First description of the breeding nest of Irenomys tarsalis, a sigmodontine rodent endemic to southern Andean forests
Primera descripción del nido de Irenomys tarsalis, un roedor sigmodontino endémico de los bosques subandinos
Anahí E. Formoso1* and Juliana P. Sánchez2
1 Unidad de Investigación, Diversidad, Sistemática y Evolución, Centro Nacional Patagónico-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, 9120. Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina. * formoso@cenpat.edu.ar
]]> 2 Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Calle 2 Núm. 584, 1900. La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Recibido: 23 enero 2014
Aceptado: 29 abril 2014
Abstract
The Chilean tree rat, Irenomys tarsalis, is a sigmodontine rodent endemic to the southern Andean forests. Very little is known about its habits. The aim of this work was to describe its breeding nest. A nest was located inside the hollow of a living Lenga Beech (Nothofagus pumilio) near Fontana Lake, Chubut province, Argentina. The nest was located 2 m above ground and inside an oval hollow, with 2 openings in the upper part and opposite to the main cavity entrance. The nest was built with a few feathers and lichens, dry and fine grass, pieces of small sticks, and scraped material from the internal side of the trunk. Two specimens of flea from the Rhopalopsyllidae family were recovered from the nest. This note allowed us to add new information on the breeding biology of one of the least known sigmodontines of the southern temperate rain forest and to the limited knowledge of sigmodontine rodents.
Key words: Chilean tree rat, nesting, Nothofagus, Patagonia, Argentina.
Resumen
]]> La rata de los árboles, Irenomys tarsalis, es un sigmodontino endémico de los bosques subandinos y se sabe muy poco acerca de sus hábitos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir su nido. Éste se encontró en el interior de un hueco de una lenga (Nothofagus pumilio) en las proximidades del lago Fontana, provincia del Chubut, Argentina. El nido estaba situado 2 m por encima del suelo y dentro de un hueco de forma ovalada, con 2 aberturas en la parte superior y opuestas a la principal. El nido estaba formado por pocas plumasy líquenes, hierba seca y fina, trozos de palillos y material raspado de la superficie interna del tronco. La fauna de artrópodos hallada en el material del nido estuvo comprendida por 2 ejemplares de pulgas de la familia Rhopalopsyllidae. Esta nota permitió añadir nueva información sobre la biología de la reproducción de uno de los sigmodontinos menos conocidos del bosque templado de sudamérica y al conocimiento limitado sobre roedores sigmodontinos.Palabras clave: rata de los árboles, nidificación, Nothofagus, Patagonia, Argentina.
The Chilean tree rat, Irenomys tarsalis(Philippi, 1900), is a sigmodontine rodent endemic to the Andean forests and forest-steppe ecotones of southern Chile and Argentina (Osgood, 1943; Pearson, 1983; Kelt, 1993; Pardiñas et al., 2004). It occurs in Chile from Chillán (Ñubleprovince, VII Region) to Puerto Ibáñez (General Carrera province, XI Region) and in Argentina from Neuquén province to Chubut province (Osgood, 1943; Kelt, 1993; Pardiñas et al., 2004). Knowledge of this species is scarce and limited to geographic distribution, phylogenetic position, and a few aspects of its natural history (Pearson, 1983, 1995; Kelt, 1993; Smith and Patton, 1999; Saavedra and Simonetti, 2000; Pardiñas et al., 2004; Kelt et al., 2008). This species has been considered rare or uncommon (Osgood, 1943; Patterson et al., 1990; Kelt et al., 1999), a status that may reflectits arboreal and trap-shy habits and, consequently, low capture success with traditional traps set in the ground (Meserve et al., 1991; Kelt, 1993). However, recent data taken from automatic camera traps in the temperate forests near the city of San Carlos de Bariloche (Río Negro province, Argentina), have shown that it is a common species in the arboreal stratum (Amico and Aizen, 2000). Furthermore, I. tarsalis has also been considered a species mostly associated with Nothofagus forests (Kelt, 1993; Pardiñas et al., 2004), although it has been captured in unusual habitats, such as ecotonal areas of shrubs and cypress (Pearson, 1983), a shrubby habitat along a stream in the North of Puerto Ibáñez and Lago General Carrera (Kelt et al., 2008), and in a Pinus contorta plantation in Coyhaique National Reserve (García et al., 2011), both in Argentina and Chile. Despite some novel data on its geographic distribution (Kelt et al., 2008; Martin, 2010; García et al., 2011), the general biology of this species (e.g., habits, behavior, breeding) still remains poorly known. The aim of this work was to describe for the first time the breeding nest of I. tarsalis and to report the arthropod fauna associated with it.
