Md. Mamun1, Mahmoud Al-Kadi2, Mohd. Marufuzzaman*2
1 Institute of Visual Informatics Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
2 Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, *mohd.marufuzzaman@gmail.com.
ABSTRACT
Analyzing Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal is a challenge due to the various artifacts used by Electromyogram, eye blink and Electrooculogram. The present de-noising techniques that are based on the frequency selective filtering suffers from a substantial loss of the EEG data. Noise removal using wavelet has the characteristic of preserving signal uniqueness even if noise is going to be minimized. To remove noise from EEG signal, this research employed discrete wavelet transform. Root mean square difference has been used to find the usefulness of the noise elimination. In this research, four different discrete wavelet functions have been used to remove noise from the Electroencephalogram signal gotten from two different types of patients (healthy and epileptic) to show the effectiveness of DWT on EEG noise removal. The result shows that the WF orthogonal meyer is the best one for noise elimination from the EEG signal of epileptic subjects and the WF Daubechies 8 (db8) is the best one for noise elimination from the EEG signal on healthy subjects.
]]> Keywords: electroencephalogram, discrete wavelet transform, denoising, root mean square.
DESCARGAR ARTÍCULO EN FORMATO PDF
References
[1] Niedermeyer E, Silva FH (2004). Electroencephalography: Basic principles, clinical applications and related fields, 5th edition, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. [ Links ]
[2] Arab MR, Suratgar AA, Hernandez VMM, Ashtiani AR (2010). Electroencephalogram Signals Processing for the Diagnosis of Petit mal and Grand mal Epilepsies Using an Artficial Neural Network, Journal of Applied Research and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 120-129. [ Links ]
[3] Holmes GL, Lombroso CT (1993). Prognostic value of background patterns in the neonatal EEG. J. Clin. Neurophysiol, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 323-352. [ Links ]
[4] Almubarak S, Wong PK (2011). Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Neonatal EEG Findings. J. Clin. Neurophysiol, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 185-189. [ Links ]
[5] Muthanantha Murugavel ASM, Ramakrishnan S (2012). Tree Based Wavelet Transform and DAG SVM for Seizure Detection, Signal and Image Processing: An International Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 115-125. [ Links ]
[6] Croft RJ, Barry RJ (2000). Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 30, pp. 5-19. [ Links ]
[7] Unser M, Aldroubi A (1996). A review of wavelets in biomedical applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 626-638. [ Links ]
[8] Hussain MS, Reaz MBI, Ibrahimy MI, Ismail AF, Mohd-Yasin F (2007). Wavelet Based Noise Removal from EMG Signals. Informacije MIDEM - Journal of Microelectronics, Electronic Components and Materials, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 94-97. [ Links ]
[9] Hussain MS, Reaz MBI, Mohd-Yasin F, Ibrahimy MI (2009). Electromyography signal analysis using wavelet transform and higher order statistics to determine muscle contraction. Expert Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 35-48. [ Links ]
[10] Zikov T, Bibian S, Dumont GA, Huzmezan M, Ries CR (2002). A wavelet based de-noising technique for ocular artifact correction of the electroencephalogram. Second joint EMBS/BMES conference, vol. 1, pp. 98-105. [ Links ]
[11] Venkataramanan S, Kalpakam NV, Sahambi JS (2004). A novel wavelet based technique for detection and de-Noising of ocular artifact in normal and epileptic electroencephalogram. International Conference on Communication, Circuits and Signals, vol. 2, pp. 1027-1031. [ Links ]
[12] Carre P, Leman H, Fernandez C, Marque C (1998). Denoising of the uterine EHG by an undecimated wavelet transform. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Signal Processing, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1104-1113. [ Links ]
[13] Mallat S (1998). A wavelet tour of signal processing. 2nd edition, Academic Press, New York, USA. [ Links ]
[14] Wachowiak MP, Rash GS, Quesada PM, Desoky AH (2000). Wavelet-based noise removal for biomechanical signals: A comparative study. IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 360-368. [ Links ]
[15] Andrzejak RG, Lehnertz K, Rieke C, Mormann F, David P, Elger CE (2001). Indications of nonlinear deterministic and finite dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity: Dependence on recording region and brain state. Phys. Rev. E, vol. 64, no. 6 Pt 1, pp. 061907. [ Links ]
]]>