<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1870-0462</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tropical and subtropical agroecosystems]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Trop. subtrop. agroecosyt]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1870-0462</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1870-04622011000300030</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of exogenous enzymes on nutrients digestibility and growth performance in sheep and goats]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Efecto de las enzimas exógenas sobre la digestibilidad de nutrientes y el comportamiento productivo en ovinos y caprinos]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. Z. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El-Adawy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Camacho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González-Ronquillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alsersy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borhami]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia Departamento de Nutrición Animal]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Alexandria University Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby) Department of Animal Production]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Alexandria ]]></addr-line>
<country>Egypt</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Ain Shams University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Animal Productions]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Cairo ]]></addr-line>
<country>Egypt</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A04">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>867</fpage>
<lpage>874</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1870-04622011000300030&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1870-04622011000300030&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1870-04622011000300030&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Six crossbred sheep (32.00±0.603 kg body weight (BW)) and 6 Baladi goats (18.00±0.703 kg BW) were used in 2 x 2 factorial design to evaluate the effect of exogenous enzymes of ZADO® (i.e., ENZ) and on nutrients digestibility and growth performance. Animals were fed on wheat straw ad libitum and restricted amount of commercial concentrate with (+ENZ) or without (-ENZ) 10 g/animal/day of ZADO® to cover 120% of their maintenance requirements. Nutrients digestibilities were increased (P<0.01) in +ENZ groups and it was better in goats than sheep. Goats had the lowest total dry matter intake (DMI) that associated with an increased in digestibility and average daily gain (ADG) more than sheep. Feed efficiency, metabolizable protein intake and net energy for growth occurred sheep and goats diets of +ENZ and the highest (P<0.01) values were observed in goats received +ENZ diet. These results suggested a good performance of goats than sheep received ENZ under the critical conditions of shortage feedstuffs in Egypt.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Seis corderos encastados (32±0.603 kg de peso vivo (PV)) y 6 cabras Baladi (18±0.703 kg de PV) fueron usados en un experimento factorial 2x2 para evaluar el efecto de las enzimas exógenas de ZADO® (ENZ), sobre la digestibilidad de nutrientes y el comportamiento productivo. Los animales se alimentaron con paja de trigo ad libitum y cantidades restringidas de un concentrado comercial con (+ENZ) y sin (-ENZ) 10 g/animal/día de ZADO® para cubrir el 120% de las necesidades de mantenimiento. La digestibilidad de los nutrientes se incrementó (P<0.01) en los grupos de +ENZ y la respuesta fue mejor en las cabras que en los borregos. Las cabras presentaron el más bajo consumo de materia seca (CMS) que estuvo asociado con un incremento en la digestibilidad y en la ganancia diaria de peso (GDP), comparadas con los borregos. La eficiencia alimenticia, el consumo de proteína metabolizable y de energía neta para el crecimiento, presentaron los valores más altos (P<0.01) en las cabras recibiendo las dietas de +ENZ. Estos resultados sugieren un buen comportamiento de las cabras recibiendo enzimas (+ENZ) comparadas con los borregos, bajo las condiciones críticas por los cortos periodos de disponibilidad de alimento en Egipto.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[enzymes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[sheep]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[goats]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[digestibility]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[average daily gain]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Enzimas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[borregos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cabras]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[digestibilidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ganancia diaria de peso]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="4">Nota corta</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="4"><b>Effects of exogenous enzymes on nutrients digestibility and growth performance in sheep and goats</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="3"><b>Efecto de las enzimas ex&oacute;genas sobre la digestibilidad de nutrientes y el comportamiento productivo en ovinos y caprinos</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>A. Z. M. Salem<sup>a,b*</sup>, M. El&#45;Adawy<sup>b</sup>, H. Gado<sup>c</sup>, L.M. Camacho<sup>d</sup>, M. Gonz&aacute;lez&#45;Ronquillo<sup>a</sup>, H. Alsersy<sup>b</sup>, B. Borhami<sup>b</sup></b></font></p>      <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>&ordf; Departamento de Nutrici&oacute;n Animal, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia,Universidad Aut&oacute;noma del Estado de M&eacute;xico, M&eacute;xico</i></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i><sup>b</sup> Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture (El&#45;Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt</i></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i><sup>c</sup> Department of Animal Productions, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt</i></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i><sup>d</sup> Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Aut&oacute;noma de Guerrero,</i> E&#45;mail address: <a href="mailto:asalem70@yahoo.com">asalem70@yahoo.com</a></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">* Corresponding author</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Submitted February 02, 2011    <br> 	Accepted June 06, 2011    <br> 	Revised received June 07, 2011</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Abstract</b></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Six crossbred sheep (32.00&plusmn;0.603 kg body weight (BW)) and 6 Baladi goats (18.00&plusmn;0.703 kg BW) were used in 2 x 2 factorial design to evaluate the effect of exogenous enzymes of ZADO<sup>&reg;</sup> (<i>i.e.,</i> ENZ) and on nutrients digestibility and growth performance. Animals were fed on wheat straw <i>ad libitum</i> and restricted amount of commercial concentrate with (+ENZ) or without (&#45;ENZ) 10 g/animal/day of ZADO<sup>&reg;</sup> to cover 120% of their maintenance requirements. Nutrients digestibilities were increased (P&lt;0.01) in +ENZ groups and it was better in goats than sheep. Goats had the lowest total dry matter intake (DMI) that associated with an increased in digestibility and average daily gain (ADG) more than sheep. Feed efficiency, metabolizable protein intake and net energy for growth occurred sheep and goats diets of +ENZ and the highest (P&lt;0.01) values were observed in goats received +ENZ diet. These results suggested a good performance of goats than sheep received ENZ under the critical conditions of shortage feedstuffs in Egypt.