<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1607-4041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista electrónica de investigación educativa]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[REDIE]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1607-4041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1607-40412017000200091</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24320/redie.2017.19.2.928</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Assessing EFL University Students&#8217; Writing: A Study of Score Reliability]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Evaluando la escritura de alumnos universitarios de EFL: estudio sobre la confiabilidad de las calificaciones]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Elsa Fernanda]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trejo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nelly Paulina]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ruth]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>91</fpage>
<lpage>103</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1607-40412017000200091&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1607-40412017000200091&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1607-40412017000200091&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract: The assessment of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing is a complex activity that is subject to human judgment, which makes it difficult to achieve a fair, accurate and reliable assessment of student writing (Pearson, 2004: 117; Hamp-Lyons, 2003). This study reports on the variability that exists between the analytical grades that 11 Mexican EFL university teachers awarded to five writing samples. It describes the raters&#8217; views on writing assessment and their use of analytical scoring rubrics. Data obtained from the grades awarded to each paper, and a background questionnaire, suggested that great variability was found between grades, and raters differed in their levels of leniency and severity, suggesting that having similar backgrounds and using the same rubric are not enough to ensure rater reliability. Participants&#8217; perceptions were found to be similar in terms of the use of analytical rubrics.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: La evaluación de la escritura en inglés como lengua extranjera (EFL) es un proceso que depende del juicio humano, por lo que es difícil de obtener evaluaciones justas, acertadas y confiables (Pearson, 2004, p. 117; Hamp-Lyons, 2003). Este estudio reporta la variabilidad existente entre las calificaciones analíticas que 11 docentes Mexicanos universitarios de EFL proporcionaron a cinco trabajos escritos. Describe las percepciones de los participantes en torno a la evaluación de la escritura y el uso de las rúbricas de evaluación. Los datos obtenidos de las calificaciones de cada trabajo y de un cuestionario escrito revelaron que existe gran variedad entre las calificaciones proporcionadas y que los evaluadores difieren en sus niveles de exigencia, sugiriendo así que antecedentes homogéneos y el uso de una misma rúbrica no son suficientes para obtener confiabilidad en las evaluaciones. Las percepciones de los participantes fueron similares en relación al uso de las rúbricas.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[EFL writing]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[EFL writing assessment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Rater reliability]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Analytical scoring rubric]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Inglés como lengua extranjera]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación de la escritura]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Confiabilidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Rúbrica de evaluación]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Scoring with the computer: Alternative procedures for improving the reliability of holistic essay scoring]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Attali]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lewis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language Testing]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>30</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>125-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Writing evaluation: What can analytic versus holistic essay scoring tell us?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bacha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[System]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>371-83</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rating scale impact on EFL essay marking: A mixed-method study]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barkaoui]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessing Writing]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>86-107</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Variability in ESL essay rating processes: The role of the rating scale and rater experience]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barkaoui]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language Assessment Quarterly]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>54-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Council of Europe</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Strasbourgh ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FR]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Council of Europe</collab>
<source><![CDATA[The manual for language test development and examination]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Strasbourgh ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FR]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Council of Europe</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Manual for relating language examinations to the common european framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Strasbourgh ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[FR]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Creswell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Thousand Oaks ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Expertise in evaluating second language compositions]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cumming]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language Testing]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>31-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rater types in writing performance assessments: a classification approach to rater variability]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Eckes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language Testing]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>155-85</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esfandiari]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Myford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessing Writing]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>111-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Exploring the variability of Mexican EFL teachers&#8217; ratings of high school students&#8217; writing ability]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonzalez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roux]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>61-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Glówka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Mix? Yes, but how? Mixed methods research illustrated]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pawlak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hamp-Lyons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Raters respond to rhetoric in writing]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dechert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raupach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Interlingual processes]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<page-range>229-44</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Tubingen ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gunter Narr Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hamp-Lyons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessing second language writing in academic contexts]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Norwood ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[NJ]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The scope of writing assessment]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hamp-Lyons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessing Writing]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<page-range>5-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hamp-Lyons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Writing teachers as assessors of writing]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kroll]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Exploring the dynamics of second language writing]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<page-range>162-89</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jacobs]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zinkgraf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wormuth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hartfiel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hughey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Testing ESL composition: A practical approach]]></source>
<year>1981</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rowley ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[MA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knoch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[U.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language Testing]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>275-304</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Assessing writing abilities]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kroll]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Review of Applied Linguistics]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>219-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The development and maintenance of rating quality in performance writing assessment: A longitudinal study of new and experienced raters]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language Testing]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>543-60</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Professors&#8217; ratings of language use and rhetorical organizations in ESL compositions]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendelsohn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cumming]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[TESL Canada Journal]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>9-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nunan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Research methods in language learning]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pearson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Controversies in second language writing: Dilemmas and decisions in research and instruction]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The University of Michigan Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Critical Thinking Analytic Rubric (CTAR): Investigating intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a scoring mechanism for critical thinking performance assessments]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saxton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Belanger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Becker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessing Writing]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>251-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Native and non-native speaking EFL teachers&#8217; evaluation of Chinese students&#8217; English writing]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language Testing]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>303-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Teaching experience and evaluation of second language students&#8217; writing]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Q.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>219-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lorenz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Error gravity: Faculty response to errors in the written discourse of non-native speakers of English]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hamp-Lyons]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessing second language writing in academic contexts]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>181-95</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Norwood ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[NJ]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weigle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Language Testing]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<page-range>97-223</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weigle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessing writing]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[United Kingdom ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Communicative language testing]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[NJ]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Language and reality in writing assessment]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[White]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[College Composition and Communication]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>87-200</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rater effects: Ego engagement in rater decision-making]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wiseman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessing Writing]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<page-range>150-73</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
