<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2007-4085</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista mexicana de urología]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. mex. urol.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2007-4085</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sociedad Mexicana de Urología]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2007-40852021000600006</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48193/revistamexicanadeurologa.v81i6.833</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Urinary continence and erectile dysfunction results in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with endopelvic fascia preservation]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Resultados de continencia urinaria y disfunción eréctil en la prostatectomía radical robótica con preservación de la fascia endopélvica]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suárez Salgado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Saskia Mercedes]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosero Morillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Fernanda]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Quito ]]></addr-line>
<country>Ecuador</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>81</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2007-40852021000600006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2007-40852021000600006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2007-40852021000600006&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  Introduction:  Radical prostatectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with organ-confined prostate cancer due to its oncological benefits and survival. With the advancement of technology, surgical techniques have been modified, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is currently the procedure with the most advanced technology. Due to its multiple advantages, such as short-term functional and surgical results, shorter hospital stay and minimal invasiveness, it constitutes a valid therapeutic option to consider for this group of cancer patients.  Objective:  To compare the results obtained in urinary continence and erectile dysfunction after RARP with a standard da Vinci® system with 4 arms, between a group of 43 patients who underwent said procedure, without preservation of the endopelvic fascia in 2018, and 68 patients who underwent the same procedure with endopelvic fascia preservation, between January 2019 and February 2021, all at the Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín, in Quito.  Methodology:  A retrospective longitudinal descriptive observational study was made, with the comparison of 68 prostate cancer patients who underwent radical surgery with endopelvic fascia preservation at the Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín, between January 2019 and February 2021, and 43 patients who had the same surgery but without endopelvic preservation, in the year 2019.  Results:  One hundred eleven surgeries for prostate cancer with the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy technique were performed. Forty-three (37.8%) surgeries were made without endopelvic fascia preservation, and 68 (61.3%) were made with endopelvic fascia preservation. At the first month of follow-up, 25 (58%) patients of the RARP without endopelvic fascia preservation group, presented with severe erectile dysfunction, 11 (26%) with moderate erectile dysfunction, 6 (14%) with moderate to mild erectile dysfunction, and 1 (2%) with mild erectile dysfunction. At 6 months follow-up, of the 25 patients with severe dysfunction, 2 presented with moderate dysfunction and 23 remained with severe dysfunction. Of the patients who underwent RARP with endopelvic fascia preservation, 54 (80%) presented with mild incontinence, and 3 (4%) were completely continent making use of this technique. Furthermore, at 9 months follow-up, 90% of the patients had complete continence and 10% mild incontinence. Fifty six percent of the RARP patients with endopelvic fascia preservation presented severe sexual dysfunction at the first postoperative month. However, after pharmacological treatments, only 19% remained with erectile dysfunction.  Conclusion:  RARP is a safe and minimally invasive technique, it improves surgical and functional results, in the short and long terms, with respect to continence and sexual function. Endopelvic fascia preservation could improve results in the long term for continence and erectile dysfunction.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  Introducción:  La prostatectomía radical es el tratamiento de elección para los pacientes con cáncer de próstata, debido a sus beneficios oncológicos y sobrevida. Conforme ha avanzado la tecnología, la medicina ha incursionado en las técnicas quirúrgicas han sido modificadas, siendo actualmente la prostatectomía radical asistida por robot el procedimiento con la tecnología más avanzada actualmente. Debido a sus múltiples ventajas como resultados funcionales y quirúrgicos a corto plazo, menor tiempo hospitalario y mínimamente invasivo constituye una opción terapéutica válida para tener en cuenta en el tratamiento de pacientes con este padecimiento oncológico.  Objetivo:  Comparar los resultados obtenidos de continencia urinaria y disfunción eréctil posterior a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot da Vinci Standard de 4 brazos realizadas en Quito en el Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín realizadas sin preservación de la fascia endopélvica en el año 2018 (43) frente a pacientes sometidos a la misma cirugía con preservación de la fascia endopélvica (68) entre enero del 2019 a febrero 2021.  Metodología:  Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo de corte longitudinal retrospectivo en 68 pacientes con cáncer de próstata sometidos a cirugía radical con preservación de la fascia endopélvica en el Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín desde enero del 2019 a febrero 2021 en Quito, Ecuador y se comparó con 43 pacientes sometidos a la misma cirugía con la característica de no preservar la fascia endopélvica en el año 2019.  Resultados:  Se realizaron 111 cirugías por cáncer de próstata localizado utilizando la técnica robótica para prostatectomía radical, 43 (38,7%) cirugías se realizaron sin preservación de la fascia endopélvica, y 68 (61,3%) se realizaron con preservación de fascia endopélvica. En la prostatectomía radical asistida por robot sin preservación de fascia endopélvica, al primer mes de seguimiento, 25 (58%) tuvieron disfunción sexual grave, 11 (26%) moderada, 6 (14%) leve a moderada y 1 (2%) paciente con disfunción sexual leve, a los 6 meses de los 25 pacientes con disfunción grave, 2 pacientes presentaban disfunción eréctil moderada, y 23 disfunción grave. Los pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot con preservación de la fascia endopélvica, mostraron una incontinencia leve 80% (54) y 4% (3) que estuvieron totalmente continentes usando esta técnica. Además, a los 9 meses el 90% de los pacientes tenían una continencia total y 10% tenían incontinencia leve. La disfunción sexual posoperatoria en pacientes con PRR con preservación de fascia endopélvica, al primer mes posoperatorio el 56% de pacientes tenían una disfunción eréctil severa sin embargo posterior a tratamientos farmacológicos apenas el 19% se quedó con disfunción eréctil.  Conclusión:  La prostatectomía radical asistida por robot es una de las técnicas mínimamente invasivas y seguras para los pacientes, que logran mejorar los resultados quirúrgicos y funcionales tanto de continencia y función sexual de los pacientes a corto y largo plazo, la preservación de la fascia endopélvica podría mejorar los resultados a largo plazo de continencia y disfunción eréctil.