<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2448-6655</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Análisis económico]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Anál. econ.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2448-6655</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Azcapotzalco, División de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2448-66552019000200009</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Entendiendo el consenso en la profesión económica en México]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Understanding the consensus in the economic profession in Mexico]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andere]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jorge L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Canché Escamilla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jorge Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Comisión Federal de Competencia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán Facultad de Economía ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>86</numero>
<fpage>9</fpage>
<lpage>34</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2448-66552019000200009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2448-66552019000200009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2448-66552019000200009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen En este trabajo se explora el consenso en grupos de una población definida de académicos de la Ciencia Económica en México, en proposiciones sobre opiniones económicas, aspectos científicos de la Economía y supuestos económicos. Se aplicaron procedimientos para determinar el consenso al interior y entre grupos, cuyos resultados indican que los encuestados que consideran que los economistas concuerdan en los asuntos fundamentales, tienden a exhibir mayores grados de consenso y ser más favorables a una economía abierta y a la Economía Neoclásica, que aquéllos que no creen en la existencia de dicho acuerdo. Los integrantes de ambos grupos apoyan políticas gubernamentales de intervención en la economía, pero de tipo diferente.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract In this paper, we explore consensus on economic opinions, economics&#8217; scientific aspects, and economics assumptions, in groups of a well-defined population of economics academic community in Mexico. We apply procedures to determine consensus within and between groups. Outcomes indicate that surveyed individuals which consider economists agree on fundamental issues tend to exhibit both higher degrees of consensus as more favorable views towards open economy and neoclassical economics, than those which do not consider economists agree on fundamental issues. Members of both groups support state interventions in the economy, but of a different kind.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[economistas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[consenso]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[política económica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[pensamiento económico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[metodología]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[economists]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[consensus]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[economic policy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[economic thought]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[methodology]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alston]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kearl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaughan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is There a Consensus among Economists in the 1990&#8217;s?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>203-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Block]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Entropy in the Canadian economics profession: sampling consensus on the major issues]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Public Policy]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>137-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castañeda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[¿Se encuentra la ciencia económica en México en la vanguardia de la corriente dominante?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[El Trimestre Económico]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>LXXXII</volume>
<numero>326</numero>
<issue>326</issue>
<page-range>433-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klamer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Making of an Economist]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Economic Perspectives]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>95-111</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosser Jr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Review of Political Economy]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>485-99</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Benedectis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Di Maio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Economists&#8217; View About the Economy. Evidence from a Survey of Italian Economists]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>XVI</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>37-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Humbert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schneider]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[What is economics? Attitudes and views of German economists]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Economic Methodology]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>317-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pommerehne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schneider]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gilbert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consensus and dissension among economists: an empirical inquiry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Economic Review]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>986-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geide-Stevenson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consensus among economists: Revisited]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Economic Education]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>369-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geide-Stevenson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consensus among economists-An update]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Economic Education]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>369-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kearl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pope]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whiting]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wimmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A confusion of economists?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Economic Review]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>69</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>28-37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[May]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGarvey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whaples]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Are Disagreements among Male and Female Economists Marginal at Best?: A Survey of AEA Members and Their Views on Economics and Economic Policy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Contemporary Economic Policy]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>111-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendes de Souza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Mainstream and Heterodox Economists. An Overview of Schools of Thought and their Policy Implications in the Portuguese Academia]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Porto]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ricketts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shoesmith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[British economic opinion: positive science or normative judgment?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Economic Review]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>210-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodrik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Nueva York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[W. W. Norton &amp; Company]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Statsny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Czech Economists on Economic Policy: A Survey]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Econ Journal Watch]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>275-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Urzúa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consensos y disensos entre los economistas mexicanos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de la CEPAL]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<page-range>153-65</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
