlm)nr-yk(τ+χΩ)m). (89)

By substituting Eqs. (86), (87) and (88) into Eq. (89), the new mass spectrum of the meson systems in 3D-ENRQM symmetries under the IMYKP model for any arbitrary radial and angular momentum quantum numbers becomes:

Mnc-nlyk-hlm=Mnlyk-hlm+{M(nlm)nr-yk((τ+χΩ)m-(4+l)6Θ) for spin-1M(nlm)nr-yk(τ+χΩ)m) for spin-0 (90)

Thus the spin-averaged mass spectra Mnlyk-hlm of the heavy quarkonium system such as cc¯ and bb¯ under the modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential model interactions in usual 3D-NRQM symmetries:

Mnlyk-hlm=2mq+α2l(l+1)2μ+De-A3+α2A5-αA4

-α22μ[l(l+1)2μα2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A4))2(n+Xnlnr)+n+Xnlnr2]2, (91)

is extended to include (δMnc-nlyk-hlm=Mnc-nlyk-hlm-Mnlyk-hlm) in 3D-ENRQM symmetries:

δMnc-nlyk-hlm={M(nlm)nr-yk((τ+χΩ)m-(4+l)6Θ) for s=1Mnlmnr-yk(τ+χΩ)m) for s=0. (92)

Which is sensitive to the atomic quantum numbers (n,j,l,s,m), potential depths (V 0 ), and the non-commutativity parameters (Θ,τ,χ) under the deformed properties of space-space. This allows us to realize logical physical limits:

Lim(Θ,τ,χ)(0,0,0)Mnc-nlyk-hlm=Mnlyk-hlm, (93)

to be achieved.

6.1. Composite systems

In this section, and in the context of NC algebra, consider composite systems such as molecules comprised of N = 2 particles of mass m α (α = 1,2). In the non-relativistic context, it is important to consider the characteristics of the system descriptions. It was discovered that those composite systems with various mass descriptions need various NC parameters [51,52,109]:

[x^μ(s,h,i),x^ν(s,h,i)]*=iθmνc, (94)

where the non-commutativity parameter θmνc is determined from α=12μα2θmν(α), with µ 1 = m 1 /(m 1 + m 2) and µ 2 = m 2 /(m 1 + m 2), and θmν(α) is the new parameter of non-commutativity, corresponding to the mass particle of mass µ n . Note that in the case of a physical system composed of two identical particles µ 1 = µ 2 such as the diatomic H2 molecules under the effect of the improved modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential and a class of Yukawa potential, the parameter θμν(α)=θμν. Thus, the three parameters Θ, τ and χ which appear in Eq. (79) are changed to become as follows:

Λc2=(2α=1μn2Λ12(α))2+(2α=1μn2Λ23(α))2+(2α=1μn2Λ13(α))2, (95)

with Λ c can be present Θ c c and χ c . As mentioned above, in the case of a system of two particles with the same mass µ 1 = µ 2, we have θμν(n)=θμν,τμν(n)=τμν and χμν(n)=χμν. Finally, we can generalize our obtained non-relativistic total energy Enc-nrsp(n,V0,α,De,re,Θc,τc,χc,j,l,s,m) under the improved modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential considering that composite systems with different masses are described with different new NC parameters in Eq. (94) for the HCl, CH, LiH and ScH diatomic molecules as:

Enc-nlnr-yk (n,V0,α,De,re,Θ,τ,χ,j,l,s,m)=α2l(l+1)2μ+De-A3+α2A5-αA4

-α22μ[l(l+1)2μα2(α2(A5+A1)+α(A2-A4))2(n+Xnlnr)+n+Xnlnr2]2

+M(nlm)yk-nr(n,V0,α,De,re)((τc+χcΩ)m+Θcϝ(j,l,s)). (96)

It is worth noting that for the three-simultaneous limits (Θ,τ,χ) → (0,0,0) and (Θ c c c ) → (0,0,0), we recover the energy equations for both the KGE and SE with modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential in 3D-RQM and 3DNRQM symmetries, which are obtained in main Ref. [1].

