<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0300-9041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecología y obstetricia de México]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecol. obstet. Méx.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0300-9041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0300-90412021000900704</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24245/gom.v89i9.5817</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Comparación de cuatro tablas de crecimiento fetal para la predicción de desenlaces perinatales adversos en un hospital de tercer nivel de México]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Comparison of four fetal growth charts in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes in a tertiary hospital in Mexico]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendoza-Carrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Claudia Elvira]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Acevedo-Gallegos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Sandra]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lumbreras-Márquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Mario]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallardo-Gaona]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Juan M]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Copado-Mendoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Diana Yazmín]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rodriguez-Sibaja]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[María J]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Nacional de Perinatología Departamento de Medicina Materno-Fetal ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Brigham and Women&#8217;s Hospital Departamento de Anestesiología ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Boston Massachusetts]]></addr-line>
<country>USA</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>89</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<fpage>704</fpage>
<lpage>714</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0300-90412021000900704&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0300-90412021000900704&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0300-90412021000900704&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  OBJETIVO: Comparar el rendimiento de cuatro tablas de crecimiento fetal para la predicción de desenlaces perinatales adversos.  MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohorte retrolectiva efectuado en el Departamento de Medicina Materno-Fetal del Instituto Nacional de Perinatología (INPer) de embarazos atendidos entre mayo de 2017 a enero de 2019. Se emplearon cuatro tablas de crecimiento fetal (Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, Fundación de Medicina Fetal y Fundación de Medicina Fetal Barcelona) para la evaluación del último ultrasonido obstétrico de una cohorte retrolectiva. Se analizaron los índices de rendimiento y riesgo relativo para desenlaces perinatales adversos dados por los percentiles menor de 10 y mayor de 90 del peso fetal estimado de acuerdo con cada tabla y se calculó la sensibilidad ajustada de cada tabla para una tasa de falsos positivos de 10%.  RESULTADOS:  Se identificaron 1053 pacientes; la media del intervalo entre la última evaluación ultrasonográfica y el nacimiento fue de 21 días ± 12. La mediana de semanas de gestación al nacimiento fue de 38.2. El peso fetal estimado menor al percentil 10, según las cuatro tablas, se asoció con un incremento del riesgo de desenlace perinatal adverso compuesto. La asociación fue mayor con la tabla de la Fundación de Medicina Fetal Barcelona (RR 1.69; IC95%: 1.41-2.02) e INTERGROWTH-21st (RR 1.59; IC95%: 1.32-1.92). La sensibilidad en el grupo de pequeño para la edad gestacional para el desenlace perinatal adverso tuvo amplia variación entre las tablas (20.5% INTERGROWTH-21st - 32.6% Fundación de Medicina Fetal), dada principalmente por la diferencia en la tasa de falsos positivos.  CONCLUSIÓN: En la población de estudio, el rendimiento predictivo de las tablas de crecimiento fetal por la de la Fundación de Medicina Fetal Barcelona e INTEGROWTH-21st fue superior.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of four fetal growth charts for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes.  MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrolective cohort study performed at the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department of the National Institute of Perinatology (INPer) of pregnancies attended between May 2017 to January 2019. Four fetal growth charts (Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, Fetal Medicine Foundation and Fetal Medicine Foundation Barcelona) were used for the evaluation of the last obstetric ultrasound of a retrolective cohort. Performance and relative risk ratios for adverse perinatal outcomes given by the less than 10th and greater than 90th percentiles of estimated fetal weight according to each table were analyzed and the adjusted sensitivity of each table for a false-positive rate of 10% was calculated.  RESULTS: 1053 patients were identified; the median interval between the last ultrasonographic evaluation and birth was 21 days +/- 12. The median number of weeks of gestation at birth was 38.2. Estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile, according to all four charts, was associated with an increased risk of composite adverse perinatal outcome. The association was greatest with the Barcelona Fetal Medicine Foundation chart (RR 1.69; 95%CI: 1.41, 2.02) and INTERGROWTH-21st (RR 1.59; 95%CI: 1.32, 1.92). Sensitivity in the small for gestational age group for adverse perinatal outcome had wide variation between the charts (20.5% INTERGROWTH-21st - 32.6% Fetal Medicine Foundation), given primarily by the difference in false positive rate.  CONCLUSION: In the study population, the predictive performance of the fetal growth charts by the Barcelona Fetal Medicine Foundation and INTEGROWTH-21st was superior.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Tablas de crecimiento fetal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[estudio de cohorte]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Medicina fetal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ecografía obstétrica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[peso fetal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[riesgo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[edad gestacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[pequeño para la edad gestacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ecografía fetal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Fetal growth charts]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cohort study]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Fetal Medicine]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Obstetric ultrasound]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Fetal weight]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Risk]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Gestational age]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Infant, small for gestational age]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ultrasonography fetal]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardosi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kalyan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Birth-weight centiles and the risk of serious adverse neonatal outcomes at term]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>159-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chauhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rice]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Grobman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[WA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Neonatal Morbidity of Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates Born at Term in Uncomplicated Pregnancies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>130</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>511-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Madden J]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flatley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kumar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Term small-for-gestational-age infants from low-risk women are at significantly greater risk of adverse neonatal outcomes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>218</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>525.e1-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boghossian]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Geraci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Edwards]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horbar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JD.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In-Hospital Outcomes in Large for Gestational Age Infants at 22-29 Weeks of Gestation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Pediatr]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>198</volume>
