<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2306-4102</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Acta ortopédica mexicana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Acta ortop. mex]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2306-4102</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2306-41022022000400223</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35366/109807</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Revascularización ósea: aloinjerto estructural intramedular versus extramedular. Trabajo experimental]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Bone revascularization: structural allograft intramedullary vs extramedullary. Experimental work]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cristiani-Winer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allende-Nores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paganini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gutiérrez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Allende de Cirugía Reconstructiva Sanatorio Allende ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Córdoba ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<fpage>223</fpage>
<lpage>229</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2306-41022022000400223&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2306-41022022000400223&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2306-41022022000400223&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen:  Introducción:  el tratamiento exitoso en pacientes con importantes defectos óseos secundarios a infección, no consolidación y fracturas osteoporóticas consecuentes a traumatismos previos representa un desafío. En la literatura actual no encontramos ningún reporte que compare el uso de Tablas de aloinjerto intramedular versus las mismas colocadas lateral a la lesión.  Material y métodos:  se trabajó sobre una muestra de 20 conejos (dos grupos de 10 conejos cada uno). El grupo 1 fue operado mediante la técnica de colocación extramedular del aloinjerto, mientras que el grupo 2 con técnica intramedular. A los cuatro meses postquirúrgico se realizaron estudios por imágenes e histología para comparar un grupo con el otro.  Resultados:  el análisis de los estudios por imágenes evidenció una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre ambos grupos con mayor reabsorción e integración ósea del aloinjerto colocado intramedular. Respecto a la histología, no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas, pero sí una predicción significativa con p valor &lt; 0.10 a favor del aloinjerto intramedular.  Conclusión:  mediante nuestro trabajo pudimos mostrar la gran diferencia que hay entre la técnica de colocación del aloinjerto respecto al análisis imagenológico e histológico utilizando marcadores de revascularización. Si bien el aloinjerto colocado de manera intramedular nos muestra mayor integración ósea, el injerto extramedular brindará más soporte y estructura en pacientes que así lo requieran.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract:  Introduction:  successful treatment in patients with significant bone defects secondary to infection, non-union and osteoporotic fractures resulting from previous trauma is challenging. In the current literature we did not find any reports that compare the use of intramedullary allograft boards versus the same ones placed lateral to the lesion.  Material and methods:  we worked on a sample of 20 rabbits (2 groups of 10 rabbits each). Group 1 underwent surgery using the extramedullary allograft placement technique, while group 2 with the intramedullary technique. Four months after surgery, imaging and histology studies were performed to compare between groups.  Results:  the analysis of the imaging studies showed a statistically significant difference between both groups with greater resorption and bone integration of the intramedullary placed allograft. Regarding histology, there were no statistically significant differences, but there was a significant prediction with a p value &lt; 0.10 in favor of the intramedullary allograft.  Conclusion:  through our work we were able to show the great difference between the allograft placement technique with respect to imaging and histological analysis using revascularization markers. Although the intramedullary placed allograft shows us greater bone integration, the extramedullary graft will provide more support and structure in patients who require it.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[revascularización ósea]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[aloinjerto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[intramedular]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[extramedular]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[trabajo experimental]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[bone revascularization]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[allograft]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[intramedullary]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[extramedullary]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[experimental work]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faldini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Traina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Surgical treatment of aseptic forearm nonunion with plate and opposite bone graft strut]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Autograft or allograft? Inte Orthop]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>1343-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kanakeshwar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jayaramaraju]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Agraharam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rajasekaran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Management of resistant distal femur non-unions with allograft strut and autografts combined with osteosynthesis in a series of 22 patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Injury]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<numero>^s2</numero>
<issue>^s2</issue>
<supplement>2</supplement>
<page-range>S14-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hsiao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tsai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intramedullary cortical bone strut improves the cyclic stability of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Musculoskelet Disord]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Basci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karakasli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kumtepe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Güran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hav&#305;tc&#305;oglu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Combination of anatomical locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures: comparison of mechanical stability]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>21-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lazaro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Birnbaum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farshad-Amacker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Helfet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Potter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lorich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DG]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Endosteal biologic augmentation for surgical fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Orthop Trauma]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>81-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Yadav, Surender Singh MS(Ortho), FAMS, DLitta,1</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The use of a free fibular strut as a &#8220;biological intramedullary nail&#8221; for the treatment of complex nonunion of long bones]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JB JS Open Access]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schliemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wahnert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Theisen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How to enhance the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures? An overview of current biomechanical and clinical data]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Injury]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>1207-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
