SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11Análisis de la estructura productiva de una economía rural; relación y efecto de las instituciones sobre los hogares agrícolas de una comunidad michoacanaEvaluación de la actividad antibacteriana de la mucosidad de la piel del pulpo común Octopus bimaculatus contra bacterias patógenas de animales de granja índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista bio ciencias

versão On-line ISSN 2007-3380

Revista bio ciencias vol.11  Tepic  2024  Epub 20-Jan-2025

https://doi.org/10.15741/revbio.11.e1541 

Original articles

Hand-pollination and application of azoxystrobin in the mooring and development of soursop fruit (Annona muricata L.) on pruned trees in Las Varas, Nayarit.

Polinización manual y aplicación de azoxystrobin en el amarre y desarrollo de fruto de guanábana (Annona muricata L.) en árboles con poda en Las Varas, Nayarit.

Clen Ciclary Becerra-Zamorano1 

Gregorio Luna Esquivel2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4716-0805

Octavio Jhonathan Cambero-Campos2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5197-9907

Álvaro Can-Chulim2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4063-7597

Marco Ventura Vázquez-Hernández3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7812-1767

Julián Ramírez-Rentería1 

1Programa de Maestría en Ciencias Biológico Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Carretera Tepic-Compostela km 9, C.P. 63780, Xalisco, Nayarit, México.

2 Unidad Académica de Agricultura, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Carretera Tepic-Compostela km 9, C.P. 63780, Xalisco, Nayarit, México.

3Campo Experimental Cotaxtla-INIFAP, Carretera Veracruz-Córdoba km 34.5, CP. 94270. Medellín de Bravo, Veracruz, México.


ABSTRACT

Soursop (Annona muricata L.) holds significant production potential in Nayarit. Soursop production is severely affected by poor pollination and fungal attacks during the flowering period. In this regard, hand-pollination has emerged as an alternative with expectations of enhancing fruit set. This research evaluated the effect of hand- and natural pollination, coupled with fungicide application, on pruned trees in the mooring and development of soursop fruit in Nayarit, Mexico. A total of 236 inflorescences underwent hand-pollination, while 256 were naturally pollinated. Fungicide was applied once to 107 hand-pollinated and 128 naturally pollinated flowers. The results reveal that manual pollination increased the soursop fruit set by 31.64 %. Similarly, the interaction between the fungicide azoxystrobin application and different pruning intensities (100 %, 75 %, and 50 %) increased fruit set by 28.97 %. Finally, the largest fruit sizes, ranging from 34.94 to 60.62 mm in diameter and 59.05 to 103.88 mm in length, were observed with manual pollination and various pruning intensities (100 %, 25 %, and 0 %).

KEYWORDS: Fungicide; Pruning; Fruit set

RESUMEN

La guanábana (Annona muricata L.) tiene gran potencial de producción en Nayarit. La producción de la guanábana se ve afectada severamente por mala polinización y ataque de hongos en periodo de floración. Al respecto, la polinización manual es una alternativa que ha generado expectativas en el incremento del cuajado de los frutos. En esta investigación se evaluó el efecto de la polinización manual y natural con la aplicación de fungicida en árboles con poda en el amarre y desarrollo de guanábana en Nayarit, México. Se polinizaron y etiquetaron 236 inflorescencias de manera manual y 256 polinizadas de manera natural. Con atomizador se aplicó en una ocasión fungicida a 107 flores polinizadas de manera manual y 128 de manera natural. Se encontró que la polinización manual incrementa 31.64 % el amarre de frutos de guanábana, de igual manera, la interacción entre la aplicación del fungicida azoxystrobin y diferente intensidad de poda (100, 75 y 50 %) incrementó en 28.97 % el amarre de frutos. Finalmente, el mayor tamaño del fruto con medias entre 34.94 a 60.62 mm de diámetro y 59.05 a 103.88 mm de longitud se evidenció con la polinización manual y diferente intensidad de poda (100, 25 y 0 %).

