<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1405-9940</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Archivos de cardiología de México]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Arch. Cardiol. Méx.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1405-9940</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1405-99402019000400301</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24875/acm.m19000042</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Risk factors and temporal trends for vascular access-related complications in coronary procedures: evolving from femoral to radial approach]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Factores de riesgo y variaciones temporales para complicaciones vasculares asociadas a procedimientos coronarios: evolución de la vía femoral a la radial]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gopar-Nieto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rodrigo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huerta-Liceaga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fernando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chávez-Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Nancy L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Araiza-Garaygordobil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Diego]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Montes-Isunza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Héctor E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cabello-López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alejandro]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raymundo-Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Grecia I. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carazo-Vargas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gonzalo]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Loáisiga-Sáenz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Arnoldo E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,“Ignacio Chávez”  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad PEMEX Picacho Servicio de Hemodinamia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Hospital Regional Licenciado Adolfo López Mateos Servicio de Hemodinamia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE) Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre Servicio de Cardiología]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af5">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>89</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<fpage>301</fpage>
<lpage>307</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1405-99402019000400301&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1405-99402019000400301&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1405-99402019000400301&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  Introduction: Radial access is the gold standard for ST-elevation myocardial infarction; nevertheless, there is scarce information in Mexico.  Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the differences in radiation exposure, intervention time, fluoroscopy time, complications and temporal trends, and risk factors among radial and femoral access for coronary procedures.  Materials and Methods: A total of 493 patients underwent coronary interventions by femoral or radial access. Sociodemographic and procedural data were recorded. A logistic regression model to determine risk factors for complications was performed.  Results: The population included 346 men and 147 women, with a median age of 63 years, 159 underwent radial and 334 femoral approaches. Complications occurred in 18 patients (3.6%), 11 in radial and 7 in femoral access, with a higher trend in the first 5 months (n = 14). Vasospasm was the most common (n = 9) complication. Median fluoroscopy time was 12 min for radial and 9 min for femoral groups, with a total radiation dose of 2282 µGm2 and 2848 µGm2, respectively. Temporal trends showed that complications occurred most frequently during the first 6 months of the study. The main predictors for complications were intervention time and one-vessel disease.  Conclusions: Radial access had higher frequency of complications than femoral approach and they were more common during the first 6 months. The main risk factor was intervention time longer than 60 min.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  Introducción: El abordaje radial es el de elección para infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST, sin embargo se desconoce información en México.  Objetivos: Describir las diferencias en exposición a radiación, tiempo de intervención, tiempo de fluoroscopía, complicaciones y sus variaciones temporales, además de los factores de riesgo entre el abordaje radial y el femoral para procedimientos coronarios.  Método: Se incluyeron 493 pacientes que fueron sometidos a estudio angiográfico o intervenciones coronarias por abordaje radial o femoral. Se recabaron datos sociodemográficos, antecedentes y variables del procedimiento. Se realizó un modelo de regresión logística para determinar los factores asociados a complicaciones.  Resultados: Se incluyeron 346 hombres y 147 mujeres, con mediana de edad de 63 años. A 159 se les realizó acceso radial y a 334 femoral. Las complicaciones ocurrieron en 18 pacientes (3.65%): 11 en radial y 7 en femoral, teniendo mayor incidencia en los primeros 5 meses (n = 14) y siendo el vasoespasmo el más común (n = 9). La mediana de tiempo de fluoroscopía fue de 12 minutos para el radial y de 9 minutos para el femoral, con una dosis total de radiación de 2,282 µGm2 y 2,848 µGm2, respectivamente. Las tendencias temporales indicaron que las complicaciones fueron más frecuentes durante los primeros 6 meses. Los principales predictores fueron el tiempo de intervención y la enfermedad de 1 vaso.  Conclusiones: La vía de acceso radial tuvo más complicaciones que la femoral. Se observaron más complicaciones en los primeros 6 meses del estudio. El principal predictor de complicaciones fue el tiempo de intervención mayor a 60 minutos.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cardiac catheterization]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Radial artery]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Femoral artery]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Coronary angiography]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Angioplasty]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Mexico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cateterismo cardiaco]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Arteria radial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Arteria femoral]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Angiografía coronaria]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Angioplastía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[México]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vranckx]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frigoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rothenbühler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Heart J]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<page-range>1069-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kiemeneij]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laarman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odekerken]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Slagboom]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[van der]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Wieken R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches:the access study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Am Coll Cardiol]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>1269-75</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TY]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention:a report from the national cardiovascular data registry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JACC Cardiovasc Interv]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>379-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bertrand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OF]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pancholy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions:results of the first international transradial practice survey]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JACC Cardiovasc Interv]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>1022-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cubeddu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bowen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Stenting in acute coronary syndromes:a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Am Coll Cardiol]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<page-range>572-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Agostoni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Biondi-Zoccai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[de]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Benedictis ML]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures;Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Am Coll Cardiol]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>349-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Campeau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>3-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hess]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CN]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peterson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ED]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Neely]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States:a study from the national cardiovascular data registry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Circulation]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>129</volume>
<page-range>2277-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sciahbasi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romagnoli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of the “learning curve” for left and right radial approach during percutaneous coronary procedures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Cardiol]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>108</volume>
<page-range>185-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greenwood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Della-Siega]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fretz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Vascular communications of the hand in patients being considered for transradial coronary angiography:is the allen's test accurate?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Am Coll Cardiol]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<page-range>2013-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yokoyama]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Takeshita]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ochiai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Catheter Cardiovasc Interv]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>357-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barbeau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arsenault]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dugas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Larivière]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography:comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am Heart J]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>147</volume>
<page-range>489-93</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wakeyama]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ogawa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. An intravascular ultrasound study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Am Coll Cardiol]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>1109-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cooper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Banerjee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brilakis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ES]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Crossover from radial to femoral access during a challenging percutaneous coronary intervention can make the difference between success and failure]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cardiovasc Revasc Med]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>266</numero>
<issue>266</issue>
<page-range>e5-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ahmed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Malenka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Significantly improved vascular complications among women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:a report from the Northern New England percutaneous coronary intervention registry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Circ Cardiovasc Interv]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>423-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pristipino]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pelliccia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Granatelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of access-related bleeding complications in women versus men undergoing percutaneous coronary catheterization using the radial versus femoral artery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Cardiol]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>99</volume>
<page-range>1216-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bashore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am Heart J]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>147</volume>
<page-range>375-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mercuri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mehta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JACC Cardiovasc Interv]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>347-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lange]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[von Boetticher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Catheter Cardiovasc Interv]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>67</volume>
<page-range>12-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geijer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Persliden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Radiation exposure and patient experience during percutaneous coronary intervention using radial and femoral artery access]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Radiol]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<page-range>1674-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brasselet]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blanpain]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tassan-Mangina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur Heart J]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>63-70</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Neill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Douglas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Richardson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of radiation dose and the effect of operator experience in femoral and radial arterial access for coronary procedures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Cardiol]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>106</volume>
<page-range>936-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lehmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ehrlich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Implementation of the transradial approach for coronary procedures is not associated with an elevated complication rate and elevated radiation patient exposure]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Interv Cardiol]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<page-range>56-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jabara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gadesam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pendyala]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ambulatory discharge after transradial coronary intervention:preliminary US single-center experience (Same-day transradial intervention and discharge evaluation, the STRIDE study)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am Heart J]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>156</volume>
<page-range>1141-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jolly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yusuf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cairns]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL):a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Lancet]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>377</volume>
<page-range>1409-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
