<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2007-4085</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista mexicana de urología]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. mex. urol.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2007-4085</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedad Mexicana de Urología]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2007-40852021000600011</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48193/revistamexicanadeurologa.v81i6.826</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Artificial urinary sphincter outcomes for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence. A narrative review]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Resultados del esfínter urinario artificial en incontinencia urinaria post-prostatectomía radical. Revisión narrativa]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Corrales-Acosta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Elizabeth]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Corrales]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mariela]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arenas Aquino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Amanda Elisa]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Melgarejo García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Giannina]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Uroclínica Barcelona  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>España</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Tenon Hospital  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Paris ]]></addr-line>
<country>Francia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabogal Sologuren  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Bellavista ]]></addr-line>
<country>Perú</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>81</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2007-40852021000600011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2007-40852021000600011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2007-40852021000600011&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract Urinary incontinence post-radical prostatectomy is a common complication that might negatively impact patients&#8217; quality of life. Treatments include medical and surgical options, being the insertion of an artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) the gold standard. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence developed post-radical prostatectomy with and without radiation, in terms of urinary continence and complications. The MEDLINE and Scopus search returned 477 articles. A total of eleven articles were included for qualitative analysis. A total of 707 men that met the inclusion criteria were included. The 22.6% of the men (160 patients) received pelvic external beam radiotherapy prior to the implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. The overall continence success rate was defined by the use of pads. Some authors reported a success rate of 0 pads per day (PPD) or &#8804; 1 PPD in the last follow-up. The complications included urethral atrophy, mechanical failure, revision and/or removal of the device, infection and erosion. Further prospective studies should be done to clarify continence concepts after the placement of an AUS and long-term complications.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen La incontinencia urinaria posterior a la prostatectomía radical es una complicación común que puede afectar negativamente la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Los tratamientos incluyen opciones médicas y quirúrgicas, siendo la inserción de un esfínter uretral artificial (EUA) el estándar de oro. El objetivo de esta revisión narrativa es evaluar los resultados de la implantación de un esfínter urinario artificial para la incontinencia urinaria desarrollada después de una prostatectomía radical con y sin radiación, en términos de continencia urinaria y complicaciones. La búsqueda en MEDLINE y Scopus arrojó 477 artículos. Se incluyeron un total de once artículos para el análisis cualitativo. Se incluyeron un total de 707 hombres que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. El 22,6% de los hombres (160 pacientes) recibieron radioterapia pélvica externa previa a la implantación del esfínter urinario artificial. La tasa general de éxito de la continencia se definió por el uso de pañales. Algunos autores informaron una tasa de éxito de 0 pañales por día (PPD) o &#8804;1 PPD en el último seguimiento. Las complicaciones incluyeron atrofia uretral, falla mecánica, revisión y/o remoción del dispositivo, infección y erosión. Se deben realizar más estudios prospectivos para aclarar los conceptos de continencia después de la colocación de un EUA y las complicaciones a largo plazo.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Stress urinary incontinence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[urinary incontinence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[prostatectomy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[artificial urinary sphincter]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[radical prostatectomy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[complications]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[outcomes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[incontinencia urinaria]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[prostatectomía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[esfínter urinario artificial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[prostatectomía radical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[complicaciones]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[resultados]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[VCH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Surgical treatment for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS One]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1-19</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sandhu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Breyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Comiter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eastham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gomez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kirages]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Incontinence after Prostate Treatment: AUA/SUFU Guideline]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Urol]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>202</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>369-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sathianathen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGuigan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BJU Int]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>113</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>636-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A state-of-the-art review on the evolution of urinary sphincter devices for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: Past, present and future innovations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Med Eng Technol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>328-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[James]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mccammon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: A review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Urol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>536-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liberati]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tetzlaff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Altman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Surg]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>336-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sacomani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CAR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zequi S de]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[da Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benigno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RSM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bachega]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: A single-center experience]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int Braz J Urol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>114-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Connor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nanigian]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Patel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guralnick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ellision]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Elderly Men]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urology]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>126-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NY]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rourke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Stemming the tide of mild to moderate post-prostatectomy incontinence: A retrospective comparison of transobturator male slings and the artificial urinary sphincter]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Can Urol Assoc]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>7-8</numero>
<issue>7-8</issue>
<page-range>273-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serag]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almallah]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YZ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Artificial urinary sphincters for treating postprostatectomy incontinence: A contemporary experience from the UK]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Res Reports Urol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>63-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Song]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J-Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Park]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Choo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M-S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparing Argus sling and artificial urinary sphincter in patients with moderate post-prostatectomy incontinence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Exerc Rehabil]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>337-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Choi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ahn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Choo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Factors contributing to treatment outcomes of post-prostatectomy incontinence surgery for the selection of the proper surgical procedure for individual patients: A single-center experience]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Neurourol Urodyn]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1978-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sacco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gandi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Totaro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Di Gianfrancesco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Palermo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BJU Int]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>127</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>229-37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kretschmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hüsch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anding]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pottek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rose]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Struss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int Braz J Urol]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>632-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mottet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chartier-Kastler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ben]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Naoum K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Richard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800 for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: The french experience]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urol Int]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<numero>^s2</numero>
<issue>^s2</issue>
<supplement>2</supplement>
<page-range>25-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trigo Rocha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gomes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mitre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AI]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arap]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Srougi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Prospective Study Evaluating the Efficacy of the Artificial Sphincter AMS 800 for the Treatment of Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence and the Correlation Between Preoperative Urodynamic and Surgical Outcomes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urology]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>85-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Der Aa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Drake]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kasyan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Petrolekas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cornu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JN]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: A critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Urol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>681-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pinheiro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atoria]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eastham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sandhu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: A population based analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Urol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>189</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>602-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rahman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NU]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Minor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TX]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lue]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Combined external urethral bulking and artificial urinary sphincter for urethral atrophy and stress urinary incontinence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BJU Int]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>824-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McKibben]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shakir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuchs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scott]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BJU Int]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>123</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>335-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davenport]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akhtar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shakir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baumgarten]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bergeson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of 3.5 cm and transcorporal cuffs in high-risk artificial urinary sphincter populations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Transl Androl Urol]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>62-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guralnick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Toh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Webster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Urol]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>167</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>2075-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Cógáin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elliott]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Urol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>190</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>113-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hofer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonzalez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Management of radiation-induced urethral strictures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Transl Androl Urol]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>66-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Queissert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huesch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kretschmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anding]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kurosch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kirschner-Hermanns]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Artificial urinary sphincter cuff size predicts outcome in male patients treated for stress incontinence: Results of a large central European multicenter cohort study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int Neurourol J]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>219-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rivera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ME]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Linder]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ziegelmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Viers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rangel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elliott]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Impact of Prior Radiation Therapy on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Device Survival]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Urol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>195</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1033-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manunta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guille]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Patard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lobel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Artificial sphincter insertion after radiotherapy : is it worthwhile ?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BJU]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<numero>85</numero>
<issue>85</issue>
<page-range>490-2</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[iardeau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aharony]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Group the]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campeau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Corcos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Executive Summary of the 2015 Consensus Conference]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Neurourol Urodyn]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>55-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
