<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1405-0218</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Isonomía]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Isonomía]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1405-0218</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México; Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1405-02182020000100031</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5347/isonomia.v0i52.282</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Prueba legítima y verdad en el proceso penal II: la dependencia epistémica de la prueba]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Legitimate Proof and Truth in Criminal Proceedings II: Epistemic Dependence of Proof]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez Barberá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Córdoba  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>52</numero>
<fpage>31</fpage>
<lpage>62</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1405-02182020000100031&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1405-02182020000100031&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1405-02182020000100031&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen En el presente trabajo intento demostrar que existe una relación (que bien puede ser considerada conceptual) de necesidad epistémica entre prueba y verdad. Esto quiere decir que no es posible, en el proceso, ni creer justificadamente ni aceptar que está probado que . si, por información pública pero extraprocesal, el juez sabe que . es (probablemente) falso. Con todo, ello es así bajo ciertas condiciones, a saber: en primer lugar, que se trate de prueba que fundamente una sentencia de condena en un proceso penal legítimo en términos de Estado de derecho; y en segundo lugar, que por verdad se entienda correspondencia entre enunciado y mundo. Esa es la tesis principal y se desarrolla en esta segunda parte de la investigación. Pero tiene apoyo en algunas tesis secundarias, ya analizadas en la primera parte del trabajo, publicada también en este volumen.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract In this paper I try to show that there is a connection (which may well be considered conceptual) of epistemic necessity between proof and truth. It means that it is not possible, in criminal proceedings, to justifiably believe or to accept that it is proven that . if, from public but extraprocedural information, the judge knows that . is (probably) false. However, this presupposes that certain conditions are met, namely: first, that we are talking about proof that is the basis of a conviction in a criminal trial which is legitimate in terms of the rule of law; and second, that we understand truth as the correspondence between a statement and the objective world. This is the main thesis and it is developed in this second part of my investigation. But it has support in some secondary assumptions, which were already analyzed in the first part of this paper, published in this volume as well.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[prueba]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[verdad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[creencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[aceptación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[relación conceptual]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[necesidad epistémica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[justicia retributiva]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Estado de derecho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[proof]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[truth]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[belief]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[acceptance]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[conceptual connection]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[epistemic necessity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[retributive justice]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[rule of law]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ayer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alfred]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Problem of Knowledge]]></source>
<year>1956</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[London ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Macmillan]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beulke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Werner]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Satzger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Helmut]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schluckebier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Wilhelm]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Strafprozessordnung. Kommentar]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<edition>2ª ed</edition>
<page-range>1-91</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Köln ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Carl Heymann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Botero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan José]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Actitudes proposicionales: formalismo y mentalismo en semántica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ideas y valores]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<numero>73</numero>
<issue>73</issue>
<page-range>3-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>v. Canstein</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Die Grundlagen des Beweisrechtes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zeitschrift für deutschen Zivilprozeß]]></source>
<year>1880</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>297</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Caracciolo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ricardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Justificación normativa y pertenencia. Modelos de decisión judicial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Análisis Filosófico]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>VIII</volume>
<page-range>37-67</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. Jonathan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[An Essay on Belief and Acceptance]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Clarendon Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Díez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moulines]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ulises]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Fundamentos de filosofía de la ciencia]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Barcelona ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Ariel]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrajoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luigi]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Dirittoe ragione. Teoria del garantismo penale.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Roma ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Laterza]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrer Beltrán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jordi]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Está probado que p]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Triolo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lucia]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Prassigiuridica e controllo di razionalità]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>I</volume>
<page-range>73-96</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Torino ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[G. Giappichelli]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrer Beltrán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jordi]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Prueba y verdad en el derecho]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<edition>2ª ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ferrer Beltrán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jordi]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La valoración racional de la prueba]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foucault]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michael]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A verdae e as formas jurídicas]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Río de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pontificia Universidade Católica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gascón Abellán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marina]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Los hechos en el derecho]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<edition>3ª ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gettier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edmund]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Analysis]]></source>
<year>1963</year>
<numero>23</numero>
<issue>23</issue>
<page-range>121-3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González Lagier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Daniel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Tres modos de razonar sobre hechos (y algunos problemas sobre la prueba judicial planteados a partir de ellos)]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vázquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carmen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Hechos y razonamiento probatorio]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<page-range>17-42</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editores del Sur]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guzmán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicolás]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La verdad en el proceso penal]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<edition>2ª ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Del Puerto]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hassemer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Winfried]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<edition>2ª ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[München ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[C. H. Beck]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Wolff entre autoridad y autonomía]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DOXA]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<numero>33</numero>
<issue>33</issue>
<page-range>515-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hans]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reine Rechtslehre]]></source>
<year>1960</year>
<edition>2ª ed.</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Wien ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[s.e.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kment]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Boris]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Varieties of Modality]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zalta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edward]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lafont]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cristina]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is Objectivity Perspectival?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aboulafia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mitchell]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bookman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Myra]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kemp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Catherine]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Habermas and Pragmatism]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>185-209</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[London/New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Julio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Derecho procesal penal]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>I: Fundamentos</volume>
<edition>2ª ed.</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Del Puerto]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez Barberá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Problemas y perspectivas de las teorías expresivas de la pena. Una justificación deontológica de la pena como institución]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[In Dret Penal]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez Barberá]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prueba legítima y verdad en el proceso penal I]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Isonomía]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<numero>52</numero>
<issue>52</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rawls]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reply to Habermas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Journal of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>XCII</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>132-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Legitimate Authority]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Authority of Law. Essays on Law and Morality]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<page-range>3-27</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Redondo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María Cristina]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La noción de razón para la acción en el análisis jurídico]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Centro de Estudios Constitucionales]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rorty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Objectivity, Relativism and Truth]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>126-50</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge (Mass.) ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sommermann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Karl-Peter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Art. 20, Abs. 3]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hermann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mangoldt]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Friedrich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Klein]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Starck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christian]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Das Bonner Grundgesetz. Kommentar]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>II</volume>
<edition>4a ed.</edition>
<page-range>1-66</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[München ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Franz Vahlen]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taruffo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michele]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La prova dei fatti giuridici. Nozioni generali]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Milano ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Giuffré]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vázquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carmen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A modo de presentación]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vázquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carmen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Estándares de prueba y prueba científica]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verde]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alejandra]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Repercusiones probatorias del principio de inocencia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Derecho Procesal Penal: La prueba en el proceso penal]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>II</volume>
<page-range>237-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waldron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Rule of Law]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zalta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edward]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gerhard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Freie Beweiswürdigung]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Tübingen ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Mohr]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
