<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1870-0578</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Mexican law review]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Mex. law rev]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1870-0578</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1870-05782025000200117</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iij.24485306e.2025.1.19606</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Toward a New Regulation on the Exclusionary Rule. What Can Mexico Learn from American and Canadian Experiences?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosa Rodríguez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paola Iliana de la]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LaRose]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Anthony P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,University of Tampa  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Florida ]]></addr-line>
<country>USA</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>117</fpage>
<lpage>143</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1870-05782025000200117&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1870-05782025000200117&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1870-05782025000200117&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract For over a century, U.S. debate surrounding the Exclusionary Rule has centered on questions such as if it inevitably allows criminals to go free, if the victims suffer due to police misconduct, or if the rule&#8217;s scope has narrowed over time. The rule&#8217;s primary objective has been to deter police misconduct. In Canada, discussions have focused on the necessity of conducting a discretionary analysis to determine the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence, especially since Canada&#8217;s Charter of Rights and Freedoms publication in 1982. Mexico&#8217;s debate on the issue began in 2008, and its version of the rule aims to guarantee more rights for the accused; however, it remains subject to legal interpretation and hasn&#8217;t been able to effectively reduce police misconduct. This article provides a brief comparison of the Exclusionary Rule&#8217;s-related regulation in the three neighboring countries. It suggests that Mexico should consider its northern neighbors common law legal history and pursue substantive changes to the National Criminal Procedures Code. These should directly address illegal evidence&#8217;s prohibition and any exceptions to the rule that may exist.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Durante más de un siglo, el debate en Estados Unidos en torno a la Regla de Exclusión se ha centrado en cuestiones como si inevitablemente permite que los delincuentes queden en libertad, si las víctimas sufren debido a la mala conducta policial o incluso si el ámbito de aplicación de la norma se ha reducido con el tiempo. En cualquier caso, el objetivo principal de la norma ha sido disuadir de la mala conducta policial. En Canadá, por su parte, los debates se han centrado en la necesidad de realizar un análisis discrecional para determinar la admisibilidad de las pruebas obtenidas inconstitucionalmente, especialmente desde la publicación de la Carta Canadiense de los Derechos y Libertades en 1982. Por último, en México el debate sobre la cuestión comenzó en 2008, y su versión de la norma pretende garantizar más derechos a los acusados; sin embargo, sigue estando sujeta a interpretación jurídica y no ha logrado reducir eficazmente la mala conducta policial. Este estudio ofrece una breve comparación de la regulación de la Regla de Exclusión en los tres países vecinos. Sugiere que México debería tener en cuenta la historia jurídica del derecho consuetudinario de sus vecinos del norte y realizar cambios sustantivos en el Código Nacional de Procedimientos Penales. Estas deberían abordar directamente la prohibición de las pruebas ilícitas y las excepciones a la regla que puedan existir.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[admissibility of evidence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[exclusionary rule]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[exceptions to exclusionary rule]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[illegal evidence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[police illegality]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[suppress evidence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[admisión de pruebas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[reglas de exclusión]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[excepciones a la prueba ilícita]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[prueba ilícita]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ilegalidad policial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[no admisión de pruebas]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alston]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Philip]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Goodman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ryan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[International human rights 1045]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anaya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Miguel]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De la Rosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paola]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[la prueba ilícita, sus premisas, regulación y excepciones en el sistema penal acusatorio]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>116</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Flores Editor y Distribuidor]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Perez Loyo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Erik]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La prueba ilicita]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Flores Editor y Distribuidor]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Armenta Deu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Teresa]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La prueba ilícita: Un estudio comparado]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<edition>2da</edition>
<page-range>188</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Editorial Marcial Pons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bellin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Crime-Severity Distinctions and the Fourth Amendment: Reassessing Reasonableness in a Changing World]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Iowa L. Rev.]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>97</volume>
<page-range>1-3-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bloom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Inevitable Discovery: An Exception Beyond the Fruits]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of Criminal Law]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>079</numero>
<issue>079</issue>
<page-range>79-104</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brooks]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Peter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Inevitable Discovery-Law, Narrative, Retrospectivity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Yale J. of Law and the Humanities]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brown]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[S. Tex. L.J.]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>655</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Aspectos materiales y procesales del principio acusatorio: problemas probatorios, prueba ilícita y procesos penales socialmente relevantes. La exclusión de pruebas ilícitamente obtenidas en el Derecho Procesal de los Estados Unidos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista del Poder Judicial]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<page-range>367-401</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clancy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Fourth Amendment`s Exclusionary Rule as a Constitutional Right]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ohio St. J. of Crim. L.]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>357</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ignacio]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fragoso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Letalidade da acao policial no Rio de Janeiro: A actuacao da Justica Militar]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Criminais]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>30</numero>
<issue>30</issue>
<page-range>207-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Correa Robles]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La función de la exclusión de la prueba ilícita en el proceso penal y sus consecuencias: un estudio comparado]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Política Criminal]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>32</numero>
<issue>32</issue>
<page-range>644-77</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davies]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Thomas]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Hard Look at What We Know and Still Need to Learn About the Costs of the Exclusionary Rule]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<page-range>611</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[USA ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[American Bar Association]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gorman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Wayne]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Admission and Exclusion of Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence in Canada]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>1-113</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Graveline]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bradley]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment-An Acceptable Erosion of the Exclusionary Rule]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Crim. L. &amp; Criminology]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>79</volume>
<page-range>647</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Halpern]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Philip]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Federal Habeas Corpus and the Mapp Exclusionary Rule After Stone v. Powell]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Colum. L. Rev.]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harvie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Exclusionary Rule and the Good Faith Doctrine in the United States and Canada: A Comparison]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative L. J.]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>798</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>INEGI</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Encuesta Nacional de Victimización y Percepción sobre Seguridad Pública (ENVIPE)]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Institute for Economics and Peace</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Índice de Paz]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jasso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lucía]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jasso]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carolina]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Abuso policial, discrecionalidad y tecnologías de vigilancia en América Latina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>90</numero>
