<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1607-4041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista electrónica de investigación educativa]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[REDIE]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1607-4041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1607-40412016000300002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Evaluando la enseñanza en la Educación Superior: percepciones de docentes y discentes]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluating Teaching in Higher Education: Teacher and Student Perceptions]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis Miguel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Miguel Ángel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Piaget-Vila Nova de Gaia  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Santiago de Compostela  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>18</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>19</fpage>
<lpage>36</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1607-40412016000300002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1607-40412016000300002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1607-40412016000300002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El artículo se centra en la evaluación de la enseñanza en la Educación Superior partiendo de la percepción de estudiantes y profesores. Analiza la relación con factores asociados a los estudiantes, los docentes y las Unidades Curriculares (UC), y la relación de concordancia entre la perspectiva de estudiantes y docentes teniendo en cuenta dos objetivos: averiguar cómo los profesores y alumnos de la Escuela Superior de Salud Jean Piaget de Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal) evalúan la calidad de la enseñanza; y verificar cuán apropiado es el uso de la herramienta Student's Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ) por parte de alumnos y profesores. Se utilizó un instrumento basado en el SEEQ, con una población de 1,343 estudiantes y 146 docentes. Los resultados de la investigación refuerzan las garantías ofrecidas por el modelo utilizado, no sólo por la fiabilidad y consistencia que el instrumento revela sino, principalmente, por la relación de concordancia entre la percepción de estudiantes y docentes.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract This paper focuses on the evaluation of teaching in higher education from student and teacher perceptions. It analyzes its relationship with factors linked to students, teachers and curricular units (CU) and the consistency between student and teacher perspectives, while taking into consideration the study's two objectives: firstly, to find out how teachers and students of the Escuela Superior de Salud Jean Piaget de Vila Nova de Gaia (Portugal) assess teaching quality; and secondly, to determine how appropriate it is for students and teachers to use the SEEQ (Student's Evaluation of Educational Quality) tool. A SEEQ-based instrument was used with a population of 1,343 students and 146 teachers. The study results support the assurances offered by the model used. This is due in part to the reliability and consistency of the instrument, but mainly to the consistency between student and teacher perceptions.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[calidad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Educación Superior]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[percepción de estudiantes y docentes]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[quality]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[perception of students and teachers]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Faculty perceptions as a foundation for evaluating use of student evaluations of teaching]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work?]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Centra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Research in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>495-518</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Grades and college students' evaluations of their courses and teachers]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Feldman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Research in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>69-111</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Valoración por parte del profesorado de la evaluación docente realizada por los alumnos]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mateo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Psicothema]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>167-72</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Two decades of classroom environment research]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fraser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Walberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<page-range>3-27</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Elmsford, NY ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pergamon]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Student feedback]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harvey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Quality in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[James]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baldwin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McInnis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Which University? The factors influencing the choices of prospective undergraduates]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Canberra ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Melbourne]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A new approach to evaluation of university teaching considering heterogeity of students' preferences]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuzmanovic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Savic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Popovic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Milan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Research in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>66</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>153-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Students' evaluation of university teaching: Research findings]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Educational Research]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>253-388</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A multidimensional perspective students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Educational Psychology]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>83</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>285-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: The stability of mean ratings of the same teachers over a 13-year period]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hocevar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Teaching and Teacher Education]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>303-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roche]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[American Psychologist]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>52</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>1187-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kuol]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A punitive bureaucratic tool or a valuable resource? Using student evaluations to enhance your teaching]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O'Neill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McMullin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<page-range>141-8</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Dublín ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[AISHE]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Percepções do ensino pelos alunos: Uma proposta de instrumento para o Ensino Superior]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morais]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montenegro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Análise Psicológica]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>73-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluación docente vs. evaluación de la calidad]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ríos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abalde]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>103-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La evaluación docente en la agenda pública]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nava]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rueda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Linking student evaluations to institutional goals: a change story]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Palermo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>211-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the course experience questionnaire]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramsden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Studies in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>129-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Promover o sucesso académico através da avaliação e intervenção na Universidade]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santiago]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tavares]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Taveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lencastre]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonçalves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Avaliação: Revista da Rede de Avaliação Institucional da Educação Superior]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>31-44</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Vector pedagóxico e profesorado universitario: sentido e sensibilidade]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Innovación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>29-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Enrolling in higher education: The perceptions of stakeholders]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shah]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nair]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Institutional Research]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>9-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simões]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A avaliação do desempenho docente: contributos para uma análise crítica]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Texto Editora]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A hierarchical approach to students' assessments of instruction]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Socha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Assessments &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>94-113</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of art]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spooren]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brockx]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mortelmans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Review of Educational Research]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
