<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1405-3195</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Agrociencia]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Agrociencia]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1405-3195</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Colegio de Postgraduados]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1405-31952012000300009</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Response of wheat (Triticum spp.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) to Fusarium poae]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Respuesta del trigo (Triticum spp.) y la cebada (Hordeum vulgare) a Fusarium poae]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stenglein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sebastián A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dinolfo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. Inés]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bongiorno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fabricio]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. Virginia]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNCPBA) Facultad de Agronomía de Azul ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Argentina</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>15</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>46</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>299</fpage>
<lpage>306</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1405-31952012000300009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1405-31952012000300009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1405-31952012000300009&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Fusarium head blight is an important disease attacking wheat (Triticum spp.), barley (Hordeum vulgare) and other grains worldwide. Among the Fusarium species causing this disease, Fusarium poae is less often implicated, but is a fungus of increasingly recognized importance and it is associated with human and animal toxicoses. The aim of this study was to examine the responses of wheat and barley varieties to inoculation by different F. poae isolates, in order to observe contamination by this fungus in the grains. The analyses were performed during 2008, 2009, and 2010 under natural conditions at the Facultad de Agronomía de Azul-UNCPBA, province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Statistical analyses were carried out and the identities of re-isolated isolates were tested by a primer-specific PCR reaction and by comparing DNA-ISSR amplifications. Differences among varieties in fungal symptoms were significant (p&#8804;0.05) only in 2008. Although the number of re-isolated isolates in wheat was greater than the number of samples with observable symptoms, no significant correlations were found. However, there were correlations in barley and the linear regression analyses allow suggesting that for each grain with visual symptoms, two barley grains could contain the fungus. Thus it can be concluded that the real number of grains contaminated with F. poae is significantly higher than the number with observable disease symptoms, and therefore the real extent of contamination with F. poae is currently underestimated and should be considered for food risk analysis in the near future.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[La fusariosis de la espiga es una enfermedad importante que ataca al trigo (Triticum spp.), la cebada (Hordeum vulgare) y otros granos en el mundo. Entre las especies de Fusarium que causan esta enfermedad, Fusarium poae es una de las menos frecuentes, pero es un hongo cuya importancia es cada vez más reconocida y se le asocia con la toxicosis en humanos y animales. El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar las respuestas de las variedades de trigo y cebada a la inoculación de diferentes aislamientos de F. poae, a fin de observar la contaminación producida por este hongo en los granos. Los análisis se realizaron durante 2008, 2009 y 2010 en condiciones naturales, en la Facultad de Agronomía de Azul-UNCPBA, provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Se hicieron análisis estadísticos, y las identidades de los aislamientos re-aislados se probaron con reacciones de iniciadores específicos PCR y por comparación de amplificaciones de ADN-ISSR. Las diferencias entre variedades en los síntomas del hongo fueron significativas (p&#8804;0.05) sólo en 2008. Aunque el número de aislamientos re-aislados en trigo fue mayor que el número de muestras con síntomas observables, las correlaciones no fueron significativas. Sin embargo, hubo correlaciones significativas en la cebada y los análisis de regresión lineal sugiriendo que por cada grano con síntomas visibles, dos granos de cebada podrían contener el hongo. Asi puede concluirse que el número de granos contaminados con F. poae es significativamente mayor que el de aquellos con síntomas observables de la enfermedad y, por tanto, el alcance real de la contaminación con F. poae es subestimado y se debiera considerar para el análisis de riesgos alimentarios en un futuro próximo.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[disease symptoms]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Fusarium poae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[grain contamination]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[síntomas de la enfermedad]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Fusarium poae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[contaminación del grano]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[  	    <p><font face="verdana" size="4">Protecci&oacute;n vegetal</font></p>         <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="4"><b>Response of wheat (<i>Triticum spp.