PALABRAS CLAVE: Fungicida; Poda; Cuajado de

Introduction

Soursop (Annona muricata L.) is a vital alternative fruit crop in Mexico, contributing 30,790.70 t per year, with 75 % (23,230.08 t) concentrated in Nayarit. Key producing areas in Nayarit include Compostela (2,371 ha), San Blas (52.40 ha), and Tepic (12 ha), with yields of 10.63, 8.86, and 8.29 t ha⁻¹, respectively (SIAP, 2022). Soursop production in Nayarit faces challenges such as limited irrigation technology, pest and disease management, manual pollination techniques, and pruning, resulting in yields of 10.53 t ha⁻¹, comparable to Veracruz (10.55 t ha⁻¹) and Colima (10.06 t ha⁻¹) (SIAP, 2022).

Soursop is significantly impacted by poor flower pollination. In most orchards, the yields obtained are incompatible with the total number of flowers produced by the plant, due to the late natural pollination process inducing early flower drop or drying (Rebolledo et al., 2009). The low fruit set is mainly due to the behavior of floral dichogamy in soursop, that is, hermaphrodite flowers that have female and male parts with outdated maturation, causing that there is no self-pollination (Pinto de Lemos, 2011; Rebolledo et al., 2009). Additionally, the closed preantesis and early anthesis floral morphology hinder wind and insect pollination, with 10 % of the flowers being self-fertilized and lacking nectar (Peña et al., 2002; Franco-Mora et al., 2001).

Rebolledo et al. (2009) reported that environmental conditions significantly influence natural pollination, with optimal conditions requiring 80 % relative humidity and a temperature of 22 °C. Temperatures exceeding 28 °C and relative humidity below 60 % result in flower and fruitlet drop, causing up to 80 % of deformed fruits, further impacting production due to quality and size (Cambero-Ayón et al., 2019; Betancourt-Aranguré et al., 2019 In arid locations, rapid stigmatic liquid drying prevents pollen germination, leading to stigmas falling and blocking the sexual process, impeding ovarian fertilization (Rebolledo et al., 2009; Cárdenas-Torres, 2002).

Given this context, hand-pollination has emerged as a strategy to enhance fruit set. In countries like Brazil, this technique is established among small producers, increasing tree production and fruit quality by up to 50 % (Oliveira et al., 2005). Hand-pollination practices should be done in flowers that are on thick branches that support the fruit load and should take advantage of the characteristics of this fruit species that can generate flowering in lateral buds of the whole plant, so that pruning is necessary to design the required tree canopy. In Mexico, high-density orchards have demonstrated that pruning contributes to yields of up to 12.79 kg per tree and 28.42 t ha⁻¹ (Reyes et al., 2018). Recent studies indicate that fungicides such as maxtrobyn and flutriafol can aid in controlling anthracnose development on soursop inflorescences and leaves (Betancourt-Aranguré et al., 2019; Hernández-Guervara & López-Rodríguez, 2019).

Given the challenges in yield and fruit malformation faced by soursop, evaluating the effect of hand- and natural pollination with fungicide application in pruned trees is imperative for soursop cultivation in Nayarit, Mexico.

Material and Methods

The study was conducted in a 4-hectare commercial rainfed soursop orchard, five years old, situated in the ejido El Capomo, Las Varas (21°7ʼ39" N and 105°10ʼ6" W) in the Municipality of Compostela (Nayarit), at an altitude of 80 meters. Weeding was performed with a machete before selecting the experimental plot. The leaves were isolated in the drip zone of each tree and fertilized by broadcasting. In July 2020, at the beginning of the rainy season, a compound mixture (ammonium sulfate, DAP, potassium sulfate, boron, magnesium sulfate, manganese sulfate, and zinc sulfate) was applied at a rate of 1 kg per tree. A second fertilization took place in September 2020 with 300 g per tree of the original Terratec mixture (urea, man, DAP, sam, phosphonitrate, KCl, sop, sulfomag).

During the cleaning process and prior to the flowering of the soursop plants, applications of insecticides, including copper oxychloride (2.5 mL L-1), permethrin (0.36 mL L-1), and imidacloprid (1 mL L-1), were made.