7. Conclusions

In summary, this paper presents an approximate analytical solution of the 3-dimensional deformed Klein-Gordon and deformed equations in 3D-ERQM symmetries with the improved modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential model models using the parametric Bopp’s shift method and standard perturbation theory. Under the deformed features of spacespace, we found new bound-state energies that appear sensitive to quantum numbers (n,j,l,s,m), the mixed potential depths (V 0 ,D e ,r e ), the screening parameter’s inverse α and the non-commutativity parameters (Θ,τ,χ). Moreover, the non-relativistic limit of the studied potential in 3DENRQM symmetries has been investigated. The modified spin-averaged mass spectra of heavy and heavy-light mesons such as cc and bb in both 3D-NRQM (commutative space) and 3D-ENRQM symmetries were determined by applying our results of the new non-relativistic energies that represent the binding energy between the quark and anti-quark.

In the context of 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetry, we have treated certain significant particular instances that we hope will be valuable to the specialized researcher, such as the improved modified Kratzer potential, improved generalized Kratzer potential, improved Kratzer potential, improved modified Kratzer plus screened Coulomb potential, improved screened Coulomb potential and improved inversely square Yukawa potential. It is shown that the IMYKP model in a 3D-ERQM and 3D-ENRQM symmetry has similar behavior to the dynamics of a bosonic particle and bosonic antiparticle with equal scalar and vector potential for the modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential model models in a 3D-RQM symmetry (commutative space) influenced by the effect of a constant magnetic field, a self-rotational and a perturbed spin-orbit interaction. We recover the energy equations for the KGE and SE with modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential in 3D-RQM and 3D-NRQM symmetries, which were found in the main reference [1], for the three-simultaneous limits (Θ,τ,χ) → (0,0,0) and (Θ c c c ) → (0,0,0).

Acknowledgements

The work is partially supported by the Laboratory of Physics and Material Chemistry and by a DGRSDT and SNDL of Algeria. We thank the kind referees for their useful suggestions and criticism that have greatly improved this manuscript.

References

1 R.H. Parmar and P.C. Vinodkumar, Eigensolution of the Klein-Gordon equation for modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential and its applications using parametric Nikiforov-Uvarov and SUSYQM method, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 59 (2021) 1638, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-021-01258-y. [ Links ]

2 C.O. Edet, U.S. Okorie, A.T. Ngiangiaand A.N. Ikot, Bound state solutions of the Schrödinger equation for the modified Kratzer potential plus screened, Coulomb potential Indian J Phys 94 (2020) 425, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12648-019-01477-9. [ Links ]

3 A.N. Ikot, U. Okorie, A.T. Ngiangia, C.A. Onate, C.O. Edet, I.O. Akpan and P.O. Amadi, Bound state solutions of the Schrödinger equation with energy dependent molecular Kratzer potential via asymptotic iteration method, Eclética Química Journal 45 (2020) 65, https://doi.org/10.26850/1678-4618eqj.v45.1.p65-76. [ Links ]

4 A.N. Ikot, U.S. Okorie, R. Sever and G.J. Rampho, Eigensolution, expectation values and thermodynamic properties of the screened Kratzer potential, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134 (2019) 386, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12783-x. [ Links ]

5 A.I. Ahmadov, M. Demirci, S.M. Aslanova, M.F. Mustamin, Arbitrary l-state solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation with the Manning-Rosen plus a Class of Yukawa potentials, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126372. [ Links ]

6 K.R. Purohit, R.H. Parmar and A.K. Rai, Energy and momentum eigenspectrum of the Hulthén-screened cosine Kratzer potential using proper quantization rule and SUSYQM method, J Mol Model 27 (2021) 358, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04965-0. [ Links ]