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Key words:</b> enzymes; sheep; goats; digestibility; average daily gain.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Resumen</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Seis corderos encastados (32&plusmn;0.603 kg de peso vivo (PV)) y 6 cabras Baladi (18&plusmn;0.703 kg de PV) fueron usados en un experimento factorial 2x2 para evaluar el efecto de las enzimas ex&oacute;genas de ZADO<sup>&reg;</sup> (ENZ), sobre la digestibilidad de nutrientes y el comportamiento productivo. Los animales se alimentaron con paja de trigo <i>ad libitum</i> y cantidades restringidas de un concentrado comercial con (+ENZ) y sin (&#45;ENZ) 10 g/animal/d&iacute;a de ZADO<sup>&reg;</sup> para cubrir el 120% de las necesidades de mantenimiento. La digestibilidad de los nutrientes se increment&oacute; (P&lt;0.01) en los grupos de +ENZ y la respuesta fue mejor en las cabras que en los borregos. Las cabras presentaron el m&aacute;s bajo consumo de materia seca (CMS) que estuvo asociado con un incremento en la digestibilidad y en la ganancia diaria de peso (GDP), comparadas con los borregos. La eficiencia alimenticia, el consumo de prote&iacute;na metabolizable y de energ&iacute;a neta para el crecimiento, presentaron los valores m&aacute;s altos (P&lt;0.01) en las cabras recibiendo las dietas de +ENZ. Estos resultados sugieren un buen comportamiento de las cabras recibiendo enzimas (+ENZ) comparadas con los borregos, bajo las condiciones cr&iacute;ticas por los cortos periodos de disponibilidad de alimento en Egipto.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Palabras clave:</b> Enzimas; borregos; cabras; digestibilidad; ganancia diaria de peso.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>INTRODUCTION</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Twenty&#45;two million tons of plant by&#45;products or crop residues are produced annually in Egypt (United States Department of Agriculture, 2002). These by&#45;products are generate plentiful, inexpensive and available year round, but are not efficiently utilized. Indeed more than eight million tons, which could potentially be used as animal feed, is wasted or burnt. Some of these residues, especially wheat and rice straws, are used as fuels, or as bulky residues on walkways. Use of these by&#45;products in animal feeds could decrease the pollution of atmosphere. Only about four million tons of cereal straws, mainly wheat straw, are available at present as feeds for livestock (Hathout, 1984). These lignocellulotic by&#45;products are widely spread. Such residues usually contain high amounts of fibrous and low protein content. They are characterized by a poor nutritive value that affects negatively the feed intake and digestibility. Offering the crop residues in large amount may allow animals, particularly sheep and goats.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">It is well established that the nutritive value could be improved substantially by different methods of chemical, physical and for microbiological treatments. Microbial treatment probably conducted by administration of microbial cells, microbial extracts or microbial enzymes such as cellulases. However, microbial treatments improve the nutritive value of these lignocellulosic by &#45;products, as well as palatability, feed intake, and animal performance (Colombatto <i>et al,</i> 2007; Di Francia <i>et al,</i> 2007; Gado <i>et al,</i> 2009 and 2011). A wide range of fibrolytic enzymes are currently commercially available for this purpose to be used with ruminants (Beauchemin <i>et al,</i> 2000; Colombatto <i>et al,</i> 2007; Gado <i>et al,</i> 2009 and 2011). Furthermore, exogenous enzymes work in synergy with rumen microbial enzymes, which increases their hydrolytic potential within the rumen (Eun <i>et al,</i> 2007; Gado <i>et al,</i> 2009 and 2011). To date, it has not been possible to predict the potential of exogenous feed enzymes to increase cell wall degradation in the rumen based on their biochemical characterization alone (Colombatto et al., 2003). Nsereko et al. (2000) reported that enzyme products containing xylanases and esterases had stimulatory effects on fiber degradation of alfalfa hay <i>in vitro,</i> whereas Colombatto et al. (2003) indicated that some xylanases and proteases improved <i>in vitro</i> degradation of alfalfa hay.</font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effect of exogenous enzymes of a commercial product of enzymes on growth performance and digestibility in sheep and goats fed on wheat straw <i>ad libitum</i> as well as a restricted amount of commercial concentrate to cover 120% of their maintenance requirements.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b><i>Invitro</i> study</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Treatment of what straw with ZADO</b><sup>&reg;</sup></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Two hundred grams of chopped what straw (1&#45;3 cm) were treated with ZADO<sup>&reg;</sup> enzymes (<i>i.e.,</i> ENZ) with the proportion of one liters of ENZ per ton) in a plastic bag (60 <i>x</i> 60 cm) according to the procedures of Gado (1997). ZADO<sup>&reg;</sup> is a patented product manufactured by the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt, and contains a mix of anaerobic bacteria and their enzymes of cellulases (7.1 unit/g), xylanases (2.3 unit/g), alpha amylase (61.5 unit/g), protease (29.2 unit/g) in a powder form obtained through an anaerobic fermentation process (Gado, 1997). Enzymes solution was mixed with water at the rate of 2:1 of the amount of what straw, 4% w/w molasses, 3% urea, 0.3% w/w formic acid and 0.3% w/w acetic acid, before applied on the straw. The bag was sealed and kept under the room temperature for 30 days before used in the <i>in vitro</i> study.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b><i>Invitro</i> digestibility</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The two stage technique of Tilley and Terry (1963) was used to study the effect of the biological treatment of the tested roughages on <i>in vitro</i> dry matter digestibility. Rumen liquor was obtained from two fistulated crossbred rams kept on high quality hay. The fluid was strained through four layers of cheese cloth. The McDougal buffer was prepared, then it was added mixed with rumen liquor at the ratio of (2 buffer: 1 rumen liquor).This mixture was saturated with CO<sub>2</sub> and warmed at 39&deg;C in a water bath. A volume of 250 ml of the mixture was added to each polyethylene tube containing 0.5g air dried sample (in triplicate), then saturated with CO<sub>2</sub> and tightly closed with rubber stopper fitted with outlet valve and incubated at 39&deg;C in a water bath for 48 hours. Tubes were well shaken twice daily during incubation period. At the end of the incubation period, 6 ml of HC1 (20%) was added gradually to each tube followed by 2 ml of 5% pepsin. Tubes were closed and incubated in the water bath at 39&deg;C for another 24 hours. Samples were filtered using a dry weighed Whatman filter paper (No. 54) and the residue was washed with boiled water; the filter paper and residue was dried at 100&deg;C overnight and weighed after cooling in desiccators.