A nest of I. tarsalis was found in a Nothofagus forest on April 14th, 2013 during a field trip. Characteristics of the nest and tree nest were measured and recorded in the field and a female and 4 young of I. tarsalis were captured inside the nest. The nest was removed from the tree and analyzed in a laboratory to determine the fine material that composed it and the associated arthropod fauna. The identification of I. tarsalis specimens was based on the following combination of characters: large mouse with a tail much longer than the head and body (total length: 280 mm (270-326 mm), tail: 165 mm (162-196 mm); Kelt, 1993); large eyes; thick and soft pelage; grayish cinnamon rufousdorsum with fine dusky lines; long braincase and large interparietal; anterior surface of upper incisors with deep grooves; prismatic and deeply dissected molar teeth (Osgood, 1943; Hershkovitz, 1962; Kelt, 1993; Pearson, 1995). The 5 captured specimens were deposited at the Colección de Mamíferos del Centro Nacional Patagónico, Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina.
The nest was located inside a hollow of a living Lenga Beech (Nothofagus pumilio) near Fontana Lake, Chubut province, Argentina (44°50'31.1" S, 71°38'14.8" W, 959 masl). In this area, the forest is mostly composed of Lenga (N. pumilio) and Antarctic Beech (N. antarctica). The tree nest was half tilted (Fig. 1A) with 53 cm of diameter at breast height (DBH). The nest was located 2 m above ground inside an oval entrance (Fig. 1B), with 2 openings in the upper part and opposite to the main opening. The entrance of the nest had the following measurements, major axis (measured from top to bottom of the entrance): 24 cm; minor axis (measured from side to side of the entrance and in the middle of it): 6 cm, while the depth of the nest was 17 cm (measured from the entrance to the inner part of the hole). The material that composed the nest was neatly ordered and composed of (from top to bottom): scarce feathers and lichens, dry and fine grass, and pieces of small sticks and scraped material from the internal side of the trunk. This nest seems to have been previously conditioned and used by some secondary cavity nesters (e.g., Enicognathus ferrugineus, Díaz and Kitzberger, 2013; Turdus falcklandii, Ojeda and Trejo, 2002) based on its general characteristics mentioned above. In the nest material were found 2 specimens of flea from the Rhopalopsyllidae family, which, since 2 species of the Rhopalopsyllidae family (Ectinorus martini Lewis, 1976 and Tetrapsyllus (Tetrapsyllus) tantillus Jordan and Rothschild, 1923), had been previously reported as parasites of this sigmodontine in the Argentinean Patagonia (Autino and Lareschi, 1998).
The tendency to nest in trees supports the notion of an association between I. tarsalis and Nothofagus forest. This connection could be reflected in the ability of this species to climb at high speed, "shinnying", as mentioned by Pearson (1983) and observed by the authors during field work. This skill is mainly attributed to the special development of palmar and plantar pads and a long and strong tail, with prehensile capacity. The pictures from camera traps taken near San Carlos de Bariloche (Amico and Aizen, 2000) corroborate its arboreal habits as well. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses showed that I. tarsalis constitutes, along with Neotomys ebriosus Thomas, 1894 (a species exclusive to northern central Andes) and Euneomys chinchilloides (Waterhouse, 1839; an Andean and Patagonian species) a small, unnamed clade associated with the central and southern Andes (Salazar-Bravo et al., 2013).
The knowledge ofsigmodontine rodent nesting in Argentina is limited, especially in natural habitats (e.g., Llanos, 1944; Massoia and Fornes, 1965; Mann-Fisher, 1978) and it is scarcer for those inhabiting Patagonia (Udrizar-Sauthier et al., 2010). With this note, we have added new information on the breeding biology of one of the least known sigmodontine rodent from the southern temperate rain forest.
]]> We thank U. Pardiñas and M. Lareschi for their help during field and laboratory work and for providing valuable comments to enrich this manuscript; to Susana Yranek and EstrellaMontabilet for helping with laboratory work and flea identification (FCNyM, UNLP); to Mr. HéctorLarrea for his kindness and assistance with lodging; to the municipality of Alto Río Senguer, its mayor, Mr. Miguel López and staff, who kindly helped us with logistics and provided us accommodation. Thisresearchwaspartiallyfundedby Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (grantsto AEF and JPS) and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2008, #0547 to U. Pardiñas, PICT 2010 and #338 to M. Lareschi).