<page-range>174-80.e13</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Weissmann-Brenner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simchen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zilberberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Maternal and neonatal outcomes of large for gestational age pregnancies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>844-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Trudell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cahill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tuuli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macones]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Odibo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AO]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Risk of stillbirth after 37 weeks in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>208</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>376.e1-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salomon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alfirevic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Da Silva Costa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>715-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lindqvist]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2005</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>258-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O&#8217;Gorman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salomon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fetal biometry to assess the size and growth of the fetus]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<page-range>3-15</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mayer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Joseph]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KS.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fetal growth: A review of terms, concepts and issues relevant to obstetrics]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>136-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Battaglia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lubchenco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LO.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Pediatr]]></source>
<year>1967</year>
<volume>71</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>159-63</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ioannou]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Talbot]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ohuma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>119</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
<page-range>1425-39</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kiserud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Piaggio]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carroli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts : A Multinational Longitudinal Study of Ultrasound Biometric Measurements and Estimated Fetal Weight]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLOS]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<page-range>1-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadlock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harrist]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martinez-Poyer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Radiology]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>181</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>129-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicolaides]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wright]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Syngelaki]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wright]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Akolekar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>52</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>44-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Figueras]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Meler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iraola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>136</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>20-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stirnemann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salomon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>478-86</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Robinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fleming]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JE.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A critical evaluation of sonar &amp;raquo;,» &amp;reg;,® &amp;sect;,§ &amp;shy;,­ &amp;sup1;,¹ &amp;sup2;,² &amp;sup3;,³ &amp;szlig;,ß &amp;THORN;,Þ &amp;thorn;,þ &amp;times;,× &amp;Uacute;,Ú &amp;uacute;,ú &amp;Ucirc;,Û &amp;ucirc;,û &amp;Ugrave;,Ù &amp;ugrave;,ù &amp;uml;,¨ &amp;Uuml;,Ü &amp;uuml;,ü &amp;Yacute;,Ý &amp;yacute;,ý &amp;yen;,¥ &amp;yuml;,ÿ &amp;para;,¶ crown-rump length &amp;raquo;,» &amp;reg;,® &amp;sect;,§ &amp;shy;,­ &amp;sup1;,¹ &amp;sup2;,² &amp;sup3;,³ &amp;szlig;,ß &amp;THORN;,Þ &amp;thorn;,þ &amp;times;,× &amp;Uacute;,Ú &amp;uacute;,ú &amp;Ucirc;,Û &amp;ucirc;,û &amp;Ugrave;,Ù &amp;ugrave;,ù &amp;uml;,¨ &amp;Uuml;,Ü &amp;uuml;,ü &amp;Yacute;,Ý &amp;yacute;,ý &amp;yen;,¥ &amp;yuml;,ÿ &amp;para;,¶ measurements]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Br J Obstet Gynaecol]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
<volume>82</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>702-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadlock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harrist]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Park]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fetal biparietal diameter: A critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Ultrasound Med]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>97-104</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mul]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mongelli]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gardosi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>397-402</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[von Elm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Altman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DG]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Egger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pocock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gøtzsche]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vandenbroucke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Clin Epidemiol]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>61</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>344-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadlock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harrist]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carpenter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Park]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Sonographic of Fetal Weight]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Radiology]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>150</volume>
<page-range>535-40</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hadlock]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[FP]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harrist]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Deter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Park]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements-A prospective study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>151</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>333-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Apgar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anesth Analg]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>120</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1056-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adamkin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DH.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Metabolic Screening and Postnatal Glucose Homeostasis in the Newborn]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pediatr Clin North Am]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>62</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>385-409</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Para la atención de la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio, y de la persona recién nacida]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-007-SSA2-2016]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<page-range>1-67</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Finken]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Der Steen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Smeets]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CCJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Children Born Small for Gestational Age: Differential Diagnosis, Molecular Genetic Evaluation, and Implications]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Endocr Rev]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>851-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farahbakhsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shastri]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intrauterine growth restriction-part 2]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Matern Neonatal Med]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>24</numero>
<issue>24</issue>
<page-range>4037-48</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pallotto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[EK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kilbride]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Obstet Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>49</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>257-69</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