Percentage of fruit moorage with pruning and without fungicide application

A total of 236 inflorescences, mature or receptive at stage 4 and displaying a sulfur yellow color (Escobar et al., 1986), were randomly selected in June 2021. These were distributed among trees with different pruning percentages (100 %, 75 %, 50 %, 25 %, 0 %). The inflorescences were hand-pollinated using pollen obtained from mature inflorescences collected manually and stored in #5 paper bags one day prior, kept at room temperature under shade. The collected pollen was stored in a glass jar and applied with a fine bristle brush (#10) using a gentle cross-shaped movement on the gynoecium of the inflorescence. Pollination was conducted between 9-and 12 a.m., coinciding with the receptivity of the female organs. Priority was given to inflorescences located on primary branches and carrying capacity. After pollination, the fungicide Maxtrobyn (Azoxystrobin) was applied to 107 inflorescences using an atomizer on a single occasion at a dose of 3 mL L-1, while the remaining 129 inflorescences did not receive the fungicide. All inflorescences were recorded and labeled for follow-up.

Natural pollination

A total of 256 inflorescences, mature or receptive at stage 4 and displaying a sulfur yellow color (Escobar et al., 1986), were randomly selected in June 2021. These were distributed among trees with different pruning percentages (100 %, 75 %, 50 %, 25 %, 0 %). They were not naturally pollinated. The fungicide Maxtrobyn (Azoxystrobin) was applied to 128 inflorescences with an atomizer on a single occasion at a dose of 3 mL L-1, while the remaining 128 inflorescences did not receive the fungicide. All inflorescences were recorded and labeled for follow-up.

Percentage of mooring

Mooring percentage was considered from the moment the first morphological change of the flower was observed, transitioning from the brown fruit bud to a brown-spiked ball, indicating the onset of fruit growth.

Fruit development (diameter and length)

Using a Vernier caliper, the polar and equatorial diameter of fruits during their tree-bound development was measured. The initial measurement was taken at the first morphological change in the flower, from the brown fruit bud to a brown-spiked ball. Subsequent measurements were taken at 15-day intervals.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using a randomized block design with a factorial arrangement, considering the factors of pollination type, pruning percentage, and fungicide application. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and mean comparisons were performed with Tukey's test (α≤ 0.05) using the statistical package SAS (Statistical Analysis System).

Results and Discussion

Fruit mooring percentage with pollination and fungicide application

Trees subjected to hand-pollination without fungicide exhibited a statistically higher fruit set, averaging 59.58 %. This was followed by the treatment involving hand pollination with fungicide, which showed an average fruit set of 30.24 %. Trees undergoing natural pollination, both with and without fungicide, displayed a lower fruit set at 7.61 % on average, with no statistically significant differences (Figure 1).

Hand-pollination resulted in an 83.04 % higher fruit moorage compared to naturally pollinated trees. In terms of fungicide application, the hand-pollination treatment without fungicide showed a 49.24 % improvement in the fruit set compared to the hand-pollination treatment with fungicide. Sánchez-Monteón et al. (2019) stated that the low percentage yield or fruit set of hand-pollinated fruit could be due to inadequate flower selection during pollination (lack of receptivity), resulting in the absence of fertilization. Contrary to this, the results of this research indicate that flower selection was adequate, leading to a higher fruit set. Although anthracnose has been reported as one of the main diseases affecting inflorescences (Betancourt-Aranguré et al., 2019), during the experiment, flowers not treated with fungicides exhibited a better fruit set.

Ma: Hand-pollination; Max: Maxtrobyn; Na: Natural pollination; Sn: Without maxtrobyn

Figure 1 Percentage of fruit moorage (fruit set) with different types of pollination and fungicide use on soursop flowers. Means with a common letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). 

Percentage of fruit set with pruning and fungicide application

The percentage of fruit set with pruning and fungicide application was statistically significant among various treatments. Trees treated with fungicide (Max), hand-pollination (Ma) with pruning at 100 %, 75 %, and 50 %, as well as trees with natural pollination (Na) at pruning levels of 75 % and 25 %, showed a significantly higher fruit set at 24.60 %, compared to hand-pollination treatments with 25 % and 0 % pruning levels and natural pollination with 100 %, 25 %, and 0 %, which did not yield any fruit (0 %) (Figure 2).

