<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0300-9041</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecología y obstetricia de México]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ginecol. obstet. Méx.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0300-9041</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecología A.C.]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0300-90412021000900696</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24245/gom.v89i9.5892</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Factores asociados con bordes quirúrgicos positivos en pacientes con cáncer de mama tratadas con cirugía conservadora]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Factors associated with positive surgical margins in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Camarillo-Quesada]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Argelia Elisa]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maytorena-Córdova]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[German]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olguín-Cruces]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Víctor Alberto]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Coutiño-Ruiz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Maritza Guadalupe]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 4 Dr. Luis Castelazo Ayala ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 4 Dr. Luis Castelazo Ayala ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 4 Dr. Luis Castelazo Ayala ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af4">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 4 Dr. Luis Castelazo Ayala ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ciudad de México ]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>89</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<fpage>696</fpage>
<lpage>703</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0300-90412021000900696&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0300-90412021000900696&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0300-90412021000900696&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen  OBJETIVO: Conocer los factores asociados con los bordes quirúrgicos positivos en pacientes con cáncer de mama tratadas con cirugía conservadora.  MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS:  Estudio descriptivo-observacional, comparativo, retrospectivo y transversal efectuado entre el 1 de enero de 2018 y el 30 de abril de 2019 en la Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 4 Luis Castelazo Ayala. Criterios de inclusión: pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de mama intervenidas con cirugía conservadora y con reporte histopatológico e inmunohistoquímico completo. Criterios de exclusión: pacientes con cáncer de mama tratadas fuera de la unidad, con otros tipos de neoplasias (linfomas, sarcomas) o en etapa clínica avanzada o tratamiento neoadyuvante. Criterios de eliminación: pacientes con reporte histopatológico incompleto y sin expediente clínico en la unidad. El análisis estadístico se procesó en el programa SPSS versión 25. El análisis bivariado estudió la relación entre las variables por medio de la prueba de &#967;2. Para todas las pruebas, los valores &lt; 0.05 se consideraron con significación estadística.  RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 153 casos; de éstos, 11 fueron de pacientes con borde quirúrgico positivo en el reporte definitivo, correspondientes al 7.18% del total de las cirugías conservadoras de mama practicadas en el periodo de estudio. Estas pacientes requirieron reintervención quirúrgica, 6 de ellas para ampliación de márgenes y las 5 restantes mastectomía total. Se observó relación entre las lesiones no palpables y el margen quirúrgico positivo, con significación estadística (p &lt; 0.003). Del resto de las variables estudiadas, no se encontró relación con significación estadística.  CONCLUSIONES: Los factores asociados con bordes positivos fueron: tamaño de 11 a 20 mm en un 45.4%, edad 58 ± 11.9 años en un 72.7%, multifocalidad en un 63.6%, invasión linfovascular en un 63.6%, subtipo carcinoma ductal en 72.7%, grado histológico 2 en un 72.7%, clasificación molecular luminal A con un 72.7% y lesión no palpable con un 54.5%.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract  OBJECTIVE: To know the factors associated with positive surgical edges in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery.  MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive-observational, comparative, retrospective and cross-sectional study, performed between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019 at the Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 4 Luis Castelazo Ayala. Inclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with breast cancer operated with conservative surgery and with complete histopathological and immunohistochemical report.Exclusion criteria: patients with breast cancer treated outside the unit, with other types of neoplasms (lymphomas, sarcomas) and in advanced clinical stage or neoadjuvant treatment. Elimination criteria: patients with incomplete histopathological report and without clinical records in the unit. The statistical analysis was processed in SPSS version 25. The bivariate analysis studied the relationship between the variables by means of the 2&amp;apos;s test. For all tests, values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.  RESULTS: 153 cases were analyzed; of these 11 were patients with a positive surgical edge in the definitive report, corresponding to 7.18% of the total number of breast-conserving surgeries performed in the study period. These patients required another surgical intervention, 6 of them in margin enlargement and the remaining 5 in total mastectomy. There was a statistically significant relationship between non-palpable lesions and positive surgical margin (p &lt; 0.003). Of the rest of the variables studied, no relationship with statistical significance was found.  CONCLUSIONS:  The factors associated with positive margins were size 11 to 20 mm in 45.4%, age 58 ± 11.9 years in 72.7%, multifocality in 63.6%, lymphovascular invasion in 63.6%, ductal carcinoma subtype in 72.7%, histologic grade 2 in 72.7%, luminal molecular classification A with 72.7% and nonpalpable lesion with 54.5%.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cáncer de mama]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[mastectomía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[linfomas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[sarcomas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[tratamiento neoadyuvante]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[cirugía conservadora]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[margen]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[mastectomía total]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[margen quirúrgico positivo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[carcinoma ductal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[luminal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Mastectomy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Lymphomas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Sarcomas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant treatment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Breast conserving surgeries]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Margin]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Total mastectomy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Positive surgical margin]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Ductal carcinoma]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Luminal]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Siegel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[KD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jemal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cancer statistics, 2020]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cancer J Clin]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>70</volume>
<page-range>7-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Houssami]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Macaskill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marinovich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>717-30</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tabár]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dean]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PB]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TH]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The incidence of fatal breast cancer measures the increased effectiveness of therapy in women participating in mammography screening]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cancer]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<numero>125</numero>
<issue>125</issue>
<page-range>515-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van Deurzen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CHM.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Predictors of surgical margin following breast-conserving surgery: a large population-based cohort study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<numero>23</numero>
<issue>23</issue>
<page-range>627-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Linden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Peterson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[LM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fowler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Clinical potential of estrogen and progesterone receptor imaging]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PET Clin]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<numero>13</numero>
<issue>13</issue>
<page-range>415-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fisher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bryant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[N Engl J Med]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<numero>16</numero>
<issue>16</issue>
<page-range>1233-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Langhans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jensen]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mm]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Talman]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reoperation rates in ductal carcinoma in situ vs invasive breast cancer after wire-guided breast-conserving surgery]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JAMA Surg]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>378-84</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morrow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abrahamse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hofer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: addressing overtreatment in surgical management]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JAMA Oncol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1352-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schulman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mirrielees]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leverson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reexcision surgery for breast cancer: an analysis of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery SM database following the SSO-ASTRO &#8220;no ink on tumor" guidelines]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<numero>24</numero>
<issue>24</issue>
<page-range>52-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morrow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Katz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Margins in ductal carcinoma in situ: is bigger really better]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Natl Cancer Inst]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>494-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albornoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CR]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Matros]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CN]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bilateral mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: the role of breast reconstruction]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Plast Reconstr Surg]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1518-26</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Van Deurzen]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Predictors of surgical margin following breast-conserving surgery: a large population-based cohort study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<numero>23</numero>
<issue>23</issue>
<page-range>627-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Landercasper]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Borgert]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fayanju]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[OM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Factors associated with reoperation in breast-conserving surgery for cancer: a prospective study of American Society of Breast Surgeon members]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Houvenaeghel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lambaudie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bannier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Positive or close margins: reoperation rate and second conservative resection or total mastectomy?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cancer Manag Res]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>2507-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YT]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>1725-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Colakovic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zdravkovic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Skuric]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mrda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intraoperative ultrasound in breast cancer surgery-from localization of non-palpable tumors to objectively measurable excision]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[World J Surg Oncol]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>184-90</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
