<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1405-0218</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Isonomía]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Isonomía]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1405-0218</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México; Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1405-02182020000200007</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La posibilidad de una ciencia jurídica trascendental]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Possibility of a Transcendental Legal Science]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Berger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mario]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>53</numero>
<fpage>138</fpage>
<lpage>159</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1405-02182020000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1405-02182020000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1405-02182020000200007&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen En este trabajo defenderé la factibilidad de una ciencia jurídica trascendental de las críticas que Jan Sieckmann y Christoph Kletzer han hecho a su carácter constitutivo. Sieckmann argumenta que las propias premisas de la teoría pura del derecho desembocan en una disciplina sin objeto de estudio, mientras Kletzer sostiene que el acto constitutivo se da realmente en la aplicación del derecho. De mi defensa se deriva una exégesis de la relación entre filosofía del derecho, ciencia jurídica y derecho positivo conforme al modelo kantiano de la conexión entre la crítica de la razón pura, la ciencia física y los fenómenos naturales.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract In this paper I defend the possibility of a transcendental legal science against the criticisms raised by Jan Sieckmann and Christoph Kletzer, who claim that legal science cannot have a constitutive character. For Sieckmann the pure theory of law´s own premises lead to an objectless science, whereas for Kletzer the real constitutive work is carried out by the law. From my considerations it follows an explanation of the relation between the philosophy of law, the legal science and the law modelled on the Kantian connection between the critique of pure reason, the physical science and the natural phenomena.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ciencia jurídica trascendental]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[teoría pura del derecho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[carácter constitutivo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[categorías jurídicas a priori]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[transcendental legal science]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[pure theory of law]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[constitutive character]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[a priori legal categories]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kant y la filosofía del derecho contemporánea]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Archivos latinoamericanos de metodología y filosofía del derecho]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>371-82</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[An Antinomy in Kelsen&#8217;s Pure Theory of Law]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ratio Juris]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>29-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bulygin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eugenio]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kelsen on Completeness and Consistency]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[D´Almeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Green]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leslie]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kelsen Revisited. New Essays on the Pure Theory of Law]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<page-range>225-43</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Hart Publishing]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Duarte d´Almeida]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comment on Kletzer &#8211; Positive Law and the `Cognitivity Thesis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[German Law Review]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>811-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Berger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mario]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La teoría kelseniana de la normatividad. Orígenes y actualidad]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Fontamara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García Berger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mario]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bulygin y el Kelsen neokantiano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Doxa]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<numero>41</numero>
<issue>41</issue>
<page-range>339-53</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hammer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stephen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Neo-Kantian Theory of Legal Knowledge in Kelsen&#8217;s Pure Theory of Law]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paulson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stanley]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Litschewski]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bonnie]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Norm and Normativity. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<page-range>177-94</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Clarendon Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hume]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[David]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Investigación sobre el conocimiento humano]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Alianza]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Immanuel]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Crítica de la razón pura]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Alfaguara]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hans]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rechtswissenschaft und Recht: Erledigung eines Versuches zur Überwindung der Rechtdogmatik]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht]]></source>
<year>1922</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>27-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kelsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hans]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vernengo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Reine Rechtslehre]]></source>
<year>1960</year>
<edition>2a ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Vienna ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Deuticke]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kletzer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Christoph]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kelsen, Sander and the Gegenstandsproblem of Legal Science]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[German Law Review]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<page-range>785-810</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Natorp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paul]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Propedéutica filosófica]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Porrúa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Natorp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paul]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kant y la escuela de Marburgo]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[México ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Porrúa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paulson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stanley]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Four Phases in Hans Kelsen´s Legal Theory? Reflections on a Periodization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Journal of Legal Studies]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>153-66</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paulson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stanley]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La distinción entre hecho y valor: la doctrina de los dos mundos y el sentido inmanente. Hans Kelsen como neokantiano]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Doxa]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<numero>26</numero>
<issue>26</issue>
<page-range>547-82</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paulson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stanley]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Dos programas radicales de &#8220;objetivización&#8221;. La influencia de Kant y los neokantianos en Hans Kelsen]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Castañeda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Felipe]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Durán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vicente]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hoyos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luis Eduardo]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Immanuel Kant: vigencia de la filosofía crítica]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>243-78</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Bogotá ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Siglo del Hombre Editores]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paulson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stanley]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Justified Normativity Thesis in Hans Kelsen&#8217;s Pure Theory of Law? Rejoinders to Robert Alexy and Joseph Raz]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klatt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Matthias]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Institutionalized Reason: the Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<page-range>61-112</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fritz]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Die Transzendentale Methode der Rechtsphilosophie und der Begriff der Rechtserfahrung]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht]]></source>
<year>1920</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>460-88</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sander]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fritz]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Rechtsdogmatik oder Theorie der Rechtserfahrung? Kritische Studie zur Rechtslehre Hans Kelsens]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht]]></source>
<year>1921</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>511-670</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sieckmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Kelsen on Natural Law and Legal Science]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Langford]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Peter]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bryan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ian]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McGary]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[John]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Kelsenian Legal Science and the Nature of Law]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>257-73</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Heidelberg ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
