<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1405-9193</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Cuestiones constitucionales]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Cuest. Const.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1405-9193</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1405-91932020000100251</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22201/iij.24484881e.2020.42.14343</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Discreción judicial, razonabilidad y control de constitucionalidad]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Judicial Discretion, Reasonableness and Judicial Review]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paredes Paredes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Felipe Ignacio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Austral de Chile  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>42</numero>
<fpage>251</fpage>
<lpage>270</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1405-91932020000100251&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1405-91932020000100251&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1405-91932020000100251&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El trabajo analiza la importancia del concepto de test de constitucionalidad en el juicio de constitucionalidad de las leyes, especialmente en los casos de discreción legislativa. Se estudian las implicaciones de la utilización de un determinado test y cómo esta decisión influye en el resultado. Con este propósito, se caracteriza el control de constitucionalidad como un control de razonabilidad. En la medida de que existen distintos modelos de razonabilidad, ello se traduce en la existencia de diversos test de constitucionalidad. El artículo discute esta hipótesis a partir de tres estándares de amplia difusión en el derecho comparado: el test de Wednesbury, el test de proporcionalidad y el test de escrutinio estricto. Dicho ejercicio muestra cómo un precepto impugnado puede tener distinta suerte y que el juicio de constitucionalidad puede arrojar resultados distintos en cada uno de estos casos.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The paper analyzes the importance of the concept of constitutionality test in the judicial review of the legislation, especially when the Constitution delivers to the Congress discretionary powers. The implications of using a specific test are as important as this decision will determine that the law be uphold or invalidate. For this purpose, judicial review of legislation is characterized as a control of reasonableness. Due to there are different models of reasonableness, consequently it produces the existence of different models of constitutionality tests. The article is focused on three widely diffused tests in comparative law: The Wednesbury test, the proportionality test and the strict scrutiny test. This exercise puts clearly in evidence how the constitutional rulings yield different results in each of these cases.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[jurisdicción constitucional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Estado de derecho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[interpretación del derecho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[derecho constitucional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[jurisprudencia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Constitutional Court]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Interpretation of the Law]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aleinikoff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Alexei]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Yale Law Journal]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>96</numero>
<issue>96</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alexy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Robert]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los derechos fundamentales y el principio de proporcionalidad]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<numero>91</numero>
<issue>91</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Da Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Virgilio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>31</numero>
<issue>31</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Davis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Martha]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Basic Guide to Standards of Judicial Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[South Dakota Law Review]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<numero>33</numero>
<issue>33</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dworkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ronald]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Una cuestión de principios]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Siglo XXI Editores]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fabbrini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Federico]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reasonableness as a Test for Judicial Review of Legislation in the French Constitutional Council]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Comparative Law]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fallon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Rule of Law as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Columbia Law Review]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>97</numero>
<issue>97</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fallon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Strict Judicial Scrutiny]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[UCLA Law Review]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<numero>54</numero>
<issue>54</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Foley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Brian]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Proportionality Test: Present Problems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Judicial Studies Institute Journal]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fordham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Michael]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Wednesbury]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Judicial Review]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fuller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lon]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Navarro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La moral del derecho]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Trillas]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Walter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Essentially Contested Concepts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society]]></source>
<year>1955</year>
<numero>56</numero>
<issue>56</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grimm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Dieter]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[University of Toronto Law Journal]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<numero>57</numero>
<issue>57</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gunther]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gerald]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Supreme Court, 1971 Term-Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>86</numero>
<issue>86</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hart]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Herbert]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[El concepto de derecho]]></source>
<year>1963</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Buenos Aires ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Abeledo Perrot]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Helmholz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Richard]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ockham&#8217;s Razor in American Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tulane European &amp; Civil Law Forum]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<numero>21</numero>
<issue>21</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hofer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ronald]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Standards of Review-Looking Beyond the Labels]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Marquette Law Review]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<numero>74</numero>
<issue>74</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jowell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Courts and the Administration in Britain: Standards, Principles and Rights]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Israeli Law Review]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<numero>22</numero>
<issue>22</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kaplow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Louis]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Duke Law Journal]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>42</numero>
<issue>42</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hans]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[¿Quién debe ser el defensor de la Constitución?]]></source>
<year>1995</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Tecnos]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[José]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zúñiga]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El principio de razonabilidad en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Estudios constitucionales]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peiris]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gamini]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Wednesbury Unreasonableness: The Expanding Canvas]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The Cambridge Law Journal]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>46</numero>
<issue>46</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pound]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roscoe]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Hierarchy of Sources and Forms in Different Systems of Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Tulane Law Review]]></source>
<year>1932</year>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Joseph]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tamayo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Rolando]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La autoridad del derecho. Ensayos sobre derecho y moral]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[UNAM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sullivan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Kathleen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Foreword: The Justices of Rules and Standards]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Miguel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Función, límites y control judicial de la discrecionalidad administrativa]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ius et Veritas]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<numero>21</numero>
<issue>21</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schlag]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pierre]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rules and Standards]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[UCLA Law Review]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<numero>33</numero>
<issue>33</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Raynor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Austin]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Economic Liberty and the Second-Order Rational Basis Test]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Virginia Law Review]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<numero>99</numero>
<issue>99</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waldron]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Core and Uneasy Case for Judicial Review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Harvard Law Review]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>121</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Webber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Grégoire]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights, Nueva York]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Cambridge University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wertheimer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ellen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Ockham&#8217;s Scalpel: A Return to a Reasonableness Standard]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Villanova Law Review]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>43</numero>
<issue>43</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Whittaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Simon]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El precedente en el derecho inglés: una visión desde la ciudadela]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Chilena de Derecho]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>35</numero>
<issue>35</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
