<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2306-4102</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Acta ortopédica mexicana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Acta ortop. mex]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2306-4102</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2306-41022022000600359</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35366/111869</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Resultados funcionales tras hemiartroplastía de hombro por fractura de húmero proximal: experiencia en nuestro centro]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Functional results after shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: experience in our center]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suárez-Quintero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández-Domínguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López-Sorroche]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Complejo Hospitalario de Torrecárdenas Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Almería Andalucía]]></addr-line>
<country>España</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<fpage>359</fpage>
<lpage>366</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2306-41022022000600359&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2306-41022022000600359&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2306-41022022000600359&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen:  Introducción:  la hemiartroplastía de hombro está siendo relegada como tratamiento de fracturas de húmero proximal no osteosintetizables. Nuestro objetivo es analizar los resultados funcionales de los pacientes tratados con hemiartroplastía por este motivo en nuestro centro.  Material y métodos:  estudio descriptivo transversal que incluye a los pacientes intervenidos entre Febrero de 2016 y Noviembre de 2021; 24 pacientes, con un seguimiento medio de 44.6 meses. Fueron recogidos el balance articular activo, el test de Constant-Murley, el cuestionario DASH y el dolor actual (EVA). Como parámetros radiográficos se analizó el número de fragmentos de fractura y la consolidación de las tuberosidades.  Resultados:  se obtuvo una media de 71.65 ± 13.75 en el Constant-Murley y de 18.14% ± 13.92 en el DASH. Para flexión de hombro la media fue de 108.75o ± 41.26; 104.5o ± 43.68 para abducción y 33o ± 14.73 para rotación externa. En rotación interna 60% llegaba hasta plano interescapular. EVA medio de 1.25 ± 1.74. Tuberosidades consolidadas en 90.5%. No hubo diferencias significativas entre el Constant-Murley, DASH ni rotaciones de pacientes mayores y menores de 65 años. Los mayores de 65 años obtuvieron flexión media de 125.91o ± 26.82 y los menores de 87.78o ± 26.82 (p = 0.038). La abducción media en mayores de 65 fue de 125.45 ± 28.94 versus 78.89 ± 46.29 en el grupo joven (p = 0.012).  Conclusión:  la hemiartroplastía otorga calidad de vida con aceptable funcionalidad y buen control del dolor, por lo que debe continuar siendo una alternativa a tener en cuenta en pacientes seleccionados.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract:  Introduction:  shoulder hemiarthroplasty is being relegated as a treatment for non-osteosynthetic proximal humerus fractures. Our objective is to analyze the functional results of patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for this reason in our hospital.  Material and methods:  cross-sectional descriptive study that includes patients operated between February 2016 and November 2021; 24 patients, with an average follow-up of 44.6 months. Active joint balance, the Constant-Murley test, the DASH questionnaire and current pain (VAS) were collected. The radiographic parameters analyzed were the number of fracture fragments and the consolidation of the tuberosities.  Results:  a mean of 71.65 ± 13.75 was obtained in the Constant-Murley and 18.14% ± 13.92 in the DASH. For shoulder flexion, the mean was 108.75o ± 41.26; 104.5o ± 43.68 for abduction and 33o ± 14.73 for external rotation. About internal rotation, 60% of the patients reached the scapular plane. Average VAS was 1.25 ± 1.74. Consolidated tuberosities in 90.5%. There were no significant differences comparing the Constant-Murley test, DASH or rotations between both, over and under 65 years old group of patients. Those over 65 years of age obtained a mean flexion of 125.91o ± 26.82 whereas those under 87.78o ± 26.82 (p = 0.038). The mean abduction in those over 65 was 125.45 ± 28.94 vs 78.89 ± 46.29 in the young group (p = 0.012).  Conclusion:  hemiarthroplasty provides quality of life with acceptable functionality and good pain control, therefore it should continue to be an alternative to consider in selected patients.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[fractura]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[húmero proximal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[artroplastia de reemplazo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[hombro]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[reemplazo total de hombro]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fracture]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[proximal humeral]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[replacement arthroplasty]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[shoulder]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[total shoulder replacement]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shukla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McAnany]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Overley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parsons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BO]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>330-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Estrada-Malacón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres-Zavala]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navarro-González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fonseca-Bemal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Resultados funcionales de fracturas Neer III-IV tratadas mediante hemiartroplastía]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Ortop Mex]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>224-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giovale]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mangano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Repetto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cerruti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuqi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complex humeral fractures: a 5 to 10-year follow-up retrospective study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Musculoskelet Surg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>98</volume>
<numero>^s1</numero>
<issue>^s1</issue>
<supplement>1</supplement>
<page-range>27-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kontakis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tosounidis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TI]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Christoforakis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadjipavlou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Early management of complex proximal humeral fractures using the Aequalis fracture prosthesis: a two- to five-year follow-up report]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg Br]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1335-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sebastiá-Forcada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cebrián-Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lizaur-Utrilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gil-Guillén]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1419-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Valenti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aliani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maroun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Werthel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elkolti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes at midterm follow-up: a series of 51 patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>309-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olerud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ahrengart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ponzer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saving]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tidermark]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>1025-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Namdari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horneff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baldwin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg Am]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<numero>18</numero>
<issue>18</issue>
<page-range>1701-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klug]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gramlich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wincheringer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schmidt-Horlohé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoffmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trends in surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in adults: a nationwide study of records in Germany from 2007 to 2016]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Orthop Trauma Surg]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>139</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>1713-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hashiguchi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iwashita]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ohkubo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is dependent on the status of the rotator cuff]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int Orthop]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1115-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hawkins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Displaced proximal humeral fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Orthopedics]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>49-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Sola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ruiz Rico Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santonja Medina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El test de Constant-M ey como método de valoración clínica para el seguimiento de las fracturas de extremidad proximal del humero: revisión y controversias]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Soc Andal Traumatol Ortop]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<numero>2/4</numero>
<issue>2/4</issue>