7 K.R. Purohit, R.H. Parmar and A.K. Rai, Solution of the modified Yukawa-Kratzer potential under influence of the external fields and its thermodynamic properties J Math Chem 60 (2022) 1930 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-022-01397-w. [ Links ]

8 A. Kratzer, Die ultraroten Rotations spektren der Halogenwasserstoffe, Z. Physik 3 (1920) 289, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01327754. [ Links ]

9 M. Aygun, O. Bayrak, I. Boztosun, Y. Sahin, The energy eigenvalues of the Kratzer potential in the presence of a magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. D 66 (2012) 35, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2011-20319-5. [ Links ]

10 K.R. Purohit, R.H. Parmar and A.K. Rai, Eigensolution and various properties of the screened cosine Kratzer potential in D dimensions via relativistic and non-relativistic treatment, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 (2020) 286, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00299-7. [ Links ]

11 K.R. Purohit, R.H. Parmar and A. K. Rai, Bound state solution and thermodynamic properties of the screened cosine Kratzer potential under influence of the magnetic field and Aharanov- Bohm flux field, Annals of Physics 424 (2021) 168335, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2020.168335. [ Links ]

12 U.S. Okorie, E.E. Ibekwe, A.N. Ikot, M.C. Onyeaju and E.O. Chukwuocha, Thermodynamic Properties of the Modified Yukawa Potential, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 73 (2018) 1211, https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.73.1211. [ Links ]

13 E. Omugbe, O.E. Osafle, M.C. Onyeaju, I.B. Okon and C.A. Onate, The unifed treatment on the non-relativistic bound state solutions, thermodynamic properties and expectation values of exponential-type potentials, Can. J. Phys. 99 (2020) 521, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2020-0368. [ Links ]

14 A.D. Antia, I. B. Okon, C. N. Isonguyo, A. O. Akankpo and N. E. Eyo, Bound state solutions and thermodynamic properties of modified exponential screened plus Yukawa potential, J Egypt Math Soc 30 (2022) 11, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787-022-00145-y. [ Links ]

15 O. Bertolami and R. Queiroz, Phase-space non-commutativity and the Dirac equation, Phys. Lett. A 375 (2011) 411, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2011.09.053. [ Links ]

16 K.R. Purohit, P. Jakhad and A. K. Rai, Quarkonium spectroscopy of the linear plus modified Yukawa potential, Phys. Scr. 97 (2022) 044002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac5bc2. [ Links ]

17 E. Witten, Non-commutative geometry and string field theory, Nuclear Physics B 268 (1986) 253, https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(86)90155-0. [ Links ]

18 S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase and G. Scarpetta, Generalized Uncertainty Principle from Quantum Geometry, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39 (2000) 15, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003634814685. [ Links ]

19 S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J.E. Roberts, Space time quantization induced by classical gravity, Phys. Lett. B 331(1994) 39, https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(94)90940-7. [ Links ]

20 E. Witten, Reflections on the Fate of Spacetime, Phys. Today 49 (1996) 24, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881493. [ Links ]

21 A. Kempf, G. Mangano and R.B. Mann, Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 1108, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1108. [ Links ]

22 R.J. Adler and D.I. Santigo, On gravity and the uncertainty principal, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 1371, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732399001462. [ Links ]

23 T. Kanazawa, G. Lambiase, G. Vilasi A. Yoshioka, Noncommutative Schwarzschild geometry and generalized uncertainty principle, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 1, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6610-1. [ Links ]

24 F. Scardigli, Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment, Phys. Lett. B 452 (1999) 39, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00167-7. [ Links ]

25 S.I. Vacaru, Exact solutions with noncommutative symmetries in Einstein and gauge gravity, J. Math. Phys. 46 (2005) 042503, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1869538. [ Links ]

26 A. Maireche, A New Approach to the Approximate Analytic Solution of the Three-Dimensional Schrödinger Equation for Hydrogenic and Neutral Atoms in the Generalized Hellmann Potential Model, Ukr. J. Phys. 65 (2020) 987, https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe65.11.987. [ Links ]

