<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0187-358X</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Investigación bibliotecológica]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Investig. bibl]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0187-358X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0187-358X2025000100007</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2025.102.58956</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Factores de rechazo en el arbitraje de artículos científicos de la revista Tecnociencia Chihuahua]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Rejection Factors in the Arbitration of Scientific Articles in the Journal Tecnociencia Chihuahua]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Picazo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Contreras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Claudia Patricia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez Piñón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Teresa]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rivera Figueroa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[César H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua Facultad de Filosofía y Letras ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua Facultad de Odontología ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua Facultad de Ciencias Agrotecnológicas ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>102</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0187-358X2025000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0187-358X2025000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0187-358X2025000100007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El objetivo del estudio fue identificar los factores de rechazo por áreas del conocimiento en el proceso de arbitraje de artículos científicos recibidos de 2008 a 2018 por una revista multidisciplinaria. Se analizaron 494 dictámenes de arbitraje emitidos sobre 225 artículos de diferentes disciplinas enviados a la revista multidisciplinaria Tecnociencia Chihuahua. La tasa de rechazo global de la revista fue de 24.9 %. Las tasas de rechazo más bajas se encontraron en las áreas de Ingeniería y Tecnología y en Salud y Deporte, con 13.9 % y 15.2 % respectivamente, mientras que las tasas de rechazo más altas están en Educación y Humanidades y en Economía y Administración, con 31.3 % cada una. El factor más frecuente de rechazo fue la carencia de un sustento metodológico válido en el estudio, seguido por deficiencias en los análisis estadísticos y en la discusión de resultados. Al hacer un análisis solo a los artículos rechazados, las características de diseño, ejecución y análisis del estudio fueron los tres aspectos que más influyeron en los resultados finales de dictaminación. Conocer los factores más relevantes en el arbitraje según el área del conocimiento puede contribuir a mejorar la coherencia y transparencia en la revisión de manuscritos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The objective of this study was to identify the rejection factors by areas of knowledge in the arbitration process of scientific articles received from 2008 to 2018 by a multidisciplinary journal. We analyzed 494 review assessments issued on 225 articles from different disciplines submitted to the multidisciplinary journal Tecnociencia Chihuahua. The journal&#8217;s overall rejection was 24.9 %. The lowest rejection rates were found in the areas of Engineering and Technology and Health and Sports, with 13.9 % and 15.2 %, respectively, while the highest rejection rates were noted in Education and Humanities and Economics and Administration, with 31.3 %, each. The most frequent factor for rejection was the lack of a valid methodological support in the study, followed by deficiencies in statistical analysis and discussion of results. When analyzing only the rejected articles, the study&#8217;s design, execution, and analysis features were the three aspects that most influenced the assessment final results. Knowing the most relevant factors in arbitration according to the area of knowledge can help improve consistency and transparency in manuscript review.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Artículos científicos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Factores de rechazo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Revisión por pares]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Revistas académicas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Scientific Articles]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Rejection Factors]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Peer Review]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Academic Journals]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adib]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Souhail]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nimehchisalem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vahid]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reasons for Manuscript Rejection at Internal and Peer-Review Stages]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>2-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bhende]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vishal]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Tanishq]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krishnakumar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mathangi]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramaswamy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Anikode Subramanian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bilgi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kanchan]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mankad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Saptak]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Decoding the Rejection Code: Understanding Why Articles Get Axed]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cureus]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Björk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bo-Christer]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Acceptance Rates of Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Journals: A Literature Survey]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[El Profesional de la Información]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Casnici]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Niccolò]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grimaldo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gilbert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nigel]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Squazzoni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Flaminio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Attitudes of Referees in a Multidisciplinary Journal: An Empirical Analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>1763-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D&#8217;Andrea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rafael]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[James]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O&#8217;Dwyer]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Can Editors Save Peer Review From Peer Reviewers?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS One]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dantas-Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Filipe]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Top 10 Reasons Your Manuscript May Be Rejected Without Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Parasites and Vectors]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>418</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Erfanmanesh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mohammadamin]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Quantitative Portrait of Open Access Mega-Journals]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>115-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ganga-Contreras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suárez-Amaya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Wendolin]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pedraja-Rejas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Liliana]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Erratas incurridas en la presentación de artículos en revistas indexadas iberoamericanas de las áreas de ciencias sociales y multidisciplinarias]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Interciencia]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>273-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Aarti]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Das]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sunanda]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jain]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hemant]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why We Say No! A Look Through the Editor&#8217;s Eye]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>JB01-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guthrie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[James]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lee]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dumay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Academic Performance, Publishing and Peer Review: Peering Into the Twilight Zone]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>2-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hesterman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Chelsea]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Szperka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christina]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dana]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1511-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Higgins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Janet]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Feng-Chang]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Evans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[James]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Plagiarism in Submitted Manuscripts: Incidence, Characteristics and Optimization of Screening-Case Study in a Major Specialty Medical Journal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Research Integrity and Peer Review]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holst]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Faye]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eggleton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kim]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Simon]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Transparency Versus Anonymity: Which Is Better to Eliminate Bias in Peer Review?