<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0187-6236</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Atmósfera]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Atmósfera]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0187-6236</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y Cambio Climático]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0187-62362003000400001</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Climatology of landfalling hurricanes and tropical storms in Mexico]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jáuregui]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Centro de Ciencias de la Atmósfera ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[México D. F]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<fpage>193</fpage>
<lpage>204</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0187-62362003000400001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0187-62362003000400001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0187-62362003000400001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Se determinó el potencial de daño de los huracanes que entran a tierra en México. Durante el período 1951&#45;2000 los impactos de los huracanes del Pacífico fueron más frecuentes en las áreas costeras del noroeste del país, como Sinaloa y la mitad sur de la península de Baja California, así como en el sur de México (Michoacán). En el lado del Atlántico la península de Yucatán y el estado norteño de Tamaulipas fueron los más expuestos a estas tormentas. Para las dos costas del país, del Pacífico y del Atlántico, la temporada de huracanes alcanza su máxima actividad en septiembre. Durante los 50 años del período de estudio cinco huracanes intensos (categoría 5) tocaron tierra en el lado del Atlántico y uno en el Pacífico. Mientras que los huracanes que afectan las costas del Pacífico muestran un incremento en número durante la última década, los del Atlántico exhiben una disminución notable desde la década de los años 70. Sin embargo, considerando la frecuencia de los huracanes y las tormentas tropicales que impactan tierra en ambos litorales del país, se observa que sus números se han incrementado considerablemente durante la década de 1990.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The potential for damage from hurricanes landfalling in Mexico is assessed. During the 1951-2000 period, Pacific hurricane hits were more frequent on coastal areas of the northwest of the country (e.g., Sinaloa and the southern half of Baja California Peninsula) as well as in southern México (Michoacán). On the Atlantic side, the Yucatán Peninsula and the northern state of Tamaulipas were the most exposed to these storms. The hurricane season reaches maximum activity in September for both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the country. During the 50 year period, five intense hurricanes (category 5) made landfall on the Gulf/Caribbean coasts, while only one such intense hurricane made a land hit on the Pacific side. While hurricanes affecting Pacific coasts show a marked increase during the last decade, those of the Atlantic side exhibit a marked decrease since the 1970s. However, when considering the frequency of landfalling tropical storms and hurricanes impacting on both littorals of the country, their numbers have considerably increased during the 1990s.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Hurricanes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Gulf of México]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Northeast Pacific]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="4"><b>Climatology of landfalling hurricanes and tropical storms in Mexico</b></font></p>         <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>                   <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>E. J&aacute;uregui</b></font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Centro de Ciencias de la Atm&oacute;sfera, Universidad Nacional Aut&oacute;noma de M&eacute;xico,  Circuito exterior, Ciudad Universitaria, CP. 04510, M&eacute;xico D. F, M&eacute;xico  </i>e&#45;mail: <a href="mailto:ejos@atmosfera.unam.mx">ejos@atmosfera.unam.mx</a>.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>              <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2">Received September 12, 2002; accepted June 11, 2003</font></p>          <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>RESUMEN</b></font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Se determin&oacute; el potencial de da&ntilde;o de los huracanes que entran a tierra en M&eacute;xico. Durante el per&iacute;odo 1951&#45;2000 los impactos de los huracanes del Pac&iacute;fico fueron m&aacute;s frecuentes en las &aacute;reas costeras del noroeste del pa&iacute;s, como Sinaloa y la mitad sur de la pen&iacute;nsula de Baja California, as&iacute; como en el sur de M&eacute;xico (Michoac&aacute;n). En el lado del Atl&aacute;ntico la pen&iacute;nsula de Yucat&aacute;n y el estado norte&ntilde;o de Tamaulipas fueron los m&aacute;s expuestos a estas tormentas. Para las dos costas del pa&iacute;s, del Pac&iacute;fico y del Atl&aacute;ntico, la temporada de huracanes alcanza su m&aacute;xima actividad en septiembre. Durante los 50 a&ntilde;os del per&iacute;odo de estudio cinco huracanes intensos (categor&iacute;a 5) tocaron tierra en el lado del Atl&aacute;ntico y uno en el Pac&iacute;fico. Mientras que los huracanes que afectan las costas del Pac&iacute;fico muestran un incremento en n&uacute;mero durante la &uacute;ltima d&eacute;cada, los del Atl&aacute;ntico exhiben una disminuci&oacute;n notable desde la d&eacute;cada de los a&ntilde;os 70. Sin embargo, considerando la frecuencia de los huracanes y las tormentas tropicales que impactan tierra en ambos litorales del pa&iacute;s, se observa que sus n&uacute;meros se han incrementado considerablemente durante la d&eacute;cada de 1990.