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b><i>Invivo</i> study</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Animals, management and growth performance trial</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Six crossbred sheep (32.00&plusmn;0.603 kg body weight (BW)) and 6 Baladi goats (18.00&plusmn;0.703 kg BW) were used to evaluate effects of ENZ on feed intake, apparent digestibility and animal performance. The growth study was lasted for 65 days followed by one week for a digestibility trail. Sheep and goats were randomly divided into two groups of three to create two experimental groups per each species. Animals were fed on wheat straw <i>ad libitum</i> and restricted amount of commercial concentrate (<a href="#t1">Table 1</a>) were offered with or without 10 g/animal/day of ENZ to cover 120% of their maintenance requirements. Animals were individually fed and had free access to fresh water. Changes in body weight were recorded each 15 days during the experimental period. Wheat straw offered and orts were measured daily during the experimental periods.</font></p>  	    <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><a name="t1"></a><img src="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t1.jpg"></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Metabolism trial</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">At the end of the growth trial of the 65 day experiment, all lambs of each treatment were used in a digestibility trial. Feed offer and feed refusals and total feces output were daily recorded for one week to determine the effect of ENZ and animal species on the apparent digestibility. Representative samples of straw, concentrate, refusals and faeces were collected daily and dried at 55&deg;C to determine daily intake of DM for each animal. Other sub&#45;samples of each material were bulked, mixed, and ground through a lmm sieve for further laboratory analysis.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Analytical methods</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Ground samples of feeds, refusals and feces were analyzed for dry matter (DM) by drying samples at 105&deg;C for 24 h in a forced air oven. Ash was determined after igniting samples in a muffle furnace at 550&deg;C for 4 h. Crude protein (CP) was determined by a Kjeldahl method (AOAC, 1990; ID 954.01). Ether extract (EE) was determined by Soxhlet method (AOAC, 1990; ID 920.39). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin were determined. NDF was assayed without the use of an alpha amylase but with use of sodium sulfite. Both NDF and ADF are expressed without residual ash.</font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Calculations</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Metabolizable energy intake (kJ/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup>) was estimated according to Luo et al. (2004) as:</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Metabolizable energy intake = 533 + (43.2 x ADG (g/kgBW<sup>0.75</sup>))</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">where: ADG is the average daily gain (g/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup>) of sheep and goats during the 65 days of the growth performance experiment.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Net energy required for growth (Mcal/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup>/d) was estimated according to NRC, (1985) as:</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Net energy required for growth = 644 &#45; 2.61 x MBW</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">where: MBW is the metabolic body weight (MBW = kg BW<sup>0.75</sup>)</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Statistical analysis</b></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">A 2 x 2 factorial experimental design (2 animal species (sheep and goats) x2 treatments (with or without ENZ)) were used to analyze the data of body weight changes, feed intake, feed efficiency, Metabolizable energy intake, and net energy required for gain during the growth trial. Also the nutrient components of total feed intake, straw consumption and digestibility during the digestibility trial. The 'PROC GLM' of SAS (1999), with methods of Steel and Tome (1980), was used to determine differences due to animal species and ENZ. In the case of significant interactions <i>(i.e.,</i> P&lt;0.05), Duncan's multiple&#45;range test (Duncan, 1955) was used to separate means within animal species.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>RESULTS</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Addition of enzymes (<i>i.e.,</i> ENZ) improved (P&lt;0.05) <i>in vitro</i> dry matter digestibility during the first 4 h and from 24 to 48 h after incubations, while decried at 6h (<a href="#t2">Table 2</a>).</font></p>  	    <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><a name="t2"></a><img src="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t2.jpg"></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Total dry matter intake <i>(i.e.,</i> DMI) was increased from 76 to 84 g/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup> in goats, but it was not affected in sheep. Digestibility of DM was increased (P&lt;0.01) by 5 and 11%, in sheep and goats respectively by addition of ENZ, while NDF digestibility was increased (P&lt;0.01) by 7 and 9%, respectively. OM and CP digestibility were increased (P&lt;0.01) also in both animal species with ENZ diets. However, the nutritive value was improved in both species and it appears to be higher (P&lt;0.05) in goats than in sheep (<a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t3.jpg" target="_blank">Table 3</a>).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">In the growth performance trial, DMI was increased (P&lt;0.05) by addition the daily addition of ENZ to sheep and goats diets during the 65 days of the experimental. Total DMI was increased (P&lt;0.01) in sheep than goats, while average daily gain (ADG) was increased (P&lt;0.01) goats than sheep with the addition of ENZ (2.2 and 6.3 g/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup>, respectively). Feed efficiency was increased in goats than sheep with ENZ addition. An increased (P&lt;0.01) in metabolizable protein intake and net energy for growth occurred by ENZ addition sheep and goats diets and the highest (P&lt;0.01) values were observed in goats received ENZ diet (<a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t4.jpg" target="_blank">Table 4</a>).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>DISCUSSION</b></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Nutrients digestibility</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">It was speculated that the addition of ZADO<sup>&reg;</sup> (<i>i.e.,</i> ENZ) increased (P&lt;0.05) total feed intake in sheep and goats (Tables <a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t3.jpg" target="_blank">3</a> and <a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t4.jpg" target="_blank">4</a>). Some results reported an effect of providing exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on feed intake of dairy cows or beef steers (Schingoethe <i>et al,</i> 1999; Gado <i>et al,</i> 2009). DM digestibility was improved by addition of ENZ by 4 and 11%, in sheep and goats, respectively. Improvement of nutrient digestibility by addition of ENZ probably due to the beneficial effects of ENZ on fiber hydrolysis and rumen fermentation activity (Gado <i>et al,</i> 2006, 2009 and 2011) and this results were confirmed <i>in vitro</i> (<a href="#t2">Table 2</a>). Beauchemin <i>et al.