</i>) and barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i>) to <i>Fusarium poae</i></b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="3"><b>Respuesta del trigo (<i>Triticum</i> spp.) y la cebada (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i>) a <i>Fusarium poae</i></b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>  	    <p align="center"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Sebasti&aacute;n A. Stenglein<sup>*</sup>, M. In&eacute;s Dinolfo, Fabricio Bongiorno, M. Virginia Moreno</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Facultad de Agronom&iacute;a de Azul, UNCPBA, Rep&uacute;blica de Italia No. 780, Azul (7300), Argentina. Author for correspondence. (<a href="mailto:stenglein@faa.unicen.edu.ar">stenglein@faa.unicen.edu.ar</a>).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"> Recibido: October, 2011.    <br> Aprobado: February, 2012.</font></p>       <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>      <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Abstract</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Fusarium</i> head blight is an important disease attacking wheat (<i>Triticum</i> spp.), barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i>) and other grains worldwide. Among the <i>Fusarium</i> species causing this disease, <i>Fusarium poae</i> is less often implicated, but is a fungus of increasingly recognized importance and it is associated with human and animal toxicoses. The aim of this study was to examine the responses of wheat and barley varieties to inoculation by different <i>F. poae</i> isolates, in order to observe contamination by this fungus in the grains. The analyses were performed during 2008, 2009, and 2010 under natural conditions at the Facultad de Agronom&iacute;a de Azul&#45;UNCPBA, province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Statistical analyses were carried out and the identities of re&#45;isolated isolates were tested by a primer&#45;specific PCR reaction and by comparing DNA&#45;ISSR amplifications. Differences among varieties in fungal symptoms were significant (p&#8804;0.05) only in 2008. Although the number of re&#45;isolated isolates in wheat was greater than the number of samples with observable symptoms, no significant correlations were found. However, there were correlations in barley and the linear regression analyses allow suggesting that for each grain with visual symptoms, two barley grains could contain the fungus. Thus it can be concluded that the real number of grains contaminated with <i>F. poae</i> is significantly higher than the number with observable disease symptoms, and therefore the real extent of contamination with <i>F. poae</i> is currently underestimated and should be considered for food risk analysis in the near future.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Key words</b>: disease symptoms, <i>Fusarium poae</i>, grain contamination.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="jusrify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Resumen</b></font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">La fusariosis de la espiga es una enfermedad importante que ataca al trigo (<i>Triticum</i> spp.), la cebada (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i>) y otros granos en el mundo. Entre las especies de <i>Fusarium</i> que causan esta enfermedad, <i>Fusarium poae</i> es una de las menos frecuentes, pero es un hongo cuya importancia es cada vez m&aacute;s reconocida y se le asocia con la toxicosis en humanos y animales. El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar las respuestas de las variedades de trigo y cebada a la inoculaci&oacute;n de diferentes aislamientos de <i>F. poae</i>, a fin de observar la contaminaci&oacute;n producida por este hongo en los granos. Los an&aacute;lisis se realizaron durante 2008, 2009 y 2010 en condiciones naturales, en la Facultad de Agronom&iacute;a de Azul&#45;UNCPBA, provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Se hicieron an&aacute;lisis estad&iacute;sticos, y las identidades de los aislamientos re&#45;aislados se probaron con reacciones de iniciadores espec&iacute;ficos PCR y por comparaci&oacute;n de amplificaciones de ADN&#45;ISSR. Las diferencias entre variedades en los s&iacute;ntomas del hongo fueron significativas (p&#8804;0.05) s&oacute;lo en 2008. Aunque el n&uacute;mero de aislamientos re&#45;aislados en trigo fue mayor que el n&uacute;mero de muestras con s&iacute;ntomas observables, las correlaciones no fueron significativas. Sin embargo, hubo correlaciones significativas en la cebada y los an&aacute;lisis de regresi&oacute;n lineal sugiriendo que por cada grano con s&iacute;ntomas visibles, dos granos de cebada podr&iacute;an contener el hongo. Asi puede concluirse que el n&uacute;mero de granos contaminados con <i>F. poae</i> es significativamente mayor que el de aquellos con s&iacute;ntomas observables de la enfermedad y, por tanto, el alcance real de la contaminaci&oacute;n con <i>F. poae</i> es subestimado y se debiera considerar para el an&aacute;lisis de riesgos alimentarios en un futuro pr&oacute;ximo.</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>Palabras clave: </b>s&iacute;ntomas de la enfermedad, <i>Fusarium poae</i>, contaminaci&oacute;n del grano.