Martinez & Vidal (1993) reported a 65 % fruit set with hand-pollination without the use of fungicide, while Nakasone & Paul (1998) reported up to 80 % fruit set with hand-pollination without fungicide. In soursop, fruit abortion or drop is attributed to anthracnose, which can cause up to 90 % fruit abortion or drop if environmental conditions favor its development (high relative humidity, poor aeration, and low light penetration in the tree) (Cambero-Ayón et al., 2019). Betancourt-Aranguré et al. (2019) reported that the use of Maxtrobyn (Azoxystrobin) can inhibit the development of anthracnose in vitro in inflorescences by up to 71.60 % with a dose of 0.88 mL. Meanwhile, Hernandez-Guevara & Lopez-Rodriguez (2019) reported a 67.50 % control of anthracnose on soursop leaves using Maxtrobyn (Azoxystrobin) and Flutriafol at a dose of 1200 mL ha-1.

In fruit trees, pruning is one of the most relevant agronomic factors, enabling greater aeration and light penetration in the tree, and preventing conditions conducive to the development of pests and diseases such as anthracnose. Additionally, pruning helps create a desired canopy with load support (Cruz-Barrón, 2011). Alternative methods, such as the use of microorganisms, have also been explored. Anaya-Martínez (2022) applied rhapsody (Bacillus subtilis) at a dose of 17.5 cm 7 L-1 water, achieving a 70 % decrease in anthracnose incidence in soursop fruits and a 58.7 % control efficiency. This alternative proves to be environmentally favorable.

Percentage of fruit moorage with pruning and without fungicide application

Trees without fungicide application (SnMax), manual pollination (Man) with pruning at 50, 25, and 0 %, as well as trees with natural pollination (Nat) with pruning at 25 and 0 %, were statistically significant, showing higher fruit mooring (38.12 %) compared to manual pollination treatments with 100 % and 75 % pruning and natural pollination with 100 %, 75 %, and 50 %, which did not moor the fruit (0 %) (Figure 2).

The results obtained in fruit mooring are highly variable, as some authors report a high percentage of fruit moorage, while others report a low percentage. With the manual pollination technique, Nakasone & Paul (1998) reported up to 80 %; Franco-Mora et al. (2001) recorded values of 70 to 30 %, and Martinez & Vidal (1993) reported values of 65 % fruit moorage. Meanwhile, Rubi (1994) found 8 % moorage in cherimoya under natural pollination conditions.

Percentages of fruit moorage have also been evaluated with hormone application. Guaycha-Armijos (2020), with the application of eco-hormones (750 mL ha-1), accelerated flower production (in 4 days) and formation of the first fruits (in 6 days) and decreased flower abortion by 25.26 % compared to the control (without hormones). Chávez & Sabando (2022), with the use of manual pollination, recorded an average of 73.33 % in the fruit set, and with the application of naphthaleneacetic acid at 2 %, recorded a maximum average of 63.33 %. This high percentage of fruit set represents an alternative to increasing yields in the orchards of this Anonacea.

The abortion or low fruit moorage is attributed to a deficiency in pollination or a blockage in the sexual process, as pollination may occur before the pollen grains germinate and fertilize the ovary (Escobar et al., 1986; Nakasone & Paull, 1998). It is also important to mention that pollination and fertilization in soursop are limited by the characteristic phenomena of its flower (Worrell et al., 1994). Temperature and relative humidity conditions are important during the pollination process; in dry places, the drying of the stigmatic liquid occurs faster, a situation that makes the germination of pollen grains on the stigma, the growth of the pollen tube, fertilization, and later the moorage impossible (Franco-Mora et al., 1999; Nakasone & Paul, 1998; Rebolledo et al., 2009; Cárdenas-Torres, 2002).

Max: Maxtrobyn, SnMax: No Maxtrobyn; Man: hand-pollination; Nat: Natural pollination.

Figure 2 Percentage of fruit set in trees with different pollination and pruning intensity. With and without Maxtrobyn (Azoxystrobin) fungicide application. Means with a common letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). 

Fruit development with different pollination types

Hand-pollinated fruits were statistically significant, presenting a greater diameter (46.75 mm) and length (78.76 mm) compared to naturally pollinated fruits with means of 21.86 mm in diameter and 29.29 mm in length (Figure 3). Hand-pollinated fruits were found to be 53.23 % and 62.80 % larger in diameter and length development, respectively. Hand-pollination increases tree production and fruit quality by up to 50 % (Oliveira et al., 2005). Chávez & Sabando 2022), with the use of hand-pollination and the application of 2 % naphthaleneacetic acid, obtained diameters of 2.019 cm.