</i> (2003) reported that supplementing the diet with <i>E. faecium</i> increased (P&lt;0.05) the proportion of propionate and, consequently, decreased (PO.10) the proportion of butyrate in ruminal fluid compared with the control regarding to its roles in stimulating the presence of lactic acid&#45;utilizing bacteria, which produce propionate. Similarly, Kim <i>et al.</i> (2000) reported increased propionate concentrations in steers fed <i>L. plantarum,</i> another lactic acid&#45;producing bacterium. NDF digestibility was increased (PO.01) in sheep and goats treated groups by about 7 and 9%, respectively (<a href="#t2">Table 2</a>). This effect may be due to the ability of ENZ to lose lignocellulotic bonds in fiber (Bassuny <i>et al,</i> 2003).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Improve the NDF digestibility by addition of ENZ may be also due to increase their degradability in the rumen which could reduce the physical fill in the rumen over time thereby allowing higher voluntary feed intake (Dado and Allen, 1995). Improved the nutrient digestibility in animals could be also refer to the improvement in ruminal fermentation activities, by addition of ENZ to diet (Gado <i>et al,</i> 2006, 2009 and 2011). ENZ may improve the stimulation of ruminal microorganism's activity by reducing the NH<sub>3</sub>&#45;N concentration in the rumen liquor throughout incorporation of NH<sub>3</sub>&#45;N into microbial protein (Gado <i>et al,</i> 2006). This effect attributed to an increase in microbial colonization of feed particles and speculated that exogenous enzymes may act similarly to primary bacterial colonization Yang <i>et al.</i> (1999), and increase the dietary energy utilization and rumen fermentation. Colombatto <i>et al.</i> (2007) reported an improvement <i>in vitro</i> ruminal fermentation activity and cell wall digestibility of alfalfa stems by addition of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme in cow. Zadrazil (1977) reported an increase of 12 % in the <i>in vitro</i> digestibility of wheat straw incubated with <i>Pleurotus florida,</i> and Ibrahim and Pearce (1980) observed an increase in digestibility of barley straw by 10 units, with <i>Peniophora gigantea.</i></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Growth performance</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Improvement of the average daily gain <i>(i.e.,</i> ADG, <a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t4.jpg" target="_blank">Table 4</a>) by addition of ENZ probably due to the improvement in nutrient digestibility of diets (<a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t3.jpg" target="_blank">Table 3</a>) which reflect on improving the feed efficiency (<a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t4.jpg" target="_blank">Table 4</a>). Supplementing diets with enzymes has been shown to improve feed efficiency and daily gain of feedlot cattle (Swinney&#45;Floyd <i>et al,</i> 1999; Galyean <i>et al,</i> 2000). Ware <i>et al.</i> (1988) Improving the nutrient digestibility and animal's performance may be due to the positive effect of ENZ on ruminal fermentation activity. Gado <i>et al.</i> (2006) reported an improvement in ruminal fermentation activity by treating of rice straw with ENZ.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Improved ADG in sheep and goats could be also explained by an increase in the available nutrients to animals for deposition and growth (Lewis <i>et al,</i> 1999). ENZ addition increased the ADG by 51 and 69% in sheep and goats, respectively. These results are in agreement with Beauchemin <i>et al.</i> (1995) who reported significant improved growth and body weight gain by adding an enzyme product containing xylanase and cellulase activities to alfalfa hay of growing beef cattle by up to 30% or high concentrate ration (Beauchemin <i>et al,</i> 1999). Meanwhile, McAllister <i>et al.</i> (1999) observed that average daily gain was related to the enzyme concentration. Dong <i>et al.</i> (1995) reported that direct fed cellulases had the ability to improve the growth of Holstein calves when administrated orally. However, improving the growth performance of sheep and goats with addition of ENZ suggested to have a marked effect on increasing the total microbial population in the rumen (Yang <i>et al,</i> 1999), and increased microbial protein synthesis (Gado <i>et al,</i> 2009). Yang <i>et al.</i> (1999) and Beauchemin <i>et al.</i> (2000) reported that the increase in nutrient digestibility (<a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t3.jpg" target="_blank">Table 3</a>) is due to the increase or stimulation in the total microbial population. However, Beauchemin <i>et al.</i> (1995) and Lewis <i>et al.</i> (1999) indicated that the improved performance might be due to increased digestibility which yields more energy and/or nutrient availability to rumen microbes because of enzyme feeding. Beauchemin <i>et al.</i> (1997) and Yang <i>et al.</i> (1999) concluded that fibrolytic enzymes can be used to improve the digestibility of treated diets and provide more nutrients for production. Fibrolytic enzymes contain a wide variety of polysaccharidase enzymes that solubilize fiber and provide some essential nutrients or growth factors to rumen microorganisms. Di Francia <i>et al.</i> (2007) who observed an improvement in average daily gain and digestive efficiency of fibre with supplementation of <i>A. oryzae</i> fermentation extract and <i>S. cerevisiae</i> culture on the calf starter.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Feeding efficiency expressed as kg feed/kg body weight was significantly improved (P&lt;0.05) for ENZ addition groups compared to control (Table 4). However, this response was mainly due to the effect of cellulase feeding on feed intake and digestibility. However, feed efficiency (P&lt;0.05) was improved by 35% with addition of ENZ, and this was associated with increased of 60% in ADG. Beauchemin <i>et al.</i> (2000) reported an 11% improvement in feed conversion ratio resulting from a 5% decrease in feed intake from enzyme treated ration associated with a 6% increase in body weight gain. En earlier study of the same author of Beauchemin <i>et al.</i> (1995) reported a 10% improvement in the feed conversion ratio of steers fed dry forages resulting from improved digestibility of enzyme&#45;supplemented ration.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Effect of animal species</b></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Sheep and goats increased the amount of straw intake when the amount offered was increased to allow animals to refuse more than the rate of 10 to 20% of amount offered, normally adopted in <i>ad libitum</i> feeding trials. Our research has aimed to define how much straw needs to be consumed in goats and sheep, to enable them to select the more nutritious components of straw, after eating the restricted amount of concentrate in absence of presence of ENZ. Differences in gut morphology, rumen size, and physiology, such as rumen motility (Tisserand <i>et al,</i> 1991), offer an explanation as to differences between the two species. Attempts have been made to explain the observed differences in diet selection, on grounds of nutrient requirements and physiology, which postulate that goats differ from sheep in energy, nitrogen, dietary fibre requirements, digestive capacity and the rate of passage of undigested residues (Brown and Johnson, 1985; Lu, 1988).