27 H.S. Snyder, Quantized Space-Time, Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 38, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.71.38; The Electromagnetic Field in Quantized Space-Time, Phys. Rev. 72 (1947) 68, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev. 72.68. [ Links ]

28 A. Connes and J. Lott, Particle models and noncommutative geometry, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 18B (1991) 29, https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5632(91)90120-4. [ Links ]

29 A. Connes, Noncommutative Geometry (ISBN-9780121858605) 1994. [ Links ]

30 N. Seiberg and E. Witten, String theory and noncommutative geometry, JHEP 1999 (1999) 32, https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/1999/09/032. [ Links ]

31 S. Terashima, A note on super fields and noncommutative geometry, Phys. Lett. B 482 (2000) 276, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00486-x. [ Links ]

32 A. Maireche, Effects of Three-Dimensional Noncommutative Theories on Bound States Schrodinger Molecular under New¨ Modified Kratzer-type Interactions, J. Nano- Electron. Phys. 10 (2018) 02011, https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.10(2).02011. [ Links ]

33 A. Maireche, New Non-relativistic Bound States Solutions for Modified Kratzer Potential in One-electron Atoms, J. NanoElectron. Phys. 9 (2017) 03031, https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.9(3).03031. [ Links ]

34 A. Maireche, Non-relativistic treatment of hydrogen-like and neutral atoms subjected to the generalized perturbed Yukawa potential with centrifugal barrier in the symmetries of noncommutative quantum mechanics, Int. J. Geom. Met. Mod. Phys. 17(2020) 2050067, https://doi.org/10.1142/S021988782050067X. [ Links ]

35 A. Maireche, Bound-state Solutions of Klein-Gordon and Schrödinger Equations for Arbitrary l-state with Linear Combination of Hulthén and Kratzer Potentials, Afr. Rev. Phys. 15 (2020) 19. [ Links ]

36 A. Maireche, The Investigation of Approximate Solutions of Deformed Klein-Gordon and Schrödinger Equations Under Modified More General Exponential Screened Coulomb Potential Plus Yukawa Potential in NCQM Symmetries, Few-Body Syst 62 (2021) 66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01639-8. [ Links ]

37 A. Maireche, A Theoretical Model of Deformed Klein-Gordon Equation with Generalized Modified Screened Coulomb Plus Inversely Quadratic Yukawa Potential in RNCQM Symmetries, Few-Body Syst 62 (2021) 12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01596-2. [ Links ]

38 A. Maireche, A New Theoretical Investigation of the Modified Equal Scalar and Vector Manning-Rosen Plus Quadratic Yukawa Potential Within the Deformed Klein-Gordon and Schrodinger Equations Using the Improved Approximation of¨ the Centrifugal Term and Bopp’s Shift Method in RNCQM and NRNCQM Symmetries, Spin J. 11 (2021) 2150029-31, https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010324721500296. [ Links ]

39 A. Maireche, A new theoretical study of the deformed unequal scalar and vector Hellmann plus modified Kratzer potentials within the deformed Klein-Gordon equation in RNCQM symmetries, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36 (2021) 2150232, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732321502321. [ Links ]

40 A. Maireche, The investigation of approximate solutions of Deformed Klein-Fock-Gordon and Schrodinger Equations under¨ Modified Equal Scalar and Vector Manning-Rosen and Yukawa Potentials by using the Improved Approximation of the Centrifugal term and Bopp’s shift Method in NCQM Symmetries, Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. 15 (2021) 2310-1, [ Links ]

41 M. Darroodi, H. Mehraban and H. Hassanabadi, The Klein-Gordon equation with the Kratzer potential in the noncommutative space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33 (2018) 1850203, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732318502036. [ Links ]