</font></p>          <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>              ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>ABSTRACT</b></font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The potential for damage from hurricanes landfalling in Mexico is assessed. During the 1951&#45;2000 period, Pacific hurricane hits were more frequent on coastal areas of the northwest of the country (e.g., Sinaloa and the southern half of Baja California Peninsula) as well as in southern M&eacute;xico (Michoac&aacute;n). On the Atlantic side, the Yucat&aacute;n Peninsula and the northern state of Tamaulipas were the most exposed to these storms. The hurricane season reaches maximum activity in September for both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the country. During the 50 year period, five intense hurricanes (category 5) made landfall on the Gulf/Caribbean coasts, while only one such intense hurricane made a land hit on the Pacific side. While hurricanes affecting Pacific coasts show a marked increase during the last decade, those of the Atlantic side exhibit a marked decrease since the 1970s. However, when considering the frequency of landfalling tropical storms and hurricanes impacting on both littorals of the country, their numbers have considerably increased during the 1990s.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Key words:</b> Hurricanes, Gulf of M&eacute;xico, Caribbean, Northeast Pacific.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>            <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>1. Introduction</b></font></p>            <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Hurricane climatology provides a useful tool for the study of potential for damage along the coasts of M&eacute;xico, especially when, as is the case, population in coastal areas of the country has increased considerably during the last two decades. In 1990, urban population in the Pacific coasts of M&eacute;xico reached more than 2 million, while that in the Gulf reached a million and a half (Aguilar, 1999). In this analysis, storms that had reached hurricane intensity (65 mph or 120 km/h) in their trajectory are considered, as well as those that could have weakened by the time of landfall. With extensive miles of coastline bordering on both oceans, M&eacute;xico is particularly vulnerable to hurricanes on both its shores. With all their destructive power, tropical storms and hurricanes are mechanisms that provide a significant amount of the country's moisture. An active hurricane season usually translates into a prosperous year for agricultural activities in most of the country. An attempt by the present author (J&aacute;uregui, 1989) to assess the contribution of 57 hurricanes on both littorals during the 19621987 period for the wet season months &#45;July to September&#45; in Northern M&eacute;xico (north of the Tropic of Cancer), showed considerable increases (three to four times the normal monthly precipitation) above average, not only in coastal regions, but also inland. On both coasts, rainfall associated with approaching hurricanes is intensified by orographic lifting by the mountain ranges of the Sierra Madre that generally run parallel and close to the coast line, resulting in flooding of coastal settlements. Such was the case of hurricane Pauline that produced rainfall amounts in the order of 400 mm/24 h near Acapulco, causing 147 dead by drowning. For a brief account of the impact of landfalling hurricanes on both coasts of M&eacute;xico, see Longshore's Encyclopedia of Hurricanes (1998). In this study, statistics of hurricane and tropical storm landfalls in M&eacute;xico are examined, as well as cases of impacts on the population and infrastructure.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>2. Data</b></font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Data for hurricane trajectories were provided by courtesy of Chris Landsea, Colorado State University and the Tropical Prediction Center (<a href="http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane" target="_blank">http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane</a>). The available periods were 1901&#45;2000 (for the Atlantic) and 1951&#45;2000 for the Pacific. Hurricanes are classified by their damage potential according to a scale developed by R. Simpson and H. Saffir, and is now in wide use. The scale has 5 categories with category 1 being the least intense hurricane (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t1.jpg" target="_blank">Table 1</a>). The greatest damage and loss of life during hurricanes result from flooding of coastal areas, mud slides in saturated mountain slopes, and ocean surges. The name of these storms is assigned when they reach tropical storm strength. This practice was initiated in 1953. However, there have been exceptions such as hurricane No. 15, class 5, an unnamed storm that devastated the port of Manzanillo in 1959, the impact of which is described below.