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Sheep and goats in our study were fed less than 60% of their DM required for the growth (NRC, 1985) to give the animal chance to increase the amount ingested from the wheat straw. Goats had the lowest (P&lt;0.05) total DM intake (<a href="/img/revistas/tsa/v14n3/a30t4.jpg" target="_blank">Table 4</a>) and associated with an improvement in nutrient digestibility and ADG more than sheep (625 and 743g/animal/d, for goats and sheep, respectively). Both goats and sheep increased their total intake with increasing amounts of straw offered, under addition of ENZ in concentrate, and this was reflected in increasing rates of live&#45; weight gain. Growth rates of goats were higher than for sheep; although intakes were higher in sheep than goats. The species differences were probably also a reflection due to the higher mature weight of the sheep genotype used than goats, and may be reflect also the higher efficiency of goats than sheep in feed utilization.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Addition of enzymes of ZADO<sup>&reg;</sup> enzymes improved nutrients digestibility in sheep and goats. The improvement was better in goats than in sheep. Goats had the lowest total dry matter intake that associated with an improvement in nutrient digestibility and average daily gain more than sheep. These results suggested a good performance of goats than sheep under the critical conditions of shortage feedstuffs during the dry season in Egypt.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>REFERENCES</b></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">AOAC. 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Official methods of analysis (15<sup>th</sup> Ed.). Arlingtion, V.A.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045135&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Beauchemin, K.A., Jones, S.D., Rode, L.M., Sewalt, V.J. 1997. Effects of fibrolytic enzymes in corn or barley diets on performance and carcass characteristics of feed lot cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 77: 645&#45;653.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045137&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Beauchemin, K.A., Rode, L.M., Karren, D. 1999. Use of feed enzymes in feedlot finishing diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 79: 243&#45;246.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045139&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Beauchemin, K.A., Rode, L.M., Maekawa, M., Morgavi, D.P., Kampen, R. 2000. Evaluation of a non starch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cow diets. Journal of Dairy Science. 83: 543&#45;553.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045141&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Beauchemin, K.A., Rode, L.M., Sewalt, V.J. 1995. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 75: 641&#45;644.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045143&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Beauchemin, K.A., Yang, W.Z., Morgavi, D.P., Ghorbani, G.R., Kautz, W., Leedle, J.A.Z. 2003. Effects of bacterial direct&#45;fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 81: 1628&#45;1640.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045145&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Brown, L.E., Johnson, W.L. 1985. Intake and digestibility of wheat straw diets by goats and sheep. Journal of Animal Science. 60: 1318&#45;1323.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045147&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Bassuny, S.M., Abdel&#45;Aziz, A.A., El&#45;Sayis, M.F., Abdulla, M.A. 2003. Fibrous crop byproducts as feed. 2&#45; Effect of chemical and biological treatments on feed intake, nutritive values and some ruminal and blood constituents. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds. 6: 901&#45;912.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045149&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Colombatto, D., Morgavi, D.P., Fu&ntilde;ado, A.F., Beauchemin, K.A. 2003. Screening of exogenous enzymes for ruminant diets: Relationship between biochemical characteristics and <i>in vitro</i> ruminal degradation. Journal of Animal Science. 81: 2628&#45;2638.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045151&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Colombatto, D., Moulda, F.L., Bhat, M.K., Owena, E. 2007. Influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme level and incubation pH on the <i>in vitro</i> ruminal fermentation of alfalfa stems. Animal Feed Science Technology. 137: 150&#45;162.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045153&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Dado, R.G., Allen, M.S. 1995. Intake limitations, feeding behavior, and rumen function of cows challenged with rumen fill from dietary fiber or inert bulk. Journal of Dairy Science. 78: 118&#45;133.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045155&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Di Francia, A., Masucci, F., De Rosa, G., Varricchio, M.L., Proto, V. 2007. Effects of <i>Aspergillus oryzae</i> extract and a <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> fermentation product on intake, body weight gain and digestibility in buffalo calves. Animal Feed Science Technology. 140: 67&#45;77.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045157&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Dong, Y., Bae, H.D., McAllister, T.A., Mathison, G.W., Cheng, K.J. 1995. The effect of supplementary fibrolytic enzymes, bromoethelenesulfunate and monensin on digestibility of grass hay and methane production. Proceedings, vol. 46. Western Section, American Society of Animal Science, USA, p. 434.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045159&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple ranges and multiple <i>F&#45;</i>test. Biometrics. 11: 42.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045161&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Eun, J.&#45;S., Beauchemin, K.A., Schulze, H. 2007. Use of an <i>in vitro</i> fermentation bioassay to evaluate improvements in degradation of alfalfa hay due to exogenous feed enzymes. Animal Feed Science Technology. 135: 315&#45;328.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045163&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Gado, H. 1997. Effect of enzymatic treatments for poor quality roughages on fiber digestibility and nitrogen metabolism in Baladi goats. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds. 50&#45;56. (Special issue)</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045165&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Gado, H., Nasr, S.A., Mohamed, B.K., Mahrous, A.A. 2006. Effect of biological treatments on the nutritive value of rice straw. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds. 9 (2): 207&#45;219.