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>INTRODUCTION</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">In cereal grain production, <i>Fusarium</i> head blight (FHB) is one of the most important and insidious diseases. It has a severe impact through yield reductions and the mycotoxin contamination that it causes. Increasing worldwide concern about food safety has enhanced interest in <i>Fusarium</i> infections and mycotoxin production in food products. <i>Fusarium graminearum</i> is the predominant FHB mycotoxin&#45;producing agent worldwide, although <i>F.culmorum</i>, <i>F. avenaceum</i> and <i>F. poae</i> are commonly isolated from cereal grains. In recent years, some changes were found in the predominance of the various <i>Fusarium</i> species. For example, <i>F. poae</i> prevails in Argentina, Hungary, Ireland, Italy and the UK, in cereal (Xu <i>et al</i>., 2005; Gonz&aacute;lez <i>et al</i>., 2008). However, the predominance and distribution, or both, of <i>Fusarium</i> species depend on climatic factors. Thus, <i>F. graminearum</i> is associated with warmer/humid conditions, <i>F. poae</i> with relatively drier and warmer conditions, and both <i>F. culmorum</i> and <i>F. avenaceum</i> with niches of cooler/wet/humid conditions (Xu <i>et al</i>., 2008).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Among the mycotoxins produced by <i>Fusarium</i> species, trichothecenes are considered the most important, since they are potent inhibitors of eukaryotic protein synthesis (Bennet and Klich, 2003), and can cause a wide range of adverse effects in animals and humans through ingestion of food and feed prepared from contaminated cereal grains (D'Mello <i>et al</i>., 1999). <i>Fusarium poae</i> is a relatively weak pathogen compared with <i>F. graminearum</i> and <i>F. culmorum</i>, but it can produce a large number of mycotoxins, such as trichothecenes of type A (T&#45;2, HT&#45;2, diacetoxyscirpenol, monoacetoxyscirpenol, scirpentriol) and B (nivalenol, fusarenone&#45;X), beauvericin and enniatins (Vogelgsang <i>et al</i>., 2008; Stenglein, 2009).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The strategies used to prevent <i>Fusarium</i> colonization and mycotoxin contamination in cereal grains caused by <i>Fusarium</i> species include crop rotation, optimized tillage and straw management, and the use of varieties with low susceptibility (Edwards, 2004). The aim of this study was to examine the responses of wheat and barley varieties to inoculation by different <i>F. poae</i> isolates, in order to observe the contamination of grains infected by the fungus.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The study was carried out at the Facultad de Agronom&iacute;a de Azul&#45;UNCPBA (36&deg; 41' S, 59&deg; 48' W; 132 m altitude), province of Buenos Aires, Argentina.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Four monosporic <i>F. poae</i> isolates obtained from wheat (TSS1a, TSa1a, T&#45;MICA&#45;01 and T&#45;MICA&#45;08) and one obtained from barley grains (Hsu1a) were used individually (Dinolfo <i>etal</i>., 2010). Fungal inoculum was produced by placing individual agar plugs with mycelium and conidia onto potato dextrose agar (PDA, Britania<sup>&#174;</sup>) in petri dishes (90&times;20 mm) and incubating for 7 d at 25&plusmn;2 &deg;C under 12 h light/dark. Conidial harvested were taken by flooding the plates with 5 mL of sterilized distilled water (SDW) and dislodging the conidia with a bent glass rod. The resulting suspension was filtered through cheesecloth and the conidial suspension was adjusted to 1&times;10<sup>5</sup> conidia mL<sup>&#45;</sup><sup>1</sup> using a haemacytometer (Neubauer) and a binocular microscope. Tween<sup>&#174;</sup> 20 (0.05 %) was added as surfactant.</font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Four wheat cultivar were used: Apogee &#91;(with susceptibility to FHB and <i>F. poae</i>, Mackintosh <i>et al</i>. (2006); Vogelgsang <i>et al</i>. (2008)&#93;; Klein Chaj&aacute; (bread wheat); Buck Bigu&aacute; (bread wheat); Chagual (durum wheat), and two barley varieties, Stander (6&#45;row and susceptible to FHB, Urrea <i>et al</i>., 2005); Quilmes Scarlett (2&#45;row). Seeds were surface&#45;sterilized by immersing them 3 min in 50 % ethanol, 3 min in sodium hypochlorite (commercial 55 g Cl L<sup>&#45;</sup><sup>1</sup>), and by washing them three times with SDW. Three seeds were sown in pots (3 L) filled with soil (mixture of farm soil, organic soil and sand, 2:1:1) and after emergence, seedlings were selected based on size uniformity, leaving one seedling per pot. Eighteen replicates (pots) of each variety were used in a completely randomized design.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Plants were grown in the absence of any nutritional, pest or water stress, except that no fungicides were applied. The experiment was performed during each of three consecutive years (2008, 2009, and 2010) under natural conditions. The sowing dates for the different varieties and species were adjusted according to growth progress observed in plants grown in 2007, to ensure that all varieties were at similar growth stages at the same time.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Wheat heads were inoculated at mid&#45;anthesis (Vogelgsang <i>et al</i>., 2008) and barley when &gt;50 % of the plants had reached anthesis (Buerstmayr <i>et al</i>., 2004). Conidial suspensions of each fungal isolate were applied to separate plants, until run off, using a gravity spray gun. Five heads of each plant variety randomly selected per isolate were inoculated. Sterilized distilled water with Tween<sup>&#174;</sup> 20 was used to inoculate two heads per plant variety to serve as control treatment. Visual disease assessment was conducted at 20 d post inoculation by counting the number of symptomatic grains (lesions or bleaching of grains or glumes with a dark margin) from each inoculated head.