42 A. Maireche, Investigations on the Relativistic Interactions in One-Electron Atoms with Modified Yukawa Potential for Spin 1/2 Particles, International Frontier Science Letters 11(2017) 29, https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/IFSL.11.29. [ Links ]

43 A. Maireche, Approximate Arbitrary k State Solutions of Dirac Equation with Improved Inversely Quadratic Yukawa Potential within Improved Coulomb-like Tensor Interaction in Deformation Quantum Mechanics Symmetries, Few-Body Syst 63 (2022) 54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-022-01755-z. [ Links ]

44 A. Maireche, On the interaction of an improved Schiöberg potential within the Yukawa tensor interaction under the background of deformed Dirac and Schrödinger equations, Indian J Phys 97 (2023) 519, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-022-02433-w. [ Links ]

45 A. Maireche, A new study of relativistic and non-relativistic for new modified Yukawa potential via the BSM in the framework of noncommutative quantum mechanics symmetries: An application to heavy-light mesons systems, YJES 19 (2022) 1, https://doi.org/10.53370/001c.39615. [ Links ]

46 A. Maireche, Approximate k-state solutions of the deformed Dirac equation in spatially dependent mass for the improved Eckart potential including the improved Yukawa tensor interaction in ERQM symmetries, Int. J. Geom. Met. Mod. Phys. 19 (2022) 2250085, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887822500852. [ Links ]

47 A. Saidi and M.B. Sedra, Spin-one (1 + 3)-dimensional DKP equation with modified Kratzer potential in the noncommutative space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35 (2020) 2050014, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732320500145. [ Links ]

48 P. Nicolini, Noncommutative black holes, the final appeal to quantum gravity: a review, Int. J Mod. Phys. A 24 (2009) 1229, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x09043353. [ Links ]

49 O. Bertolami, G.J. Rosa, C.M.L. Dearagao, P. Castorina and D. Zappala, Scaling of variables and the relation between noncommutative parameters in noncommutative quantum mechanics, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21 (2006) 795, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732306019840. [ Links ]

50 E.E. N’Dolo, D.O. Samary, B. Ezinvi and M.N. Ounkonnou, Noncommutative Dirac and Klein-Gordon oscillators in the background of cosmic string: spectrum and dynamics, Int. J. Geom. Met. Mod. Phys. 17 (2020) 2050078, https://doi. org/10.1142/s0219887820500784. [ Links ]

51 K.P. Gnatenko, V.M. Tkachuk, Composite system in rotationally invariant noncommutative phase space, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (2018) 1850037, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x18500379. [ Links ]

52 A. Maireche, Bound-state solutions of the modified Klein-Gordon and Schrödinger equations for arbitrary l-state with the modified Morse potential in the symmetries of noncommutative quantum mechanics, J. Phys. Stud. 25 (2021) 1002, https://doi.org/10.30970/jps.25.1002. [ Links ]

53 S. Aghababaei and G. Rezaei, Energy level splitting of a 2D hydrogen atom with Rashba coupling in non-commutative space, Commun Theor. Phys. 72 (2020) 125101, https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/abb7cc. [ Links ]

54 E.F. Djemaï and H. Smail, On Quantum Mechanics on Noncommutative Quantum Phase Space, Commun. Theor. Phys. 41 (2004) 837, https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0253-6102/41/6/837. [ Links ]

55 J.F.G. Santos, Heat flow and noncommutative quantum mechanics in phase-space J. Mat. Phys. 61 (2020) 122101 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0010076. [ Links ]

56 O. Bertolami, J.G. Rosa, C.M.L. De Aragão, P. Castorina and D. Zappalà, Noncommutative Gravitational Quantum Wel, Phys. Rev. D 72(2) (2005) 025010, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.72.025010. [ Links ]

57 T. Harko and S.D. Liang, Energy-dependent noncommutative quantum mechanics, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 300, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6794-4. [ Links ]

58 M. Chaichian, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari and A. Tureanu, Hydrogen Atom Spectrum and the Lamb Shift in Noncommutative QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2716, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.86.2716. [ Links ]