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Only those hurricanes having category 1 to 5 at landfall were considered for the statistics. Among the tropical storms that made landfall on Mexican coasts (31), seven of them on the Pacific, had previously attained hurricane force as will be discussed later. Hurricane trajectories on the north east Pacific are less reliable prior to 1963, when satellite imagery was initiated to follow the development of these storms over the oceans.</font></p>              ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>3. Results</b></font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Frequency of landfalling hurricanes by states</i></font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Results show that during the second half of the 20th century, Pacific hurricane hits were more frequent in the states of Baja California Sur (19 strikes), Sinaloa (18) and Michoac&aacute;n (9). In contrast, Gulf/Caribbean landfalls were less frequent (about &frac12;) being the states of Quintana Roo (13) on the eastern Yucat&aacute;n Peninsula and Tamaulipas (with 7 hits), the most exposed to these storms (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1f1.jpg" target="_blank">Fig. 1</a>).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Long&#45;term variability of landfalling hurricanes on the Gulf of Mexico/Caribbean coast of M&eacute;xico during the 20th century</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">During the 20th century, 58 hurricanes of all categories made landfall on Mexican coasts of the Gulf of M&eacute;xico and the state of Quintana Roo's coasts facing the Caribbean. This amount represents only 35 percent of those hurricanes that hit the US' Gulf of M&eacute;xico and the Atlantic coasts together.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">During the decades 1931&#45;40, 1941&#45;50, the number of hurricanes of all categories (that made landfall on the Gulf of M&eacute;xico and Caribbean coasts of M&eacute;xico) was well above (72 %) the average (5.8 hurricanes/decade) of the entire century. During this period, 13 hurricanes reached categories 2 and 3 and, one hurricane category 4, but none category 5. These decades correspond to the first half of the 40&#45;year period (1930&#45;1960s) identified by FEMA (2001) as the most active in the Atlantic (also documented by Reading, 1990). After peaking in the 1970, the last two decades of the century have seen a declining and leveling&#45;off trend of hurricanes affecting the Mexican Gulf and its Caribbean coasts. In fact, they were the least active in this regard (<a href="#t2">Table 2</a>). The same trend has been observed on the northern US coasts of the Gulf (Bove <i>et al.,</i> 1998) with no apparent indication of any change in this trend according to these authors.</font></p>              <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><a name="t2"></a></font></p>             <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t2.jpg"></font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Comparison of hurricane landfalls on both ocean regions</i></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">During the period 1951&#45;2000, only 9% of all hurricane activity (all categories) in the Atlantic made landfall on Gulf/Caribbean coasts of M&eacute;xico, while the number of hurricanes that hit the Pacific coast amounted to 18% of the total activity in that ocean region. This means that, in spite of the fact that although the total number of hurricanes in the Pacific was only 25% higher than in the Atlantic for the period, the percentage of landfalling hurricanes was double than those landing on the Atlantic (<a href="#t3">Table 3</a>).</font></p>              <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><a name="t3"></a></font></p>             <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t3.jpg"></font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">It is possible that the higher number of landfalling hurricanes on the Pacific may be linked to the relative closeness of the crescent&#45;like Mexican Pacific coast line to their source region on the west of Central America; and also, to the fact that these disturbances reach their maximum intensity not far from the southern coasts of M&eacute;xico (see Fig. 6 on Whitney and Hobgood, 1997).</font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">A glance at the map of tropical storm tracks from Fern&aacute;ndez&#45;Partagas and Diaz (1996) article on Atlantic hurricane climatology, shows clearly that the US Gulf and Atlantic coasts get the largest impact of tropical storms generated in the Atlantic region, followed by M&eacute;xico, Central America and the Caribbean islands.