<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2306-4102</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Acta ortopédica mexicana]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Acta ortop. mex]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2306-4102</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2306-41022019000600391</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35366/93347</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Artrodesis metatarsofalángica del hallux: comparación retrospectiva entre placa bloqueada y tornillos canulados]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Hallux metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: retrospective comparison between blocked plate and cannulated screws]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arvinius]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Checa-Betegón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pozo-Martin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R del]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manrique-Gamo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galeote-Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JE]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Clínico San Carlos  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></addr-line>
<country>España</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<fpage>391</fpage>
<lpage>394</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2306-41022019000600391&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2306-41022019000600391&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2306-41022019000600391&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen:  Introducción:  Existen múltiples métodos e implantes utilizados para la artrodesis metatarsofalángica del hallux sin evidencia a favor de uno u otro en la bibliografía. El objetivo fue comparar los resultados clínicos y radiológicos de dos métodos e implantes utilizados en nuestro centro.  Material y métodos:  Revisión retrospectiva de 37 pies entre 2013 y 2017 (22 pies mediante placa y 15 mediante tornillos canulados). Se recogieron variables clínicas y radiológicas y se aplicaron las escalas AOFAS y Manchester-Oxford. Se estudiaron las variables descriptivas y analíticamente mediante el programa SPSS v15.  Resultados:  El grupo intervenido mediante placa lo compuso 77% de mujeres, con una edad media de 65 años y una distribución por diagnósticos de hallux valgus (HV) severo (36%), recidiva de hallux valgus (RHV) (36%) y hallux rigidus (HR) (28%), frente a 80% de mujeres, con media de 68 años y HVS (34%), RHV (46%) y HR (20%) en el grupo de tornillos canulados. No se encontró diferencias significativas en la corrección de los ángulos para HVS o RHV. La tasa de seudoartrosis dolorosa fue de 13% en ambos y la reintervención fue de 18% en el grupo de placas y 26% en el grupo de tornillos. Tanto la escala AOFAS como la M-O fueron mejores en el grupo de placa 63.8 versus 52.6 (p = 0.07); 30.1 versus 41.0 (p = 0.10); así como la satisfacción del paciente 86 versus 66% (p &gt; 0.05) y el dolor postoperatorio 3.68 versus 5.58 (p &gt; 0.05).  Conclusión:  Son grupos pequeños de estudio, sin aleatorización de implantes, ambas opciones son funcionales sin poder encontrar una preferente.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract:  Introduction:  There are multiple methods and implants used for the metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis of hallux without evidence in favor of one or the other in the bibliography. The goal was to compare the clinical and radiological results of 2 methods and implants used in our center.  Material and methods:  Retrospective review of 37 feet between 2013 and 2017 (22 feet by plate and 15 by cannulated screws). Clinical and radiological variables were collected and the AOFAS and Manchester-Oxford scales were applied. Variables were studied descriptively and analytically through the SPSSv15 program.  Results:  The group intervened by plate was composed of 77% of women, with an average age of 65 years and a distribution by diagnosis of severe hallux valgus (HV) (36%), hallux valgus relapse (HVR) (36%) and hallux rigidus (HR) (28%), compared to 80% of women, 68 years old and HV (34%), HVR (46%) HR (20%) in the group of cannulated screws. No significant differences were found in the correction of angles for HV or HVR. The rate of painful pseudoarthrosis was 13% in both and the re-intervention was 18% in the plate group and 26% in the screw group. Both the AOFAS and M-O scales were better in the plate group 63.8 vs 52.6 (p = 0.07); 30.1 vs 41.0 (p = 0.10); as well as patient satisfaction 86% vs 66% (p &gt; 0.05) and postoperative pain 3.68 vs 5.58 (p &gt; 0.05).  Conclusion:  Small study groups, not implant randomization, both options are functional without being able to find a preferred one.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Artrodesis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[pie]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[placa]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tornillos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tratamiento]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Arthrodesis]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[foot]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[plate]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[screws]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[treatment]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stevens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de Bot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hermus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Rhijn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Witlox]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Outcome following total joint replacement and arthrodesis for hallux rigidus: a systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JBJS Rev]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGlamry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: current fixation options]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Podiatr Med Surg]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>405-19</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lortat-Jacob]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hardy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[First metatarsophalangeal joint percutaneous arthrodesis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Orthop Traumatol Surg Res]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>96</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>567-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Treadwell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis; what is the best fixation option? a critical review of the literature]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Podiatr Med Surg]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>327-49</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moroney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tourné]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a biomechanical comparison of four fixation techniques]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Foot Ankle Surg]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>268-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Claassen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Plaass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pastor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ettinger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wellmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stukenborg-Colsman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: a retrospective comparison of crossed-screws, locking and non-locking plate fixation with lag screw]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arch Bone Jt Surg]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>221-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gross]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parekh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Dual plating with bone block arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: A clinical retrospective review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Foot Ankle Surg]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>235-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Asif]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kassim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kannan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A consecutive case series of 166 first metatarsophalangeal joint fusions using a combination of cup and cone reamers and crossed cannulated screws]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Foot Ankle Surg]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>462-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Donegan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blume]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Functional results and patient satisfaction of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using dual crossed screw fixation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Foot Ankle Surg]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>291-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dening]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van Erve]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a retrospective analysis of plate versus screw fixation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Foot Ankle Surg]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>172-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bass]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sirikonda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[1st metatarsophalangeal joint fusion: a comparison of non-union and gender differences between locking and non-locking plating systems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Foot (Edinb)]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>195-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dalat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cottalorda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fessy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Besse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JL]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Does arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint correct the intermetatarsal M1M2angle? Analysis of a continuous series of 208 arthrodeses fixed with plates]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Orthop Traumatol Surg Res]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>101</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>709-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wanivenhaus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Espinosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tscholl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krause]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wirth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Quality of early union after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Foot Ankle Surg]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>50-3</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rammelt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Panzner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mittlmeier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Metatarsophalangeal joint fusion: why and how?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Foot Ankle Clin]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>465-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
