<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0188-6649</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0188-6649</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Panamericana, Facultad de Filosofía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0188-66492024000200031</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21555/top.v690.2521</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[F. H. Jacobi y el problema de la afección en Kant: una solución metodológica]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[F. H. Jacobi and the Problem of Affection in Kant: A Methodological Solution]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guzmán Grez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nicolás]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Católica de Temuco  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>69</numero>
<fpage>31</fpage>
<lpage>53</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0188-66492024000200031&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0188-66492024000200031&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0188-66492024000200031&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen. El presente artículo busca describir la crítica de F. H. Jacobi a la filosofía trascendental en torno al problema de la afección y la cosa en sí. Esta crítica atribuye al pensamiento de Kant un idealismo incompatible con toda noción de realismo. La interpretación de Jacobi, sin embargo, se apoya sobre un desconocimiento de la naturaleza metodológico-trascendental no solo de la terminología involucrada en el problema de la afección, sino de toda la reflexión kantiana acerca del conocimiento. El modelo exegético de la two aspects view ha proporcionado instrumentos que nos permiten una reconstrucción hermenéutica del problema de la afección y ponen en evidencia el extravío metodológico en la crítica de Jacobi.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract. This paper seeks to describe F. H. Jacobi&#8217;s critique of transcendental philosophy concerning the problem of affection and the thing in itself. This critique attributes to Kant&#8217;s thought an idealism incompatible with any notion of realism. Jacobi&#8217;s interpretation, however, rests on an ignorance of the methodological-transcendental nature not only of the terminology involved in the problem of affection, but of the whole Kantian reflection about knowledge. The exegetical model of the two aspects view has provided instruments that allowed for a hermeneutical reconstruction of the problem of affection and put in evidence the methodological mistake present in Jacobi&#8217;s critique.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Jacobi]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Kant]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[afección]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cosa en sí]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[metodología]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Jacobi]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Kant]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[affection]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[thing in itself]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[methodology]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adickes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kants Opus postumum dargestellt und beurteilt]]></source>
<year>1920</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Verlag von Reuther &amp; Reichard]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adickes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant und das Ding an sich]]></source>
<year>1924</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pan Verlag Rolf Heise]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adickes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kants Lehre von der doppelten Affektion unseres Ich als Schlüssel zu seiner Erkenntnistheorie]]></source>
<year>1929</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[J. C. Mohr]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Non-Spatiality of Things in Themselves for Kant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of the History of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<page-range>313-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Things in Themselves, Noumena, and the Transcendental Object]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dialectica]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>41-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Allison]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Yale University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameriks]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Recent Work on Kant&#8217;s Theoretical Philosophy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Philosophical Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ameriks]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Idealism on a Moderate Interpretation]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schulting]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Verburgt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Idealism: New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<page-range>29-53</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bird]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the &#8220;Critique of Pure Reason&#8221;]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cassirer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit]]></source>
<year>1974</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cohen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kants Theorie der Erfahrung]]></source>
<year>1885</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Dummler]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eisler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant Lexicon]]></source>
<year>1961</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Georg Olms]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guzmán Grez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kants Theorie der Selbstsetzung. Versuch über die Epigenesis des transzendentalen Subjekts als Form und Materie der Erkenntnis]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Königshausen &amp; Neumann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hartmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Über die Erkennbarkeit des Apriorischen]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Logos]]></source>
<year>1914</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>290-329</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Herring]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Das Problem der Affektion bei Kant. Die Frage nach der Gegebenheitsweise des Gegenstandes in der &#8222;Kritik der reinen Vernunft&#8220; und in die Kant-Interpretation. [Ergänzungsheft de Kant Studien, 67]]]></source>
<year>1953</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Kölner Universitätsverlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoppe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kants Theorie der Physik. Eine Untersuchung über das Opus postumum von Kant]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Vittorio Klostermann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jacobi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[David Hume über den Glauben, oder Idealismus und Realismus]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Köppen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Werke. II]]></source>
<year>1968</year>
<page-range>1-323</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jacobi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Brief über den Nihilismus]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Frommann-Holzboog]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften. Band 21. Opus postumum. 1. Hälfte (Convolut I bis VI)]]></source>
<year>1936</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Walter de Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Gesammelte Schriften. Band 22. Opus postumum. 2. Hälfte (Convolut VII bis XIII)]]></source>
<year>1938</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Walter de Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duque]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Transición de los principios metafísicos de la ciencia natural a la física (Opus postumum)]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Anthropos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ribas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón pura]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Alfaguara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kritik der reinen Vernunft]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Felix Meiner]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kemp Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Commentary to Kant&#8217;s &#8220;Critique of Pure Reason&#8221;]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Humanities Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant&#8217;s Metaphysic of Experience: A Commentary on the First Half of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft. II]]></source>
<year>1936</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[George Allen &amp; Unwin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prauss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Erscheinung bei Kant. Ein Problem der ,,Kritik der reinen Vernunft&#8216;&#8216;]]></source>
<year>1971</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Walter de Gruyter]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prauss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rousset]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La doctrine kantienne de l&#8217;objectivité. L&#8217;autonomie comme devoir et devenir]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schulze]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liebert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Aenesidemus oder über die Fundamente der von dem Herrn Professor Reinhold in Jena gelieferten Elementar-Philosophie. Nebst einer Vertheidigung des Skepticismus gegen die Anmaassungen der Vernunftkritik]]></source>
<year>1911</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Verlag von Reuther &amp; Reichard]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaihinger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kommentar zu Kants &#8222;Kritik der reinen Vernunft&#8220;. II]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Scientia Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
