<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0188-6649</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Tópicos (México)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0188-6649</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Panamericana, Facultad de Filosofía]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0188-66492005000100051</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21555/top.v28i1.224</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Réplica a: La unidad de la filosofía de Heráclito]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>28</numero>
<fpage>51</fpage>
<lpage>56</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0188-66492005000100051&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0188-66492005000100051&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0188-66492005000100051&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Como comentario a &#8220;La Unidad de la Filosofía de Heráclito&#8221; de Enrique Hülsz, se advierte que existen maneras alternas de interpretar los fragmentos heraclitianos con igual validez y se apunta que no toda reconstrucción es deseable, como con la Venus de Milo. Toda reconstrucción es afortunada o desafortunada, y lo único malo en ello es no poder desembarazarse de ésta para volver al origen, a los fragmentos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract As a commentary on Enrique Hülsz's &#8220;La Unidad de la Filosofía de Heráclito&#8221;, it is warned here that there exists different ways to interpret the Heraclitean fragments with the same amount of validity and it is pointed out that not every reconstruction is desirable, as with the Venus de Milo. Every reconstruction is fortunate or unfortunate, and the only thing that is wrong with this is not being able to disembarrass from it in order to return to the origins, to the fragments.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Enrique Hülsz]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[unidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[filosofía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Heráclito]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Enrique Hülsz]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[unity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[philosophy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Heraclitus]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albrecht]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Estefania]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pociña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Historia de la literatura romana. Desde Andrónico hasta Boecio]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Herder]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Capizzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Eraclito e la sua legenda. Proposta di una diversa lettura dei frammenti]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Roma ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Edizioni dell&#8217;ateneo &amp; Bizzari]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hülz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La unidad de la filosofía de Heráclito]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tópicos]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<numero>28</numero>
<issue>28</issue>
<page-range>13-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