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045166&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Gado, H.M., Salem, A.Z.M., Odongo, N.E., Borhami, B.E. 2011. Effect of exogenous enzymes ensiled with orange pulp on digestion, blood metabolites and growth performance in lambs. Animal Feed Science Technology. 165: 131&#45;136.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045168&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Gado, H.M., Salem, A.Z.M., Robinson, P.H., Hassan, M. 2009. Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science Technology. 154, 36&#45;46.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045170&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Galyean, M.L., Nunnery, G.A., Defoor, P.J., Salyer, G.B., Parsons, C.H. 2000. Effects of live cultures of <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> (Strains 45 and 51) and <i>Propionibacterium freudenreichii</i> PF&#45;24 on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 4: 548&#45;552.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045172&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Hathout, M.K. 1984. Use of liquid supplements, molasses blocks and anhydrous ammonia to improve the feeding quality of agricultural by products. UNDP/FAO beef industry development and related ruminant production system project. 21 pp.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045174&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Ibrahim, M.N.M., Pearce, G.R. 1980. Effects of white rot&#45;fungi on the composition and <i>In vitro</i> digestibility of crop by production. Agricultural Wastes. 2:199&#45;205.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045176&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Kim, S.W., Standford, D.G., Roman&#45;Rosario, H., Yokoyama, M.T., Rust, S.R. 2000. Potential use of <i>Propionibacterium acidipropionici,</i> strain DH42, as a direct&#45;fed microbial for cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 78:1225 (Abstr.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045178&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref -->).</font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Lewis, G.E., Sanchez, W.K., Hunt, C.W., Guy, M.A., Pritchard, G.T., Swanson, B.I., Trearcher, R.J. 1999. Effect of direct fed fibrolytic enzymes on the lactational performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 82: 611&#45;617.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045180&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Lu, CD. 1988. Grazing behavior and diet selection of goats. Small Ruminant Research. 1: 205&#45;216.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045182&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Luo, J., Goetsch, A.L., Nsahlai, I.V., Sahlu, T., Ferrell, C.L., Owens, F.N., Galyean, M.L., Moore, J.E., Johnson, Z.B. 2004. Metabolizable protein requirements for maintenance and gain of growing goats. Small Ruminant Research. 53: 309&#45;326.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045184&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Nsereko, V.L., Morgavi, D.P., Rode, L.M., Beauchemin, K.A., McAllister TA. 2000. Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms <i>in vitro.</i> Animal Feed Science Technology. 88: 153&#45;170.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045186&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000027&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">NRC. 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic animals. National Research council, Washington, DC, USA.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045188&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000028&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045190&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000029&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Schingoethe, D.J., Stegman, G.A., Treacher, R.J. 1999. Response of lactating dairy cows to a cellulase and xylanase enzyme mixture applied to forages at the time of feeding. Journal of Dairy Science. 82: 996&#45;1003.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045192&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000030&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd ed. McGraw&#45;Hill International, New York, NY, USA.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045194&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000031&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Swinney&#45;Floyd, D., Gardner, B.A., Owens, F.N., Rehberger, T., Parrott, T. 1999. Effect of inoculation with either strain P&#45;63 alone or in combination with <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> LA53545 on performance of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 77:77.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045196&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000032&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Tilley, J.A., Terry, R.A. 1963. A two stage technique for the digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society. 18: 104&#45;111.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045198&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000033&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Tisserand, J.L., Hadjipanayiotou, M., Gihad, E.A. 1991. Digestion in goats. In: Morand&#45;Fehr, P. (Ed.), Goat Nutrition. Pudoc, Wageningen, the Netherlands, pp. 46&#45;60.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045200&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000034&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">United States Department of Agriculture 2002. Agricultural Statistics 2002. National Agricultural Statistics Service. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045202&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000035&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Ware, D.R., Read, P.L., Manfredi, E.T. 1988. Pooled summary of eight feedlot trials evaluating performance and carcass characteristics of steers fed <i>Lactobacillus acidophilus</i> strain BT138. Journal of Animal Science. 66: 436.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045204&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000036&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Yang, W.Z., Beauchemin, K.A., Rode, L.M. 1999. Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 82: 391&#45;403.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045206&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000037&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Zadrazil, F. 1977. The conversation of straw into feed by Basidiomycetes. European Journal of Applied Microbiology. 4: 273&#45;281.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=10045208&pid=S1870-0462201100030003000038&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>AOAC</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Official methods of analysis]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<edition>15th</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Arlingtion^eV.A V.A]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jones]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rode]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sewalt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of fibrolytic enzymes in corn or barley diets on performance and carcass characteristics of feed lot cattle]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<page-range>645-653</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rode]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Use of feed enzymes in feedlot finishing diets]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>79</volume>