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">When the statistics are limited to the Gulf of M&eacute;xico during the period 1951&#45;2000, hurricanes landed more frequently on the US region: of a total of 68 hurricanes, 41 (60%) made landfall on US coasts, while the rest (27 or 40%) made hits on Mexican territory. With regard to the rest of the region affected by these storms generated in the Tropical Atlantic, statistics of landfalling hurricanes and tropical storms for Central America and the Caribbean show that, while this region receives 19% of all Atlantic hurricane activity, Cuba &#45;having the largest land mass of the region&#45; gets the largest proportion of these storms (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t4.jpg" target="_blank">Table 4</a>).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Hurricane activity in the second half of the 20th century on both Pacific and Gulf regions</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">During the 1951&#45;2000 period, 65 hurricanes stroke the Pacific coasts of M&eacute;xico, whereas those on the Gulf coasts and Caribbean amounted to 27, meaning that the probability of a hurricane landfall is about two and a half times higher on the Pacific than on the Gulf.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Most hurricanes (77% or 50) affecting the Pacific coasts of M&eacute;xico (during period 1951&#45;2000) were categories 1 and 2, while 15 (23%) were major (intense) or categories 3 or higher (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t5.jpg" target="_blank">Table 5</a>). Only one intense (category 5) hurricane hit the sea&#45;port of Manzanillo in 1959 (see <a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1f2.jpg" target="_blank">Fig. 2</a>). In contrast, during the same period, 16 intense (see below) hurricanes made landfall on the Gulf/ Caribbean side, of which 7 were category 5.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Decadal variability of intense landfalling hurricanes (ILH). 1951&#45;2000 period</i></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">An intense hurricane is defined as having maximum sustained winds of at least 96 kt (178 km/h) which is a category 3 storm on the Saffir&#45;Simpson scale (Bove <i>et al.,</i> 1998).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">a) Gulf of M&eacute;xico/Caribbean. During this period, ILH reached a peak (6/decade) during the 1970s and have markedly declined thereafter (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t6.jpg" target="_blank">Table 6</a>).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">b) Pacific. While no ILH occurred in the 1960's they have increased their frequency particularly during the last decade of the 20th century when 6 ILH hit the Pacific coast of M&eacute;xico (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t6.jpg" target="_blank">Table 6</a>). Hurricane landfalls on the Gulf/Caribbean coasts of M&eacute;xico show a seasonal variation from June to October with a clear maximum in September when the most intense hurricane (category 5) hits have been recorded. In contrast, on the Pacific the season stretches over a longer period begining in May reaching maximum activity in September&#45;October. It is worth noting that a distinct secondary maximum occurs in June (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t7.jpg" target="_blank">Table 7</a>).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>The great (category 5) landfalling hurricanes</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Trajectories and impact of some category 5 landfalling hurricanes that occurred on Mexican coasts during the second half of the 20th century</i></font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">With extended (2825 km) coast lines on both oceans (Gulf of M&eacute;xico, Caribbean and Pacific), M&eacute;xico is highly vulnerable to the arrival of hurricanes. During the second half of the 20th century, </font><font face="verdana" size="2">nine of the most destructive mature (class 5) hurricanes came ashore on Mexico's coasts. In this section, a description is made of these major tropical cyclones some of them landing with full hurricane force (winds &gt; 249 km/h) (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t8.jpg" target="_blank">Table 8</a>).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Six great hurricanes made landfall on the Gulf and Caribbean coasts of M&eacute;xico during the 19512000 period. Three of them followed a west north&#45;west trajectory entering the Gulf either through the Yucat&aacute;n channel or crossing the Yucat&aacute;n peninsula carried by the strong trade wind flow (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1f2.jpg" target="_blank">Fig. 2</a>). They developed on the warm tropical Atlantic waters east of the Lesser Antilles (e.g. Gilbert, Beulah and Allen) during cold/neutral phase of ENSO. Upon entering the Caribbean sea they intensified their strength probably due to favorable general convergence flow associated with <i>La Ni&ntilde;a</i> conditions in that region (see Maga&ntilde;a and P&eacute;rez, 1998).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Most of these intense hurricanes made a double strike landfalling, first on the Yucat&aacute;n peninsula and, after crossing the Gulf of M&eacute;xico, made a second hit on the Tamaulipas/Veracruz coasts (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1f2.jpg" target="_blank">Fig. 2</a>). An exception was hurricane Anita which displayed an anomalous track.