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Temperature and RH data (from inoculation to the time of visual disease assessment) were obtained from the Bolet&iacute;n Agrometeorol&oacute;gico del Centro&#45;Sur de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (2008, 2009, 2010), located 50 m from the experimental site.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The five heads of each variety per inoculated isolate and the controls were individually threshed and grains were collected. All grains (with and without symptoms) were transferred to petri dishes containing PDA with 250 mg chloramphenicol L<sup>&#45;</sup><sup>1</sup> and incubated 7d at 25&plusmn;2 &deg;C under 12 h light/dark. Fungal isolates were then taken from the incubated grains.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">To be sure that the re&#45;isolated isolates obtained were the same as the ones originally inoculated, the DNA of all isolates was extracted using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method according to Stenglein and Balatti (2006), amplified by a species specific&#45;<i>F. poae</i> PCR reaction using primers Fp82F 5'&#45;ACGACGAAGGTGGTTATG&#45;3' and Fp82R 5'&#45;GAAGAGCCTGTTTGCTTG&#45;3' (Parry and Nicholson 1996), and compared in five ISSR primer amplifications, CTC(GT)8, (GAG)5CAG, CAC5, CT(GA)8, and (GCC)5, with the DNA of the original isolates used for inoculations (Dinolfo <i>et al</i>., 2010). Each ISSR reaction was performed at least twice, running eight DNA samples plus the DNA ladder and a negative control in one gel, simultaneously. Products from PCR reactions were examined by electrophoresis in 1.5 % (w v<sup>&#45;</sup><sup>1</sup>) agarose gels containing GelRedTM (Biotium, Hayward, USA). Fragments were visualised under UV light. The size of the DNA fragments were estimated by comparing the DNA bands with a 1 kb and 100 bp DNA ladder (Genbiotech S.R.L., Buenos Aires, Argentina).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">A factorial experiment with 30 treatments (five different isolates X six different plant varieties) in a completely random design was used. An analysis of variance of the number of infected (visible symptoms) grains/total grains per head, was performed for each year in order to determine differences between varieties and isolates, and their interaction. Percentage data were arcsin (square root) transformed.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">A Chi&#45;square test was carried out to test independence between plant varieties and <i>F. poae</i> isolates re&#45;isolated from grains. A correlation and linear regression analyses were performed to test the relationship between the number of grains with visible symptoms (x) and the number of grains from which isolates could be re&#45;isolated (y) with and without symptoms. All statistical analyses were performed using INFOSTAT version 2006 (Infostat group, FCA, Universidad Nacional de C&oacute;rdoba, Argentina).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</b></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">No symptoms were observed on control head cultivars. The five isolates differed in the rate of <i>F. poae</i> symptoms developments on the six plant genotypes (<a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c1.jpg" target="_blank">Table 1</a>). Apogee was the most susceptible wheat variety to all <i>F. poae</i> isolates tested, whereas the barley variety Stander was more susceptible to all isolates, except to MICA&#45;T&#45;08, than Scarlett, for the three years (<a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c1.jpg" target="_blank">Table 1</a>). In general, all varieties inoculated with the different <i>F. poae</i> isolates showed a low incidence of disease symptoms, ranging from 0.0 to 7.94 % (<a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c1.jpg" target="_blank">Table 1</a>). These results agree with reports that <i>F. poae</i> is a weak pathogen for wheat and barley (Xue <i>et al</i>., 2006; Vogelgsang <i>et al</i>., 2008). However, data analyses showed in 2008 differences (p=0.009) between varieties in disease symptoms development. In that year, greater differences in relativel humidity (average maximum RH, 81.9 %; average minimum RH, 33.2 %) and especially in temperature (average maximum T, 28.4 &deg;C; average minimum T, 13.4 &deg;C) were registered, as compared to 2009 (average maximum RH, 80.1 %; average minimum RH, 34.7 %; average maximum T, 21.8 &deg;C; average minimum T, 6.6 &deg;C), and 2010 (average maximum RH, 76.9 %; average minimum RH, 46.8 %; average maximum T, 22.5 &deg;C; average minimum T, 8.6 &deg;C).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><i>Fusariumpoae</i> was associated with relatively warmer and drier conditions than other <i>Fusarium</i> species (Turner and Jennings, 1997; Xu <i>et al</i>., 2008). Average RH was not different (p&gt;0.05) between years; however, in 2008 there were higher temperatures which could explain the statistical significances for 2008 only, a result in agreement with reports from Turner and Jennings (1997) and Xu <i>et al</i>. (2008).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">No isolates of <i>F.poae</i> were obtained from control grains. All re&#45;isolated isolates correspond to <i>F. poae</i> (no other <i>Fusarium</i> species were isolated from inoculated grains) and we used the ISSR method to check that the re&#45;isolated isolates corresponded to each <i>F. poae</i> isolate used to inoculate each plant genotype in all the experiments. These reisolation tests are essential to show the absence of cross&#45;infection with other <i>Fusarium</i> species or other <i>F. poae</i> isolates, or both, used in our study that could interfere with the results and conclusions.