Figure 3 Fruit diameter and length with hand- and natural pollination at Las Varas, Compostela, Nayarit. Means with a common letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). 

Fruit development with the use of fungicides and different pollination

Fruits treated with fungicide and subjected to hand-pollination demonstrated statistically greater size, with means of 48.64 mm in diameter and 80.48 mm in length. In contrast, fruits without fungicide and undergoing natural pollination exhibited smaller sizes, with means of 5.90 mm and 6.60 mm in diameter and length, respectively (Figure 4). In fruit development, it was observed that the treatment with hand-pollination and fungicide was 87.87 % larger in diameter and 93.91 % in fruit length. Betancourt-Aranguré et al. (2019) mentioned that the use of Maxtrobyn (Azoxystrobin) can inhibit the development of anthracnose in vitro in inflorescences by up to 71.60 % with a dose of 0.88 mL. Meanwhile, Hernandez-Guevara & Lopez-Rodriguez (2019) reported a 67.50 % control of anthracnose on soursop leaves with the use of Maxtrobyn (Azoxystrobin) and Flutriafol at a dose of 1200 mL ha-1.

Figure 4 Fruit diameter and length with hand- and natural pollination with the use of fungicide during the pollination process. Means with a common letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). 

Fruit development with different pruning and pollination intensity

Fruit development varied according to the intensity of pruning and pollination. In the treatment with 0 % pruning and manual pollination, the fruit presented an average diameter of 34.99 mm and a length of 59.05 mm; on the contrary, there was no mooring with natural pollination. The treatment with 25 % pruning and hand-pollination was outstanding in fruit development, with a diameter of 60.62 mm and a length of 103.88 mm. The treatments with 50 % pruning and hand-pollination, as well as natural pollination, were not significant in fruit diameter, with an average of 42.53 mm; however, fruit length was greater with hand-pollination, reaching 75.69 mm. The treatment with 75 % pruning and hand- and natural pollination was not significant, with an average fruit diameter of 44.22 mm and a length of 59.20 mm. The treatment with 100 % pruning and hand-pollination showed better fruit development, with a diameter of 50.86 mm and a length of 91.89 mm, in contrast to fruits with natural pollination, which showed a diameter of 3.69 mm and a length of 6.61 mm (Figure 5).

Nolasco et al. (2019) reported a mean of 21.82 cm in longitudinal diameter and 117.96 mm in equatorial diameter in harvested fruits, while Avila et al. (2012) reported a mean of 24 cm in longitudinal diameter and 41 cm in equatorial diameter.

Figure 5 Equatorial and longitudinal diameter of hand-pollinated and naturally pollinated fruit on trees with different pruning intensities. Means with a common letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). 

Conclusions

The hand-pollination technique promoted a 31.64 % increase in soursop fruit mooring. The combination of Maxtrobyn fungicide application and different pruning intensities (100 %, 75 %, and 50 %) increased the fruit set by 28.97 %. Similarly, the interaction between manual pollination and different pruning intensities (100 %, 25 %, and 0 %) showed greater fruit size, with means ranging from 34.94 to 60.62 mm in diameter and 59.05 to 103.88 mm in length.

Recommendation

Considering the environmental implications of the prolonged use of chemical products as a natural resource conservation strategy, it is advisable to evaluate biological controllers of these pathogens in the soursop crop.

References

Anaya-Martínez, N. J. (2022). Evaluación de productos biológico y químicos para el control de la antracnosis en la Guanábana (Anona muricata L.), causado por el hongo (Colletotrichum spp.) [Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia] https://repository.unad.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10596/54463/njanayam.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. [ Links ]

Ávila de H.R., Pérez, de C.M., Jiménez, A., & Hernández, C.E. (2012). La guanábana: una materia prima saludable para la industria de alimentos y bebidas. Revista Digital de Investigación y Postgrado de la Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre. Vicerrectorado Barquisimeto, 2(2),134-142. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4204951#:~:text=Buscar,La%20Guan%C3%A1bana%3A%20una%20materia%20prima%20saludable%20para,industria%20de%20alimentos%20y%20bebidas&text=Las%20frutas%20conforman%20un%20grupo,para%20disfrutar%20una%20vida%20saludableLinks ]