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Insights: The UKSG Journal]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jürgen]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Inoua]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sabiou]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kerschbamer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rudolf]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[König-Kersting]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Palan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stefan]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vernon]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nobel and Novice: Author Prominence Affects Peer Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>119</volume>
<numero>41</numero>
<issue>41</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jackson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Srinivasan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Malathi]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joanna]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fletcher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kathlyn]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kravitz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Validity of Peer Review in a General Medicine Journal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS One]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kalayarasan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Raja]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Murugesan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Chandrasekar]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How to Handle a Manuscript Rejection?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>120-3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lamb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christopher]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Clifford]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Acceptance Rates for Manuscripts Submitted to Veterinary Peer-Reviewed Journals in 2012]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Equine Veterinary Journal]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>736-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carole]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy of Science]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>79</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>859-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carole]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sugimoto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cassidy]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Guo]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cronin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Blaise]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bias in Peer Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technolog y]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>2-17</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vikas]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Varadharajan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Natarajan]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Praharaj]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Samir Kumar]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Shahul]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why Do Manuscripts Get Rejected? A Content Analysis of Rejection Reports From the Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>59-65</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schulz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barnett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Adrian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bernard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[René]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicholas]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Byrne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eckmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Peter]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gazda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ma&#322;gorzata]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is the Future of Peer Review Automated?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Research Notes]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>203</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sepúlveda-Vildósola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana Carolina]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abdo-Francis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan Miguel]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clark]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Patricia]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montalvo-Javé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eduardo Esteban]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carrillo-Esper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Raúl]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Good Editorial Practices]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gaceta Médica de México]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>159</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>87-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Severin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Anna]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chataway]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joanna]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Purposes of Peer Review: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Expectations and Perceptions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Learned Publishing]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>144-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kyle]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kirby]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lisa]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Measuring the Effectiveness of Scientific Gatekeeping]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>112</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>360-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stephen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dimity]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Peer Reviewers Equally Critique Theory, Method, and Writing, With Limited Effect on the Final Content of Accepted Manuscripts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Scientometrics]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>127</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>3413-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jerry]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[René]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Perspectives on Psychological Science]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>40-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thelwall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mike]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Journal and Disciplinary Variations in Academic Open Peer Review Anonymity, Outcomes, and Length]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Librarianship and Information Science]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>299-312</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>UACH</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sobre la revista]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tecnociencia Chihuahua Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ware]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mark]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mabe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michael]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[La Haya ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Asociación Internacional de Editores Científicos, Técnicos y Médicos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ann]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<edition>2ª</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Medford, Nueva Jersey ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Information Today]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zuckerman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Harriet]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Merton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Minerva]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>66-100</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
