<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0300-9041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecología y obstetricia de México]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecol. obstet. Méx.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0300-9041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0300-90412018000800502</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24245/gom.v86i8.1722</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Ecografía transvaginal en preinducción de parto: predicción de parto vaginal en gestantes con cesárea anterior]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Transvaginal ultrasound in induction of labour: predicting vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruiz-Sada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Julia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martí-Gamboa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sabina]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Redrado-Giménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Olga]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrigo-Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lapresta-Moros]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castán-Mateo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sergio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Fundación Hospital de Calahorra  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>España</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet Departamento de Diagnóstico Prenatal y Ecografía ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Zaragoza ]]></addr-line>
<country>España</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Zaragoza ]]></addr-line>
<country>España</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Zaragoza ]]></addr-line>
<country>España</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af5">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Zaragoza ]]></addr-line>
<country>España</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>86</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<fpage>502</fpage>
<lpage>509</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0300-90412018000800502&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0300-90412018000800502&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0300-90412018000800502&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  Objetivo: Determinar qué mediciones de la ecografía transvaginal efectuada en el momento de la inducción actúan como predictoras de éxito de parto vaginal en embarazadas con cesárea anterior. La valoración cervical previa a la inducción del parto se lleva a cabo mediante tacto vaginal y estimación del índice de Bishop. Se trata de un diagnóstico subjetivo y sujeto a variabilidad interobservador, por lo que es necesario encontrar un sistema alternativo objetivo y con mínima variabilidad interindividual.  Materiales y métodos: Estudio analítico, observacional y prospectivo al que se incluyeron pacientes con antecedente de cesárea, previamente inducidas con sonda de doble balón. Antes de la finalización del embarazo a todas las pacientes se les tomó una ecografía transvaginal para determinar: la longitud cervical, ángulo cervical posterior, grosor y dilatación cervical. Se obtuvieron los informes de la preinducción, parto y puerperio.  Resultados: Se estudiaron 35 pacientes y la tasa de parto vaginal fue de 52%. Hubo diferencias significativas en la medición de la longitud cervical entre el grupo de parto vaginal y cesárea, en estas últimas fue más larga (26.8 vs 33.5 mm; p = 0.036). No se encontraron diferencias en el ángulo cervical posterior, dilatación o grosor cervical.  Conclusiones: La longitud cervical se perfila como variable predictora de parto vaginal en la preinducción de embarazadas con cesárea anterior; existen diferencias significativas entre el grupo de embarazadas con parto vaginal luego de una cesárea previa (26.8 mm) y el grupo de pacientes con segunda cesárea (33.5 mm).]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  Objective: The aim of this study was to determine what circumstances during transvaginal ultrasound predict vaginal delivery in labour induction of patients with a previous caesarean section. Several studies have confirmed that the accuracy of the Bishop&#8217;s score in predicting the outcome of induction of labour is poor, due to the subjectivity of digital examination, which is also influenced by interobserver variability. That is why it is necesary to find an alternative score which provides objectiveness and minimum interobserver differencies.  Materials and methods: An observational prospective and analytic study was designed and 35 patients were included. All of them had a previous caesarean section and underwent cervical induction with a double balloon device. Transvaginal ultrasound was run in all the cases, regarding cervical length, posterior cervical angle, thickness and cervical dilation. Moreover, data from delivery and postpartum were recorded.  Results: Vaginal delivery rate was 51.6%. Significative diferencies between cervical lenght in patients who delivered vaginally and those with a second cesarean section were found (26.8mm versus 33.5mm, p = 0.036). No differencies were found between posterior cervical angle measures, nor cervical dilation or cervical thickness.  Conclusions: Cervical length is outlined as a predictive variable of vaginal delivery in preinduction of patients with a previous cesarean section. It has been demostrated that this measurement is significatively shorter in patients having a vaginal delivery (26.8mm) than in patients with a second cesaren section (33.5 mm).]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Inducción del trabajo de parto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[parto vaginal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cesárea]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[dilatación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[posparto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Labour induced]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Vaginal delivery]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Caesarean section]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Dilatation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Parturition]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Postpartum period]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth: Green-Top Guideline]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<numero>45</numero>
<issue>45</issue>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London(UK) ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[RCOG]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boyon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Cervical ripening: is there an advantage for a double balloon device in labour induction?]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Parto vaginal tras cesárea anterior]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Protocolos Asistenciales en Obstetricia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jozwiak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rab]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MT]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Transcervical Foley's catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Feghali]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dhall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kolkmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pandis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bahadori]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Predicting factor son cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uyar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Erbay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Demir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baytur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elghorori]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MRM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cevix before induction of labour]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keepanasseril]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A new objective scoring system for the prediction of sucessful induction of labour]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez-Laencina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cheung]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CW]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix.]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bastani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with Bishop score for predicting cesarean section after induction of labor]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Transvaginal sonography of cervical length and Bishop score as predictors of successful induction of term labor the effect of parity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>35-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