<page-range>243-246</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rode]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maekawa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kampen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation of a non starch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cow diets]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Dairy Science]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>83</volume>
<page-range>543-553</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rode]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sewalt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<page-range>641-644</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ghorbani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kautz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leedle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials and yeast on site and extent of digestion, blood chemistry, and subclinical ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<page-range>1628-1640</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Intake and digestibility of wheat straw diets by goats and sheep]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<page-range>1318-1323</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bassuny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abdel-Aziz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[El-Sayis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abdulla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fibrous crop byproducts as feed. 2- Effect of chemical and biological treatments on feed intake, nutritive values and some ruminal and blood constituents]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>901-912</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colombatto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuñado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Screening of exogenous enzymes for ruminant diets: Relationship between biochemical characteristics and in vitro ruminal degradation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<page-range>2628-2638</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colombatto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moulda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bhat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Owena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme level and incubation pH on the in vitro ruminal fermentation of alfalfa stems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Animal Feed Science Technology]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>137</volume>
<page-range>150-162</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Intake limitations, feeding behavior, and rumen function of cows challenged with rumen fill from dietary fiber or inert bulk]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Dairy Science]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<page-range>118-133</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Di Francia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Masucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Rosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Varricchio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Proto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of Aspergillus oryzae extract and a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on intake, body weight gain and digestibility in buffalo calves]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Animal Feed Science Technology]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>140</volume>
<page-range>67-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bae]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McAllister]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mathison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cheng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The effect of supplementary fibrolytic enzymes, bromoethelenesulfunate and monensin on digestibility of grass hay and methane production]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<page-range>434</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Western Section, American Society of Animal Science]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duncan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Multiple ranges and multiple F-test]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biometrics]]></source>
<year>1955</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.-S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schulze]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Use of an in vitro fermentation bioassay to evaluate improvements in degradation of alfalfa hay due to exogenous feed enzymes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Animal Feed Science Technology]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>135</volume>
<page-range>315-328</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of enzymatic treatments for poor quality roughages on fiber digestibility and nitrogen metabolism in Baladi goats]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>50-56</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nasr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohamed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mahrous]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of biological treatments on the nutritive value of rice straw]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>207-219</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.Z.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odongo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borhami]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of exogenous enzymes ensiled with orange pulp on digestion, blood metabolites and growth performance in lambs]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Animal Feed Science Technology]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>165</volume>
<page-range>131-136</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gado]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.Z.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hassan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Animal Feed Science Technology]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>154</volume>