<issue>90</issue>
<page-range>119-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kaczynski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stephen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nix v. Williams and the Inevitable Discovery Exception to the Exclusionary Rule]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Army Law]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kamisar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Yale]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Brewer v. Williams, Massiah and Miranda, What Is &#8216;Interrogation&#8217;-When Does It Matter]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Geo. L. J.]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>67</volume>
<page-range>1</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Matthew D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Exclusionary Rule and Judicial Integrity: An Empirical Study of Public Perceptions of the Exclusionary Rule]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mo. L. Rev.]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>87</volume>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fee Jr.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edwin]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure I: Narrowing the Protection of the Fourth Amendment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann. Surv. Am. L.]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<page-range>371</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fishkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[James]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nix v. Williams, An Analysis of the Preponderance Standard for the Inevitable Discovery Exception]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Iowa L. Rev]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>70</volume>
<page-range>1369</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lavin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mike]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Impact of the Exclusionary Rule Upon the Montana Criminal Justice System, United States]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Institute of Justice]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luengo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jose]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Butler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Tessa]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Impunity in Mexico: A Rising Concern]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Justice in Mexico]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nardulli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Peter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Societal Cost of the Exclusionary Rule: An Empirical Assessment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Bar Foundation Research Journal]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>585-609</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Esther]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Empowering the Exclusionary Rule: Using Suppression Motion Data to Improve Police Searches and Searches in the United States]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Police Science &amp; Management]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>96-107</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Orfield]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Myron]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Exclusionary Rule and Deterrence: An Empirical Study of Chicago Narcotics Officers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The University of Chicago Law Review]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>1016-69</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Osborn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Debra]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Suppressing the Truth: Judicial Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence in the United States, Canada, England and Australia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Elaw Journal, Murdoch University Electronic Journal]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Posner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rethinking the Fourth Amendment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Supreme Court Review]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>49-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Report by the Comptroller General of the United States, Impact of the Exclusion Ary Rule on Federal Criminal Prosecutions]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<page-range>14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rivera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Marien]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chávez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rafael]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Presentan cifras de inseguridad en México]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Números Rojos del Sistema Penal]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-17</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schwartz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joanna]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[After Qualified Immunity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Columbia Law Review]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>120</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>309-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Concept of Jurisprudencia in Mexican Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mexican Law Review]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siyu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Liu]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Esther]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mission Impossible? Challenging Police Credibility in Suppression Motions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Criminal Justice Policy Rev.]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>33</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>584-607</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Skinnider]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eileen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Improperly or Illegally Obtained Evidence: The Exclusionary Evidence Rule in Canada]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1-26</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smith]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Herring v. United States: The Continued Erosion of the Exclusionary Rule]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mercer Law Review]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>61</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stribopoulos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[James]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Lessons from the Pupil: A Canadian Solution to the American Exclusionary Rule Debate]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Boston College International and Corporative L. Rev.]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>77-140</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Philip]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Criminology Explains Police Violence]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of California Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Tesis: CLXII/2011]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<page-range>226</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Tesis 139/2011]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<page-range>2057</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Tesis: 1a./J. 35/2015 (10a.)]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>302</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gaceta del Semanario Judicial de la Federación]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Tesis: (II Región) 1o.6 P (10a.)]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<page-range>2006</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gaceta del Semanario Judicial de la Federación]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Tesis: I.1o.P.50 P (10a.)]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>3031</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gaceta del Semanario Judicial de la Federación]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Tesis:I.9o.P.63P]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<page-range>2529</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gaceta del Semanario Judicial de la Federación]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Tesis: I.9o.P. J/16 (10a.)]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>1583</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gaceta del Semanario Judicial de la Federación]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<source><![CDATA[Tesis: (II Región)1o.5 P (10a.)]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<page-range>2007</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Gaceta del Semanario Judicial de la Federación]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tokson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Matthew]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gentithes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michael]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Reality of the Good Faith Exception]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Georgetown Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<numero>546</numero>
<issue>546</issue>
<page-range>1-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uchida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Craig]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bynum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Timothy]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Effects of &#8220;United States vs. Leon&#8221; on Police Search Warrant Practices]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Stanford libraries]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Usaid</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Observatorios de Audiencias y Resoluciones Judiciales. Estado de México y Baja California]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wilkey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Malcolm]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Exclusionary Rule: Why Suppress Valid Evidence?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal Judicature]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>214-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Westley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[William]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Violence and the Police]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of Sociology]]></source>
<year>1953</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>59</numero>
<issue>59</issue>
<page-range>34-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>World Justice Project</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Índice de Estado de Derecho en México 2019-2020]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yagla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carolyn]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule: The Latest Example of &#8220;New Federalism&#8221; in the States]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Marquette L. Rev.]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