Betancourt-Aranguré, A., Cambero-Campos, O.J., Rios-Velasco, C., Cruz-Crespo, E., Cambero-Ayón, C.B., & Luna-Esquivel, G. (2019). In vitro evaluation of antagonistic microorganisms and fungicides against Colletotrichum theobromicola Delacr, causal agent of anthracnose on soursop (Annona). Revista Bio Ciencias, 6, e678. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15741/revbio.06.e678 [ Links ]

Cambero-Ayón, C.B., Luna-Esquivel, G., Rios-Velasco, C., Díaz-Heredia, M., Rodríguez-Palomera, M., Betancourt-Aranguré, A., & Cambero-Campos, O.J. (2019). Causal agents of rot in Soursop fruit (Annona muricata L.) in Nayarit, Mexico. Revista Bio Ciencias , 6, e538. http://dx.doi.org/10.15741/revbio.06.e538 [ Links ]

Cárdenas-Torres, L.F. (2002). Influencia de la humedad relativa y la temperatura en la receptividad del estigma de guanábana (Annona muricata Ll) en el Guamo (Tolima). Colombia Forestal, 7(15), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.14483/2256201X.3308 [ Links ]

Chávez, J.P.A., & Sabando, K.D.C. (2022). Evaluación del ácido naftalenacético en el cuajado del fruto de guanábana (Annona muricata L.). SATHIRI, 17(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.32645/13906925.1135 [ Links ]

Cruz-Barrón, V.S. (2011). Asignación de materia seca y extracción nutrimental en brotes anuales de mango cv. ataulfo manejados con poda mecanizada [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit]. http://dspace.uan.mx:8080/jspui/ handle/123456789/1443Links ]

Escobar, W., Zárate, R.D., & Bastidas, A. (1986). Biología floral y polinización artificial del guanábano (Annona muricata L.) en condiciones del valle del Cauca, Colombia. Acta agronómica, 36 (1), 7-20. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/acta_agronomica/article/view/14650/16136 Links ]

Franco-Mora, O., García, E., Jasso, J., Saucedo, C., & Sánchez, S. (1999). Influencia del grado de polinización en la calidad de la guanábana. Reporte Técnico. Memorias de la Fundación Salvador Sánchez Colín. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242363512_INFLUENCIA_DEL_GRADO_DE_POLINIZACION_EN_LA_CALIDAD_DE_LA_GUANABANALinks ]

Franco-Mora, O., Jasso, J., García-Villanueva, E., & Saucedo, C. (2001). Crecimiento y calidad de frutos de Annona muricata L. Con diferente intensidad de polinización. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, 24(2),139-144. https://revistafitotecniamexicana.org/documentos/24-2/2a.pdfLinks ]

Guaycha-Armijos, J.M. (2020). Evaluación de hormonas comerciales para inducción a la floración del cultivo de guanábana (Annona muricata) en el sector de Fumisa. [Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad Tecnológica del Estado de Quevedo]. https://repositorio.uteq.edu.ec/handle/43000/6009Links ]

Hernández-Guevara, B., & López-Rodríguez, N.A. (2019). Evaluación de Fungicidas para el Control de la Enfermedad Antracnosis (Colletotrichum gloeosporides) en el cultivo de guanábana (Annona muricata L). [Tesis de Licenciatura. Universidad de los Llanos]. https://repositorio.unillanos.edu.co/handle/001/1369Links ]

Martínez, H.M.J., & Vidal, L.H. (1993). La polinización manual y su efecto en el amarre, tamaño y forma de los frutos en guanábana (Annona muricata L.). Resúmenes V congreso Nacional de horticultura. SOMECH. Veracruz, México. [ Links ]

Nolasco, G.Y., Hernández, F.L.M., & González, E.M. (2019). Caracterización morfológica y fisicoquímica de frutos de accesiones de guanábana seleccionadas en Nayarit. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 23, 223-237. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v0i23.2023 [ Links ]

Nakasone,H.Y., & Paull, R.E. (1998). Tropical fruits. CAB International. [ Links ]

