<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2007-4387</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2007-4387</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2007-43872020000100147</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iij.24487937e.2020.14.14908</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Friendly Combat Over Moral Combat: A Reply to My Critics]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Un combate amistoso sobre combate moral: respuesta a mis críticos]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Heidi M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,University of Illinois  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Champaign IL]]></addr-line>
<country>USA</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>14</numero>
<fpage>147</fpage>
<lpage>172</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2007-43872020000100147&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2007-43872020000100147&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2007-43872020000100147&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract In this piece, I respond to critics who maintain that moral combat is not only possible, but ubiquitous. In the view of some, morality is role-relative, and thus the unique package of reasons for action possessed by someone within a given role may dictate a course of conduct that thwarts the actions required of others who do not share that role. Other critics instead defend meta-ethical moral relativism, from which it follows that two people who hail from distinct cultures may both be right (relative to their separate &#8220;forms of life&#8221;) in thwarting the actions of the other. A third line of attack is mounted by critics who believe that certain first-order moral values are incommensurable and who thus argue that two people may both be blameless in pursuing incommensurably valuable but mutually incompatible goals at each other&#8217;s expense. As I argue, all three of these strategies fail to vindicate the claim that our best theory of morality tolerates gladiatorial encounters in which one person&#8217;s moral success necessitates another&#8217;s moral failure.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen En esta pieza respondo a los críticos que sostienen que el combate moral no sólo es posible, sino ubicuo. En opinión de algunos, la moralidad está relacionada con los roles, y por lo tanto el paquete único de razones para la acción que posee alguien dentro de un rol determinado puede dictar un curso de conducta que frustre las acciones requeridas de otros que no comparten ese rol. Otros críticos defienden, en cambio, el relativismo moral meta ético, del que se deduce que dos personas que provienen de culturas distintas pueden tener razón (en relación con sus &#8220;formas de vida&#8221; separadas) al frustrar las acciones del otro. Una tercera línea de ataque es la de los críticos que creen que ciertos valores morales de primer orden son inconmensurables, y que, por lo tanto, sostienen que dos personas pueden ser inocentes al perseguir objetivos inconmensurables, pero mutuamente incompatibles a expensas del otro. Como sostengo, estas tres estrategias no logran reivindicar la afirmación de que nuestra mejor teoría de la moralidad tolera los encuentros de gladiadores en los que el éxito moral de una persona requiere el fracaso moral de otra.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Combate moral]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[razones relacionadas con el rol]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[relativismo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[perspectivalismo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tesis de la correspondencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[inconmensurabilidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Moral Combat]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Role-Relative Reasons]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Relativism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Perspectivalism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Correspondence Thesis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Incommensurability]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bustamante]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lopes Decat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thiago]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Incommensurability, Social Practices and Moral Dilemmas: A Rejoinder to Heidi Hurd&#8217;s Anti-Perspectivalism]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hohfeld]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Wesley Newcomb]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cook]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fundamental Legal Conceptions]]></source>
<year>1919</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Yale University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Heidi M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Moral Combat]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Heidi M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Relativistic Jurisprudence: Skepticism Founded on Confusion]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Southern California Law Review]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>61</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Heidi M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Virtue of Consumer Bankruptcy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brubaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lawless]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tabb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Debtor World: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Debt]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>317-44</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Heidi M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brubaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ralph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Virtue of Bankruptcy]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford forthcoming]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lyons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism]]></source>
<year>1965</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alexander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Larry]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Pursuing the Good Indirectly]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ethics]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>95</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Matos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Saulo M.M. de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Wittgensteinian-Based Moral Realism: Deflating Hurd&#8217;s Moral Combat Antimony]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michael S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hurd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Heidi M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Moral Combat: Disagreement in Action, Not Belief]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Porto Macedo Jr.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ronaldo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Is Bernard Williams&#8217; Distance Relativism Really Defeated by Heidi Hurd&#8217;s Attack on Perspectivalism?]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rawls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two Concepts of Rules]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Philosophical Review]]></source>
<year>1955</year>
<volume>64</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Morality of Freedom]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reeves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Anthony R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Do Judges Have an Obligation to Enforce the Law?: Moral Responsibility and Judicial-Reasoning]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Law and Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>29</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[William]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Romeo and Juliet]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greenblatt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stephen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Norton Shakespeare]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[W.W. Norton &amp; Company Inc.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Souza Faggion]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vinicius de]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Is the Judicial Role Just a Descriptive Social Fact?]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
