<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1405-0218</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Isonomía]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Isonomía]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1405-0218</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México; Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1405-02182023000100001</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5347/isonomia.58/2023.469</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Principio de eficacia e imperio de la ley. Observaciones en torno a su relación]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Principle of efficacy and rule of law. Observations about their relationship]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almonacid-Almarza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Diego]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Austral de Chile  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>58</numero>
<fpage>1</fpage>
<lpage>31</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1405-02182023000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1405-02182023000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1405-02182023000100001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen el propósito de este trabajo es explorar la relación entre el principio de eficacia y el imperio de la ley como formalidad legal. Parte sustancial del trabajo se dedica a reconstruir el fundamento que se atribuye a cada noción en las teorías jurídicas preponderantes y cómo se relacionan con el concepto de derecho y con la existencia de los sistemas jurídicos. Este examen muestra que el imperio de la ley como formalidad legal y el principio de eficacia comparten un mismo fundamento, lo que permite trazar ciertas relaciones entre ellas. Los principales resultados de este análisis son dos. Primero, no existe una determinación unánime acerca de la relación entre el principio de eficacia y el imperio de la ley como formalidad legal con el concepto de derecho y con las condiciones de existencia de los sistemas jurídicos. Segundo, dos de las posiciones que mayor influjo ejercen en la literatura acerca de la relación entre ambas nociones, presentes en los trabajos de M. Kramer y J. Raz, tienen problemas importantes.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract the purpose of this work is to explore the relationship between the principle of efficacy and the rule of law as formal legality. A substantial part of the work is dedicated to reconstructing the foundation attributed to each notion in the prevailing legal theories and how they are related to the concept of law and the existence of legal systems This examination shows that the formal legality and the principle of effectiveness share the same foundation, which allows establishing certain relationships between them. The main results of this analysis are two. First, there is no unanimous determination about the relationship between the principle of efficacy and the rule of law as a legal formality with the concept of law and with the conditions of existence of legal systems. Second, two of the most influential positions in the literature on the relationship between both notions, present in the works of M. Kramer and J. Raz, have significant problems.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[principio de eficacia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[imperio de la ley]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[formalidad legal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[dimensión social del derecho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[principle of efficacy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[rule of law]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[formal legality]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[social dimension of the law]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Efficacy Condition]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>225-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Austin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rumble]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Wilfrid E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Province of Jurisprudence Determined]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bennett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Rule of Law Means Literally What It Says: The Rule of the Law: Fuller and Raz on Formal Legality and the Concept of Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>90-113</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bobbio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Norberto]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. Giappichelli]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teoria della norma giuridica]]></source>
<year>1960</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Temis]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sobre el fundamento de la validez]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Notas de Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>1964</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>23-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Validez y positivismo]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alchourrón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Análisis lógico y derecho]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>499-519</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios Constitucionales]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El positivismo jurídico]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México, D.F ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Remarks on Kelsen&#8217;s Validity and Efficacy of the Law]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernal Pulido]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huerta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carla]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mazzarese]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Tecla]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Juan]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navarro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pablo]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paulson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stanley]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Essays in Legal Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>69-74</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caracciolo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La noción de sistema en la teoría del derecho]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México, D.F ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caracciolo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Existencia de normas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>159-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caracciolo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sistema jurídico]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garzón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ernesto]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laporta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El derecho y la justicia]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<page-range>161-76</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Trotta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caracciolo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El derecho desde la filosofía: Ensayos]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Craig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paul]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bellamy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>95-115</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Londres y Nueva York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fallon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard, H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Rule of Law&#8217; as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Columbia Law Review]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>97</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finnis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Natural Law and Natural Rights]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<edition>2ª ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford y Nueva York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lon]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>1958</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>630-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lon]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Morality of Law]]></source>
<year>1964</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New Haven y Londres ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Yale University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Walter B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Essentially Contested Concepts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>167-98</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Law as a leap of faith: Essays on law in general]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Herbert, L. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Morality of Law by Lon L. Fuller]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>1965</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1281-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Herbert, L. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulloch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Penelope, A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Postcript]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Herbert, L. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The concept of law]]></source>
<year>1961</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hierro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Liborio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La eficacia de las normas jurídicas]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ariel]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ingram]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Peter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Effectiveness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ARSP: Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>484-503</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hans]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reine Rechtslehre]]></source>
<year>1960</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Zweite ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Viena, Auflage]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hans]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The General Theory of Law and State]]></source>
<year>1945</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge MA ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hans]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reine Rechtslehre]]></source>
<year>1934</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Viena ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Auflage]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kramer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Matthew]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kramer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Matthew]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Objectivity and the Rule of Law]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Juan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La teoría del derecho en el siglo XX: Kelsen, Ross y Hart&#8212; Introducción]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José Juan]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Casanovas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pompeu]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El ámbito de lo jurídico: Lecturas de pensamiento contemporáneo]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<page-range>353-60</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Crítica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navarro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pablo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La eficacia del derecho: Una investigación sobre la existencia y funcionamiento de los sistemas jurídicos]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios Constitucionales]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navarro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pablo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Dinámica y eficacia del derecho: Un análisis conceptual de la obediencia y aplicación del derecho]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México, D.F ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Radin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Margaret]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reconsidering the Rule of Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Boston University Law Review]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>781-822</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rawls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Theory of Justice]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge MA ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Belknap Press of Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Clarendon Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Concept of Legal System. An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<edition>2ª ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Clarendon Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Law&#8217;s Own Virtue]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scalia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Antonin]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Law Review]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1175-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shklar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Judith]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Political Theory and The Rule of Law]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hutchinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Allan]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Monahan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Patrick]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<page-range>1-16</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Toronto ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Carswell]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simmonds]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nigel E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Straightforwardly False: The Collapse of Kramer&#8217;s Positivism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Cambridge Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>98-131</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simmonds]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nigel E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Law as a Moral Idea]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of Toronto Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>61-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simmonds]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nigel E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Freedom, Law, and Naked Violence: A Reply to Kramer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of Toronto Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>381-404</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simmonds]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nigel E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kramer&#8217;s High Noon]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The American Journal of Jurisprudence]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>135-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Summers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert, S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Professor Fuller on Morality and Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Education]]></source>
<year>1965</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-27</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Summers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert, S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Formal Theory of the Rule of Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ratio Juris]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>127-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tamanaha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Brian]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Socio-Legal Positivism and a General Jurisprudence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tamanaha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Brian]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[On the rule of law: History, politics, theory]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tamanaha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Brian]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Disruptive Implications of Legal Positivism&#8217;s Social Efficacy Thesis]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spaak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Torben]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mindus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Patricia]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Cambridge companion to legal positivism]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<page-range>512-35</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vilajosana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José María]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Identificación y justificación del derecho]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid, Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vilajosana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José María]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El derecho en acción]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid, Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waldron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why Law ? Efficacy, Freedom, or Fidelity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Law and Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>259-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waldron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (In Florida)?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Law and Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>137-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