</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">All <i>F. poae</i> isolates were re&#45;isolated from each inoculated plant varieties, except for the barley Scarlett variety inoculated with MICA&#45;T&#45;01 (<a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c2.jpg" target="_blank">Table 2</a>). Surprisingly, the number of grains from which we recovered isolates was always higher than the number of grains with visible symptoms in the three years (<a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c1.jpg">Tables 1</a> and <a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c2.jpg" target="_blank">2</a>). For example, the wheat variety Apogee presented 7.94 % of grains with symptoms and we re&#45;isolated isolates from 23.98 % grains (<a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c1.jpg" target="_blank">Tables 1</a> and <a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c2.jpg" target="_blank">2</a>), and the wheat variety Chagual showed &plusmn;10 % differences between symptomatic and infected grains (<a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c1.jpg" target="_blank">Table 1</a> and <a href="/img/revistas/agro/v46n3/a9c2.jpg" target="_blank">2</a>). Another interesting result was that, although in 2008 the conditions favored <i>F. poae</i> infections and was the only year for which we observed statistical significances, the numbers of re&#45;isolated isolates were similar during each of the three years analyzed (data not shown).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The Chisquare test to prove independence between plant varieties and <i>F. poae</i> isolates re&#45;isolated showed that only in 2008 we can reject the null hypothesis; thus, these variables were dependent (p=0.01). This allows confirming that the degree of success for <i>F. poae</i> infection depends on the environmental conditions, a result in agreement with reports by Turner and Jennings (1997) and Xu <i>et al</i>. (2008).</font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The number of grains from which isolates could be re&#45;isolated was higher than the number of grains with observable symptoms in wheat varieties, but no correlations were found. However, in barley there were positive correlations, and therefore linear regressions analyses were performed. The 2008 analysis showed a correlation of 0.82 and the linear regression equation was: y=2.3049x + 0.2073 (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>=0.67). For 2009 and 2010 the correlation coefficients were 0.84 and 0.63 and the regression equations were: y=3.0198x &#150; 0.4455 (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>=0.71), and y = 2.3043x + 1.2609 (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>=0.40). These results allow suggesting that for each grain with visual symptoms two barley grains could actually contain the fungus. Stenglein (2009) highlights the increasingly recognized importance of <i>F. poae</i> in different countries and summarizes the potential mycotoxin production, with particular regard to possible human and animal health issues. Niessen (2008) indicate that the level of contamination with certain mycotoxins may be related to the amount of pathogen biomass present in plant material. Correlations between DNA level and enniatins and nivalenol in barley grains samples were found using TaqMan assays (Yli&#45;Mattila <i>et al</i>., 2008). However, in asymptomatic wheat samples contaminated with <i>F. poae</i> and using a TaqMan assay, no positive correlation was found between <i>F. poae</i> DNA and the quantity of enniatins B+B1 (Kulik and Jestoi, 2009).</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">The results confirm the importance of <i>Fusariumpoae</i>. Thus, the environmental conditions during anthesis are important for the development of the symptoms but they do not seem to be determinant for fungus colonization of the grains. Moreover, the actual number of grains contaminated with <i>F. poae</i> is significantly higher than the number with observable disease symptoms. Therefore, the actual degree of grain contamination with <i>F. poae</i> is currently underestimated and should be considered for a food risk analysis.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</b></font></p>  	    <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">This work was supported by FONCYT&#45;SECYT PICT&#45;PRH 2008/110 and PIP 167 CONICET.</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">&nbsp;</font></p>     <p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2"><b>LITERATURE CITED</b></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Bennet, J., W., and M. Klich. 2003. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 497&#45;516.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567677&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Buerstmayr, H., L. Legzdina, B. Steiner, and M. Lemmens. 2004. Variation for resistance to <i>Fusarium</i> head blight in spring barley. Euphytica 137: 279&#45;290.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567679&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">D'Mello, J., P., F., C. M. Placinta, and A. M. C. McDonald. 1999. <i>Fusarium</i> mycotoxins: a review of global implications for animal health, welfare and productivity. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 80: 183&#45;205.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567681&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Dinolfo, M., I., S. A. Stenglein, M. V. Moreno, P. Nicholson, P. Jennings, and G. L. Salerno. 