<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1665-1200</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos del Seminario]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Tóp. Sem]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1665-1200</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Seminario de Estudios de la Significación]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1665-12002022000200048</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Afección y cognición: un boceto husserliano]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Affection and Cognition: A Husserlian Sketch]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Affection et cognition : une esquisse husserlienne]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Téllez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Orlando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Ludwig Maximilians Universität München  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>48</numero>
<fpage>48</fpage>
<lpage>68</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1665-12002022000200048&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1665-12002022000200048&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1665-12002022000200048&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El objetivo de este artículo es abordar el fenómeno de la afección mediante un contraste con el tema de la cognición (humana), el cual aparece, por lo regular, en el primer plano de la investigación filosófica. Con la mira puesta en esta meta, el autor procede de la siguiente manera: 1) discute la tesis sellarsiana según la cual lo no-proposicional (por ejemplo, la afección) es epistémicamente ineficaz. Para ello, apela a la teoría de la experiencia pre-predicativa expuesta por Edmund Husserl, fundamentalmente en su obra póstuma Experiencia y juicio (1939); 2) sostiene que esta experiencia es no-epistémica y no es susceptible de ser eliminada o trivializada en favor de la hegemonía del espacio de las razones, o bien, de las descripciones empíricas enmarcadas en el orden causal. Dentro de este campo no-epistémico, 3) se concentra, por un lado, en la afección en cuanto algo pre-dado. Por el otro, intenta situar el fenómeno de la afección en el contexto del denominado &#8220;ABC de la constitución&#8221; (Husserl, 1966, p. 125). Con esto 4) busca refrendar la aseveración de Husserl según la cual la afección juega un papel central en la constitución de sentido, de modo que sin ella &#8220;no habría objetos en lo absoluto&#8221; (Husserl, 1966, p. 164). Para concluir, 5) intenta vincular la noción de afección con un ejemplo concreto de estar afligido, a saber: la experiencia del hambre tal como es descrita por Husserl en algunos pasajes de Problemas límite de la fenomenología (Husserl, 2014).]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The aim of the paper is to turn toward the phenomenon of affection by contrasting it with the theme of (human) cognition, which usually stands in the foreground of philosophical inquiry. In order to achieve this goal I follow these steps: (1) I discuss the Sellarsian thesis according to which &#8216;the nonpropositional&#8217; (e.g., affection) is &#8216;epistemically inefficacious&#8217; by bringing into play Edmund Husserl&#8217;s theory of pre-predicative experience, especially in the posthumous work Experience and Judgment (1939). (2) I maintain that this experience is &#8216;nonepistemic,&#8217; and is not liable to be eliminated nor trivialized in favor of the hegemony of the &#8216;space of reasons&#8217; or of empirical descriptions enframed in the causal order. Within this nonepistemic field, (3) I focus on affection, on the one hand, as something pre-given. On the other hand, I attempt to situate the phenomenon of affection in the context of the so-called &#8220;ABCs of the constitution&#8221; (Husserl, 1966, p. 125). By doing this, (4) I want to endorse Husserl&#8217;s claim that affection plays a crucial role in the constitution of sense in such a way that without it &#8220;there would be no objects at all&#8221; (Husserl, 1966, p. 164). To conclude, (5) I try to link the notion of affection with a concrete example of being distressed, to wit: the experience of hunger as described by Husserl in some passages of the Limit Problems of Phenomenology (Husserl, 2014).]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Résumé Cet article a pour objectif d&#8217;aborder le phénomène de l&#8217;affection au moyen d&#8217;un contraste sur le thème de la cognition (humaine) qui en général apparaît au premier plan de la recherche philosophique. Une fois cet objectif fixé, l&#8217;auteur procède de la manière suivante : 1) il analyse la thèse de Sellars selon laquelle ce qui n&#8217;est pas propositionnel (par exemple l&#8217;affection) est épistémiquement inefficace. Pour ce faire, il fait appel à la théorie de l&#8217;expérience pré-prédicative exposée par Edmund Husserl, principalement dans son &#339;uvre posthume, Expérience et jugement (1939) ; 2) il soutient que cette expérience est non-épistémique et n&#8217;est pas susceptible d&#8217;être éliminée ou trivialisée au profit de l&#8217;hégémonie de l&#8217;espace des raisons ou bien des descriptions empiriques encadrées dans l&#8217;ordre causal. Dans ce champ non-épistémique, 3) il se consacre d&#8217;un côté, à l&#8217;affection quant à un quelque chose pré-donné. De l&#8217;autre, il essaie de placer le phénomène de l&#8217;affection dans le contexte dudit « ABC de la constitution » (Husserl, 1966, p. 125). De là, 4) il cherche à confirmer l&#8217;affirmation de Husserl selon laquelle l&#8217;affection joue un rôle central dans la constitution du sens, de telle manière que sans cette dernière « dans l&#8217;absolu, il n&#8217;y aurait pas d&#8217;objet » (Husserl, 1966, p. 164). Pour conclure, 5) il tente de relier la notion d&#8217;affection à un exemple concret d&#8217;affliction, à savoir : l&#8217;expérience de la faim telle que décrite par Husserl dans certains passages de Problèmes marginaux de la phénoménologie (Husserl, 2014).]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[afección]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[experiencia pre-predicativa]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[constitución]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[affection]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pre-predicative experience]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[constitution]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[affection]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[expérience pré-prédicative]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[constitution]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bruzina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wilshire]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crosscurrents in Phenomenology]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martinus Nijhoff Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cairns]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Guide for Translating Husserl]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<numero>55</numero>
<issue>55</issue>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martinus Nijhoff Publishers]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DeVries]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Triplett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Knowledge, Mind, and the Given: Reading Wilfrid Sellars&#8217;s &#8220;Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind&#8221;]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hackett]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husserl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Landgrebe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik]]></source>