59 E.M.C. Abreu, C. Neves and W. Oliveira, non-commutativity from the symplectic point of view, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21 (2006) 5359, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x06034094. [ Links ]

60 E.M.C. Abreu, J.A. Neto, A.C.R. Mendes, C. Neves, W. Oliveira and M.V. Marcial, Lagrangian formulation for noncommutative nonlinear systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1250053, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x12500534. [ Links ]

61 Wang J. and Li K., The HMW effect in Noncommutative Quantum Mechanics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 (2007) 2197, https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/9/021. [ Links ]

62 A.D. Alhaidari, H. Bahlouli, A. Al-Hasan, Dirac and Klein-Gordon equations with equal scalar and vector potentials, Phys. Lett. A 349 (2006) 87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.09.008. [ Links ]

63 A. Connes, Noncommutative geometry and reality, J. Mat. Phys. 36 (1995) 6194, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.531241. [ Links ]

64 A. Connes, J. Cuntz and M.A. Rieffel, Noncommutative Geometry, Oberwolfach Reports 4( (2008) 2543, https://doi.org/10.4171/OWR/2007/43. [ Links ]

65 A. Connes, J. Cuntz, M.A. Rieffel and G. Yu, Noncommutative Geometry, Oberwolfach Reports 10 (2013) 2553, https://doi.org/10.4171/OWR/2013/45. [ Links ]

66 P. M. Ho and H.C. Kao, Noncommutative Quantum Mechanics from Noncommutative Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 151602, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.88.151602. [ Links ]

67 A. Connes, M.R. Douglas and A. Schwarz, Noncommutative Geometry and Matrix Theory, JHEP 02 (1998) 003, https: //doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/1998/02/003. [ Links ]

68 H. Benzair, M. Merad, T. Boudjedaa and A. Makhlouf, Relativistic Oscillators in a Noncommutative Space: a Path Integral Approach, Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung A 67 (2012) 77, https://doi.org/10.5560/zna.2011-0060. [ Links ]

69 B. Mirza and M. Mohadesi, The Klein-Gordon and the Dirac Oscillators in a Noncommutative Space, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) 664, https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/42/5/664. [ Links ]

70 M.R. Douglas and N.A. Nekrasov, Noncommutative Field Theory, Reviews of Modern Physics 73 (2001) 977, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.73.977. [ Links ]

71 H. Motavalli and A.R. Akbarieh, Klein-Gordon equation for the Coulomb potential in noncommutative space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25 (2010) 2523, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732310033529. [ Links ]

72 T. Curtright, D. Fairlie and C. Zachos, Features of timeindependent Wigner functions Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 025002, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.025002. [ Links ]

73 F. Bopp, La mécanique quantique est-elle une mécanique statistique classique particulière In Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré 15 (1956) 81. [ Links ]

74 L. Mezincescu, Star Operation in Quantum Mechanics, (2000). https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0007046. [ Links ]

75 J. Gamboa, M. Loewe and J.C. Rojas, Noncommutative quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 067901, https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.067901. [ Links ]

76 L. Gouba, A comparative review of four formulations of noncommutative quantum mechanics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (2016) 1630025, https://doi.org/10.1142/ s0217751x16300258. [ Links ]

77 A. Maireche, The Influence of Deformation Phase-Space on Spectra of Heavy Quarkonia in Improved Energy Potential at Finite Temperature Model of Schrodinger¨ Equation Via the Generalized Boob’s Shift Method and Standard Perturbation Theory, East European Journal of Physics 2023 (2023) 28, https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2023-1-03. [ Links ]

78 A. Maireche, A theoretical investigation of non-relativistic bound state solution at finite temperature using the sum of modified Cornell plus inverse quadratic potential, Sri Lankan Journal of Physics 21 (2020) 11, https://doi.org/10.4038/sljp.v21i1.8069. [ Links ]

