<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2448-5136</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Derecho global. Estudios sobre derecho y justicia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Derecho glob. Estud. sobre derecho justicia]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2448-5136</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Guadalajara, División de Estudios Jurídicos]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2448-51362018000300104</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32870/dgedj.v0i10.197</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Estoppel y la Convención de Nueva York. Contornos económicos de una aproximación hermeneútico- axiológica]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Estoppel and the New York Convention. Economic aspects of an hermeneutical and axiological approach]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Téllez Núñez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andrés]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Pontificia Universidad Javeriana  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<fpage>101</fpage>
<lpage>126</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2448-51362018000300104&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2448-51362018000300104&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2448-51362018000300104&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: Este artículo propone como hipótesis de trabajo que ciertas interpretaciones del Artículo V-2b de la Convención de Nueva York comparadas con la dimensión conceptual del estoppel podría equivaler a una violación del ordenamiento internacional. El método utilizado es hermenéutico-analítico y se examinan diversos ejemplos en los que hay de por medio o tratados en vigor o declaraciones hechas por los Estados y cómo el principio de estoppel puede verse menoscabado. El artículo se divide en dos partes: la primera presenta algunas precisiones preliminares doctrinales y jurisprudenciales; la segunda, examina el problema de las declaraciones de los Estados y el estoppel a la luz de una pieza jurisprudencial de Colombia. Con base en los hallazgos resultantes de los análisis precitados se concluye que debe haber flexibilidad en las políticas comerciales y de inversión de los Estados, pero rigidez en la observancia de los principios y valores jurídicos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: This Article puts forth the following working hypothesis by which it is asserted that on the basis of comparing certain interpretations of Article V-2b of the New York Convention with the notion of estoppel, such interpretations may be tantamount to a violation of international law. The method implemented to demonstrate the working hypothesis is hermeneutical-analytical and several examples of treaties in force or declarations made by the States are laid out to show how estoppel may be or is actually impaired. This Article is divided into two parts: the first one lays out certain preliminary clarifications from the doctrine and jurisprudential viewpoint and the second one examines the issue of States declarations and estoppel in the light of a recent ruling in Colombia. On the basis of the Article findings, it is concluded that States may be and need to be flexible as to trade and investment policies, but would need to be rigid as to the observance of juridical principles and values.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Estoppel]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Convención de Nueva York]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[buena fe]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[pacta sunt servanda]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Estoppel]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[New York Convention]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[good faith]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pacta sunt servanda]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andritoi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Collateral Estoppel Theory in International Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[AUDJ]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<numero>VII</numero>
<issue>VII</issue>
<page-range>47-54</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aust]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Modern Treaty Law and Practice]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Cambridge ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Comparative and Critical Assessment of Estoppel in International Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of Miami Law Review]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<numero>369</numero>
<issue>369</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Convención de Nueva York]]></source>
<year>1958</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Corte Internacional de Justicia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[North Continental Shelf/ North Sea Continental Shelf Cases]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Corte Internacional de Justicia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Nuclear Test Case/ Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France)]]></source>
<year>1973</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Corte Internacional de Justicia]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Corte Internacional de Justicia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua/ Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America)]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Corte Internacional de Justicia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute/ Case concerning the Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/ Honduras)]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Corte Internacional de Justicia</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria case concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria), Preliminary Objections (Nigeria v. Cameroon)]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Corte Permanente de Justicia Internacional</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Legal Status of Eastern Greenland/ Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, Denmark v. Norway]]></source>
<year>1933</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Corte Permanente de Justicia Internacional</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Serbians Loans Case/ Case concerning the payment of various Serbian Loans issued in France]]></source>
<year>1923</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República de Colombia</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[SC9909- 2017 Radicación No.: 11001-02-03-000-2014-01927-00]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República de Colombia]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D&#8217;Amato]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Consent, Estoppel and Reasonableness: Three Challenges to Universal International Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Virginia Journal of International Law]]></source>
<year>1969</year>
<volume>102</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Franck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sughrue]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The International Role of Equity as Fairness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Georgetown Law Journal]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
<volume>81</volume>
<numero>563</numero>
<issue>563</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guevara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Equity in Mercosur: The Use of Estoppel in a Customs Union for and by Countries of the Civil System of Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Law and Business Review of the Americas]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>303</numero>
<issue>303</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ibrahim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Doctrine of Laches in International Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Virginia Law Review]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>83</volume>
<numero>647</numero>
<issue>647</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Fundamental Shift in Power: Permitting International Investors to Convert their Economic Expectations into Rights]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[UCLA Law Review Discourse]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>65</volume>
<numero>106</numero>
<issue>106</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Fraga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Samra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Role of Precedent in Defining Res Judicata in Investor-State Arbitration]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Northwestern Journal of International Law]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>419</numero>
<issue>419</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mavroidis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[No Outsourcing of Law? WTO Law as Practiced by WTO Courts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of International Law]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>102</volume>
<numero>421</numero>
<issue>421</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mitchell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heaton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Inherent Jurisdiction of WTO Tribunals. The Select Application of Public International Law Required by the Judicial Function]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Michigan Journal of International Law]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>559</numero>
<issue>559</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ngugi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Promissory Estoppel: The Life History of an Ideal Legal Transplant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of Richmond Law Review Association]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>425</numero>
<issue>425</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Organización Mundial de Comercio</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Entendimiento relativo a las normas y procedimientos por los que se rige la solución de diferencias]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ovchar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Estoppel in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ. A Principle promoting stability threatens to undermine it]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Bond Law Review]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reinhold]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Good Faith in International law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>40-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Téllez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El problema de la efectividad del derecho internacional público]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pontificia Universidad Javeriana]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>The International Commercial Disputes Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Lack of Jurisdiction and Forum Non Conveniens as Defenses to the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The American Review of International Arbitration]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>407</numero>
<issue>407</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wagner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Jurisdiction by Estoppel in the International Court of Justice]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[California Law Review]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<numero>1777</numero>
<issue>1777</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zeynalova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Is it Broken and How Do We Fix It]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Berkeley Journal of International Law]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>150</numero>
<issue>150</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