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[robot-assisted prostatectomy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[functional results]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[prostate]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[prostatectomía robótica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[resultados funcionales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[próstata]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lepor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eggleston]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Prostate]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>473-85</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schuessler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schulam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clayman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kavoussi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urology]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>854-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Egan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marhamati]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galfano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kowalczyk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Robotic Prostatectomy: Past, Present, and Future]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urologic Clinics of North America]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>11-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guillonneau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cathelineau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barret]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rozet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vallancien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Presse Med]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>31</numero>
<issue>31</issue>
<page-range>1570-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rassweiler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sentker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hatzinger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frede]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Urol]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>54-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gregori]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simonato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lissiani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bozzola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gaboardi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative complications in an initial and consecutive series of 80 cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Urol]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>190-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stolzenburg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J-U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Do]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rabenalt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pfeiffer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Truss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Urol]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>169</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>2066-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poulakis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dillenburg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moeckel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Vries]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Witzsch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zumbé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: prospective evaluation of the learning curve]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[European urology]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El-Feel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roigas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wille]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schnorr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Positive margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective study of 100 cases performed by 4 different surgeons]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Urol]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>622-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raboy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferzli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Initial experience with extraperitoneal endoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urology]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>849-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bollens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vanden Bossche]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roumeguere]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Damoun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ekane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoffmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Urol]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>65-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dahl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urology]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>320-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Remzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klingler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tinzl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lodde]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kiss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Urol]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>83-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rassweiler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sentker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hatzinger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rumpelt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Urol]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>166</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>2101-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guillonneau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rozet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cathelineau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barret]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doublet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J-D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Urol]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>167</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>51-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stolzenburg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J-U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KMT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Do]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rabenalt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dorschner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Truss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Impact of previous surgery on endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urology]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>325-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Erdogru]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zukosky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frede]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rassweiler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prosthetic mesh hernioplasty during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Urology]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1173-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gianduzzo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Urol]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>285-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Massouh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aliaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica asistida por robot con preservación de la fascia endopélvica y complejo venoso dorsal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Chilena de Urología]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tasci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AI]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simsek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sokmen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tugcu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prostatectomía radical asistida por robot con conservación de nervios, intrafascial, con conservación de fascia y anastomosis vesicouretral anatómica: Técnica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Archivos españoles de urología]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>67</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>731-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