Oliveira, Z.P.O., Queiroz, F.M., Barros, P.G., Campos, R.S., Lemos, E.E.P., & Neto, J.P.S. (2005). Recomendações técnicas para a cultura da pinheira. Boletím. Secretaria de Estado da Agicultura do Desenvolvimento Agrario,1, 56. https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/123134/1/Recomendacoes-Tecnicas-CT69.pdfLinks ]

Pinto de Lemos, E.E. (2011). Panorama de las anonas cultivadas en Brasil: saramuyo, guanábana y atemoya. In González-Esquinca, A.R., Luna-Cazáres, L.M., Gutiérrez-Jiménez, J., Schlie-Guzmán, M.A., Vidal-López, DG. Anonáceas: Plantas antiguas, estudios recientes. (pp. 21-36). Colección Jaguar. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Elena-Cartagena/publication/ 260903254_Acetogeninas_de_anonaceas_estimulantes_de_la_produccion_de_autoinductores_y_biofilms_de_bacterias_degradadoras_de_HAPs/links/563d590f08ae8d65c011897e/Acetogeninas-de-anonaceas-estimulantes-de-la-produccion-de-autoinductores-y-biofilms-de-bacterias-degradadoras-de-HAPs.pdfLinks ]

Peña, J.E., Nadel, H., Barbosa, M., & Smith, D. (2002). Pollinators y pests of Annona species. Tropical fruit pests y pollinators. CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994345.019 [ Links ]

Rebolledo, M., Del Ángel, A., Becerra, E., Rosas, X., & Zetina, R. (2009). Frutales tropicales no tradicionales para Veracruz. Centro de Investigación Regional Golfo Centro Campo Experimental Cotaxtla, Veracruz, México. Folleto Técnico, 45, 110. [ Links ]

Reyes-Montero, J.A., Acevez-Navarro, E., Caamal-Velázquez, J.H., & Alamilla-Magaña, J.C. (2018). Producción de guanábana (Annona muricata L.) en alta densidad de plantación, como alternativa para productores con superficies reducidas. Agro Productividad, 9(11), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v11i9.1212 [ Links ]

Rubí, A.M. (1994). Polinización manual de chirimoya y su relación con amarre, tamaño de fruto y rendimiento. Fundación Salvador Sánchez Colín, CICTAMEX, SC Coatepec Harinas, México. 161-169. [ Links ]

Sánchez-Monteón, A.L., Luna-Esquivel, G., Ramírez-Guerrero, L.G., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, B.B. (2019). Comparative study between natural, entomophilic and manual pollination in soursop (Annona muricata L.). Journal of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources, 5(15), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.35429/JESN.2019.15.5.18.22 [ Links ]

Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc [SAS]. (2011). Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. [ Links ]

Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera [SIAP]. (2022). Producción anual agrícola. http://www.siap.sagarpa.gob.mx/.15Links ]

Worrell, D.B., Carrington, C.M.S., & Hubert, D.J. (1994). Growth maduration and ripening or soursop (Annona muricata L.) fruit. Scientia Horticulturae, 57(1-2), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(94)90030-2 [ Links ]

Financing The research is funded by the project: "Aprovechamiento del germoplasma, desarrollo tecnológico e innovación en cadenas de valor de anonáceas en México," with the Project number 266891SADER-CONACYT.

Received: June 26, 2023; Accepted: January 01, 2024; Published: January 16, 2024

*Corresponding Author: Gregorio Luna- Esquivel. Unidad Académica de Agricultura, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Carretera Tepic-Compostela km 9, Z.C. 63780, Xalisco, Nayarit, Mexico. Phone: (52) 311 184 81 53. E-mail: gregorio.luna@uan.edu.mx

Authors contribution

Conceptualization of the work (LEG, CCJ, CCA, VHMV, BZCC, RRJ). Methodology development (BZCC, RRJ). Software management (BZCC, VHMV). Experimental validation (LEG, CCJ). Results analysis (BZCC, VHMV). Data management (BZCC, VHMV). Manuscript writing and preparation (BZCC, RRJ). Writing, revising, and editing (LEG, CCJ, CCA, VHMV). Project manager (LEG, CCJ). Acquisition of funds (LEG, CCJ). All authors of this manuscript have read and accepted the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License