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Impact of some intense (category 5) landfalling hurricanes</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i> Hurricane No. 15</i></font></p>          ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">This unnamed hurricane struck the sea&#45;port of Manzanillo on the Pacific coast, with powerful gales </font><font face="verdana" size="2">on October 23, 1959. An estimated 25% of homes were destroyed in neighboring Cihuatlan, three merchant ships capsized and 1500 people were killed (CENAPRED, 2001).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Hurricane Anita</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Hurricane Anita originated in the warm waters of the eastern Gulf of M&eacute;xico. As it started to move in a south&#45;easterly direction, Anita crossed a pool of warm waters and a period of sudden intensification followed. Anita landed in a sparsely populated area near the fishing village of La Pesca in southern Tamaulipas State on September 2, 1977 as a category 5 hurricane. As noted by Longshore (1998), Anita provided evidence not only of a direct link between the presence of warm water eddies and a hurricane's abrupt intensification, but also, a cooling of the sea surface waters after the passage of the storm. In spite of its powerful winds and high storm surge, no human losses were reported (Gross and Lawrence, 1989).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Hurricane Gilbert</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Hurricane Gilbert firstly developed as a low&#45;level circulation off the African coast on September 3; after becoming a tropical storm a week later, it reached hurricane intensity east of the Lesser Antilles. Following Gilbert's passage over Jamaica, rapid intensification occurred. Pressure fell 72 hPa/24h to reach a minimum pressure of 888 hPa (the lowest ever recorded sea&#45;level pressure in the Western hemisphere (Gross and Lawrence, 1989). On September 14, it made landfall on northeast Yucat&aacute;n Peninsula near Cozumel. Sustained winds at landfall were estimated at 241 km/h corresponding to a category 5 of the Simpson/Saffir scale. During the next two days, Gilbert continued the same west&#45;northwest course across the Gulf and making landfall late on the 16, as a category 3 near the town of La Pesca in southern Tamaulipas State. After moving inland, the weakening storm passed south of Monterrey on the 17 and then turned north&#45;bound across western Texas. Torrential rains accompanied the storm over the coast and mountainous areas. The normally dry bed of the Santa Catarina River that crosses Monterrey was flooded, and more than 100 persons died when passenger buses were trapped and overturned in the rising waters.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Overall, the reported death toll from Gilbert, including those from Yucat&aacute;n, was 202; damage (including 60,000 destroyed homes) was estimated between 1 and 2 billion dollars (Gross and Lawrence, 1989).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Landfalling Tropical Storms</i></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Tropical depressions and tropical storms (sustained wind speed 39&#45;73 mph) often affect both Pacific and Gulf littorals of M&eacute;xico. Although most of them maintained their status during their life cycle before making landfall, some of these storms (11) had been hurricanes that decayed to tropical storms or depressions before hitting the coast. The number of tropical storms that affected both coasts during the period was 67.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The ratio of landfalling tropical storms (LFTS) in the Pacific with respect to those landing on the Gulf/Caribbean coasts is 2.2 which is similar to that for landfalling hurricanes. The number of LFTS has markedly increased on the Atlantic side during the 1990s, while that on the Pacific shows a slight increase during the same period. (<a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t9.jpg" target="_blank">Table 9</a>).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">With regard to the most vulnerable regions to these storms, geographic distribution is somewhat similar to that of hurricanes, except for the states of Baja California, Jalisco and Oaxaca on the Pacific side, where the probability of landfalling tropical storms dominates over hurricane hits (<a href="#f3">Fig. 3</a>). Interesting to note from <a href="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1t9.jpg" target="_blank">Table 9</a> is that the total number of tropical storm landfalls on both oceanic coasts of the country is not very different from the corresponding numbers for hurricane hits.</font></p>              ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><a name="f3"></a></font></p>             <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><img src="/img/revistas/atm/v16n4/a1f3.jpg"></font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>4. Concluding remarks</b></font></p>             <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">M&eacute;xico is particularly vulnerable to tropical storms of both Atlantic and Pacific oceans. During the 1951&#45;2000 period hurricanes making landfall on the country's coasts amounted to 9% and 18% of all hurricane activity on the Atlantic and northeastern Pacific, respectively. The probability of a hurricane landfall is two and&#45;a&#45;half times higher on the Pacific than on the Gulf/Caribbean coasts of the country (<a href="#t3">Table 3</a>). Both Atlantic and Pacific coasts are vulnerable to the same number of intense (categories 3 to 5) hurricanes. However, great hurricanes (category 5) making landfall on the Atlantic side, were more numerous (7) than those on the Pacific coasts (1).