<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0300-9041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecología y obstetricia de México]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecol. obstet. Méx.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0300-9041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0300-90412018001000650</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24245/gom.v86i10.2188</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Patrón menstrual y reserva ovárica en pacientes con salpingectomía y oclusión tubárica para esterilización definitiva]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Menstrual pattern and ovarian reserve in patients undergoing to salpingectomy and tubal occlusion for definitive sterilization]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgan-Ortiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fred]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Burgos-Tamayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quevedo-Castro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Everardo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morgan-Ruiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fred V]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Báez-Barraza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Josefina]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peraza-Garay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Felipe de Jesús]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Ciencias de la Salud ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>86</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<fpage>650</fpage>
<lpage>657</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0300-90412018001000650&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0300-90412018001000650&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0300-90412018001000650&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  Objetivo: Evaluar el patrón menstrual y la reserva ovárica mediante la determinación de FSH y conteo de folículos antrales en pacientes con salpingectomía y oclusión tubárica bilateral como métodos de esterilización definitiva.  Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo, longitudinal, comparativo, experimental, con asignación al azar, ciego simple, al que se incluyeron pacientes con deseos de esterilización definitiva como método anticonceptivo. Las pacientes se asignaron al azar a dos grupos, el primero con oclusión tubárica bilateral y el segundo con salpingectomía. A los seis meses posprocedimiento se evaluaron en forma ciega el patrón menstrual y la determinación sérica de hormona folículo estimulante (FSH) y el recuento de folículos antrales por ultrasonido transvaginal como marcadores de reserva ovárica. El análisis estadístico se llevó a cabo con t de Student para muestras independientes (comparación entre los grupos) y dependientes (comparación intragrupo) para comparación de medias y la prueba x2 para comparación de proporciones.  Resultados: Se estudiaron 60 pacientes, 31 con oclusión tubárica bilateral y 29 con salpingectomía. Se registraron aumentos significativos en los días de sangrado menstrual con respecto a la basal después de la oclusión tubaria bilateral (p = .002) y salpingectomía (p = .008). No hubo diferencias entre oclusión tubárica bilateral y salpingectomía con respecto al tiempo quirúrgico para llevar a cabo la técnica de esterilización (p = .83), duración del ciclo menstrual (p = .35), duración de los días de sangrado menstrual (p = .40). Tampoco resultaron diferencias en las concentraciones séricas de FSH (p = 0.75) ni en el recuento de folículos antrales (p = .44) entre los grupos.  Conclusiones: El patrón menstrual y la reserva ovárica son muy similares en pacientes con oclusión tubárica bilateral o salpingectomía. Ambas técnicas incrementan la duración del sangrado menstrual posterior al procedimiento. La salpingectomía implica un aumento ligero en el tiempo quirúrgico, sin diferencias en la frecuencia de complicaciones.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  Objective: To evaluate the menstrual pattern and ovarian reserve in patients undergoing salpingectomy and bilateral tubal occlusion as definitive sterilization methods.  Material and methods: A prospective, longitudinal, comparative, experimental, randomized, single blind study was carried out in patients with a desire for definitive sterilization as a contraceptive method. Patients were randomly assigned to perform bilateral tubal occlusion or salpingectomy. Six months after the procedure in each patient, the menstrual pattern and the serum determination of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and the antral follicle count were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound as markers of ovarian reserve. The statistical analysis was carried out using the student's t-test for independent samples (comparison between groups) and dependent samples (intra-group comparison) for comparison of means and the x2 test for comparison of proportions.  Results: Sixty patients were studied, 31 with bilateral tubal occlusion and 29 with salpingectomy. Significant increases were observed in the days of menstrual bleeding with respect to the baseline after bilateral tubal occlusion (p = .002) and salpingectomy (p = .008). No differences were observed between bilateral tubal occlusion and salpingectomy with respect to the surgical time to carry out the sterilization technique (p = .83), menstrual cycle duration (p = .35), duration of the days of menstrual bleeding (p = .40). No differences were observed in the serum levels of FSH (p = .75) nor in the antral follicle count (p = .44) between the groups.  Conclusions: The menstrual pattern and the ovarian reserve are very similar in patients who undergo bilateral tubal occlusion and salpingectomy, although the two techniques increase the duration of menstrual bleeding after the procedure.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Salpingectomía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[oclusión tubárica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ciclo menstrual]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[reserva ovárica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[métodos de esterilización]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Salpingectomy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Tubal occlusion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Menstrual cycle]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ovarian reserve]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Sterilization methods]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sadatmahalleh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Menstrual pattern following tubal ligation: a historical cohort study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>477-82</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peterson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[N Engl J Med]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>343</volume>
<numero>23</numero>
<issue>23</issue>
<page-range>1681-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shobeiri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization: a case control study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Women's Health]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gentile]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is there any evidence for a post-tubal sterilization syndrome?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>179-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harlow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Does tubal sterilization influence the subsequent risk of menorrhagia or dysmenorrhea?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fertil Steril]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>754-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peterson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>174</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>1161-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Danis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Minim Invasive Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>928-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Browning]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Salpingectomy for Sterilization: A New Standard of Care?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Topics Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>35</volume>
<numero>14</numero>
<issue>14</issue>
<page-range>1-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Broekmans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hum Reprod Update]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>685-718</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brodin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparing four ovarian reserve markers - associations with ovarian response and live births after assisted reproduction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>94</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1056-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jamil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Assessment of ovarian reserve: Anti-Mullerian hormone versus follicle stimulating hormone]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Res Med Sci]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>100</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Riggs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Assessment of ovarian reserve with antiMüllerian hormone: a comparison of the predictive value of anti-Müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, and age]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>199</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>202. e1-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Capecce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La hormona antimülleriana como marcador de función ovárica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Argent Endocrinol Metab]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>106-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Committee on Gynecologic Practice</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ovarian reserve testing]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>125</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>268-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Qin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The effect of salpingectomy on ovarian reserve and ovarian function]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol Surv]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>369-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kotlyar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The effect of salpingectomy on ovarian Function]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Minim Invasive Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>563-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelekci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood supply after tubal ligation by the Pomeroy technique: Comparison with controls]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Gynecol Endocrinol]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>279-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Venturella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[3 to 5 Years Later: Long-term Effects of Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingectomy on Ovarian Function]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Minim Invasive Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>145-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alipour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of Specificity and Sensitivity of AMH and FSH in Diagnosis of Premature Ovarian Failure]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dis Markers]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Swanson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Options in Prophylactic Surgery to Prevent Ovarian Cancer in High-Risk Women: How New Hypotheses of Fallopian Tube Origin Influence Recommendations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Curr Treat Options Oncol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Measuring anti-Müllerian hormone for Prevent Ovarian Cancer in High-Risk Women: How New the assessment of ovarian reserve: when and for whom Hypotheses of Fallopian Tube Origin Influence Recommen- is it indicated?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Maturitas]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>28-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