Literature cited
Amico, G. C. and M. A. Aizen. 2000. Mistletoe seed dispersal by a marsupial. Nature 408:21-28. [ Links ]
Autino, A. and M. Lareschi.1998. Chapter 27. Siphonaptera. Biodiversidad de artrópodos argentinos. In Una perspectiva biotaxonómica, J. J. Morrone and S. Coscaron (eds.). Ediciones Sur, La Plata, Buenos Aires. p. 279-290. [ Links ]
Díaz, S. and T. Kitzberger. 2013. Nest habitat selection by the Austral parakeet in north-western Patagonia. Austral Ecology 38:268-278. [ Links ]
Hershkovitz, P. 1962. Evolution of neotropicalcricetinerodents (Muridae). With special reference to Phyllotine group.Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology Series 46:1-524. [ Links ]
García, K., J. C. Ortiz, M. Aguayo and G. D'Elía. 2011. Mammalia, Rodentia, Sigmodontinae, Irenomys tarsalis (Philippi, 1900) and Geoxus valdivianus (Philippi, 1858): significant ecological range extension. Check List 7:276-278. [ Links ]
Kelt, D. A. 1993. Irenomys tarsalis. Mammalian Species 447:1-3. [ Links ]
Kelt, D. A., P. L. Meserve, B. D. Patterson and B. K. Lang. 1999. Scale dependence and scale independence in habitat associations of small mammals in southern temperate rainforest. Oikos 85:320-334. [ Links ]
Kelt, D. A., A. Engilis Jr., I. Torres and A. T. Hitch. 2008. Ecologically significant range extension for the Chilean tree mouse, Irenomys tarsalis. Mastozoología Neotropical 15:125-128. [ Links ]
Llanos, A. C. 1944. Apreciaciones de campo con motivo de una concentración de roedores en las provincias de Salta y Jujuy. Revista Argentina de Zoogeografía 4:51-59. [ Links ]
Mann-Fisher, G. 1978. Los pequeños mamíferos de Chile. Marsupiales, quirópteros, edentados y roedores. Editorial de la Universidad de Concepción, Concepción. p. 1-342. [ Links ]
Martin, G. M. 2010. Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae, Irenomys tarsalis (Philippi, 1900): new records for Argentina and filling gaps. CheckList 6:561-563. [ Links ]
Massoia, E. and A. Fornes. 1965. Nuevos datos sistemáticos, biológicos y etoecológicos de Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) delticola Thomas (Rodentia-Cricetidae). Delta del Paraná, Investigaciones Agrícolas 4:27-34. [ Links ]
Meserve, P. L., B. K. Lang, R. Murúa, A. Muñoz-Pedreros and L. A. Gonzalez. 1991. Characteristics of a terrestrial small mammal assemblage in a temperate rainforest in Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 64:157-169. [ Links ]
Ojeda, V. and A. Trejo 2002. Primeros registros de nidificación en cavidades para tres especies de aves del bosque andino patagónico. Hornero 17:85-89. [ Links ]
Osgood, W. H. 1943. The mammals of Chile. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoological Series 30:1-268. [ Links ]
Pardiñas, U. F. J., S. Cirignoli, J. Laborde and A. Richieri. 2004. Nuevos datos sobre la distribución de Irenomys tarsalis (Philippi, 1900) (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) en Argentina. MastozoologíaNeotropical 11:99-104. [ Links ]
Patterson, B. D., P. L. Meserve and B. K. Lang. 1990. Quantitative habitat association of small mammals along an elevational transect in temperate rainforest of Chile. Journal of Mammalogy 71:620-623. [ Links ]
Pearson, O. P. 1983. Characteristics of mammalian faunas from forests in Patagonia, southern Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 64:476-492. [ Links ]
Pearson, O. P. 1995. Annotated keys for identifying small mammals living in or near Nahuel Huapi National Park or Lanín National Park, southern Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 2:99-148. [ Links ]
Saavedra, B. and J. Simonetti. 2000. A northern and threatened population of Irenomys tarsalis (Mammalia: Rodentia) from central Chile. ZeitschriftfürSäugetierkunde 64:243-245. [ Links ]
Salazar-Bravo, J., U. F. J. Pardiñas and G. D'Elía. 2013. A phylogenetic appraisal of Sigmodontinae (Rodentia, Cricetidae) with emphasis on phyllotine genera: systematics and biogeography. Zoologica Scripta 42:250-261. [ Links ]
Smith, M. F. and J. L. Patton. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships and the radiation of sigmodontine rodents in South America: evidence from cytochrome b. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 6:89-128. [ Links ]
Udrizar-Sauthier, W. O., A. Abba and D. E. Udrizar-Sauthier. 2010. Nests of Oligoryzomys sp. and Holochilus brasiliensis (Rodentia, Cricetidae) in eastern Entre Ríos province, Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 17:207-211. [ Links ]
Waterhouse, G. R. 1839. The zoology of the voyage of H. M. S. Beagle, under the command of Captain Fitzroy, R. N., during the years 1832 to 1836. Part II. Mammalia. Smith, Elder and Co. London. p. 97. [ Links ]
]]>