2010. ISSR markers detect high genetic variation among <i>Fusarium poae</i> isolates from Argentina and England. Eur, J. Plant Pathol. 127: 483&#45;491.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567683&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Edwards, S., G. 2004. Influence of agricultural practices on <i>Fusarium</i> infection of cereals and subsequent contamination of grain by trichothecene mycotoxins. Toxicol. Lett. 153: 29&#45;35.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567685&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Gonz&aacute;lez, H., H., L., G. A. Molt&oacute;, A. Pacin, S. L. Resnik, M. J. Zelaya, M. Masana, and E. J. Mart&iacute;nez. 2008. Trichothecenes and mycoflora in wheat harvested in nine locations in Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Mycopathologia 165: 105&#45;114.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567687&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Kulik, T., and M. Jestoi. 2009. Quantification of <i>Fusariumpoae</i> DNA and associated mycotoxins in asymptomatically contaminated wheat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 130: 233&#45;237.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567689&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Mackintosh, C., A., D. F. Garvin, L. E. Radmer, S. J. Heinen, and G. J. Muehlbauer. 2006. A model wheat cultivar for transformation to improve resistance to <i>Fusarium</i> head blight. Plant Cell Rep. 25: 313&#45;319.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567691&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Niessen, L. 2008. PCR&#45;based diagnosis and quantification of mycotoxin&#45;producing fungi. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 54: 81&#45;138.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567693&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Parry, D., W., and P. Nicholson. 1996. Development of a PCR assay to detect <i>Fusarium poae</i> in wheat. Plant Pathol. 45: 383&#45;391.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567695&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Stenglein, S., A. 2009. <i>Fusariumpoae</i>: a pathogen that needs more attention. J. Plant Pathol. 91: 25&#45;36.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567697&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Stenglein, S., A., and P. A. Balatti. 2006. Genetic diversity of Phaeoisariopsis griseola in Argentina as revealed by pathogenic and molecular markers. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 68: 158&#45;167.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567699&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Turner, J., A., and P. Jennings. 1997. The effect of increasing humidity on <i>Fusarium</i> ear blight and grain quality. Cereal Res. Commun. 15: 825&#45;826.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567701&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Urrea, C., A., R. D. Horsley, B. J. Steffenson, and P. B. Schwarz. 2005. Agronomic characteristics, malt quality, and disease resistance of barley germplasm lines with partial <i>Fusarium</i> head blight resistance. Crop Sci. 45: 1235&#45;1240.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567703&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Vogelgsang, S., M. Sulyok, A. Hecker, E. Jenny, R. Krska, R. Schuhmacher, and H. R. Forrer. 2008. Toxigenicity and pathogenicity of <i>Fusarium poae</i> and <i>Fusarium avenaceum</i> on wheat. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 122: 265&#45;276.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567705&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Xu, X., P. Nicholson, M. A. Thomsett, D. Simpson, B. M. Cooke, F. M. Doohan, J. Brennan, S. Monaghan, A. Moretti, G. Mule, L. Hornok, E. Beki, J. Tatnell, A. Ritieni, and S. G. Edwards. 2008. Relationship between the fungal complex causing <i>Fusarium</i> head blight of wheat and environmental conditions. Phytopathology 98: 69&#45;78.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567707&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Xu, X., D. Parry, P. Nicholson, M. Thomsett, D. Simpson, S. Edwards, B. Cooke, F. Doohan, J. Brennan, A. Moretti, G. Tocco, G. Mul&egrave;, L. Hornok, G. Giczey, and J. Tatnell. 2005. Predominance and association of pathogenic fungi causing <i>Fusarium</i> ear blight in wheat in four European countries. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 112: 143&#45;154.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567709&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    <!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Xue, A., G., K. M. Ho, G. Butler, B. J. Vigier, and C. Babcock. 2006. Pathogenicity of <i>Fusarium</i> species causing head blight in barley. Phytoprotection 87:55&#45;61.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567711&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>  	    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p align="justify"><font face="verdana" size="2">Yli&#45;Mattila, T., S. Paavanen&#45;Huhtala, M. Jestoi, P. Parikka, V. Hietaniemi, T. Gagkaeva, T. Sarlin, A. Haikara, S. Laaksonen, and A. Rizzo. 2008. Real&#45;time PCR detection and quantification of <i>Fusarium poae</i>, <i>F. graminearum</i>, <i>F.sporotrichioides</i> and <i>F. langsethiae</i> in cereal grains in Finland and Russia. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Protec. 41: 243&#45;260.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=567713&pid=S1405-3195201200030000900019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></font></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bennet, J.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Mycotoxins]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin. Microbiol. Rev.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<page-range>497-516</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Buerstmayr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Legzdina]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steiner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lemmens]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Variation for resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring barley]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Euphytica]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>137</volume>