<year>1939</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Academia Verlagsbuchhandlung]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husserl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fleischer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs - und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918-1926]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martinus Nijhoff]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husserl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Churchill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameriks]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husserl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biemel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Martinus Nijhoff]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husserl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biemel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch, Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husserl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Breeur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Aktive Synthesen: Aus der Vorlesung &#8220;Transzendentale Logik&#8221; 1920/21. Ergänzungsband zu &#8220;Analysen zur passiven Synthesis&#8221;]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husserl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steinbock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis. Lectures on Transcendental Logic]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kluwer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husserl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sowa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vongehr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908-1937)]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Landgrebe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Faktizität und Individuation. Studien zu Grundfragen der Phänomenologie]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N. I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Edmund Husserls Phänomenologie der Instinkte]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N. I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Pluralistic Concept of the Life-World and the Various Fields of the Phenomenology of the Life-World in Husserl]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Husserl Studies]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<page-range>47-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lévinas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guillot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Totalidad e infinito: Ensayo sobre la exterioridad]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ediciones Sígueme]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lohmar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Grundzüge eines Synthesis-Modells der Auffassung: Kant und Husserl über den Ordnungsgrad sinnlicher Vorgegebenheiten und die Elemente einer Phänomenologie der Auffassung]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Husserl Studies]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>111-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lohmar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Zu der Entstehung und den Ausgangsmaterialen von Edmund Husserls Werk Erfahrung und Urteil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Husserl Studies]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<page-range>31-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lohmar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Erfahrung und kategoriales Denken. Hume, Kant und Husserl über vorprädikative Erfahrung und prädikative Erkenntnis]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lohmar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Phänomenologie der schwachen Phantasie. Untersuchungen der Psychologie, Cognitive Science, Neurologie und Phänomenologie zur Funktion der Phantasie in der Wahrnehmung]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rump]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Epistemic Import of Affectivity: A Husserlian Account]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Midwest Studies in Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>XLI</volume>
<page-range>82-104</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seibt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Myth of Substance and the Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Analytica]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>119-39</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sellars]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Realism and the New Way of Words]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy and Phenomenological Research]]></source>
<year>1948</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>601-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sellars]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>253-329</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sellars]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Behaviorism, Language and Meaning]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pacific Philosophical Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>61</volume>
<page-range>3-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sellars]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Foundations for a Metaphysics of Pure Process (The Carus Lectures for 1977)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Monist]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<page-range>3-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sellars]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mental Events]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophical Studies]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<page-range>325-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Soffer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Revisiting the Myth: Husserl and Sellars on the Given]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Review of Metaphysics]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<page-range>301-37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steinbock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Affection and Attention: On the Phenomenology of Becoming Aware]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Continental Philosophy Review]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<page-range>21-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Triplett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sellars&#8217;s Misconstrual of the Defenders of the Given]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[History of Philosophy Quarterly]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>79-99</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wittgenstein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anscombe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. E. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Werkausgabe Band 8]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Suhrkamp]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