79 A. Maireche, New Relativistic Atomic Mass Spectra of Quark (u, d and s) for Extended Modified Cornell Potential in Nano and Plank’s Scales, J. Nano- Electron. Phys. 8 (2016) 01020, https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.8(1).01020. [ Links ]

80 H. Hassanabadi, S.S. Hosseini, S. Zarrinkamar, The Linear Interaction in Noncommutative Space; Both Relativistic and nonrelativistic Cases, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54 (2015) 251, https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2219-1. [ Links ]

81 M. Solimanian, J. Naji and K. Ghasemian, The noncommutative parameter for cc in non-relativistic limit, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 331, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02546-5. [ Links ]

82 A. Maireche, Heavy-light mesons in the symmetries of extended non-relativistic quark model, YJES. 17 (2019) 51, https://doi.org/10.53370/001c.23732. [ Links ]

83 A. Maireche, New relativistic and non-relativistic model of diatomic molecules and fermionic particles interacting with improved modified Mobius potential in the framework of noncommutative quantum mechanics symmetries, YJES 18 (2021)10, https://doi.org/10.53370/001c.28090. [ Links ]

84 A. Maireche, The Effects of non-commutativity on the Energy Spectra for Mass-Dependent Klein-Gordon and Shrodinger¨ Equations with Vector Quark-Antiquark Interaction and Harmonic Oscillator Potential: Application to HLM Systems, Bulg. J. Phys. 50 (2023) 054, https://doi.org/10.55318/ bgjp.2023.50.1.054. [ Links ]

85 A. Maireche, Heavy quarkonium systems for the deformed unequal scalar and vector Coulomb-Hulthén potential within the deformed effective mass Klein-Gordon equation using the improved approximation of the centrifugal term and Bopp’s shift method in RNCQM symmetries, Int. J. Geom. Met. Mod. Phys. 18 (2021) 2150214, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887821502145. [ Links ]

86 A. Maireche, Solutions of Klein-Gordon equation for the modified central complex potential in the symmetries of noncommutative quantum mechanics, Sri Lankan Journal of Physics 22 (2021) 1, https://doi.org/10.4038/sljp.v22i1.8079. [ Links ]

87 A. Maireche, The Klein-Gordon equation with modified Coulomb plus inverse-square potential in the noncommutative three-dimensional space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35 (2020) 052050015, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732320500157. [ Links ]

88 A. Maireche, Modified Unequal Mixture Scalar Vector Hulthén-Yukawa Potentials Model as a Quark-Antiquark Interaction and Neutral Atoms via Relativistic Treatment Using the Improved Approximation of the Centrifugal Term and Bopp’s Shift Method, Few-Body Syst 61 (2020) 30, https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00601-020-01559-z. [ Links ]

89 M.Z. Abyaneh and M. Farhoudi, Electron dynamics in noncommutative geometry with magnetic field and Zitterbewegung phenomenon, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 863, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01855-5. [ Links ]

90 Y. Yi, K. Kang, W. Jian-Hua and C. Chi-Yi, Spin-1/2 relativistic particle in a magnetic field in NC phase space, Chin. Phys. C 34(5) (2010) 543 https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/34/5/005. [ Links ]

91 A. Maireche, Diatomic molecules and fermionic particles with improved Hellmann-generalized Morse potential through the solutions of the deformed Klein-Gordon, Dirac and Schrödinger equations in extended relativistic quantum mechanics and extended non-relativistic quantum mechanics symmetries, Rev. Mex. Fís. 68 (2022) 020801, https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.68.020801. [ Links ]

92 A. Maireche, A Novel Exactly Theoretical Solvable of Bound States of the Dirac-Kratzer-Fues Problem with Spin and Pseudo-Spin Symmetry, International Frontier Science Letters 10 (2016) 8, https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/IFSL.10.8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-020-01559-z. [ Links ]