<page-range>279-290</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D'Mello]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J., P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Placinta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F., C. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McDonald]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M. C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fusarium mycotoxins: a review of global implications for animal health, welfare and productivity]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>80</volume>
<page-range>183-205</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dinolfo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M., I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stenglein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moreno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicholson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jennings]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salerno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[ISSR markers detect high genetic variation among Fusarium poae isolates from Argentina and England]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur, J. Plant Pathol.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>127</volume>
<page-range>483-491</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Edwards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S., G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Influence of agricultural practices on Fusarium infection of cereals and subsequent contamination of grain by trichothecene mycotoxins]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Toxicol. Lett.]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>153</volume>
<page-range>29-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González, H.]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H., L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moltó]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pacin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Resnik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zelaya]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Masana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Trichothecenes and mycoflora in wheat harvested in nine locations in Buenos Aires province, Argentina]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Mycopathologia]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>165</volume>
<page-range>105-114</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kulik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jestoi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Quantification of Fusariumpoae DNA and associated mycotoxins in asymptomatically contaminated wheat]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int. J. Food Microbiol.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>130</volume>
<page-range>233-237</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mackintosh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C., A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Garvin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Radmer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L. E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heinen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muehlbauer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[A model wheat cultivar for transformation to improve resistance to Fusarium head blight]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Cell Rep.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<page-range>313-319</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Niessen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[PCR-based diagnosis and quantification of mycotoxin-producing fungi]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Adv. Food Nutr. Res.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>81-138</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D., W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicholson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Development of a PCR assay to detect Fusarium poae in wheat]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plant Pathol.]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<page-range>383-391</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stenglein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S., A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Fusariumpoae: a pathogen that needs more attention]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Plant Pathol.]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<page-range>25-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stenglein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S., A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Balatti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Genetic diversity of Phaeoisariopsis griseola in Argentina as revealed by pathogenic and molecular markers]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<page-range>158-167</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Turner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J., A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jennings]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The effect of increasing humidity on Fusarium ear blight and grain quality]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cereal Res. Commun.]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>15</volume>
