<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1405-9193</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Cuestiones constitucionales]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Cuest. Const.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1405-9193</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1405-91932024000200115</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iij.24484881e.2024.51.17548</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[El debate constitucional sobre el derecho al aborto en Estados Unidos]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The constitutional debate on the right to abortion in the United States]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez Peralta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Héctor]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>51</numero>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1405-91932024000200115&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1405-91932024000200115&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1405-91932024000200115&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El artículo muestra el debate constitucional sobre el derecho al aborto entre las diferentes escuelas jurídicas dominantes en la Suprema Corte de los Estados Unidos de América. Se sostiene que el debate en el seno de la Suprema Corte de ese país, además de ser una lucha entre liberales y conservadores, es también entre dos filosofías jurídicas sobre cuál debe de ser el papel político del Poder Judicial dentro de una sociedad que se considera a sí misma democrática: el activismo judicial vs. la restricción judicial -esta última integrada por el originalismo y el textualismo-.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The article shows the constitutional debate on the right to abortion between the different dominant legal schools of thought in the Supreme Court of the United States. It is argued that the debate within the Supreme Court, in addition to being a fight between liberals and conservatives, is also between two philosophies about what the political role of the Judicial Power should be within a society that considers itself a democracy: judicial activism vs. judicial restraint -the latter integrated by originalism and textualism-.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[aborto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Suprema Corte de Estados Unidos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[activismo judicial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[restricción judicial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[abortion]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Supreme Court of United States]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[judicial activism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[judicial restraint]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Life and Legacy of Norma McCorvey]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[History in the Making]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anzarouth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Misguided Criticism of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's Judicial Philosophy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Political Review]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why Liberals and Conservatives Flipped on Judicial Restraint: Judicial Review in the Cycles of Constitutional Times]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Texas Law Review]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>98</volume>
<page-range>215-65</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Texas AG says he'd defend sodomy law if Supreme Court revisits ruling]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blackmore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Principios constitucionales]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernández]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blackmore]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[¿Qué es Estados Unidos?]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<page-range>126-64</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Fondo de Cultura Económica]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bringer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The 'Trimester' Lenguage of Roe v. Wade: State Legislators ' Conceptualization of Their Relationship with the Supreme Court]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of California]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Buchanan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dorf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Tale of Two Formalisms: How Law and Economics Mirrors Originalism and Textualism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cornell Law Review]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>106</volume>
<page-range>591-676</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cassidy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Scalia on Abortion: Originalism... But, Why?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Touro Law Review]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>741-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Center for Reproductive Rights</collab>
<source><![CDATA[After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State]]></source>
<year></year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Center for Reproductive Rights]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DeLuca]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Jane Roe Baptized by Former Adversary]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Dallas Morning News]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Devins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How Planned Parenthood v. Casey (Pretty Much) Settled the Abortion Wars]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Yale Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<page-range>1320-1</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Felix]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[A Short Biography of Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Benna Books]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frommer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Justice Ginsburg Thought Roe Was The Wrong Case to Settle Abortion Issue]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gersen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Mississippi Abortion Case and the Fragile Legitimacy of the Supreme Court]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The New Newyorker]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El ABC del sistema político de los Estados Unidos de América]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El discurso de odio y los límites de la libertad de expresión en Estados Unidos]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<numero>249</numero>
<issue>249</issue>
<page-range>281-306</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greene]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Meming of Substantive Due Process]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of Minnesota Law Review]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>253-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Greenhouse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sandra Dar O'Connor and the Reconsideration of Roe v. Wade]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Experience]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gupta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why Ruth Bader Ginsburg Wasn't All That Fond of Roe v. Wade]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[New York Times]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heagney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Offers Critique of Roe v. Wade During Law School Visit]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Law School of University of Chicago]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Higgins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade: Abortion and a Woman's Right to Privacy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ABDO Publishing]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hollis-Brusky]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jenkins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Partisan: The Life of William Rehnquist]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Public Affairs]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[King]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>409-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Landau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dixon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Abusive Judicial Review: Courts Against Democracy]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of California Davis Law Review]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>1313-87</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LaTasha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[It's me Choice, Right? Abortion Law Reform in the United States]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[FAU Undergraduated Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<page-range>106-13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>Library of Congress</collab>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment Citizenship, Equal Protection, and Other Rights of Citizens]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Library of Congress]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McCarthy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In Defense of Griswold v. Connecticut: Privacy, Originalism, and the Iceberg Theory of Omission]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Willamette Law Review]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>335-69</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McCorvey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[I Am Roe: My Life, Roe v. Wade, y Freedom of Choice]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Harper Collins]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McWhinney]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Judicial Review in the English-speaking]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[University of Toronto Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Mississippi Gestational Age Act</collab>
<source><![CDATA[EE.EE: Justia US Law]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molony]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Taking Another Look at the Call on the Field: Roe, Chief Justice Roberts, and Stare Decisis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Journal of Law &amp; Public Policy]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>733-814</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Newburger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Amy Coney Barrett pays homage to conservative mentor Antonin Scalia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[CNBC]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pacelle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Role of the Supreme Court in American Politics: The Least Dangerous Branch?]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Routledge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pandey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Understanding Judicial Activism and Its Impact]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[GLS Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>15-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>PBS NewsHour</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Supreme Court Moments in History: Sandra Day O'Connor on Abortion]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Pennsylvania General Assembly</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Chapter 32. Abortion]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peters]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Pinter Publisher]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pilon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why I Am an Originalist-Properly Understood]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Liberty.org]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rehnquist]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Dissenting Opinion on Roe v. Wade]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[LandmarkCases.org]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rowlinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hassard]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Historical Neo-institucionalism or Neo-Institutionalist History? Historical Research in Management and Organization Studies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Management &amp; Organizational History]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>111-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scalia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Manning]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Dialogue on Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[George Washington Law Review]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1610-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scalia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[God's Justice and Ours]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[First Things]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<page-range>17-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Senado de la República</collab>
<source><![CDATA[La Constitución Política de México es una de las más reformadas en el mundo, señala el IBD]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Senado de la República LXIV Legislatura]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strauss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Living Constitution]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Strauss]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Why The Burger Court Mattered]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Michigan Law Review]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>116</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1067-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Supreme Court of the United States</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania ET AL. v. Casey, Governor of Pennsylvania, ET AL]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Supreme Court of the United States</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Healt, ET AL. v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ET AL]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trachtman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Supremes Greates hits: the 45 Supreme Court Cases that Most Directly Affect Your Life]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Sterling]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Meter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Miranda v. Arizona: The Rights of the Accused]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Chelsea House]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vitiello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Introducing the Warren Court's Criminal Procedure Revolution: A 50-Year Retrospective]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of the Pacific Law Review]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>621-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Watson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Living Constitution, Dying Faith: Progressivism and the New Science of Jurisprudence]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Open Road Media]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