</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Most vulnerable regions in the country to hurricanes are those in the NW (Sinaloa and the southern part of Baja California peninsula) followed by Michoac&aacute;n state. On the Atlantic side, the state of Tamaulipas and the Yucat&aacute;n peninsula are most susceptible to these storms. September is the month of highest hurricane landfalls on both oceanic coasts of the country. While hurricanes making landfall on the Pacific coasts of M&eacute;xico show a marked increase since the 1960s, those landing on the Gulf/Caribbean coasts of M&eacute;xico have markedly declined. However, the overall number of hurricane landfalls on both littorals has significantly increased since the 1980s. After a reduction of activity during the 1980s, tropical storm landfalls on the Atlantic side of the country have markedly increased compensating somehow for the decline in hurricane landfalls in that region.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">While hurricanes affecting the Pacific coasts show a marked increase since the 1980s (Table 10), those impacting on the Gulf and Caribbean seem to have markedly decreased in numbers during the last two decades of the 20th century. This last result seems to be in contradiction to what is occurring at the scale of the whole Atlantic basin where according to FEMA, 1995&#45;2000 was the busiest period of North Atlantic hurricane activity ever measured.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Since as it has been suggested (FEMA), the Atlantic and Caribbean sea surface temperatures are shifting toward a warm phase, it is likely that more hurricanes will affect the Gulf and Caribbean coasts of M&eacute;xico in the coming years. However, as noted by Bove <i>et al.</i> (1998), no indication of a change to an increasing trend is apparent. An analysis made over the period during the period 1951&#45;2000 revealed that hurricane activity in the Northeast Pacific increased markedly (99.95% significance). While the marked observed increase in landfalling hurricane activity over the Pacific coasts of M&eacute;xico (Table 10) in the 1990s decade is not statistically significant, this increase might be linked to more frequent and extensive warm waters of El Ni&ntilde;o events that occurred in this decade.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">In conclusion, it may be said that landfalling hurricanes have significantly declined during the second half of the 20th century on the Gulf/Caribbean coasts of M&eacute;xico. Hurricane activity in the Pacific has markedly increased in the last decade as compared with 1980s decade. Even though the 1951&#45;2000 landfalling hurricane trend is significantly negative for both coasts of the country, it should be noted that the slight positive trend is evident after the 1980s.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>              ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Acknowledgements</b></font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The author is grateful to Elda Luyando and Mario Casasola for producing hurricane landfalling statistics and tables. To Alfonso Estrada for doing the maps.</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>References</b></font></p>              <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Aguilar, G. 1999. Human settlements and climate change in M&eacute;xico &#45;A scenario of regional vulnerability&#45;. In: <i>El cambio clim&aacute;tico en M&eacute;xico.</i> C. Gay ed., 171&#45;194. INE/PUMA.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254201&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>              <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Bove, M., D. Zierden and J. O'Brien, 1998. Are Gulf landfalling hurricanes getting stronger? <i>Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.</i> <b>79,</b> 1327&#45;1328.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254203&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>              <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">CENAPRED, 2001. Diagn&oacute;stico de peligros e identificaci&oacute;n de riesgos de desastres en M&eacute;xico. Atlas Nacional de Desastres. 219 p. M&eacute;xico.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254205&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>              ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">FEMA, 2001. (Federal Emergency Management Agency) U.S. to see above normal hurricane activity over next several decades. In: <a href="http://www.fema.gov" target="_blank">http://www.fema.gov</a>.</font></p>              <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Fern&aacute;ndez&#45;Partag&aacute;s, J. and H. Diaz. 1996. Atlantic Hurricanes in the second half of the 19th Century. <i>Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,</i> <b>77,</b> 2899&#45;2906.