<page-range>825-826</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Urrea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C., A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horsley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Steffenson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schwarz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Agronomic characteristics, malt quality, and disease resistance of barley germplasm lines with partial Fusarium head blight resistance]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Crop Sci.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>45</volume>
<page-range>1235-1240</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vogelgsang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sulyok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hecker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jenny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Krska]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schuhmacher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Forrer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Toxigenicity and pathogenicity of Fusarium poae and Fusarium avenaceum on wheat]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur. J. Plant Pathol.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>122</volume>
<page-range>265-276</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicholson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thomsett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simpson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cooke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doohan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brennan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Monaghan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moretti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mule]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hornok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tatnell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ritieni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Edwards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Relationship between the fungal complex causing Fusarium head blight of wheat and environmental conditions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phytopathology]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>98</volume>
<page-range>69-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicholson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thomsett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simpson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Edwards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cooke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doohan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brennan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moretti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tocco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mulè]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hornok]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giczey]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tatnell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Predominance and association of pathogenic fungi causing Fusarium ear blight in wheat in four European countries]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur. J. Plant Pathol.]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>112</volume>
<page-range>143-154</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xue]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A., G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Butler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vigier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B. J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Babcock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pathogenicity of Fusarium species causing head blight in barley]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Phytoprotection]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>55-61</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yli-Mattila]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paavanen-Huhtala]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jestoi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Parikka]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hietaniemi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gagkaeva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sarlin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Haikara]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Laaksonen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rizzo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Real-time PCR detection and quantification of Fusarium poae, F. graminearum, F.sporotrichioides and F. langsethiae in cereal grains in Finland and Russia]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Protec.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>243-260</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
