A. Altamirano-Corro*, R. Peniche Vera

Facultad de Ingeniería - Posgrado Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro Querétaro, Qro. México. *jaaltami@gmail.com

Abstract

There is a general interest in the study of schemes for the measurement of the efficiency of universities, which generates demand but at the same time is controversial because of the complexity of the problem. This problem is associated with the highly combinatorial characteristics that occur when facing the selection of the proper combination of the attributes, namely inputs and outputs. This investigation proposes an approach to measure the institutional efficiency in higher educational institutions combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Both methods are frequently used independently, on a global level in areas such as government, business, industry, health care and education. The use of the two methodologies as an evaluation tool is novel and very useful in institutional efficiency studies where results already exist, in order to obtain and confirm important equivalences. The use of the proposed approach is demonstrated using the Queretaro State University-Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro (UAQ)-as a case study.

Keywords: data envelopment analysis, analytic hierarchy process, linear programming, efficiency.

Resumen

Hay un interés general en el estudio de los esquemas para la medición de la eficiencia en las universidades, que genera demanda y al mismo tiempo controversia debido a la complejidad del problema, asociada al carácter altamente combinatorio que se presenta para la seleccionar la combinación adecuada de los múltiples atributos (inputs y outputs). En esta investigación se propone un enfoque para medir la eficiencia institucional en la educación superior combinando el Proceso de Jerarquía Analítica (PJA) con el Análisis Envolvente de datos (AED). Actualmente, ambas metodologías son usadas ampliamente de manera independiente, a nivel mundial en áreas, tales como gobierno, negocios, industria, atención de salud y educación. El uso conjunto de las dos metodologías constituye una herramienta novedosa y es muy útil para estudios de eficiencia institucional, ya que los resultados que arroja permiten obtener y confirmar equivalencias importantes. La utilización del enfoque propuesto es ilustrada con el caso de la Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro (UAQ).

DESCARGAR ARTÍCULO EN FORMATO PDF

References

[1] Koontz, H. & Weinrich, H., Management. A Global Perspective, 12th ed., Ed. McGraw-Hill, 2012.         [ Links ]

[2] Martin, E., Efficiency and Quality in the Current Education Context in Europe: an application of the data envelopment analysis methodology to performance assessment of departments within the University of Zaragoza, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 12, No 1, April, 2006, pp. 57-79.         [ Links ]

[3] Colbert, A., Levary, R. & Shaner, M., Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA, European Journal of Operational Research 125, 2000, pp. 656-69.         [ Links ]

[4] Johnes, G., Performance indicators in higher education: a survey of recent work, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8(2), 1992, pp. 19-34.         [ Links ]

[5] Saaty, T.L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 1977, pp. 234-281.         [ Links ]

[6] Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1998.         [ Links ]

[7] Saaty, T.L., Decision Making for Leaders, Belmont, CA, Lifetime Learning Publications, Division of Wadsworth, 1982.         [ Links ]

[8] Vaidya, O. & Kumar, S., Analytic hierarchy process: An Overview of applications, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 169, pp. 1-29, 2006.         [ Links ]

[9] Ho, W., Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications -A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 186, pp. 211-228, 2008.         [ Links ]

[10] Sipahi, S., & Timor, M., The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, vol. 48, pp. 775-808, 2010.         [ Links ]

[11]Iç, Y. T., & Yurdakul, M., Development of a decision support system for machining center selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 3505-3513, 2009.         [ Links ]

[12] Labib, A. W., A supplier selection model: a comparison of fuzzy logic and the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Research, 2011.         [ Links ]

[13] Kahraman, C., & Kaya, I., A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37(9), 2010, pp. 6270-6281.         [ Links ]

[14] Lee, S. H., Using fuzzy AHP to develop intelectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37(7), 2010, pp. 4941-4947.         [ Links ]

[15] López, C. & Salmeron, J.L., Ranking risks in ambient intelligence projects, Journal of Applied Research and Technology, vol. 9 (3), 2011, pp. 419-429.         [ Links ]

[16] Tian, J. & Yan, Z.F., Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Risk Assessment to General-assembling of Satellite, vol. 11 (4), pp. 568-577, 2013.

[17] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. & Rhodes, E., Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 1978, pp. 429-444. 18.         [ Links ]

[18] Rhodes, E. & Southwick, L., Determinants of Efficiency in Public and Private Universities, Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, 1986.         [ Links ]

[19] McMillan, M. & Datta, D., The relative efficiencies of Canadian universities: a DEA perspective, Canadian Public Policy, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1998, pp. 485-511.         [ Links ]

[20] Ng, Y.C. & Li, S.K., Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions: an application of data envelopment analysis, Education Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2000, pp. 139-56.         [ Links ]

[21] Abbot, M. & Doucouliagos, C., The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis, Economics of Education Review, 22, 2003, pp. 89-97.         [ Links ]

[22] Bougnol, M. & Dula, J., Validating DEA as a ranking tool: An application of DEA to assess performance in higher education, Ann Oper Res, Vol. 145, 2006, pp. 339-365.         [ Links ]

[23] Figueiredo de Franca, J., de Figueiredo, J. & dos Santos, J., A DEA Methodology to evaluate the impact of information asymmetry on the efficiency of not-for-profit organizations with an application to higher education in Brazil, Ann. Oper. Res., Vol. 173, No. 1, 2010, pp-39-56.         [ Links ]

[24] Sav, T., Data Envelopment Analysis of Productivity Changes in Higher Education For-profit Enterprises Compared to Non-profits, International Business Research, Vol. 5, No. 9, 2012.         [ Links ]

[25] Sigler, L., The relative of the public institutions on economics research in Mexico City. In: Emrouznejad A, Podinovski V, editors. Proceedings of DEA 2004, Birmingham, UK.         [ Links ]

[26] Güemes-Castorena, D., A DEA Decision Making Model for Higher Education Funding. The Case of Mexico's Public State Universities, VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2008.         [ Links ]

[27] Expert Choice, Inc., Expert Choice for Windows', Version 11.0, Pittsburgh, PA., 2004.         [ Links ]

[28] Zhu, J., Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking. Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets, Springer, 2009.         [ Links ]

[29] Seiford, L.M. & Zhu, J., Modeling Undesirable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 142, No. 1, 2002, pp. 16-20.         [ Links ]

[30] DEAFrontier, (2009), 'DEAFrontier DEA add-in for Microsoft Excel', Worcester, MA.         [ Links ]

[31] Güemes-Castorena, D., A DEA Decision Making Model for Higher Education Funding. The Case of Mexico's Public State Universities, VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2008.         [ Links ]