<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2007-4387</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2007-4387</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2007-43872016000100167</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[(Un)Chaining Prometheus: Is Law an Applicative Model?]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Prometeo desencadenado: ¿es el derecho un modelo aplicativo?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Imer B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Legal Research Institute ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>MX</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>10</numero>
<fpage>167</fpage>
<lpage>191</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2007-43872016000100167&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2007-43872016000100167&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2007-43872016000100167&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract:In this article the author questions whether the law is an applicative or an argumentative model. Hence, he criticizes the idea that mistakenly reduces law and legal education to the teaching-learning of an applicative model, which he characterizes as a-critical, passive and re -creative, and confronts it with an argumentative one, which he conceives as critical, active and creative. For that purpose, he revises, on one side, the critiques that Duncan Kennedy formulated on legal education and its role in the reproduction of hierarchy; and, on the other, the characteristics of the standard theory of legal argumentation, from the classics that distinguished between analytical and dialectical logic and within the latter between topic and rhetoric, to the contemporaries, including the anti-formalist movements.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen:En este artículo el autor cuestiona si el derecho es un modelo aplicativo o uno argumentativo. Así, critica la idea que reduce equivocadamente el derecho y la educación jurídica a la enseñanza-aprendizaje de un modelo aplicativo, el cual caracteriza como acrítico, pasivo, recreativo, y lo confronta con uno argumentativo, el cual concibe como crítico, activo y creativo. Para tal propósito, revisa, de un lado, las críticas que Duncan Kennedy formuló acerca de la educación jurídica y su rol en la reproducción de la jerarquía y, del otro, las características de la teoría estándar de la argumentación jurídica, desde los clásicos que distinguieron entre lógica analítica y dialéctica y al interior de la última entre tópica y retórica, hasta nuestros contemporáneos, sin olvidar los movimientos anti-formalistas.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Educación jurídica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[metodología jurídica y teoría del derecho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[modelo argumentativo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[teoría estándar de argumentación jurídica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Duncan Kennedy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Argumentative Model]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Standard Theory of Legal Argumentation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Legal Education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Legal Methodology]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Duncan Kennedy]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></surname>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Organon]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McKeon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Basic Works of Aristotle]]></source>
<year>1941</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Random House]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atienza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Las razones del derecho. Teorías de la argumentación juridical]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mémorial de Sainte-Hélène]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cases]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E de las]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the Private Life and Conversations of the Emperor Napoleon at Saint Helena]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trascendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Columbia Law Review]]></source>
<year>1935</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>809</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Model of Rules]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[University of Chicago Law Review]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<page-range>14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[No Right Answer?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hacker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PMS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honour of H. L. A. Hart]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Talking Rights Seriously]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is There Really No Right Answer in Hard Cases?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Matter of Principle]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Objectivity and Truth: You'd Better Believe It]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Philosophy and Public Affairs]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Justice in Robes]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Langdell v. Holmes: On Legal Education and the Legal Profession]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[De Legibus. Review of the Harvard Law School Association of Mexico]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Quest for Legisprudence: Constitutionalism v. Legalism]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wintgens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Theory and Practice of Legislation: Essays on Legisprudence]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ashgate]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Legisprudence: The Forms and Limits of Legislation]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>1</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Legisprudence: The Role and Rationality of Legislators - vis-à-vis Judges- towards the Realization of Justice]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mexican Law Review]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>91</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[¿Es el derecho un modelo aplicativo?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arriola Cantero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rojas Amandi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La filosofía del derecho hoy]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Porrúa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Unchaining Prometheus: The Struggle for Legal Philosophy (vis-à-vis Legal Education)]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uygur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Alternative Methods in the Education of Philosophy of Law (and the Importance of Legal Philosophy in the Legal Education)]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Franz Steiner Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Natalie Stoljar's Wishful Thinking and One Step Beyond: What Should Conceptual Legal Analysis Become?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Struggle for Legal Philosophy (vis-à-vis Legal Education): Methods and Problems]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mexican Law Review]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>125</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Problem about the Nature of Law vis-à-vis Legal Rationality Revisited: Towards an Integrative Jurisprudence]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waluchow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sciaraffa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin (1931-2013): A Legal Theory and Methodology for Hedgehogs, Hercules, and One Right Answers]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[IB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>9</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Case of the Speluncean Explorers]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>112</volume>
<page-range>1859</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El principio jurídico de razón suficiente]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Máynez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de la Escuela Nacional de Jurisprudencia]]></source>
<year>1950</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<page-range>21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Máynez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Introducción a la lógica juridical]]></source>
<year>1951</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fondo de Cultura Económica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HLA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Concept of Law]]></source>
<year>1961</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HLA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Jhering's Heaven of Concepts and Modern Analytical Jurisprudence]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HLA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jhering]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Husik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Isaac]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Law as a Means to an End]]></source>
<year>1913</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Boston Book Co.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jhering]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lalor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Struggle for Law]]></source>
<year>1915</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Callaghan and Company]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jhering]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RV]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In the Heaven for Legal Concepts: A Fantasy]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Charlotte L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Temple L Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>58</volume>
<page-range>799</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jhering]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Príncipe y Satorres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Enrique]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El espíritu del derecho romano en las diversas fases de su desarrollo]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Comares]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kennedy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy. A Polemic Against the System]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Afar]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kennedy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Left Phenomenological Critique of the Hart/Kelsen Theory of Legal Interpretation]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cáceres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Problemas contemporáneos de la filosofía del derecho]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klug]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Juristische Logic]]></source>
<year>1951</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maccormick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perelman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olbrecht-Tyteca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wilkinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weaver]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Purcell]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Notre Dame]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Law in Books and Law in Action]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pound]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[American Law Review]]></source>
<year>1910</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>12</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pound]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Justice According to Law]]></source>
<year>1951</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Yale University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Recaséns Siches]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Tratado general de filosofía del derecho]]></source>
<year>1959</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Porrúa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montesquieu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Secondat de Charles Louis Barón de la Bréde et de]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nugent]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Spirit of Laws]]></source>
<year>1949</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hafner Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Southern Pacific v. Jensen]]></source>
<year>1917</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[U.S. ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Toulmin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Uses of Argument]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Deontic Logic]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wright Von George]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mind]]></source>
<year>1951</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wright Von George]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[An Essay in Modal Logic]]></source>
<year>1951</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[North-Holland Publishing Company]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Path of Law]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wendell Holmes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jr. O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>110</volume>
<page-range>991- 998</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