93 R.R. Cuzinatto, M. De Montigny and P.J. Pompeia, Noncommutativity and non-inertial effects on a scalar field in a cosmic string space-time: II. Spin-zero Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau-like oscillator, Class. Quantum Grav. 39 (2022) 075007, https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac51bc. [ Links ]

94 H. Aounallah, A. Boumali, Solutions of the Duffin-Kemmer Equation in Non-Commutative Space of Cosmic String and Magnetic Monopole with Allowance for the Aharonov-Bohm and Coulomb Potentials, Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 16 (2019) 195, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477119030038. [ Links ]

95 R.L. Greene, C. Aldrich, Variational wave functions for a screened Coulomb potential, Phys. Rev. A 14 (1976) 2363, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.14.2363. [ Links ]

96 A. Tas, O. Aydogdu and M. Salti, Dirac particles interacting with the improved Frost-Musulin potential within the effective mass formalism, Annals of Physics 379 (2017) 67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2017.02.010. [ Links ]

97 A.I. Ahmadov, M. Demirci, S.M. Aslanova and M.F. Mustamin, Arbitrary l-state solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation with the Manning-Rosen plus a Class of Yukawa potentials, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126372. [ Links ]

98 M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (Dover, New York), 1964. [ Links ]

99 K. Bencheikh, S. Medjedel and G. Vignale, Current reversals in rapidly rotating ultracold Fermi gases, Phys. Lett. A 89 (2014) 063620, https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.89.063620. [ Links ]

100 S.M. Ikhdair, B.J. Falaye, M. Hamzavi, non-relativistic molecular models under external magnetic and AB flux fields, Ann. Phys. 353 (2015) 282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.11.017. [ Links ]

101 N. Saad, R. Hall, H. Ciftci, The Klein-Gordon equation with the Kratzer potential in d dimensions, Eur. J. Phys. 6 (2008) 717, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-008-0022-4. [ Links ]

102 C.A. Onate and J.O. Ojonubah, Eigensolutions of the Schrödinger equation with a class of Yukawa potentials via supersymmetric approach, J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 10 (2016) 21, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40094-015-0196-2. [ Links ]

103 A. Maireche, A model of modified Klein-Gordon equations with modified scalar-vector Yukawa potential Afr. Rev. Phys. 15 (2020) 1. [ Links ]

104 A.I. Ahmadov, M. Demirci, S.M. Aslanova, M.F. Mustamin, Arbitrary l-state solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation with the Manning-Rosen plus a Class of Yukawa potentials, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126372. [ Links ]

105 A. Maireche, New bound-state solutions of the deformed Klein-Gordon and Schrodinger equations for Manning-Rosen¨ plus a class of Yukawa potential in RNCQM symmetries, Journal of Physical Studies 25 (2021) 4301, https://doi.org/10.30970/jps.25.4301). [ Links ]

106 M. Abu-Shady, T.A. Abdel-Karim and S.Y. Ezz-Alarab, Masses and thermodynamic properties of heavy mesons in the non-relativistic quark model using the Nikiforov-Uvarov method, J Egypt Math Soc 27 (2019) 14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42787-019-0014-0. [ Links ]

107 R. Rani, S.B. Bhardwaj and F. Chand, Mass Spectra of Heavy and Light Mesons Using Asymptotic Iteration Method, Commun. Theor. Phys. 70 (2018) 179, https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/70/2/179. [ Links ]

108 A. Maireche, Analytical Expressions to Energy Eigenvalues of the Hydrogenic Atoms and the Heavy Light Mesons in the Framework of 3D-NCPS Symmetries Using the Generalized Bopp’s Shift Method, Bulg. J. Phys. 49 (2022) 239, https://doi.org/10.55318/bgjp.2022.49.3.239. [ Links ]

109 K. P. Gnatenko, Composite system in noncommutative space and the equivalence principle, Phys. Lett. A 377 (2013) 3061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.09.036. [ Links ]

Received: April 11, 2023; Accepted: May 18, 2023

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License