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254208&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>              <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Gross, J.M. and M.B. Lawrence. 1989. North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones, 1988. Mariner's Weather Log, <b>33,</b> 8&#45;14.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254210&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>              <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">J&aacute;uregui, E. 1989. El impacto de los huracanes en la precipitaci&oacute;n en el norte de M&eacute;xico. Ingenier&iacute;a Hidr&aacute;ulica en M&eacute;xico. Sept.&#45;Dic. 43&#45;50.</font></p>              <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Longshore, D. 1998. <i>Encyclopedia of hurricanes, typhoons and cyclones.</i> 362 p. Facts on File, Inc.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254213&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>              <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Maga&ntilde;a, V. and J.L. P&eacute;rez, 1998. Variabilidad clim&aacute;tica en los mares interamericanos. Proceed. VIII OMMAC Congress. 28&#45;30 Oct/98. 69&#45;72. Veracruz, M&eacute;xico.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254215&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>              ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Reading, A. 1990. Caribbean tropical storm activity over the past four centuries. <i>Int. J. of Climatology</i> <b>10,</b> 365&#45;376.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254217&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>              <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Whitney, L. and J. Hobgood, 1997. The relationship between sea surface temperature and maximum intensity of tropical cyclones in the Eastern North Pacific Ocean. <i>J. of Climate,</i> <b>10,</b> 2921&#45;2930.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1254219&pid=S0187-6236200300040000100009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aguilar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Human settlements and climate change in México -A scenario of regional vulnerability-]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El cambio climático en México]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<page-range>171-194</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[INEPUMA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bove]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zierden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O'Brien]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Are Gulf landfalling hurricanes getting stronger?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>79</volume>
<page-range>1327-1328</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>CENAPRED</collab>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Diagnóstico de peligros e identificación de riesgos de desastres en México]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Atlas Nacional de Desastres]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<page-range>219</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández-Partagás]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Atlantic Hurricanes in the second half of the 19th Century]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<page-range>2899-2906</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gross]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lawrence]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones, 1988]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mariner's Weather Log]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<page-range>8-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Longshore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Encyclopedia of hurricanes, typhoons and cyclones]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>362</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Facts on File, Inc.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Magaña]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pérez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Variabilidad climática en los mares interamericanos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceed. VIII OMMAC Congress]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<month>28</month>
<day>-3</day>
<page-range>69-72</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Veracruz ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reading]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Caribbean tropical storm activity over the past four centuries]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int. J. of Climatology]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>365-376</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whitney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hobgood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The relationship between sea surface temperature and maximum intensity of tropical cyclones in the Eastern North Pacific Ocean]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. of Climate]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>2921-2930</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
