<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0041-8633</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Bol. Mex. Der. Comp.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0041-8633</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0041-86332025000100102</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iij.24484873e.2025.172.19422</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Diálogos entre cortes constitucionais e sociedade civil em perspectiva comparada "Brasil e França": audiências públicas, participação de amici curiae e terceiros interessados]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Diálogos entre cortes constitucionales y sociedad civil en perspectiva comparada "Brasil y Francia": audiencias públicas, participación de amici curiae y terceros interesados]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dantas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bruno]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Guilherme Mazarello Nóbrega de]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade do São Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>58</volume>
<numero>172</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0041-86332025000100102&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0041-86332025000100102&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0041-86332025000100102&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo O paradigma dos diálogos constitucionais despontou como tentativa de superação da dualidade "Parlamento versus Cortes", que povoou o pensamento jurídico das últimas décadas, em crítica à ideia de uma última palavra e de supremacia judicial. Contudo, verifica-se que os estudos insertos nessa temática foram centralizados em debates teoréticos, sem que se buscasse analisar os mecanismos que concretamente permitem o exercício dos diálogos constitucionais entre Cortes, Parlamentos, e sociedade civil. O presente trabalho busca fazer análise dos mecanismos que permitem diálogo entre Cortes Constitucionais e sociedade civil de maneira comparada, em um cotejo de duas Cortes com perfis diversos de exercício da jurisdição: o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), do Brasil, e o Conseil Constitutionnel, da França. Para tanto, o trabalho foca nas audiências públicas, participação de amici curiae, e terceiros interessados, de um ponto de análise normativo e jurisprudencial.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El paradigma de los diálogos constitucionales surgió como un intento de superar la dualidad "Parlamento versus Cortes", que ha dominado el pensamiento jurídico de las últimas décadas, en crítica a la idea de una palabra final y de supremacía judicial. Sin embargo, se observa que los estudios en esta temática se han centrado en debates teóricos, sin analizar los mecanismos que concretamente permiten el ejercicio de los diálogos constitucionales entre cortes, parlamentos y sociedad civil. El presente trabajo busca analizar los mecanismos que permiten el diálogo entre cortes constitucionales y sociedad civil de manera comparada, en un cotejo entre dos cortes con perfiles diversos de ejercicio de la jurisdicción: el Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil, y el Conseil Constitutionnel de Francia. Para ello, el trabajo se enfoca en las audiencias públicas, la participación de amici curiae y terceros interesados, desde un punto de vista normativo y jurisprudencial.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[direito comparado]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[diálogos constitucionais]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[amicus curiae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Supremo Tribunal Federal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[conseil constitutionnel]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[derecho comparado]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[diálogos constitucionales]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[amicus curiae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Supremo Tribunal Federal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Conseil Constitutionnel]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[O amicus curiae na jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Estudos Constitucionais]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<numero>24</numero>
<issue>24</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Princeton University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Béchillom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reflexões sobre o estatuto das portas estreitas perante o Conselho Constitucional]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Club des juristes]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Becker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Amicus curiae: Teoria, prática e sugestões de aprimoramento]]></source>
<year>2025</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Juspodivm]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bickel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The least dangerous branch: the Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Yale University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brandão]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mecanismos de diálogos constitucionais nos EUA e no Brasil]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[RJLB]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Christelle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Combrande]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sénac]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La QPC et les représentants d'intérêt: techniques d'influence et influences sur la technique]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Recherche réalisée à l'occasion des dix ans de la QPC, avec le soutien du Conseil constitutionnel]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cornu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Vocabulaire juridique]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<edition>9</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Association Henri Capitant]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Drago]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Le nouveau visage du contentieux constitutionnel]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[RFDC]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<numero>84</numero>
<issue>84</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Constitutionalism and Democracy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[European Journal of Philosophy]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Taking rights seriously]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[A&amp;C Black]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ely]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Democracy and distrust: a theory of judicial review]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harvard University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Faigman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Constitutional Fictions: a Unified Theory of Constitutional Facts]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gargarella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El nuevo constitucionalismo dialógico, frente al sistema de los frenos y contrapesos. Escuela de Derecho: Universidad Torcuato di Tella]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Argentina de Teoría Jurídica]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>14</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Godoy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[As audiências públicas e os "amici curiae" influenciam as decisões dos ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal? E por que isso deve(ria) importar?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista da Faculdade de Direito - UFPR]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Groppi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Interventi di terzi e amici curiae: dalla prospettiva comparata uno sguardo sulla giustizia costituzionale in Italia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Consulta Online]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guillaume]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Dalloz]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Häberle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hermenêutica constitucional - a sociedade aberta dos intérpretes da Constituição: Contribuição para interpretação pluralista e procedimental da Constituição]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[DPU]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<numero>60</numero>
<issue>60</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Habermas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siebeneichler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Flávio Beno]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direito e democracia: entre facticidade e liberdade]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Tempo Brasileiro]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hesse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Derecho constitucional y derecho privado]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Civitas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holmes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A sociedade civil contra a população: uma teoria crítica do constitucionalismo de 1988]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Direito e Práxis]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Houssou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Déstigmatiser la maladie mentale: contre-exemple de l'audience publique relative à la décision du Conseil constitutionnel no 2010-71 QPC du 26 novembre 2010]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annales Medico-Psychologiques]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<numero>170</numero>
<issue>170</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Januel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lobbying perante o Conselho Constitucional: por detrás das portas estreitas]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Artigos Dalloz]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lecis Cocco Ortu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[QPC et interventions des tiers: le débat contradictoire entre garantie des droits de la défense et utilité des amici curiae]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revue française de droit constitutionnel]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>104</numero>
<issue>104</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lecis Cocco Ortu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Le rôle des associations dans la protection des personnes vulnérables en QPC. Systèmes de contrôle de constitutionnalité par voie incidente et protection des personnes en situation de vulnérabilité]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Approche de droit comparé]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<numero>14</numero>
<issue>14</issue>
<page-range>541-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Loiselle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[De l'État légal à l'État de droit. L'évolution des conceptions de la doctrine publiciste française, 1870-1914]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Politix]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>27</numero>
<issue>27</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marinoni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Processo constitucional e democracia]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Neves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Entre Hidras e Hércules: os princípios e regras constitucionais como diferença paradoxal do sistemajurídico]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Editora WMF]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rousseau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Six thèses pour la démocratie continue]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Odile Jacob]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schoettl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La place du Conseil dans la démocratie française]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spriggs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wahlbeck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Political Research Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waldron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>18-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
