<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0011-1503</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Crítica (México, D.F.)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Crítica (Méx., D.F.)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0011-1503</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0011-15032008000200045</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2008.1011</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Sobre paralogismos: ideas para tener en cuenta]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[About Paralogisms: Some Ideas to Keep in Mind]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vega Reñón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia Departamento de Lógica, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>119</numero>
<fpage>45</fpage>
<lpage>65</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0011-15032008000200045&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0011-15032008000200045&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0011-15032008000200045&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN En este artículo me propongo dos tareas. (1) Mostrar la singularidad de los paralogismos según Vaz Ferreira dentro de la tradición de las falacias, debida no sólo a su peculiar marco &#8220;psicológico&#8221; de planteamiento, sino a su concepción del paralogismo como un proceso o estado de confusión y una fuente de errores mentales y cognitivos antes que discursivos. (2) Trasladar esta idea al campo actual de la argumentación para aprovechar su poder de sugerencia, pues la contribución de Vaz Ferreira no se limita a la lúcida exploración e ilustración del paralogismo como una dimensión del discurrir falaz, antes de él apenas entrevista. Además abunda en propuestas dignas de tenerse en cuenta en nuestras discusiones actuales en torno a la argumentación falaz.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[SUMMARY This paper has two aims. (1) To show the singularity of Vaz Ferreira&#8217;s idea of paralogisms inside the fallacy tradition, due not only to his &#8220;psychologic&#8221; frame of approach, but to his conception of the paralogism as a process or state of confusion and a source of mistakes that are mental and cognitive rather than discursive. (2) To translate this idea to the present-day field of argumentation so as to take advantage of Vaz&#8217;s power of suggestion. For his contribution is not confined to the lucid exploration and illustration of the paralogism as a dimension of fallacies barely noticed before him, but also abounds with suggestions worth taking into account in our current discussions about fallacious argumentation.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Vaz Ferreira]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Lógica viva]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[teoría de argumentación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[argumentación falaz]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Vaz Ferreira]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Lógica viva]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[argumentation theory]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fallacious argumentation]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doury]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moirand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[L&#8217;Argumentation aujourd&#8217;hui]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[París ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eemeren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.H. van]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Houtlosser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Une Vue synoptique de l&#8217;approche pragma-dialectique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Doury y Moirand, 2004]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<page-range>45-75</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eggers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Juliá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Los filósofos presocráticos]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>I</volume>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gredos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fogelin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dugan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fallacies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Argumentation]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>255-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hanna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Rationality and Logic]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge, Mass ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The MIT Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lloyd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.E.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Polaridad y analogía. Dos tipos de argumentación en los albores del pensamiento griego]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Taurus]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ovejero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jorro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mauri Daniel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sistema de lógica inductiva y deductiva]]></source>
<year>1917</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Palladino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La Lógica Viva y la teoría de los sofismas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>165-92</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Montevideo ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pohl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook of Fallacies and Biases on Thinking, Judgement and Memory]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Hove ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Psychology Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Could Man Be an Irrational Animal? Some Notes on the Epistemology of Rationality]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Synthese]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>64</volume>
<page-range>115-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tindale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fallacies and Argument Appraisal]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaz Ferreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lógica viva. Moral para intelectuales]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Caracas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Biblioteca Ayacucho]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaz Ferreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Algunas conferencias sobre temas científicos, artísticos y sociales]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Losada ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaz Ferreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lógica viva]]></source>
<year>1945</year>
<edition>4</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Losada ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Buenos Aires]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaz Ferreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Un paralogismo de actualidad]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Vaz 1979]]></source>
<year>1908</year>
<page-range>174-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Woods]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Death of Argument. Fallacies in Agent-Based Reasoning]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Dordrecht ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kluwer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