<page-range>8-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hervás]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navarro Collado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peiró]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrigo Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[López Matéu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez Tello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Versión española del cuestionario DASH. Adaptación transcultural, fiabilidad, validez y sensibilidad a los cambios]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Clin (Barc)]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>127</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>441-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Demirhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kilicoglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Altinel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eralp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akalin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prognostic factors in prosthetic replacement for acute proximal humerus fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Orthop Trauma]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>181-discussion 188-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frankle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mighell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pupello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg Am]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>89</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>292-300</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[H ey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ET]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Condren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kearney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Tuile]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Management options for proximal humerus fractures - A systematic review &amp; network meta-analysis of randomized control trials]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Injury]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>244-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallinet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clappaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garbuio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tropet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Obert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Orthop Traumatol Surg Res]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>48-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Loew]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heitkemper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parsch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schneider]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rickert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg Br]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>88</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>345-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wild]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DeMers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[French]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shipps]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bergin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Musapatika]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Functional outcomes for surgically treated 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Orthopedics]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>e629-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noyes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kleinhenz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Markert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crosby]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Functional and radiographic long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>372-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thorsness]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iannuzzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noyes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kates]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Voloshin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Open reduction and internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty in the management of proximal humerus fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>56-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baudi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campochiaro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serafini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gazzotti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Matino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rovesta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Musculoskelet Surg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>98</volume>
<numero>^s1</numero>
<issue>^s1</issue>
<supplement>1</supplement>
<page-range>19-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bonnevialle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tournier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clavert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ohl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sirveaux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saragaglia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: multicenter retrospective study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Orthop Traumatol Surg Res]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>102</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>569-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gronhagen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abbaszadegan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Révay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adolphson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PY]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Medium-term results after primary hemiarthroplasty for comminute proximal humerus fractures: a study of 46 patients followed up for an average of 4.4 years]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>766-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spross]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Platz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Erschbamer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lattmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dietrich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Surgical treatment of Neer group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Orthop Relat Res]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>470</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>2035-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dogramaci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gültekin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deveci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suluova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kanatli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Factors affecting results of patients with humeral proximal end fractures undergoing primary hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective study in 42 patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Injury]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>1336-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pijls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Werner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eggen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Primary uncemented hemiarthroplasty for severe fractures of the proximal humerus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Orthop Trauma]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>279-85</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Loisel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saadnia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uhring]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cementless and locked prosthesis for the treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: prospective clinical evaluation of hemi- and reverse arthroplasty]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>301-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Li]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Internal fixation versus shoulder hemiarthroplasty for displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Orthopedics]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>e1340-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prakash]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGurty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dent]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hemiarthroplasty for severe fractures of the proximal humerus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>428-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goosen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Grinsven]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Susante]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Loon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hemiarthroplasty for humeral four-part fractures for patients 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Orthop Relat Res]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>470</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>3483-91</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garrigues]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnston]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pepe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tucker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramsey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Austin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Orthopedics]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>e703-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cuff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pupello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg Am]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>95</volume>
<numero>22</numero>
<issue>22</issue>
<page-range>2050-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Antuña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sperling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cofield]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>202-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chalmers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Slikker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mall]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gupta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rahman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Enriquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>197-204</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Young]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Segal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Poon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the primary treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ANZ J Surg]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>789-93</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boileau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krishnan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Tuberosity osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty for four-part fractures of the proximal humerus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tech Shoulder Elb Surg]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>96-109</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boileau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krishnan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tinsi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Coste]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molé]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>401-12</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huffman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Itamura]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGarry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gililland]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tibone]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Neer Award 2006: Biomechanical assessment of inferior tuberosity placement during hemiarthroplasty for four-part proximal humeral fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Shoulder Elbow Surg]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>189-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foruria]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Gracia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Munuera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanchez-Sotelo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The pattern of the fracture and displacement of the fragments predict the outcome in proximal humeral fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Bone Joint Surg Br]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>93</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>378-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