<page-range>36-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galyean]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nunnery]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Defoor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parsons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of live cultures of Lactobacillus acidophilus (Strains 45 and 51) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii PF-24 on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[African Journal of Agricultural Research]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>548-552</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hathout]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Use of liquid supplements, molasses blocks and anhydrous ammonia to improve the feeding quality of agricultural by products]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<page-range>21</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[UNDP/FAO beef industry development and related ruminant production system project]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ibrahim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.N.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pearce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of white rot-fungi on the composition and In vitro digestibility of crop by production]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agricultural Wastes]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>199-205</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Standford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roman-Rosario]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yokoyama]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rust]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Potential use of Propionibacterium acidipropionici, strain DH42, as a direct-fed microbial for cattle]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>78</volume>
<page-range>1225</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lewis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hunt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pritchard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swanson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trearcher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of direct fed fibrolytic enzymes on the lactational performance of dairy cows]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Dairy Science]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>611-617</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CD]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Grazing behavior and diet selection of goats]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Small Ruminant Research]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>205-216</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goetsch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nsahlai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sahlu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Owens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galyean]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Metabolizable protein requirements for maintenance and gain of growing goats]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Small Ruminant Research]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>309-326</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nsereko]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgavi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rode]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McAllister]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TA.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Animal Feed Science Technology]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>88</volume>
<page-range>153-170</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>NRC</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Nutrient Requirements of Domestic animals]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington^eDC DC]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Research council]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>SAS</collab>
<source><![CDATA[SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<edition>4th</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cary^eNC NC]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SAS Institute]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schingoethe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stegman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Treacher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Response of lactating dairy cows to a cellulase and xylanase enzyme mixture applied to forages at the time of feeding]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Dairy Science]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>996-1003</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.G.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torrie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Principles and Procedures of Statistics]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<edition>2nd</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York^eNY NY]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw-Hill International]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swinney-Floyd]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Owens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rehberger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parrott]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of inoculation with either strain P-63 alone or in combination with Lactobacillus acidophilus LA53545 on performance of feedlot cattle]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<page-range>77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tilley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Terry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A two stage technique for the digestion of forage crops]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the British Grassland Society]]></source>
<year>1963</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>104-111</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tisserand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadjipanayiotou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gihad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Digestion in goats]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morand-Fehr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Goat Nutrition]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>46-60</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Wageningen ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pudoc]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>United States Department of Agriculture</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Agricultural Statistics 2002]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Washington^eDC DC]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Agricultural Statistics Service. United States Government Printing Office]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ware]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Read]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manfredi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pooled summary of eight feedlot trials evaluating performance and carcass characteristics of steers fed Lactobacillus acidophilus strain BT138]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Science]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<page-range>436</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beauchemin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rode]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Dairy Science]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<page-range>391-403</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zadrazil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The conversation of straw into feed by Basidiomycetes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[European Journal of Applied Microbiology]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>273-281</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
